CJUS 601 LU Wk 1 The Street level Information Economics Article Response Discussion
The ORIGINAL POST: Read the article "The Street-level Information Economics Activities: Estimating the Yield of Begging in Brussels" (This article can be found at the website link in the Reading & Study folder). Based on the principles of survey research noted in Chapter 1 of The Mismeasure of Crime textbook, describe your thoughts on trusting the research used in the article. Describe the limitations of the research and article. Would you base public polity with respect to beggars off of this article?
1) Based on the information presented through the article “The Street-level Information Economics Activities: Estimating the Yield of Begging in Brussels,” and the information from Chapter 1 of The Mismeasure of Crime textbook, I would not base public policy solely off of the article. According to The Mismeasure of Crime textbook, there are many factors to consider in survey research that could alter the reliability and/or validity of data (Mosher, Miethe, & Hart, 2011). Because of the numerous possibilities of biases and limitations, findings from any research study should be critiqued, analyzed, and compared with others before being implemented for policy purposes.
While the researchers conducting the study on beggars in Brussels do a remarkable job accounting for various limitations, they simply cannot cater to every issue of reliability or validity that may arise in their endeavors (Adriaenssens & Hendrickx, 2011). The research study incorporates several different methods, including self-reports, observations, and a quasi-experimental version of participant observation. From the data gathered, the researchers make a reasonable estimate of the income of beggars. While this is a good start in the right direction of understanding the life and social implications of beggars’ incomes, the research cannot be applied to every context. For example, different locations and countries could and are likely to have much different results than the ones found in Brussels. Also, social and economic climates are constantly changing, so results from when this study was conducted could look much different in modern day society. In conclusion, I believe the findings of the research can prove to be very useful and can lead to public policy changes with more corroboration from other research and more specific time and place analysis.
References
Adriaenssens, S., & Hendrickx, J. (2011). Street-level Informal Economic Activities: Estimating the Yield of Begging in Brussels. Urban Studies, 48(1), 23-40. DOI: 10.1177/0042098009360688
Mosher, C. J., Miethe, T. D., & Hart, T. C. (2011). The mismeasure of crime (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. ISBN: 9781412981811.
2) Although the article had several limitations, the research can be used to support future studies on beggar incomes in Brussels. The authors noted the limitations of the study and that the research is best used as a "starting-point" for other research (Adriaenssens & Hendrickx, 2011). Therefore, other studies can utilize this study as a guideline or reference to develop more accurate conclusions. In addition, other researchers can develop effective research methods based on the self-reports, observations, and quasi-experimental methods used in the article (Adriaenssens & Hendrickx, 2011).
The research would be more accurate if every 'beggar' in Brussels was studied. The study only used six participants and only two were female (Adriaenssens & Hendrickx, 2011). More women should have been included in the study to achieve a more accurate conclusion. As a result, the authors may have made an overgeneralization about the homeless population. The completed surveys are unreliable due to reporter bias. Moreover, observations made during the study are likely biased as well. For the study to be effective, researchers should have used homeless shelters. A system could be implemented to ensure shelters catalog every individual who stays there. Surveys with anonymous reporting can be distributed to the shelter tenants. Consequently, the researchers will gain a better understanding of the amount of homeless people in the area and income estimates. Although biased, the surveys may lead to a better understanding of income.
Because begging is not illegal, public policy could not be ethically created to prohibit it. Furthermore, due to the limitations of the article, it would be unwise to create public policy based on this research alone. However, this article and research can be used to support future research on beggar incomes. Surveys would have to be formatted in a manner that encourages honesty. Many researchers collect and analyze data without considering bias (Mosher, Miethe, & Hart, 2011). A general margin of error should be implemented to account for reporter bias, nonresponse, and extra submissions. Overall, public policy cannot be created based on this research due to its many limitations and the lack of more accurate information.
References
Adriaenssens, S., & Hendrickx, J. (2011). Street-level Informal Economic Activities: Estimating the Yield of Begging in Brussels. Urban Studies, 48(1), 23-40. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009360688.
Mosher, C. J., Miethe, T. D., & Hart, T. C. (2011). The mismeasure of crime (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. ISBN: 9781412981811.