Running head: EMBASSY SECURITY
1
Embassy Security
John K. Doku, Jr
American Military University
Dr. Robert Pittman
Security Management Capstone
8/4/2017
EMBASSY SECURITY
2
Abstract
U.S. embassies and consulates in many foreign locations have always been a target of
terrorist attacks and other criminal activities. The attacks attack on these embassies has not been
a problem that the U.S. has started facing recently but an issue that has been in happening since
the evolution of diplomatic activities between nations. The most recalled attack on the U.S.
embassy was in Benghazi, Libya attack that claimed the life of Ambassador Christopher Stevens
and other U.S citizen. The Beirut, Lebanon attack on the U.S embassy also claimed lives of both
American nationals and locals. Therefore, these attacks have led to a series of questions about
the security measures implemented at the embassies in high-risk environments. In the series of
these events, the landscape designs of embassy facility have come under criticism for as they do
not reflect the functions of the embassies. The aim of this study is to explore the best security
alternative that can provide maximum security to American embassies while all are together
upholding the image, goals, and values of the host country.
EMBASSY SECURITY
3
Table of Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4
Literature Review............................................................................................................................ 6
Assessing the Threat ................................................................................................................... 7
Embassy Security Construction .................................................................................................. 8
Physical Security......................................................................................................................... 9
Deployment of Marines and Mobile Security........................................................................... 10
Problem Statement ........................................................................................................................ 10
Purpose Statement ......................................................................................................................... 11
Research Questions ....................................................................................................................... 11
Hypothesis Statements .................................................................................................................. 11
Research Proposal Variable .......................................................................................................... 12
Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 12
Research Methodology ................................................................................................................. 12
Research Design........................................................................................................................ 13
References ......................................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
EMBASSY SECURITY
4
Introduction
An embassy is regarded as the nerve center of a nation’s diplomatic activities within the
borders of another country, serving as the headquarters of the chief of mission, staff and other
organizations. American embassies and consulates in foreign countries have a special status
because they represent the sovereign state as much as the diplomatic spaces remain to be the
territory of the host country (Dahl, 2013). Apart from the obvious functions of providing visas
and helping American citizens in foreign countries, the consulate and the embassy interact with
host administration, private citizens, non-governmental organizations, educational institutions,
and local businesses to create a positive response to the American policy and U.S in general.
Since U.S officers are normally allocated to a foreign nation for few years, it is important for the
U.S to hire citizens from the host nation to fill certain positions in the consulates and embassies.
Known as Locally Employed Staff, they ensure that missions of the embassy are fulfilled.
The United States has around 285 diplomatic facilities in foreign locations, and attacks on
embassies and other diplomatic personnel have been frequent of late. As Dahl (2013) indicates,
renewed attention has been focused on the security challenges facing U.S. embassies and the
problems of balancing the security concerns and the outreach needed for their duties after a
series of attacks on these facilities and personnel. The death of Ambassador Christopher Stevens
and other U.S citizen in Benghazi, Libya in 2012 together with other attacks on U.S. embassies
in Yemen, Egypt, Tunisia, and Sudan has indicated the inability to provide adequate security by
the current security frameworks put in place. Since President Reagan’s Administration, attacks
on U.S embassies have been frequent where in each attack, a significant number of both U.S. and
non-U.S. citizens perish. In 1983, the U.S. embassy in Beirut, Lebanon was rammed into by
truck of a suicide bomber killing 63 people including 17 American citizens. The worst of all
EMBASSY SECURITY
5
attacks occurred in the 1990s as four incident attacks were aimed at American embassies when
Al Qaeda attacked the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania on August 7. 1998. The Nairobi
bombing claimed the lives 224 locals and 12 American nationals while the Dares Salaam
bombing claimed ten lives of the locals (Dahl, 2013).
According to the reciprocal treaty responsibilities, the host country is obligated to give
security for the embassies of the sending states. However, there have been circumstances where
the host countries have not been fully committed or unable to meet this requirement due to poor
security frameworks or inadequate cooperation between the country and the U.S. Such instances
have left U.S. embassies vulnerable forcing the Federal government to use a layered approach to
security and other additional measures such as hardened facilities, Diplomatic Security agents,
and sometimes the detachment of the U.S. Marine Security Guard. This follows the rapid growth
of American nationals being sent to high-risk areas such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iraq
spurring an increased investment in the security of such individuals. It’s the role of the DS
(Bureau of Diplomatic Security) to address these security concerns in high-risk areas.
Due to such cases of increased attacks directed at the U.S. embassies and consulates, the
DS needs to evaluate and enhance the security features around the embassies in foreign locations
because, in every attack that occurs, American nationals are the target. The U.S through the DS
has put in place the latest physical security measures such as transparent window grille that has
bullet-proof resistant strips, construction of a gate that can endure a 50-mile crash and other
options to protect embassy buildings against fire. According to Demkin (2014), other
improvements involve the provision of streaming videos from cameras positioned at U.S
missions around the globe. Irrespective of such measures, the U.S embassies are still defenseless
when it comes to terrorists’ threats that are targeted to American facilities and nationals. The
EMBASSY SECURITY
6
U.S. government should consider implementing state-of-the-art security measures that will
prevent any targeted attack from happening. Apart from the installation of the surveillance
cameras, construction of perimeter walls, and anti-ram vehicle barriers, the government has
shipped the Hardened Alternative Trailer Systems (HATS) that offer safe non-permanent
structures during attacks or natural disasters. These HATS will be utilized as safe havens,
housing, and offices they are supplied with necessities such as electricity, computer connectivity,
and water (Demkin, 2014).
These HATS are installed in areas of high risks such as Syria, Pakistan, and Sudan since
they are part of the wide-ranging obligation that the DS meets as a diplomatic role in high-risk
environments. In places such as Islamabad, Pakistan where suicidal bombs are common, these
security upgrades will offer sanctuary to all the people during an attack as they feature defensive
weapons systems, hardened guard towers, and Tactical Operations Center. Therefore, the aim of
this thesis proposal is to analyze other security considerations that would ensure that American
embassies in high-risk environments are safe. This is because these construction designs tend to
portray these embassies as a fortress instead of depicting them as a contact and connection point
between the U.S. government and its citizens living in host nation or between the host nations.
So, these embassies are unable to maintain their representational role as demonstrations of the
best image of the U.S and also limited the U.S diplomatic activities (Demkin, 2014). The
proposal highlights new measures that are aimed at providing the best security measures while
upholding the mission and goals of the embassies and consulates.
Literature Review
Hurley (2017) illustrates that the protection of the U.S embassies and personnel from
criminals and terrorist falls under the duties of the Secretary of the State as indicated in the 1998
EMBASSY SECURITY
7
Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act. According to the regulation, the required
personnel should create and implement policies and programs that provide state-of-the-art
security to U.S. diplomatic operations (Hurley, 2017). Reporting to the Secretary of the State is
the Assistant Secretary of Diplomatic Security who in in charge of the Bureau for Diplomatic
Security (DS). Within this structure, the DS has many tasks such as instituting and operating
protective and security functions overseas, emergency planning, and establishing and executing
technical and physical security programs like armored vehicles, security-related construction,
and personnel security communications. The DS offers security and protection to more than 237
consulates and embassies (Hurley, 2017). The Bureau has a team of special agents known as
regional security officers whose duties include providing first line defense to U.S diplomats,
formulating emergency contingency plans, and managing security programs. These agents work
closely with the Marine Security Guards, host government officials, surveillance detection teams,
and local investigators to ensure that their mission is accomplished. In conjunction with
Washington D.C, the D.S dispatches the Mobile Security Teams to areas vulnerable to terrorist
attacks to train the embassy personnel as well as provide emergency security support in instances
where the host nation is unwilling or unable to give the required level of security support
(Hurley, 2017).
Assessing the Threat
According to the DS, U.S. embassies receive more than 1,000 security threats per year
(Hurley, 2017). Based on the level of the threat, four threat categories inform the DS they type of
threat including residential and non-residential crimes, terrorism, and political violence then a
rating is allocated to each category. The protective measures put in place are depended on the
level of the overall threat. They include:
EMBASSY SECURITY
▪
Critical; pose a grave impact on the American diplomat
▪
High: serious impact on the American diplomat
▪
Medium: moderate impact on the American diplomat
▪
Low: minor impact on American Diplomats.
8
Embassy Security Construction
The bombing of U.S. embassies Tanzania and Kenya in 1998 resulted in a period of
careful congressional analysis of the construction of embassies. After conducting investigations,
the Department of State concluded that more than 80% of its embassies and consulates across the
globe did not fulfill the security requirements and should be replaced. Therefore, the Congress
allocated a special funding to the construction of the embassies that would deter any criminal
activities. As much as more than 100 embassies all over the world were designed and constructed
according the required strategy, the designs have received criticism because of the highly secured
facilities indicate an unpleasant, unwelcoming, and closed fortress image of the U.S (Demkin,
2014). These designs also tended to locate the embassies away from the urban areas because
implementing the required standard embassy design required a lot of spacing that was only
available in remote areas. So, these embassies were unable to maintain their representational role
as demonstrations of the best the U.S and also limited the U.S diplomatic activities (Demkin,
2014).
The fearful posture presumed by the U.S embassies in many developing countries is a
cause for concern. As much as the country is touting the vital need of better diplomacy, the State
Department is constructing embassies that don’t reflect the agenda because the inaccessibility
and modern standardized designs are damaging the efforts to depict America as an open society.
While no one argues that necessity of increased security is important for everyone, designing
EMBASSY SECURITY
9
faceless architecture makes one a target by terrorist. For instance, having established that they
could not access the American consular compound in Istanbul, terrorists blew up the more
accessible British embassy and a nearby bank in 2003 (Dahl, 2013). When we view security
measures in such perspective, we realize that U.S. embassies are fortified thus making them a
target. The design of the embassy in foreign location matters a lot because the buildings say a lot
about us and when it comes to diplomatic affairs, what the U.S. says about itself matters a lot.
The issue of security and openness is important as they represent the kind of security measures
that need to be put in place so that the problem of insecurity can be resolved.
For instance, the American embassy in Chile is like a fortress and does not represent the
culture of Santiago. The State Department needs to revisit the Inman recommendations and
build embassies based on those recommendations. For example, if they had fully understood
them, then the London embassy that lacks the identified 100-foot setback would have been
abandoned. The militarization of embassies is compromising the state of security in these
facilities. It’s time for openness and security conversations to take place because a good
architecture has the ability to lift the spirit and symbolize effective diplomacy (Argyros,
Grossman, Rohatyn & Witkowsky, 2017).
Physical Security
The DS does not make public the security arrangements for individuals and locations but
depends on the combination of host country contracted security forces to protect the outside
perimeters of the diplomatic facilities. Together, with the Marine Security Guards, the DS posts
new Marine Security Guards to U.S diplomatic facilities to prevent any compromise of the
government equipment and information (Dahl, 2013). They also protect the U.S. personnel
during attacks, and this was effected after the Benghazi attack when a memorandum between the
EMBASSY SECURITY
10
Marine Corps and the Department of State was renegotiated to provide the protection to
individuals as the primary mission of the Guards. When these detachments are deployed, they are
usually in civilian authority and under a line of command that involves the Chief of Mission and
the RSO. These detachments are important in preventing mob violence over a sustained period
around the embassies and consulates because even fortified facilities can still be overpowered
with the absence of the protection from such detachments.
Deployment of Marines and Mobile Security
The Mobile Security teams, under the DS respond to crises in external locations and
remain there for the required period with no outside support. In dangerous environments where
the embassies are located, the Mobile Security is important in providing security and other
measures such as the evacuation of personnel from global hotspots (Dahl, 2013). Apart from
these six-agent team, the deployment of Marine at embassies and consulates provides an agile
response to any impending threat that may jeopardize the mission of the embassy. After the
attack on the U.S embassy in Tunisia, the quick response demonstrated by the Marines
demonstrated flawless actions that left more than 80n employees safe and the building still
standing (Demkin, 2014). With the augmentation of the Special Skills Branch and the Mobile
Security Deployment, the Marine receives retraining on current matters of security such as
advanced room entry, tactical medicine, and security equipment.
Problem Statement
The frequent attacks on U.S embassies and industries abroad call for new security
measures that will ensure that these facilities across the world are secure. Unfortunately, the
current architectural designs have turned embassies into fortresses thus making them a target for
terrorism. Additionally, they do not represent the cultural values of the host nation because of
EMBASSY SECURITY
11
sophisticated security measures such as the installation of surveillance including CCTV cameras,
using ant-blast materials, high perimeter walls and anti-ram vehicle barriers. The Inman
recommendations are not considered during the construction of the embassies and consulates in
most developing nations because these designs depict a negative image of the American society
since embassies are not considered as a place of contact rather than a fortress. Therefore, there is
a need to look for alternative security measures that will provide the best security measures while
upholding the mission and goals of the embassies and consulates.
Purpose Statement
This research is significant and will bridge the gap existing between the new architectural
designs of the U.S. embassies and security thereby answering the questions between Security Vs.
Openness. There is little research that has been done in this areas, and the findings of the study
will provide State Department with adequate information that can be used enhance security in the
embassy while sending a positive message to the host nation.
Research Questions
1. Does the current fortress–like structures of the various American embassies negatively
affect the image of these embassies?
2. Is there a best security enhancement alternative that will ensure a positive image of these
embassies to the host countries?
3. Which kind of architects’ design will offer the American embassies maximum protection
while ensuring that it conforms to the values and culture of the host nation?
4. Can proper knowledge of the capabilities of security components and vulnerability of a
facility site assist in making design decisions that are functional, aesthetic, and meeting
security objectives?
EMBASSY SECURITY
12
Hypothesis Statements
This thesis proposal will proceed on the following hypothesis:
If the State Department utilizes architectural designs that respect the culture and values of the
host nations by employing innovative construction techniques that that would encourage
openness, then security within U.S. embassies would improve.
Research Proposal Variable
Independent Variable: U.S embassies and consulates
Dependent Variable: Security of the embassies
Objectives
1. To critically assess the security threats that U.S. embassies face in high-risk environments
2. To analyze the current architectural designs that of the U.S. embassies in foreign
locations.
3. To make recommendations to improve the architectural designs so that they respect the
cultural values of the host nation, thereby encouraging openness.
Research Methodology
The research will dwell on qualitative methods of data collection because the thesis aims
to illustrate the security options that the State Department should employ when tackling security
concerns at the embassies. Also, the thesis aims to provide evidence on the expected outcomes in
the event of an attack and the possible solutions that will assist the State Department in assessing
the level of risks and reducing the vulnerability of the site. Qualitative methods will allow the
researcher to conduct a thorough analysis of the findings of the study. Qualitative research
methodology will use survey and questionnaire as a method of data collection thereby giving the
researcher an opportunity to explore and analyze the feedback from a particular event.
EMBASSY SECURITY
13
Observation as a qualitative research strategy will allow the researcher to get information about
the landscape security practices and recommend options that solve the research questions.
Research Design
This research will proceed with quasi- experimental design that will determine the causeeffect relationship between U.S. embassies and their security. The cause-effect relationship
results because the current landscape design of the embassies is believed to be the main cause of
security threats. Therefore, the researcher will not manipulate the independent variable or assign
groups to the treatment process. Control groups will be recognized and exposed to the variables,
and the results will be compared with findings of groups that will not be exposed to the variable.
EMBASSY SECURITY
14
References
Argyros, G. L., Grossman, M., Rohatyn, F. G., Witkowsky, A., & Center for Strategic and
International Studies (Washington, D.C.). (2017). The embassy of the future. Washington,
D.C: CSIS Press.
Dahl, E. J. (2013). Intelligence and surprise attack: Failure and success from Pearl Harbor to
9/11 and beyond. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Demkin, J. A. (2014). Security planning and design: A guide for architects and building design
professionals. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Hurley, A. K. (2017, May 5). Diplomatic design: New US embassies make an architectural
statement. Retrieved July 6, 2017, from CNN Style:
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/04/architecture/us-embassy-design/index.html
Purchase answer to see full
attachment