Humanities
Ashford University Prevention of Sexual Harassment in The Workplace Paper

ashford university

Question Description

Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper, and re-read them often during and after the writing process to make sure that you are fulfilling all of the instructions. Please also utilize the assignment guidance and the outlined model provided.

Overview
In the Week One Assignment, you formulated a concrete ethical question, took a position on that topic, and identified a reason supporting and a reason opposing that position. In the Week Three Assignment, you discussed either deontological or utilitarian theory, applied that theory to the question, and raised a relevant objection.

By engaging with the course material, you now have had a chance to refine your thinking and broaden your understanding of the problem by approaching it from the perspective of multiple ethical theories.

In this paper, you will demonstrate what you have learned by writing an essay in which you

  • Present a revised formulation of the ethical question and introduction to the topic.
  • Explain the kind of reasoning you think is the best way to approach this question, and how that reasoning supports the position you think is strongest.
  • Raise an objection, and be able to respond to it.

Instructions
Write an essay that conforms to the requirements below. The paper must be 1500 to 2000 words in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

The paragraphs of your essay should conform to the following guidelines:

  • Introduction
    Your first paragraph should begin with the topic question, suitably revised. It should be focused, concrete, and on a relevant moral problem. You should then introduce the topic in the way described by the Week One instructions, but reflecting the developed understanding and information you have gained about the topic and any necessary refinement of the scope.

    Follow this with a thesis statement that states your position, and a brief description of the primary reason(s) supporting your position. (See the handout on thesis statements provided). Finally, provide a brief preview of the overall aim and procedure of your paper.
  • Explanation and Demonstration of Moral Reasoning
    This section of the Final Paper will explain and demonstrate what you believe to be the best way of reasoning about the question you have chosen, and showing how that reasoning supports the position you have taken on the question. You might explain the principles, rules, values, virtues, conceptions of purposes and ends, and other general ideas that you find persuasive, and show how they support concrete judgments.

    In the course of doing so, you must make reference to at least two of the approaches that we have examined in the course (such as deontological, utilitarian, or virtue-based), and utilize at least one resource off the provided list for each of the two approaches. One of these theories may be the theory you discussed in your Week Three Assignment, but your discussion here should be more refined.

    For example, you might find the reasoning associated with Aristotelian virtue ethics to be the most compelling, and reference Aristotle in the process of showing how that reasoning supports a certain conclusion. In the course of this, you could contrast that with a utilitarian approach, referencing Mill for instance.
  • Objection and Response
    After explaining the ethical reasoning that supports your position, you should raise an objection and respond to it. An objection articulates a plausible reason why someone might find the argument weak or problematic. You should explain how it brings out this weakness, and do so in a way that would be acceptable to someone who disagrees with your own argument. Then, provide the best response you can to the objection, showing how it does not undermine your position. Your response should not simply restate your original position or argument, but should say something new in support of it.
  • Conclusion
    Provide a conclusion that sums up what you presented in the paper and offers some final reflections.

Resource Requirement
You must use at least four scholarly resources. Two of the resources must be drawn from the list of acceptable primary resources on each of the two theories you discuss. For example, if you discuss deontology and virtue ethics, you would need at least one resource under the “Deontology” list and at least one resource under the “Virtue Ethics” list. The other two may be from either the Required or Recommended Resources, or scholarly resources found in the Ashford University Library.

  • The textbook may be cited, but it does not count toward the resource requirement. If you cite the textbook, you will still need to cite at least four more sources that fulfill the requirements stated above.
  • If you need help with finding additional resources, or are unsure about whether a particular resource will count toward the requirement, please contact your instructor.
  • For sources to count toward the resources requirement, they must be cited within the text of your paper and on the reference page. Sources that are listed on the references page, but not cited within the paper, do not count toward fulfilling the resources requirement.
  • For information regarding APA, including samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center.

Final Answer

Hey there, please be informed that the final answer has already been uploaded.

Running head: SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE

Prevention of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace through Application of Ethics

Name

Course
Instructor
Date Due

1

SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE

2

Prevention of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace through Application of Ethics
Different forms of abuse or discrimination exist in the workplace, and sexual harassment
is one of the. Harassment that is discriminatory in workplace encompasses workplace behaviors
portrayed by third parties, co-workers or supervisors that is unwelcome, intimidating, offensive,
threatening or humiliating to workers either individually or collectively (Bravo & Cassedy, 1992;
Mosser, 2014). This begs this ethical question: To what extent can employers go in preventing
sexual harassment? The incentives provided by employers play an imperative role in the
prohibition of sexual harassment acts or behaviors, and have been significantly increased by
employers in recent past based on the Civil Rights Acts of 1991. According to Bravo and
Cassedy (1992), this Act compels employers to liability or legal obligation for any emotional
distress and damages attributed to sexual harassment in the place of work.
The same laws prohibiting gender discrimination are similarly responsible for prohibiting
sexual harassment. For example, the main federal law prohibiting sexual harassment was
formulated in 1991 and is the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. As a result, employers in every
sector of the economy must ensure enforcement of the Policy Prohibiting Discrimination
subsequent to extending the guidelines to employees in their respective workplaces. Employers
should express commitment to maintain a work environment where workers are respectfully
treated (Waller, 2016). According to Russell (2013), code of ethics implementation is a
fundamental strategy in ensuring sexual harassment is prevented in the workplaces. The
definition of sexual harassment by the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
is, “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors (2002).” Despite sexual harassment
being gender-neutral, women are the most vulnerable as research shows that 80 percent of sexual
harassment victims tend to be women (Bravo & Cassedy, 1992).

SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE

2

The most extensively used workplace ethics’ theories, deontology and virtue ethics are
examined in this paper. Employers are equally guilty just their employees when the issue of
sexual harassment in the place of work is considered, and such acts often make th...

Drsteeh (126)
Boston College

Anonymous
I was on a very tight deadline but thanks to Studypool I was able to deliver my assignment on time.

Anonymous
The tutor was pretty knowledgeable, efficient and polite. Great service!

Anonymous
I did not know how to approach this question, Studypool helped me a lot.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors