Description
To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the "Section B: Problem Description" assignment in Topic 2. Appraise each resource using the "Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists," available in the textbook appendix. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.
Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the "Evaluation Table Template," available in the textbook appendix. Use the "Evaluation Table Template" as an adaptable template.
Write a narrative of 750-1,000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Make sure to do the following:
- Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
- Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
- Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research.
It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.
Although you will not be submitting the checklist information or the evaluation table you design in Topic 3 with the narrative, the checklist information and evaluation table should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Evidence Based Practice
I.
Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for
inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria)
II.
Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of
each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit,
including study strengths and limitations
III.
Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research
Running Head: EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE
Evidence Based Practice
Institution Affiliation
Date:
1
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE
2
Various researchers have taken the initiative to conduct studies on communication in
health care. Some of the research cases include “Let’s talk about improving communication in
health care,” “Perceptions of effective and ineffective nurse-physician communication in
hospitals” and “Identifying patients in need of a palliative care assessment in the hospital
setting.” Each of these research studies can be obtained from the internet. Therefore, to collect
data on communication in the hospital one can utilize the internet as a search method. Data
collected in the study abo...
Review
Review
