Earlier this week, you practiced using factorial ANOVA models with SPSS and, ideally, used the Collaboration Lab to ask, answer, and otherwise address any questions you had. In this Assignment, you apply what you learned to answer a social research question using factorial ANOVA.To prepareReview the datasets provided.Construct a research question with social change implications based on one of those datasets.Be sure to focus on the assumptions of this test and ask yourself, “Does it make sense to interpret the mean of this dependent variable?”Remember that you will need categorical predictor variables.By Day 7The AssignmentUse SPSS to answer the research question you constructed. Write an analysis in APA format, including title page, references, and an appendix, that includes your data output and addresses each of the tasks listed below. The content should be 2–3 pages, including setup of the assignment, results, and interpretation of results. Your SPSS output should be included as an appendix.What is the null hypothesis for your question?What research design(s) would align with this question?What dependent variable was used and how is it measured?What independent variable is used and how is it measured?If you found significance, what is the strength of the effect?What is the answer to your research question?What are the possible implications of social change?Early in your Assignment, when you relate which dataset you analyzed, please include the mean of the following variables. If you are using the Afrobarometer Dataset, report the mean of Q1 (Age). If you are using the General Social Survey Dataset, report the mean of Age. If you are using the HS Long Survey Dataset, report the mean of X1SES. See pages 533 and 534 in your Warner textbook for an excellent APA-compliant write-up of a factorial analysis of variance.

SPE/574: Characteristics Of Intellectual/developmental DisabilitiesWk 6 – Observation, Conference, and Mini-Lesson^ – Lesson Plan and Reflection [due Mon]Assignment ContentReview the mini-lesson that you discussed with the cooperating teacher in Week 3.Make the necessary adaptations to meet the needs of the small group, or the individual student’s exceptionality and communication skill needs.Include the following elements in your mini-lesson:Description of instructional approach and explanation of why you chose itTargeted communication skill(s) and strategies being usedModifications and accommodationsLearner supports, such as assistive technologyA formative assessment and a summative assessment to measure student learning (exceptionality-specific)Teach the mini-lesson in a small group or to an individual in a one-on-one setting.Consider using methods of delivery (technology, oral, etc.) that promote expressive and receptive communication skill reinforcement, meet the needs of the exceptionalities, and ensure student engagement.Write a 275- to 350-word reflection that describes the following:Overall teaching experienceInitial changes you made to adapt the lessonChanges you would make after teaching the lessonSubmit the following:Original lesson planAdapted lesson planReflection

Were the Mongols barbaric?Sources: Escaping the Mongols: A Survivor’s Account from the 13th Century” http://www.medievalists.net/2018/01/escaping-mongols-survivors-account-13th-century/ “William of Rubruck’s Account of the Mongols” https://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/texts/rubruck.htmlInstruction:Through roughly 70 years of military campaigning, the Mongols established the largest contiguous land empire in world history. As the historian Morris Rossabi explains, because of the speed and ruthlessness with which they did so, the Mongols have been portrayed as barbaric in Persian, Chinese, and Russian accounts. Yet, the Mongols were certainly not the first or the last to brutally conquer others in the quest for empire. This raises the question as to whether, in other facets of their lives, the Mongols are as barbaric as these sources show them to be.Outsider accounts of the Mongols are available that offer insight into their culture and way of life. For example, one of the earliest and most useful accounts was written by William of Rubruck, a Catholic missionary (a Flemish Franciscan, to be precise) who traveled through Mongol territory from 1253 to 1255 CE.For this discussion, review the short article about Mongols methods of warfare, “Escaping the Mongols.” Then read sections of William of Rubruck’s account that pertain to Mongol culture or that are of particular interest to you (especially “Mongols social and religious customs”, “Funeral Practices”, “The Khan’s Palace at Karakorum”, “Religious Customs”).Does William of Rubruck’s account show another side to Mongol culture different from what one might see solely from considering the way they waged war? Are they wholly barbaric or also civilized and sophisticated? Choose at least four examples from William of Rubruck’s account to explain your answer.For more background on the Mongols, see “The Mongols in World History” under “Supplemental Learning Materials”Please post your own response (2-3 paragraphs)