Western Carolina University Six Myths and Six Principles Discussion

User Generated

ahmedalouda

Writing

Western Carolina University

Description

David Orr's essay takes up 6 myths and 6 principles --

choose one from each category that resonates with you and discuss why you choose that one myth and that one principle.

How do you see it reflected in your own life?

Unformatted Attachment Preview

The End of Nature In The End of Nature, Bill McKibben, a writer from the Adirondack region of New York, laments the loss of a pristine natural world untouched by human hands and capable of sustaining and renewing itself indefinitely. With the advent of such global environmental problems as acid rain, the greenhouse effect, the depletion of the ozone layer, and the massive destruction of tropical rain forests, humankind has lost its sense of nature as an infinitely renewable resource capable of absorbing any amount of human alteration. Whatever we think nature is—the external world, wilderness, the biosphere, the source of life, God—it can no longer be considered a force independent of human impact. The air, the water, trees, land, and oceans all have become increasingly subject to environmental degradation to the point that they have lost their natural resiliency. Earth, Gaia itself, is like a great organism suffering from the impact of man’s technological civilization. In his title essay, McKibben laments the loss of the concept of wilderness, or unspoiled nature. Increasingly, everything in the natural world is in some way altered by human use. Along with the loss of the last remnants of pristine natural environment, McKibben suggests, we are losing our idea of nature, so that we can no longer appreciate the value of an unspoiled natural environment. Unspoiled nature is our Eden, our genesis, our point of departure. Surrounded by a monotonous, artificial landscape of urban sprawl, we feel the need for pristine nature, untouched by human presence. Such wilderness is valuable for its own sake, for its spiritual value, as Henry David Thoreau and other naturalists have argued. The existence of wilderness reminds us of those natural forces beyond human control, but such places are increasingly difficult to find. Westerners have traditionally viewed the natural world as a collection of natural resources to be developed—as sources of food, habitat, and raw materials—or as an adversary to be conquered rather than as a sacred, nurturing habitat in which humans take their place alongside other forms of life. Lacking primitive human sense of the sacredness of the natural world, the artist’s aesthetic appreciation of natural beauty, and the conservationist’s sense of prudent husbandry, we have heedlessly consumed and polluted the natural resources necessary to sustain the earth’s biosphere. Awareness of an impending global environmental crisis suggests that the earth’s natural, self-regulating systems have reached the limits of their capacity to absorb manmade pollutants and are being seriously degraded by the deluge of toxic environmental pollutants. With the loss of the health of the natural environment, McKibben argues, humans will be forced to manage the entire planet as an artificial environment—as a convalescing patient whose health must be constantly monitored. This would be a profoundly depressing fact if it could be proved incontrovertibly true; most of McKibben’s arguments, however, are unprovable assertions based upon extrapolations from scientific evidence. Huge natural cataclysms have occurred periodically in the history of the earth, McKibben concedes, and aside from computer-generated models or extrapolations, there is no clear way of predicting the effects of possible human global alterations of the natural environment. The warning signs, however, of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, with dire forecasts of global warming, massive changes in weather patterns, melting of the polar ice caps, and a consequent rise in the level of the oceans, have given scientists pause for thought. In much the same way that studies of the global consequences of nuclear war led to the hypothesis of a nuclear winter, McKibben is warning of the equally serious cumulative effects of global atmospheric pollution from the burning of fossil fuels. McKibben’s argument feels like an absolute, ( entitled: “end of nature”) but this is more of slogan, caution, and hyperbole than scientific insight. Perhaps we are indeed reaching a great watershed in human civilization, akin to the introduction of domesticated crops or animals, as a result of which we will henceforth become stewards of a domesticated global environment; perhaps, however, the natural world is more resilient than McKibben imagines. As McKibben makes his case for global environmental crisis in terms of the scope and degree of our environmental impact, what concerns you? Is humankind, in terms of McKibben’s view, not at least in some sense, a part of nature? Read his article “Do the Math” or watch the film on Youtube (same title). Link: The myth I found most resonated with me was "knowledge is increasing and by implication human goodness." Information is so readily available everywhere all the time and I know from experience that just because there is an excess of knowledge doesn't mean that human goodness is in excess. On the contrary, more knowledge has created more division and made people turn on each other. There are many issues that have become "big deals" but really, they're inconsequential compared to information that we need to know for survival. The principle that most resonated with me was "knowledge carries with it the responsibility to see that it is well used in the world. " I think that knowledge can be used for good and evil and if we truly hold a belief in this knowledge, it should be used to help benefit the world. We use knowledge to learn more about places, people, topics, and more to better understand them and when I think about my own journey through education, I know that I want to use my knowledge to help others and make the world a better place.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer:
250 words
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.

1

David Orr’s essay & Reply
Student’s Name
Institutional affiliation

2

Discussion
David Orr's essay includes six myths and six principles, and out of these, I selected one
of each to discuss. The principle I relate with is "knowledge must come responsibility, " which
is reflected so much in my own life. The more that I am learning and educated, the more the
responsibility I have towards o...

Similar Content

Related Tags