Sartre's "No Exit " concludes with the characters accepting that: "Hell is other people."So this is hell. I'd never have believed it. You remember all we were told about the torture-chambers, the fire and brimstone, the "burning marl." Old wives' tales! There's no need for red-hot pokers. HELL IS-OTHER PEOPLE! --No ExitEssay Prompt: how do the characters ultimately come to this conclusion? How is their predicament in Sartre's view, an Existential Hell? How is it opposed to the conventional Christian depiction and view, and how might it reflect on our own lives, social, religious, and psychological perceptions? ******************Approx. 750--1000 words*******************Key Existential ConceptsAbsurdity: What human beings encounter when they come into contact with the world. Absurdity is brought about because the human instinct to seek order and meaning is frustrated by the refusal of the world to be orderly or meaningful.Anxiety: Kierkegaard said, “Anxiety is the dizziness of freedom.” You feel anxiety because you recognize that you and you alone are responsible for your actions. This produces the two-sided feeling of simultaneous dread and exhilaration.Alienation: The sense that you’re a stranger in the world, or a stranger to yourself. Many aspects of existence can be alienating. One of the primary sources is absurdity. Ironically, the stories and systems developed by philosophy and religion to address that absurdity can be just as alienating.Existence precedes essence: Sartre’s phrase to describe the existential situation humans find themselves in. It refers to the fact that when you’re born, you have no meaning, no purpose, no definition. Human beings exist first, and only later define themselves.The Übermensch: The word Nietzsche uses to refer to his ideal human being. Literally “overman,” the word reflects the importance in his philosophy of overcoming — overcoming traditional values, overcoming the herd mentality, and, most importantly, overcoming yourself. You overcome these things so that you might attain something greater. Nietzsche’s Übermensch is an unconventional creator of values, a joyous free spirit, and one who embraces the earth instead of pining away for heaven.The death of God: The death of the notion that belief in God alone, or belief in any religious or philosophical system, is sufficient to provide human beings with the meaning, purpose, and definition they crave. It’s the recognition that, because no external system can provide you with the answers, you must take responsibility for providing them yourself.Subjectivity: Your first-person perspective on the world, including the needs, desires, and emotions that accompany that perspective. The existentialists take this as a valid and important starting point for genuinely human endeavors. This can be contrasted with the scientific mindset, which always starts with objectivity — seeing people in impersonal, objective terms without emotion or appreciation for their individual point of view.https://archive.org/stream/NoExit/NoExit_djvu.txt

Week 6 Assignment: Ethics Influences and InfluencersUse the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.Choose either a current federal or a current state issue which is influenced by and/or is influencing psychology ethics.Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) in which you discuss the influence of the selected issue. Include the following in your paper:A detailed explanation of the issue.A discussion of how the issue influences psychology ethics from an objective (scholarly) perspective.A discussion of how the issue influences psychology ethics from a subjective (personal) perspective.A discussion of how, if at all, the issue is influenced by current psychology ethics. thanks