Reading, understanding, and appreciating original nursing research literature is essential for evidence-based practice (AACN, 2008; QSEN, 2018).PurposeThis assignment provides a learning activity for students to read an original research study and complete a worksheet to demonstrate understanding of the study purpose, design, sample, data collection, analysis, limitations, conclusions, and the importance of reading research literature.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 & 8)CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4, 8)CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs 7 & 8)Due DateSubmit the completed RRL Worksheet by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.PointsThis assignment is worth 200 points.Assignment Directions:Read over each of the following directions, the required Reading Research Literature worksheet, and grading rubric.Download and complete the required Reading Research Literature (RRL) worksheet (Links to an external site.).Download or access the required article. The required article must be used. O’Connor, M., Tanner, P. , Miller, L., Watts, K., & Musiello, T. (2017). Detecting distress: Introducing routine screening in a gynecological cancer setting. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 21(1), 79-85. Retrieved from https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? (Links to an external site.)You must use the grading rubric to ensure you are meeting all grading criteria of the worksheet.You are required to complete the worksheet using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the ".docx" format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.). Click on the envelope at the top of the page.Use correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and in-text APA formatting.Submit the completed Reading Research Literature Worksheet to the Week 6 Assignment.ReminderBefore preparing your assignment, please review this "Crediting Sources Made Simple (Links to an external site.)" resource. This tool is intended to help you understand scholarly writing, APA, referencing, and crediting. Please reach out to your instructor with any questions as you prepare your assignment.**Academic Integrity**Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment. Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.NOTE: Please use your browser's File setting to save or print this page.ReferencesAmerican Association of Colleges of Nurses (AACN). (2008). Executive summary: The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice (2008). Retrieved from http://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AAC...Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN). (2018). Quality and safety education for nurses competencies. Retrieved from http://qsen.org/competencies/pre-licensure-ksas/#e...RubricNR439 Reading Research Literature Worksheet RubricNR439 Reading Research Literature Worksheet RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose of the StudyUsing information from the required article and mostly your words, thoroughly summarize the purpose of the study. Describe what the study is about. Provide details.30.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.26.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.24.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.11.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeType of Research & the DesignUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize the description of the type of research and the design of the study. Include how it supports the purpose (aim or intent) of the study. Provide details.20.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.18.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.16.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.8.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSampleUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize the population (sample) for the study; include key characteristics, sample size, sampling technique. Provide details.20.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.18.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.16.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.8.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData CollectionUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize one data that was collected and how the data was collected from the study. Provide details.20.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.18.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details16.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.8.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData AnalysisUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the data analysis/ tests performed or one method of data analysis from the study; include what you know/learned about the descriptive or statistical test or data analysis method. Provide details.20.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.18.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.16.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.8.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitationsUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize one limitation reported in the study. Provide details.20.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.18.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.16.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.8.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFindings/DiscussionUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the authors' findings/discussion reported in the study. Include one interesting detail you learned from reading the study. Provide details.20.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.18.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.16.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.8.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReading Research LiteratureSummarize why it is important for you to read and understand research literature. Summarize what you learned from completing the reading research literature activity worksheet. Provide details.30.0 ptsThoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.26.0 ptsMostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.24.0 ptsMinimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.11.0 ptsPoorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.0.0 ptsAll criteria from the first column are missing.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing, Mechanics, Organization, Spelling, Sentence Structure, Grammar10.0 ptsExcellent writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. No errors or 1-2 errors noted.6.0 ptsGood writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. A few errors noted.4.0 ptsFair writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Some errors noted.3.0 ptsPoor writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Many errors noted.0.0 ptsVery poor writing, mechanics, and organization. Errors throughout are noted. Writing is difficult to understand or follow.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA In-Text Formatting for Cited Sentences10.0 ptsExcellent APA in-text formatting with no errors. Uses mostly your own words with no more than two direct quotes.5.0 ptsGood APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with 1-2 errors noted.4.0 ptsFair APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with some errors noted or does not use in-text citation formatting.3.0 ptsPoor APA formatting with many errors noted.0.0 ptsVery poor APA with errors noted throughout.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired RRL Worksheet and Required Article Use0.0 pts0 points deducted Required RRL Worksheet used for this assignment and Required Article used for this assignment. 0 points deducted0.0 pts20 points (10%) deducted Required RRL Worksheet NOT used and/or Required Article NOT used for this assignment results in a deduction of 20 points (10%). 20 points deducted0.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction0.0 pts0 point deductionSubmitted on time0.0 ptsNot submitted on time - Points deducted1 day late = 10 deduction; 2 days late = 20 deduction; 3 days late = 30 deduction; 4 days late = 40 deduction; 5 days late = 50 deduction; 6 days late = 60 deduction; 7 days late = 70 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late0.0 ptsTotal Points: 200.0

1. In a group of 92 students 40 have brown eyes, 35 have hazel eyes, and 17 have blue eyes. Find the probability that a student picked from this group at random either has hazel or brown eyes?Enter your answer as a fraction in the form a/b (for example 2/3, 5/7) or as an integer. 2. In a group of 45 boys; 17 own laptop, 19 own desktop computers, and 7 own both. Find the probability that a boy picked from this group at random owns either a laptop or a desktop computer?Enter your answer as a fraction in the form a/b (for example 2/3, 5/7) or as an integer.

A federal government agency that is responsible for setting vehicle fuel economy standards for automobile manufacturers is conducting research in order to update its fuel economy standards for the year 2030. Automobile manufacturers, and consumers, are highly interested in what the agency's findings and determinations will be as this will affect every vehicle in the United States. The federal government agency is very interested in the relationship between the weight of a vehicle and the vehicle's fuel economy (average miles per gallon (MPG)). Specifically, the agency is concerned that if the current trend of automobile manufacturers producing heavier new vehicles continues that its fuel economy targets will not be met. The agency's research department recently collected data for analysis in order to support the agency's upcoming discussion with the industry regarding its proposed 2030 fuel economy standards. The average MPG from a random sample of 750 vehicles was recently calculated by the agency. The research division also collected the vehicle weight of these 750 randomly sampled vehicles. The Vehicle Number, Type, Vehicle Weight, Average MPG, Fuel Tank Size (Gallons), Engine Size (Liters), and Meet or Not Meet Current Standards data were collected for these 750 vehicles. 1. Agency leadership is interested in analyzing the engine sizes of this sample of 750 vehicles. (Use the mean and standard deviation of the Engine Size (L) data. Also, if appropriate based upon your visual analysis of a histogram of the Engine Size (L) data, use the Normal distribution to answer this question.) ROUND TO TWO DECIMAL PLACES-Calculate the probability of randomly selecting a vehicle with an engine size less than 2.7 L.-Calculate the probability of randomly selecting a vehicle with an engine size greater than 3.9 L.-Calculate the probability of randomly selecting a vehicle with an engine between 3.1 L and 4.2 L.-Calculate the engine size that represents the 10th percentile of this sample.2. Agency leadership is very interested in trend analysis. Using the 750 randomly selected vehicles as their sample, data were collected to determine which vehicles currently meet or exceed fuel economy standards and which vehicles currently do not meet fuel economy standards. This information is found in the Meet or Not Meet Current Standards column. Agency leadership asks your team to construct a 95% One-Sample proportion confidence interval for the population proportion of all vehicles that meet current fuel economy standards. Assume that all necessary Central Limit Theorem conditions for a One-Proportion confidence interval have been met.-What is the 95% lower limit?-What is the 95% upper limit?-Using the 95% confidence interval, would it be plausible to conclude that the population proportion of vehicles that currently meet fuel economy standards is 90%?A. No, since 90% lies within the constructed confidence interval.B. Yes, since 90% lies within the constructed confidence interval.C. No, since 90% lies outside the constructed confidence interval.D. Yes, since 90% lies outside the constructed confidence interval.3. Agency leadership decides to run a One Proportion hypothesis test to determine if the proportion of all vehicles that meet or exceed current fuel economy standards is less than 90%. Assume that all necessary Central Limit Theorem conditions for a One-Proportion Z-test have been met.-What is the appropriate null hypothesis in this case? The proportion of all vehicles that meet or exceed current fuel economy standards is, less than, not equal to, greater than, or equal to, 90%.-What is the appropriate alternative hypothesis in this case? The proportion of all vehicles that meet or exceed current fuel economy standards is, less than, greater than, not equal to, or equal to, 90%.-What is the test statistic for this hypothesis test? The test statistic is-What is the p-value for this hypothesis test? The p-value is-What would you conclude based on an α=0.05 level?We, fail to reject or reject, the null hypothesis and, do not accept or accept, the alternative hypothesis since there,is not or is, sufficient evidence that the proportion of all vehicles that meet or exceed current fuel economy standards is, greater or less, than 90% due to the p-value being, greater or less, than the α level.-Explain the results of your hypothesis test. What does the p-value signify? Would you say the observed outcome was unusual? If so, how unusual was the outcome?4. Agency leadership decides to use the vehicle weight data from its random sample of 750 vehicles to estimate the mean vehicle weight of all passenger vehicles currently on the road. Construct a 95% One-Sample T confidence interval for the mean vehicle weight of all passenger vehicles currently on the road. Assume that all necessary Central Limit Theorem conditions for a One-Sample T confidence interval have been met.-What is the 95% lower limit?-What is the 95% upper limit?- Using the 95% confidence interval, would it be plausible to conclude that the mean vehicle weight of all passenger vehicles currently on the road is 2500 pounds?A. No, since 2500 lies within the constructed confidence intervalB. Yes, since 2500 lies outside the constructed confidence interval.C. Yes, since 2500 lies within the constructed confidence interval.D. No, since 2500 lies outside the constructed confidence interval.-Explain why the agency would construct a confidence interval instead of collecting vehicle weight information of all passenger vehicles currently on the road.5. Agency leadership decides to use the vehicle weight data from its random sample of 750 vehicles to estimate the mean vehicle weight of all passenger vehicles currently on the road. Construct a 90% One-Sample T confidence interval for the mean vehicle weight of all passenger vehicles currently on the road. Assume that all necessary Central Limit Theorem conditions for a One-Sample T confidence interval have been met.-What is the 90% lower limit?-What is the 90% upper limit?-Using the 90% confidence interval, would it be plausible to conclude that the mean vehicle weight of all passenger vehicles currently on the road is 2400 pounds?A. No, since 2400 lies outside the constructed confidence interval.B. Yes, since 2400 lies within the constructed confidence intervalC. Yes, since 2400 lies outside the constructed confidence interval.D. No, since 2400 lies within the constructed confidence interval.-Compare your 90% confidence interval to the 95% confidence interval, (2484.92, 2569.56). Explain which confidence interval is wider and why.6. Agency leadership decides to run a One Sample-T hypothesis test to determine if the mean vehicle weight of all passenger vehicles currently on the road is significantly different than 2600 pounds. Assume that all necessary Central Limit Theorem conditions for a One-Sample T-test have been met.-What is the appropriate null hypothesis in this case? The mean vehicle weight of all passenger vehicles currently on the road is, less than, greater than, or equal to, 2600 pounds.-What is the appropriate alternative hypothesis in this case? The mean vehicle weight of all passenger vehicles currently on the road is, greater than, not equal to, equal to, or less than, 2600 pounds.-What is the test statistic for this hypothesis test? The test statistic is-What is the p-value for this hypothesis test? The p-value is-What would you conclude based on an α=0.05 level? We, reject or fail to reject, the null hypothesis and, accept or do not accept, the alternative hypothesis since there, is or is not, sufficient evidence that the mean vehicle weight of all passenger vehicles currently on the road is, not equal to or equal to, 2600 pounds due to the p-value being, greater or less, than the α level.-Based upon your hypothesis test, was the observed outcome unusual? If so, how unusual was the outcome?