Case study response, communications homework help

User Generated

fgenhowbena

Business Finance

brandman

Description

Write a four-page paper in which you choose a media practitioner to interview. Your objective is to learn the following from your subject:

  1. What ethical dilemmas the subject has encountered;
  2. How the subject was involved in the dilemma;
  3. How the subject resolved this dilemma; (Do not include a transcript of the interview; this should be written in paragraph format.)
  4. Your assessment of whether the subject handled the dilemma correctly;
  5. How the subject’s handing of the dilemma compares with the NPR and/or New York Times Codes of Ethics.

A full explanation, including detailed requirements and the related rubric, is located under the “Course Information” tab, in the folder labeled “Case Study Response Papers.”


Unformatted Attachment Preview

COMU 375 Case Study Response Paper Rubric 100 points Learning Outcome Criteria EXEMPLARY Factual Summary of ethical dilemma (20) The learner provides a sophisticated, factual, 3rd person summary of the ethical dilemma. No “I/you” pronouns are used. Explanation of choice of ethical dilemma, including explanation of relevance to personal experience (20) The learner provides a sophisticated and indepth explanation for the ethical dilemma chosen, including a reflection about why the learner finds this particular case study interesting and relevant to his or her own personal experience. (20) The learner offers sophisticated evaluation and reflection of this ethical dilemma, explaining why chosen. Personal evaluation and reflection of dilemma PROFICIENT DEVELOPING EMERGING (16) The learner demonstrates an adequate factual, 3rd person summary of the ethical dilemma. No “I/you” pronouns are used. (16) The learner provides an adequate understanding of the ethical dilemma chosen, including a reflection about why the learner finds this particular case study interesting and relevant to his or her own personal experience. (14) The learner demonstrates a partial factual summary of the ethical dilemma. “I/you” pronouns are used. (6) The learner demonstrates no greater than surface understanding of the ethical dilemma. “I/you” pronouns are used. (14) The learner provides a partial explanation of the dilemma chosen, including a reflection about why the learner finds this particular case study interesting and relevant to his or her own personal experience. (6) The learner demonstrates surface explanation of the dilemma chosen, including a reflection about why the learner finds this particular case study interesting and relevant to his or her own personal experience. (16) The learner provides an adequate evaluation and reflection of this ethical dilemma, explaining why chosen. (14) The learner provides a partial evaluation and reflection of this ethical dilemma, explaining why chosen. (6) The learner demonstrates surface evaluation and reflection of this ethical dilemma, explaining why chosen. Recommendation for dealing with dilemma (20) The learner offers a sophisticated strategy for dealing with the dilemma, including the usage of outside sources, such as our course textbook, The New York Times’ “Ethical Journalism” handbook, and NPR’s Ethics Handbook to support his or her strategy and provide a justification for this particular approach. (16) The learner provides an adequate strategy for dealing with the dilemma, including the usage of outside sources, such as our course textbook, The New York Times’ “Ethical Journalism” handbook, and NPR’s Ethics Handbook to support his or her strategy and provide a justification for this particular approach. Scholarly Sources (10) At least 4 scholarly sources are incorporated effectively and citations are applied flawlessly. Includes appropriate graphics, photos, statistics, charts, newspaper clippings, and/or music tracks as well as thorough justification. (8) A minimum of 4 scholarly sources are incorporated and citations are applied. Includes appropriate graphics, photos, statistics, charts, newspaper clippings, and/or music tracks as well as sufficient justification of selection. (10) Includes flawless formatting of the paper (including the title page, bibliography, and (8) Includes appropriate formatting of the paper (including the title page, bibliography, and Formatting, Organization, and Mechanics (14) The learner provides a partial strategy for dealing with the dilemma, including the usage of outside sources, such as our course textbook, The New York Times’ “Ethical Journalism” handbook, and NPR’s Ethics Handbook to support his or her strategy and provide a justification for this particular approach. (7) Includes some scholarly sources and some citations are applied, but the minimum requirement of 4 sources is not met. Includes some appropriate graphics, photos, statistics, charts, newspaper clippings, and/or music tracks as well as partial justification of selection. (7) Includes some appropriate formatting of the paper (including the title page, (6) The learner demonstrates a surface or no strategy for dealing with the dilemma, including the usage of outside sources, such as our course textbook, The New York Times’ “Ethical Journalism” handbook, and NPR’s Ethics Handbook to support his or her strategy and provide a justification for this particular approach. (6) Includes little to no scholarly sources or accurate citations. Includes little to no graphics, photos, statistics, charts, newspaper clippings, and/or music tracks. Little or no justification of selection is present. (6) Includes little to no appropriate formatting of the paper (including the title page, references). The ideas are clear, well organized, and have a logical flow. Word choice is precise and accurate. The paper is free of mechanical errors including grammar and spelling. The paper meets the stated length requirements. references). The ideas are mostly clear, well organized, and have a logical flow. Word choice is m o s t l y precise and accurate. The paper is free of major mechanical errors including grammar and spelling. The paper meets the stated length requirements. bibliography, and references). The ideas are partially clear, somewhat organized, and have insufficient logical flow. Word choice is not consistently precise or accurate. The paper includes some major mechanical errors such as grammar and spelling. The paper does not meet the stated length requirements. bibliography, and references). The ideas are not clear, organized, and/or do not have logical flow. Word choice lacks precision and accuracy. The paper includes major mechanical errors such as grammar and spelling. The paper does not meet the stated length requirements.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Find attached com...


Anonymous
Just what I needed. Studypool is a lifesaver!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags