1.  Introduction: Explain the issue you are examining and why it is significant. a.  Describe the general area being studied. b.  Explain why this area is important to the general area under study. c.  State your research problem first. d.  Explain the background to the research problem. e.  State your research questions. f.  Justify the proposed study. g.  List the issues that emerge from the problem. 2.  Rationale: Explain how these questions are related to the larger issues raised in the introduction. a.  Describe what specific claim, hypothesis, or model of criminal justice you will evaluate with these questions. b.  Explain what the hypothesis will suggest about criminal justice theory if confirmed. c.  Explain what the hypothesis will suggest about criminal justice theory if not confirmed. 3.  Background or literature review: description of what is known about this area and short discussion of why background studies are not sufficient a.  Summarize what is known about the field. Include a summary of background information on the topic from your literature review. You may include information from the book and class, but the bulk of the information must be outside sources. b.  Discuss several critical studies done in this area, citing consistent with APA guidelines. Use current references, studies, and material that is fewer than 5 years old, unless it is the only literature that addresses the topic. c.  Point out why these studies are insufficient. In other words, what questions do they leave unresolved that you would like to study? I only need 2c answered in one page APA format that is due today 10/7/2013 before noon and if you agree send me a message so I can send you the other information

You are working at a law firm on a negligence case for the defendant. Outline a plan for discovery where spending is not an issue. How would your plan differ if your client was poor? How do Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 16 and 26 relate to the response? *** 200 - 250 words 100% Plagiarism free Original work***

A forensic psychologist is often hired by the defense or the prosecutor to assist with jury selection. Using the library, Internet, or any other available materials, discuss in detail the following:What would this psychologist be looking for during voir dire and in investigations of the jury pool?What, if any, different analysis techniques might a psychologist use when assisting the defense versus assisting the prosecution?Why would the items being investigated be important to the defense or to the prosecution?What specific area of forensics are you interested in, or what type of position are you interested in?i need 5 good reference please and a low score on the scale for coping and it has to be 1100 words  i need it by tomorrow night please i will pay for your work but i need to check it first  last time  i had to redue it before i could turn it in and i still had to pay. introbody conculdes