Part 2: Financial Accounting Analysis, economics homework help

User Generated

GrnpureYnevffn

Economics

Description

Part 2: Financial Accounting Analysis

For this part of your Scholar-Practitioner Project you will develop a financial accounting analysis of the public health initiative you selected (initiative proposal is attached) in week 2. In your analysis be sure to incorporate return on investment, time-value of money, and inflation factors.

The financial accounting analysis should include:

  • A 5-year proposed budget including major line items (the forms to be used are located at the link below. Please use MS Word version of forms 4 & 5)

https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs39...

PHS 398 form4 is for the initial or first year budget, and form5 is for all 5 years.

Each year should request $500,000 or less.

  • An analysis of budget line items, costs, sources of revenue, and deficits
  • An analysis of the fiscal soundness and long-term viability of the public health initiative The budget not necessarily real, you can just make up and make it look real
  • Example budget paper

    http://sam.research.sc.edu/pdf/NIHjust.pdf

    Unformatted Attachment Preview

    Running head: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC HEALTH INITIATIVE 1 Economic Analysis of Health Initiative Principles of Economics for Evaluating and Assessing the Need for Public Health Initiative Public health is a science that collectively aims to improve and reduce inequalities in health. Public health economics guides the decision-making process for public health practitioners in the utilization of available resources while minimizing opportunity cost (Edwards, Charles & Lloyd-Williams, 2013). The project will focus on public health interventions that help reduce and obesity. Obesity is a medical condition where a person has accumulated excess fats in their body to the extent that it poses a health risk. The rise in obesity is an increasing concern to public health causing the need for attention to reducing the potential health impacts it has on the human population. Changes in the environment primarily contribute to the rising rates of obesity due to lower costs and time for food production and monetary costs of buying food. Consumers have often demanded faster, convenient and affordable access to food, which has led to improvements in technology to deliver fast foods across the world. However, these improvements have come with adverse effects on the health of most consumers. It is important to recognize that economic force significantly contributes to the obesity health crisis that is experienced in the United States because it is possible for users to access, affordable high energy tasty meals making most people less physically active while at work and home. Additionally, healthcare costs have been lowered with technological advancements, which result to less motivation to diet or exercise to avoid the consequences of obesity. Economics explains the relationship between prices and demand. When the prices for commodities are higher, the quantity required is lower and vice versa. The advancements in technology have reduced the costs and time spent on the production of fast foods and thus makes them available ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC HEALTH INITIATIVE 2 at lower prices which explain the increase in consumption of the same (Finkelstein & Strombotne, 2010). Even though the cost of producing high-calorie foods has reduced, the cost of burning-out the intake of the same calories has increased. Letting-off this energy in the workplace has been made almost impossible with the replacement of most of the physical activities of blue-collar jobs by machines which automate processes. Technology advancements have increased the productivity of employees and their wages but at the expense of increasing their weight (Finkelstein & Strombotne, 2010). Individuals can only decrease the calories consumed by engaging more in physical activity if they want to consume more calories. This is not a moderate exercise as it comes with significant costs, which economists refer to as opportunity cost. The opportunity cost of making a choice from various alternatives. Leisure time is hardly spent on physical activities with most people even at home spending a significant proportion of their time on the computers, televisions and other gadgets. The low activity levels due to advancements in technology are substantially affecting the lifestyle of the citizens. Is the Public Health Initiative a Micro or Macroeconomic Program? The public health initiative to help reduce and prevent obesity is a macroeconomic program. The obesity issue is not only an individual concern but also affects the nation as a whole. When individuals are obese, they are prone to various medical conditions like cardiovascular diseases, diabetes type 2, depression, arthritis, certain cancers and many more conditions, which have the potential of influencing the productivity of such people. When a significant number of individuals are not productive due to obesity, it becomes a threat to a countries economic growth because the nation growth is dependent on the productivity of its citizens. Nearly half of the population of North America is obese, and the negative health ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC HEALTH INITIATIVE 3 consequences of obesity represent approximately 7 percent of the national health expenditure (Roux & Donaldson, 2004). A lot of resources allocation is towards ensuring healthcare services are available to the public to access treatment for obesity and conditions that are attached to them. Is the Public Health Initiative Results a public or private good? The public health initiative in reducing obesity is a public good. In economics, public goods are those which its consumption by one individual does not diminish the amount available for others to consume and are all inclusive such that no one is excluded from enjoying the benefits associated with them (Scott, Solomon & McGowan, 2001). Public health initiatives are a function of various factors both structural, political and social forces and not an individual's actions (Finkelstein & Strombotne, 2010). The elements that strengthen the ability to have public health initiatives as identified cannot be owned or controlled by an individual. The incentives that advocate for the consumption of healthier foods to prevent and reduce the obesity rates in the country are non-excludable and have no aspects of rivalry. The accessibility of this information to one individual does not make it less available for others to utilize and benefit from it. The provision of public health services has a close link to the government decisions as well as other public goods (Galea, 2016). Any initiative that intends to improve the health of the public is therefore well categorized as a mutual interest. The public action to reduce and prevent obesity will occur by providing general knowledge on healthy food consumption, the risks of highcalorie diets and the physical activities to engage in to burn out the high calories. The access to information regarding public health initiative to reduce and prevent obesity provides shared benefit for a shared good. The ability to protect the public from unhealthy habits through group behaviors that foster human health and wellbeing are mutual benefits which are all ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC HEALTH INITIATIVE 4 inclusive. For instance, one individual benefiting from knowledge on unhealthy behaviors or benefit from the obesity reduction and prevention program does not prevent another person from experiencing similar benefits. Additionally, the provision of public health is dependent on the global public goods, which need universal solutions (Galea, 2016). The prevention and reduction of obesity, for instance, is not a challenge to the United States alone but also of other neighboring countries since the technologies and advancements that led to the crisis also move to the other countries causing similar problems. The public health initiative to reduce obesity is also considered a public good because it provides equal opportunity for everyone in the society to adopt a healthy lifestyle. Financing Source for the Public Health Initiative The Federal government funds public health programs through grants to states distributed through CDC's National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. The public health initiative to reduce obesity implementation is in Texas, and we shall access the financial resources of the grants disbursed by the government through the Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. The Prevention and Public Health Funds can also be mobilized to support the initiative. The fund supports various activities in the prevention of obesity including CDC's Division of Nutrition Physical Activity and Obesity (DNPAO). The DNPAO supports healthy eating behaviors and physical activity for obesity prevention by focusing on dietary quality to support the development of children from an early stage (CDC, 2017). How the Public Health Initiative will affect the Supply and Demand for Health Services Unhealthy food consumption behaviors that result in obesity are likely to increase the demand for healthcare services. The reduction in costs and time for producing high-calorie foods ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC HEALTH INITIATIVE 5 makes the meals affordable to consumers providing an incentive to consume more. The consumption of junk food results in high fat building up in the body making a person exposed to risks of a variety of medical conditions. Due to this pre-exposure, the victims of obesity tend to seek medical services. Demand for medical services originates from the demand for health (Gupta & Greve, 2009). Other than health status, the demand for healthcare services is also influenced by factors such as age, wages, education, and prices for medical goods. Unhealthy behaviors such as smoking, drinking, and obesity also contribute to the increased demand for the access of medical care (Finkelstein & Strombotne, 2010). The proposed public initiative aims to reduce and prevent obesity by promoting healthy eating behaviors and encouraging physical activity. If successful, the effort is likely to lead to improved health behaviors that promote the wellbeing of the public and thus significantly reduce the demand for medical services. The reduction of obesity means a decrease in the associated risks of cardiovascular conditions, diabetes, certain types of cancer and arthritis among other ailments that would initially require increased medical attention. Obesity also leads to various effects on the supply of medical services. For instance, the increased rates of obesity demand that more spending on pharmaceuticals because the condition affects a person's pharmacokinetics which requires them to be administered with higher dosages of medication and increased frequencies in administration (Klein, et al., 2004). Additionally, hospitals are also forced to spend more on equipment like beds, wheelchairs, and walkers to accommodate patients with obesity. The cost of a standard bed is lower than that of a bariatric bed used for handling obese patients. Some hospitals go as far as modifying their buildings hallways and doorways to accommodate obese patients (Camden, 2009). In general, obesity leads to increased spending on the supply side of medical services. The proposed public initiative ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC HEALTH INITIATIVE to reduce and prevent obesity if successful will go a long way in ensuring fewer cases in the hospital and thus lead to reduced spending on the supply of healthcare services. 6 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC HEALTH INITIATIVE 7 References Camden, S. (2009). Obesity: An emerging concern for patients and nurses. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 14 (1), 278-290. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2017). Federal funding for obesity prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/obesity Edwards, T.R., Charles, M.J. & Lloyd-Williams, H. (2013). Public health economics: A systematic review of guidance for the economic evaluation of public health interventions and discussion of key methodological issues. BMC Public Health, 13:1001, doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1001 Finkelstein, A.E. & Strombotne, K.L. (2010). The economics of obesity. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 91, 1520-1524. Galea, Sandro. (2016, January 10). Public health as a public good. Retrieved from https://www.bu.edu/sph/2016/01/10/public-health-as-a-public-good/ Gupta, N.D. & Greve, J. (2009). Overweight and obesity and the demand for primary physician care. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp4098.pdf Klein, S., Burke, L., Bray, G., Blair, S., Allison, D. (2004). Clinical implications of obesity with specific focus on cardiovascular disease: A statement for professionals from the american heart association council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism. Circulation, 110, 2952-2967 Rabarison, K. M., Bish, C. L., Massoudi, M. S., & Giles, W. H. (2015). Economic evaluation enhances public health decision making. Frontiers in Public Health, 3(164), 1-5. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00164 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC HEALTH INITIATIVE Roux, L. and Donaldson, C. (2004), Economics and obesity: Costing the problem or evaluating solutions?. Obesity Research, 12 (2), 173–179. doi:10.1038/oby.2004.23 Scott, R. D., Solomon, S. L., & McGowan, J. E. (2001). Applying economic principles to health care. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 7(2), 282-285. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0702.700282. 8 Running head: SCHOLAR PRACTITIONER PROJECT 1 Brief Overview of the Initiative Worth a note, the increasing prevalence of obese persons in the Austin TX, has seen the development and implementation of a public health initiative focused on the reduction and prevention of obesity in Texas. According to Texas Department of State Health Service (2016), the program primary objective for the public health initiative is to bring up a healthy people by working towards creating awareness in selecting healthy choices among Texans, for instance, decreased usage of added sugars, low nutrients as well as high calories foods and increasing duration for physical activities. Besides, the program aims at fostering an increasing of some types of food, such as vegetables, water as well as fruits, as well as an increase in the mothers’ breastfeeding duration. As a result, the public health initiative would move to heighten the prevention and reduction of obesity among the Texans. The Rationale of the Topic Notably, the choice of my topic was highly promoted by the increasing outcry by the government and the public health departments regarding the increasing influence of obesity on personal health. Lavie, Milani, and Ventura, (2009), postulated that by an individual being overweight increases the risks of a person suffering cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, cancers, and stroke, among other sicknesses. This has not only become an expensive condition but also leading to household economic crisis especially when a member suffers an ailment related to obesity. Worth a note, obesity cases in the United States has increased over the past few years with current statistics revealing that approximately 36.5% of American are overweight and obese (CDC, 2016). In addition, Texas is ranked 10th in the United States in the prevalence cases of obesity currently at 32.4 percent in the year 2015, an upward growth from 21.7 percent RUNNING HEAD: Obesity Prevention Program in the year 2000; thus, my desire in pursuing a scholar-practitioner project on the reduction and prevention of the prevalent cases of obesity among Texans. 2 RUNNING HEAD: Obesity Prevention Program References CDC, (2016). Obesity is common, serious and costly. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html Texas Department of State Health Service (2016). Obesity Prevention Program. Retrieved from: https://www.dshs.texas.gov/obesity/ Lavie, C. J., Milani, R. V., & Ventura, H. O. (2009). Obesity and cardiovascular disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53(21), 1925-1932. 3 Program Director/Principal Investigator (Last, First, Middle): Doe, John DETAILED BUDGET FOR INITIAL BUDGET PERIOD DIRECT COSTS ONLY FROM THROUGH 1-1-16 12-31-16 List PERSONNEL (Applicant organization only) Use Cal, Acad, or Summer to Enter Months Devoted to Project Enter Dollar Amounts Requested (omit cents) for Salary Requested and Fringe Benefits NAME ROLE ON PROJECT Doe, John Cal. Mnths Acad. Mnths Summer INST.BASE Mnths SALARY SALARY REQUESTED FRINGE BENEFITS TOTAL Commented [SB1]: This indicated 28% fringe rate, each institution is different. This can usually be found by Googling. PD/PI 12 100,000 100,000 28,000 128,000 Mouse, Mickey Scientist 12 65000 65000 18200 83200 Duck, Donald Research Asst 6 50000 25000 7000 32000 Commented [SB2]: This shows 6 months or 50% of the base salary. White, Snow Dietician 3 40000 10000 2800 12800 Commented [SB3]: This is 3 months or 25% of the base salary. 200,000 56,000 256,000 SUBTOTALS CONSULTANT COSTS Jones, Bob 5000 Commented [SB4]: This is 28% of the salaries requested. Commented [SB5]: This column should add up both vertically and horizontally so double check your math! EQUIPMENT (Itemize) Industrial Fan 5000 Commented [SB6]: Equipment would be > $5000. If less it is a supply. Commented [SB7]: Itemized detail of the cost and purpose of each item goes in the budget justification. SUPPLIES (Itemize by category) Test Tubes, Weight Control Printed Pamphlets, Questionnaire Designing Program 600 TRAVEL APHA 2000 INPATIENT CARE COSTS OUTPATIENT CARE COSTS ALTERATIONS AND RENOVATIONS (Itemize by category) Commented [SB8]: Itemized detail of the cost and purpose of each item goes in the budget justification. OTHER EXPENSES (Itemize by category) Compensation Cards for Participation 2000 CONSORTIUM/CONTRACTUAL COSTS DIRECT COSTS SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS FOR INITIAL BUDGET PERIOD (Item 7a, Face Page) $ 270,600 $ 270,600 FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS CONSORTIUM/CONTRACTUAL COSTS TOTAL DIRECT COSTS FOR INITIAL BUDGET PERIOD PHS 398 (Rev. 08/12 Approved Through 8/31/2015) Page OMB No. 0925-0001 Form Page 4 Commented [SB9]: Contractual work requires a completely separate budgets so this is not required for the course. Doe, John Program Director/Principal Investigator (Last, First, Middle): BUDGET FOR ENTIRE PROPOSED PROJECT PERIOD DIRECT COSTS ONLY BUDGET CATEGORY TOTALS PERSONNEL: Salary and fringe benefits. Applicant organization only. CONSULTANT COSTS EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES TRAVEL INITIAL BUDGET PERIOD (from Form Page 4) 2nd ADDITIONAL YEAR OF SUPPORT REQUESTED 3rd ADDITIONAL 4th ADDITIONAL 5th ADDITIONAL YEAR OF SUPPORT YEAR OF SUPPORT YEAR OF SUPPORT REQUESTED REQUESTED REQUESTED 256,000 263,680 271,590 279,737 288,129 5,000 5,150 5,304 5,463 5626 5000 5150 5304 5463 5626 600 618 636 655 674 2,000 2060 2121 2184 2249 2,000 2060 2121 2184 2249 270,600 278,718 287,076 295,686 304,553 270600 278718 287076 295686 304553 Commented [SB1]: 3% increase annually is standard. Commented [SB2]: INPATIENT CARE COSTS OUTPATIENT CARE COSTS ALTERATIONS AND RENOVATIONS OTHER EXPENSES DIRECT CONSORTIUM/ CONTRACTUAL COSTS SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS (Sum = Item 8a, Face Page) F&A CONSORTIUM/ CONTRACTUAL COSTS TOTAL DIRECT COSTS TOTAL DIRECT COSTS FOR ENTIRE PROPOSED PROJECT PERIOD $ 1,436,663 JUSTIFICATION. Follow the budget justification instructions exactly. Use continuation pages as needed. John Doe, Ph.D. (PI) will be the lead faculty member on the grant project………. The following Sample is not for this BUDGET. It does give you an idea of how a budget justification should be written. (Also see the examples provided in the Doc Sharing area for how to itemize personnel, consultants, equipment, etc.). The budget justification should be detailed and each item should be listed and you should describe why the item is needed for the program to function. PHS 398 (Rev. 08/12 Approved Through 8/31/2015) Page OMB No. 0925-0001 Form Page 5 Commented [SB3]: These equal $1,436,663 SAMPLE NIH R01 Budget Justification BUDGET JUSTIFICATION Senior/Key Personnel Margaret Meade, PhD, Principal Investigator. Dr. Meade will be responsible for the overall administration of this project. She will share responsibility for the substantive direction of the project with Dr. Benjamin Spock and Dr. Vandana Shiva. Dr. Meade will have primary responsibility for the organization and operation of the project. She will oversee hiring, training, and supervision of all staff and ensure the quality of data collection, coding, and data management over time. She will train data collectors and behavioral and interview coders. She will conduct much of the data analyses and author publications. In Year 1, Dr. Meade will devote 25% of her effort (of her 9month faculty assignment) during the academic year and .5 summer month managing this project. In years 24, she will devote 15% each academic year and 1 summer month each year to work on the project. Dr. Spock will serve as co-investigator and coordinate specific aspects of the project in collaboration with Dr. Meade. Dr. Spock will have primary responsibility for coding and scoring measures of mothers’ attributions about crying and will assist Dr. Meade in training the project staff to code maternal behavior/sensitivity. He will assist with designing effective strategies for sample recruitment and retention. He will assist with the interpretation of data and will co-author publications. Dr. Spock will devote a 20% effort (of a 10-month faculty assignment) to this project throughout each year for the duration of the project. Dr. Shiva will serve as co-investigator on this project. As Program Director of the UNCG Center for First Generation North Carolinians, she has connections with diverse population groups in the area. These connections will serve in the efforts to recruit first-generation Americans refugees and immigrant families for the study. She will have primary responsibility for creating procedures to ensure the adequate collection and interpretation of data to assess mother and infant vagal withdrawal. She contributes knowledge of crosscultural feminist theory and cultural competence, and will also co-author publications. Dr. Shiva will contribute 15% of her effort to this project each year (12-month position). Other Personnel A full-time, MA-level Project Coordinator will be responsible for the day-to-day management of the project, and will work closely with Dr. Meade and the co-investigators in hiring, training, and supervising the project staff. A full-time Research Assistant will be responsible for arranging recruitment visits and scheduling participant visits, and will assist with data collection. This person will also order research supplies and reconcile the budget. In Years 3 and 4, a full-time postdoctoral fellow with advanced quantitative skills will be hired to assist with data analysis and manuscript preparation. Graduate Research Assistants will be supported by the project; two GRAs will work during Year 1, and additional GRA’s will be hired to work in Years 2-4. Their primary responsibilities will be to recruit participants and to collect and code data. Additional GRAs will be needed during the summer for coding and during peak data collection years when there is a great deal of overlap in assessment points. GRAs will work 50% of their time during the academic year and 100% for the summer. Fringe benefit rate is 32% for full-time employees, .8 % for enrolled students, and 8.45% for non-enrolled students during the summer. Equipment Funds are requested to purchase three Biologs ($7,150 each). These are ambulatory physiological data recorders with multiple channels that will be used to record mothers’ heart rate (RSA), activity level, and 1 electrodermal activity (e.g., skin conductance). Recorded data is compactly stored on a removable memory card. When recording is complete, the card is inserted into a card reader which is connected to a PC through a serial port. The affiliated Downloading and Plotting Software ($1,100 under Supplies) which operates on the PC supervises the downloading of data to the PC and ensure data is recorded according to the needs specified by the researchers. From this program, the data can be converted into separate data files for each physiological measure. These measures are all synchronized with one another and can be synchronized with video files as well. Three Biologs are needed because there are several periods when assessment points overlap (e.g., prenatal interviews, 6 months laboratory visits, and 6 month home visits), and dedicated equipment for each type of visit will ease scheduling demands. Travel Funds are requested for each of the assigned consultants to visit Greensboro once each year ($1,500 per trip) that they work for the project. Staff will travel to meet with hospitals and governmental health services during the first two years. Reimbursement is calculated at 160 visits each year, 20 average miles at $.585 per mile. Travel for home visits is estimated at 20 miles round trip; travel reimbursement is calculated at $.585 per mile throughout the years, according to the number of home visits scheduled for the 6-month visit (see schedule below). Funds are requested for one professional conference in Years 2-4 to present findings from the study ($1,200 per trip). Other Direct Costs Supplies Startup supplies – For Year 1, funds are requested to purchase electrodes (67 adult, 67 child, total $1,340), Biolog software ($1,100), Noldus software upgrade and license for coding visits ($5,000), an external data module ($2,850) to synchronize video and physiological data, two DVD video cameras ($650 each) to be used at home visits, two wall-mounted DVD video cameras ($2,000 each) for the lab, two desktop computers ($1,000 each), a laptop ($2,000), printer ($350), and two external hard drives ($300 each). General research supplies – Research supplies are calculated at approximately $1,875 per year, and include snacks for participants, printer cartridges, blank DVD’s for data storage, DVD storage portfolios, paper and other office materials. Funds are requested during Years 2-4 for consumable research supplies using a cost estimate based on Year 1. Small gifts, approximately $10 each, will be given to participants as incentives each year, calculated according to the number of participants scheduled each year (see timeline below). Consultants In Years 1 and 2, Dr. Carol Adams from the University of Northern Virginia will train 3 research assistants to administer the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI). She will periodically review interview transcripts to ensure adherence to the interview protocol over time. Dr. Adams will also assist in identifying trained AAI coders. She will provide support for this project at a rate of $400 per day for 5 days during Years 1 and 2. In Year 1, Dr. Susan Griffin of American University will assist the PI and co-investigators in communicating with the manufacturer of Biolog to ensure that the physiological equipment and software that records and summarizes the data will be configured properly given the goals of the study. She will also assist in preparing data collection procedures for the measurement of activity level and electrodermal activity and in the interpretation of these measures in data analysis. Dr. Griffin will provide support for this project at a rate of $500 per day for 5 days during Year 1. 2
    Purchase answer to see full attachment
    User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

    Explanation & Answer

    attached is my complete financial accounting analysis paper with 1% plagiarized shown by the content checker

    Assignment Title: Financial Accounting Analysis
    Student Name
    Course Name
    Instructor Name
    Due Date

    Financial Accounting Analysis
    Introduction:
    Connected to this investigation is a five-year spending plan for the Brown
    Primary Care Dental centers Oral Health Initiative. The spending covers consumption
    expected for the monetary years 2016 to 2020. The money related year of Brown Primary
    Care Dental facilities Oral Health Initiative keeps running from the beginning of January
    to the end of December.
    General well-being is a science that all in all means to enhance and lessen
    disparities in well-being. General well-being financial matters manage the basic
    leadership process for general well-being experts in the use of accessible assets while
    limiting open door cost (Camden, 2009). The venture will concentrate on general wellbeing intercessions that assistance lessen and weight. Heftiness is a restorative condition
    where a man has amassed abundance fats in their body to the degree that it represents a
    well-being hazard. The ascent in weight is an expanding worry to general well-being
    making the requirement for consideration lessening the potential well-being impacts it
    has on the human populace. Changes in nature basically add to the rising rates of weight
    because of lower expenses and time for nourishment creation and fiscal expenses of
    purchasing sustenance. Shoppers have frequently requested quicker, advantageous and
    reasonable access to nourishment, which has prompted changes in innovation to convey
    quick sustenance over the world. Be that as it may, these changes have accompanied
    unfriendly impacts on the well-being of general shoppers.

    It is essential to perceive that financial drive fundamentally adds to the stoutness
    well-being emergency that is knowledgeable about the United States since it is feasible
    for clients to get to, reasonable high vitality wonderful suppers making a great many
    people less physically dynamic while at work and home. Also, human services costs have
    been brought down with mechanical progressions, which result to less inspiration to
    eating regimen or exercise to maintain a strategic distance from the outcomes of
    corpulence. Financial matters clarify the connection amongst costs and request. At the
    point when the costs for wares are higher, the amount required is lower and the other way
    around. The headways in innovation have decreased the expenses and time spent on the
    creation of quick sustenance and in this way makes them accessible at bringing down
    costs which clarify the expansion in the utilization of the same (Finkelstein and
    Strombotne, 2010).
    Analysis of budget line items, costs, sources of revenue, and deficits:
    The monetary allowance appended expects that there will be no significant
    movement in the level of swelling for the following five years. The moment base
    compensation is relied upon to develop at an unfaltering rate of 15% every year. This
    implies the compensation paid in this classification is utilized to ascertain the pay to be
    paid in the succeeding year.
    115% instant base salary for 2016 (115%*100,000) = instant base salary for year 2017
    115,000
    On the contrary, the salary demanded is relied upon to rise relentlessly for the
    initial four years. Nonetheless, there is no normal ascent in asked for payment in the fifth

    year. The ascent in asked for pay is relied upon to cover new enlistments. Subsequently,
    the monetary allowance expects that before the finish of the fourth year, the labor pre
    requisites will have settled and there might be no requirement for additional enlistment in
    the fifth year.
    Salary demanded for 2017 = salary demanded in 2016+ 10,000
    = 50,000 + 10,000
    = 60,000
    Incidental advantages are dealt with as adaptable expenses and are kept up at a
    similar figure for the following five years. The count of incidental advantages might be
    founded on a level of yield. In the circumstance that there is overflow, the overabundance
    should be conveyed forward in the next year suspecting an ascent underway. If there
    should be an occurrence of a shortage, this might be obtained from other operation
    accounts with no intrigue charge.
    The expanding predominance of corpulent people in the Austin TX has seen the
    advancement and execution of a general well-being activity concentrated on the
    diminishment and counteractive action of corpulence in Texas. As indicated by Texas
    Department of State Health Service (2016), the program essential target for the general
    well-being activity is to raise a sound...


    Anonymous
    Really great stuff, couldn't ask for more.

    Studypool
    4.7
    Trustpilot
    4.5
    Sitejabber
    4.4

    Related Tags