The purpose of this assignment is to examine the importance of informatics and evolving trends in personalized or precision medicine.As a health informaticist, create a 10-slide presentation to your clinical staff discussing the following:Discuss the role of personalized or precision medicine and the advantages and disadvantages of personalized or precision medicine in the delivery of health care.Discuss how the fields of personalized or precision medicine and informatics have mutually affected one another.Discuss the importance of creating personalized or precision medicine applications that collect accurate data and how those data are communicated to various locations and providers.Describe how personalized or precision medicine supports the aging population and population heath.Describe current gaps and challenges in personalized or precision medicine and informatics. How could the future of health informatics evolve over time to respond to those gaps? Integrate four or five scholarly articles in your paper.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.As referred above there should be 10 slides or more. This presentation needs to include speaker notes. Every slide with information needs to have detailed speaker notes that explains the information presented in each slide. The 10 slides does not include title slide or the reference slide. Please if you are not certain on how to work on this assignment, do not accept it. I want QUALITY work. The information needs to 100% follow the rubric or I will request for a refund. Also your references must be academic based. I do not want any information that is not academic based. Meaning it must be a peer reviewed article or an information from online that is either .edu, .org. I do not want any .com online information. Please follow the rubric. I am emphasizing again on following the rubric.

Deliverable Length: 750–1,000 wordsMary Francis has just returned to her office after attending preliminary discussions with investment bankers. Her last meeting regarding the intended capital structure of Apix went well, and she calls you into her office to discuss the next steps.“We will need to determine the required return for our intended project so that we have a decision criteria defined for the project,” she says.“Do you have the information I need to describe capital structure and to calculate the weighted average cost of capital (WACC)?” you ask.“I do,” she smiles. “We can determine the target WACC for Apix Printing Inc., given these assumptions,” she says as she hands you a piece of paper that says the following: Weights of 40% debt and 60% common equity (no preferred equity)A 35% tax rateCost of debt is 8%Beta of the company is 1.5Risk-free rate is 2%Return on the market is 11%“Great,” you say. “Thanks.”“Be sure to indicate how these costs of capital might be used to determine the feasibility of the capital project,” Mary says. “I want your recommendation about which is more appropriate to apply to project evaluation, too. Let me know what you think.”“One more thing,” she says as she stands up to signal the end of the meeting. “You did a good job with the explanations that you provided Luke the other day. Would you have time to define marginal cost of capital for me so I can include it in my discussions with investors? You seem to have a knack for making things accessible to nonfinancial folks.”“No problem,” you say. “I’m glad my explanations are so useful!”For this assignment, complete the following:Describe capital structure.Determine the WACC given the above assumptions.Indicate how these might be useful to determine the feasibility of the capital project.Recommend which is more appropriate to apply to project evaluation.Define marginal cost of capital.

Please write a 3-5 page paper discussing a topic of your choice from one of the chapters we have previously discussed.  Choose from chapters 1, 2, 3, or 5.  Choose one topic and explain why you believe that is appropriate or suggest a change and why the change to the law should be made to improve the law.