Reflect back over the past eight weeks and describe how the achievement of the course outcomes in this course have prepared you to meet the MSN program outcome #4, the MSN Essential IV, and the Nurse Practitioner Core Competencies # 7. Program Outcome #4: Integrate professional values through scholarship and service in health care. (Professional identity) MSN Essential IV: Translating and Integrating Scholarship into Practice Recognize that the master’s-prepared nurse applies research outcomes within the practice setting, resolves practice problems, works as a change agent, and disseminates results.Nurse Practitioner Core Competencies # 7Health Delivery System Competencies1. Applies knowledge of organizational practices and complex systems to improve health care delivery.2. Effects health care change using broad based skills including negotiating, consensus-building, andpartnering.3. Minimizes risk to patients and providers at the individual and systems level.4. Facilitates the development of health care systems that address the needs of culturally diversepopulations, providers, and other stakeholders.5. Evaluates the impact of health care delivery on patients, providers, other stakeholders, and theenvironment.6. Analyzes organizational structure, functions and resources to improve the delivery of care.7. Collaborates in planning for transitions across the continuum of care.

PART I Discussion Question: As nurses, we complete physical assessments on a routine basis, even though they are typically focused assessments. What type of technology have you seen utilized in your assessment process that assists in your effectiveness to communicate findings both orally and in written format? If you have not seen or utilized technology in your assessment process, how do you ensure effective communication for assessment findings?  Part 2: **Signature Assignment** Holistic Assessment of the Older Adult This assignment is a voice over PowerPoint recording of 13-15 minutes. For the PowerPoint and recorded presentation, create a presentation that addresses each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the prompts or questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least four (4) scholarly sources throughout your presentation, referencing in APA style. Include title and references slides in the presentation. Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Ensure that you have permission from your older adult to conduct the health assessment and ensure that they are not identified on the PPT. Review the Signature Assignment rubric criteria for this assignment. Part 1: Assessment: Choose an adult (65 years or older) friend or relative and perform a holistic health assessment. Clearly discuss your discovered holistic health assessment data. Your assessment should include the following parts for the holistic assessment: General Health History Physiological Assessment Psychological Assessment Social Assessment Cultural Assessment Developmental Assessment Spiritual Assessment Part 2: Interpretation (Abnormality and Coping) Choose one abnormality from the data gained in the assessments and discuss possible reasons/causes for the abnormality.  How does this abnormality impact the other areas of the patient’s life? Discuss the client’s stress and coping mechanisms.   Are they healthy?  What recommendations and improvements could be made that are individualized for this person? Part 3: Teaching Plan: Create a teaching plan that addresses the client holistically by applying the assessment data you have analyzed.  Describe at least one client goal for each of the six categories (each category should have a goal) (physical, psychological, social, cultural, developmental, and spiritual). Discuss one strategy per goal you would use to teach your client about each individual goal Explain how you will evaluate if your teaching was effective  Title Slide (1 slide) Objective Slide (1 slide) Assessment General Health History (1slide) Physical (1 slide) Psychological (1 slide) Social (1 slide) Cultural (1 slide) Developmental (1 slide) Spiritual (1 slide) Interpretation (Abnormality and Coping) Abnormality, Reasons/Causes, Impact on Life (1 slide) Stress, Coping, Recommendations (1 slide) Teaching Plan Physical Goal and Teaching Strategy (1 slide) Psychological Goal and Teaching Strategy (1 slide) Social Goal and Teaching Strategy (1 slide) Cultural Goal and Teaching Strategy (1 slide) Developmental Goal and Teaching Strategy (1 slide) Spiritual Goal and Teaching Strategy (1 slide) Evaluation Plan (1 slide)

Unit 4 Assignment - Migration PathsSubmit AssignmentDue Aug 2 by 11:59pm Points 40 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file uploadInstructionsFigures 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6 and 6.7 in the Amatayakul textbook all show the migration path towards an EHR using different formats, e.g. picture, building block, step diagram, flow chart, etc. Assess the migration path formats and evaluate the similarities and differences.Develop an EHR migration path of a type of your choice for a small, 49-bed, rural hospital. The hospital has no skilled nursing homes, nor is it associated with any physician clinics.Develop a summary of your evaluation and reasoning for the chosen format.Your file should be in Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Excel, or Adobe Acrobat format.Cite all sources in APA format.Submit your EHR migration path and summary for grading.Reminder: You must upload your completed document using Browse My Computer. Then, hit the Submit button to successfully complete the assignment submission process. Do not copy and paste text into the text box.RubricUnit 4 Assignment - Migration PathsUnit 4 Assignment - Migration PathsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of KnowledgePRICE-P10.0 ptsLevel 5Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline.9.0 ptsLevel 4Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline.8.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline.7.0 ptsLevel 2Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline.6.0 ptsLevel 1There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content10.0 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.9.0 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.8.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.7.0 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.6.0 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to Research5.0 ptsLevel 5Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.4.5 ptsLevel 4Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.4.0 ptsLevel 3Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.3.5 ptsLevel 2Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.3.0 ptsLevel 1Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Related Outcomes5.0 ptsLevel 5Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.4.5 ptsLevel 4Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.4.0 ptsLevel 3Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and is identified clearly.3.5 ptsLevel 2Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).3.0 ptsLevel 1Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.0.0 ptsLevel 0Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 ptsLevel 5The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 ptsLevel 4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling, and minor errors do not impair the flow of communication.4.0 ptsLevel 3The paper exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.3.5 ptsLevel 2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 ptsLevel 1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I5.0 ptsLevel 5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 ptsLevel 4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 ptsLevel 3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 ptsLevel 2The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 ptsLevel 1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 40.0PreviousNextSubmission Not Submitted!Submission Details(40 pts possible)Graded Anonymously: noComments:No Comments