The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
The Case for
Reparations
Two hundred fifty years of slavery. Ninety years of Jim Crow. Sixty
years of separate but equal. Thirty-five years of racist housing
policy. Until we reckon with our compounding moral debts,
America will never be whole.
Carlos Javier Ortiz
TA-NEHISI COATES
|
JUNE 2014 ISSUE
|
BUSINESS
And if thy brother, a Hebrew man, or a Hebrew woman, be sold unto thee, and
serve thee six years; then in the seventh year thou shalt let him go free from thee.
And when thou sendest him out free from thee, thou shalt not let him go away
empty: thou shalt furnish him liberally out of thy flock, and out of thy floor,
1 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
and out of thy winepress: of that wherewith the LORD thy God hath blessed thee
thou shalt give unto him. And thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman
in the land of Eg ypt, and the LORD thy God redeemed thee: therefore I
command thee this thing today.
— DEUTERONOMY 15: 12–15
Besides the crime which consists in violating the law, and varying from the right
rule of reason, whereby a man so far becomes degenerate, and declares himself
to quit the principles of human nature, and to be a noxious creature, there is
commonly injury done to some person or other, and some other man receives
damage by his transgression: in which case he who hath received any damage,
has, besides the right of punishment common to him with other men, a
particular right to seek reparation.
— JOHN LOCKE, “SECOND TREATISE”
By our unpaid labor and suffering, we have earned the right to the soil, many
times over and over, and now we are determined to have it.
— ANONYMOUS, 1861
I. “So That’s Just One Of My Losses”
C
LYDE ROSS was born in 1923, the seventh of 13 children, near
Clarksdale, Mississippi, the home of the blues. Ross’s parents
owned and farmed a 40-acre tract of land, flush with cows, hogs,
and mules. Ross’s mother would drive to Clarksdale to do her shopping in
a horse and buggy, in which she invested all the pride one might place in a
Cadillac. The family owned another horse, with a red coat, which they
gave to Clyde. The Ross family wanted for little, save that which all black
2 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
families in the Deep South then desperately desired—the protection of the
law.
In the 1920s, Jim Crow
Mississippi was, in all
facets of society, a
kleptocracy. The majority
of the people in the state
were perpetually robbed
of the vote—a hijacking
engineered through the
trickery of the poll tax and
the muscle of the lynch
mob. Between 1882 and
1968, more black people
were lynched in
Mississippi than in any
other state. “You and I
Clyde Ross, photographed in November 2013 in his
home in the North Lawndale neighborhood of Chicago,
where he has lived for more than 50 years. When he first
tried to get a legitimate mortgage, he was denied;
mortgages were effectively not available to black people.
(Carlos Javier Ortiz)
know what’s the best way
to keep the nigger from
voting,” blustered
Theodore Bilbo, a
Mississippi senator and a
proud Klansman. “You do
it the night before the
election.”
The state’s regime partnered robbery of the franchise with robbery of the
purse. Many of Mississippi’s black farmers lived in debt peonage, under
the sway of cotton kings who were at once their landlords, their employers,
3 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
and their primary merchants. Tools and necessities were advanced against
the return on the crop, which was determined by the employer. When
farmers were deemed to be in debt—and they often were—the negative
balance was then carried over to the next season. A man or woman who
protested this arrangement did so at the risk of grave injury or death.
Refusing to work meant arrest under vagrancy laws and forced labor under
the state’s penal system.
Well into the 20th century, black people spoke of their flight from
Mississippi in much the same manner as their runagate ancestors had. In
her 2010 book, The Warmth of Other Suns, Isabel Wilkerson tells the story
of Eddie Earvin, a spinach picker who fled Mississippi in 1963, after being
made to work at gunpoint. “You didn’t talk about it or tell nobody,” Earvin
said. “You had to sneak away.”
“Some of the land taken from
black families has become a
country club in Virginia,” the AP
reported.
When Clyde Ross was still a child, Mississippi authorities claimed his
father owed $3,000 in back taxes. The elder Ross could not read. He did
not have a lawyer. He did not know anyone at the local courthouse. He
could not expect the police to be impartial. Effectively, the Ross family had
no way to contest the claim and no protection under the law. The
authorities seized the land. They seized the buggy. They took the cows,
4 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
hogs, and mules. And so for the upkeep of separate but equal, the entire
Ross family was reduced to sharecropping.
This was hardly unusual. In 2001, the Associated Press published a
three-part investigation into the theft of black-owned land stretching back
to the antebellum period. The series documented some 406 victims and
24,000 acres of land valued at tens of millions of dollars. The land was
taken through means ranging from legal chicanery to terrorism. “Some of
the land taken from black families has become a country club in Virginia,”
the AP reported, as well as “oil fields in Mississippi” and “a baseball spring
training facility in Florida.”
Clyde Ross was a smart child. His teacher thought he should attend a more
challenging school. There was very little support for educating black
people in Mississippi. But Julius Rosenwald, a part owner of Sears,
Roebuck, had begun an ambitious effort to build schools for black children
throughout the South. Ross’s teacher believed he should attend the local
Rosenwald school. It was too far for Ross to walk and get back in time to
work in the fields. Local white children had a school bus. Clyde Ross did
not, and thus lost the chance to better his education.
Then, when Ross was 10 years old, a group of white men demanded his
only childhood possession—the horse with the red coat. “You can’t have
this horse. We want it,” one of the white men said. They gave Ross’s father
$17.
“I did everything for that horse,” Ross told me. “Everything. And they
took him. Put him on the racetrack. I never did know what happened to
him after that, but I know they didn’t bring him back. So that’s just one of
my losses.”
5 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
Sharecropper boys in 1936 (Carly Mydans/Library of Congress)
The losses mounted. As sharecroppers, the Ross family saw their wages
treated as the landlord’s slush fund. Landowners were supposed to split
the profits from the cotton fields with sharecroppers. But bales would often
disappear during the count, or the split might be altered on a whim. If
cotton was selling for 50 cents a pound, the Ross family might get 15
cents, or only five. One year Ross’s mother promised to buy him a $7 suit
for a summer program at their church. She ordered the suit by mail. But
that year Ross’s family was paid only five cents a pound for cotton. The
mailman arrived with the suit. The Rosses could not pay. The suit was sent
back. Clyde Ross did not go to the church program.
It was in these early years that Ross
REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK
Elegant Racism
6 of 70
began to understand himself as an
American—he did not live under the
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
“If you sought to advantage one group
of Americans and disadvantage
another, you could scarcely choose a
more graceful method than housing
discrimination.”
Read more
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
blind decree of justice, but under the
heel of a regime that elevated armed
robbery to a governing principle. He
thought about fighting. “Just be
quiet,” his father told him. “Because
they’ll come and kill us all.”
Clyde Ross grew. He was drafted into the Army. The draft officials offered
him an exemption if he stayed home and worked. He preferred to take his
chances with war. He was stationed in California. He found that he could
go into stores without being bothered. He could walk the streets without
being harassed. He could go into a restaurant and receive service.
Ross was shipped off to Guam. He fought in World War II to save the world
from tyranny. But when he returned to Clarksdale, he found that tyranny
had followed him home. This was 1947, eight years before Mississippi
lynched Emmett Till and tossed his broken body into the Tallahatchie
River. The Great Migration, a mass exodus of 6 million African Americans
that spanned most of the 20th century, was now in its second wave. The
black pilgrims did not journey north simply seeking better wages and
work, or bright lights and big adventures. They were fleeing the acquisitive
warlords of the South. They were seeking the protection of the law.
Clyde Ross was among them. He came to Chicago in 1947 and took a job
as a taster at Campbell’s Soup. He made a stable wage. He married. He
had children. His paycheck was his own. No Klansmen stripped him of the
vote. When he walked down the street, he did not have to move because a
white man was walking past. He did not have to take off his hat or avert his
gaze. His journey from peonage to full citizenship seemed near-complete.
Only one item was missing—a home, that final badge of entry into the
7 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
sacred order of the American middle class of the Eisenhower years.
In 1961, Ross and his wife bought a house in North Lawndale, a bustling
community on Chicago’s West Side. North Lawndale had long been a
predominantly Jewish neighborhood, but a handful of middle-class
African Americans had lived there starting in the ’40s. The community
was anchored by the sprawling Sears, Roebuck headquarters. North
Lawndale’s Jewish People’s Institute actively encouraged blacks to move
into the neighborhood, seeking to make it a “pilot community for
interracial living.” In the battle for integration then being fought around
the country, North Lawndale seemed to offer promising terrain. But out in
the tall grass, highwaymen, nefarious as any Clarksdale kleptocrat, were
lying in wait.
From the 1930s through the
1960s, black people across the
country were largely cut out of the
legitimate home-mortgage
market.
Three months after Clyde Ross moved into his house, the boiler blew out.
This would normally be a homeowner’s responsibility, but in fact, Ross
was not really a homeowner. His payments were made to the seller, not
the bank. And Ross had not signed a normal mortgage. He’d bought “on
contract”: a predatory agreement that combined all the responsibilities of
8 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
homeownership with all the disadvantages of renting—while offering the
benefits of neither. Ross had bought his house for $27,500. The seller, not
the previous homeowner but a new kind of middleman, had bought it for
only $12,000 six months before selling it to Ross. In a contract sale, the
seller kept the deed until the contract was paid in full—and, unlike with a
normal mortgage, Ross would acquire no equity in the meantime. If he
missed a single payment, he would immediately forfeit his $1,000 down
payment, all his monthly payments, and the property itself.
The men who peddled contracts in North Lawndale would sell homes at
inflated prices and then evict families who could not pay—taking their
down payment and their monthly installments as profit. Then they’d bring
in another black family, rinse, and repeat. “He loads them up with
payments they can’t meet,” an office secretary told The Chicago Daily News
of her boss, the speculator Lou Fushanis, in 1963. “Then he takes the
property away from them. He’s sold some of the buildings three or four
times.”
Ross had tried to get a legitimate mortgage in another neighborhood, but
was told by a loan officer that there was no financing available. The truth
was that there was no financing for people like Clyde Ross. From the
1930s through the 1960s, black people across the country were largely cut
out of the legitimate home-mortgage market through means both legal
and extralegal. Chicago whites employed every measure, from “restrictive
covenants” to bombings, to keep their neighborhoods segregated.
Their efforts were buttressed by the federal government. In 1934,
Congress created the Federal Housing Administration. The FHA insured
private mortgages, causing a drop in interest rates and a decline in the size
of the down payment required to buy a house. But an insured mortgage
9 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
was not a possibility for Clyde Ross. The FHA had adopted a system of
maps that rated neighborhoods according to their perceived stability. On
the maps, green areas, rated “A,” indicated “in demand” neighborhoods
that, as one appraiser put it, lacked “a single foreigner or Negro.” These
neighborhoods were considered excellent prospects for insurance.
Neighborhoods where black people lived were rated “D” and were usually
considered ineligible for FHA backing. They were colored in red. Neither
the percentage of black people living there nor their social class mattered.
Black people were viewed as a contagion. Redlining went beyond
FHA-backed loans and spread to the entire mortgage industry, which was
already rife with racism, excluding black people from most legitimate
means of obtaining a mortgage.
Explore Redlining in Chicago
A 1939 Home Owners’ Loan Corporation “Residential Security Map” of Chicago shows
10 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
discrimination against low-income and minority neighborhoods. The residents of the areas
marked in red (representing “hazardous” real-estate markets) were denied FHA-backed
mortgages. (Map development by Frankie Dintino)
“A government offering such bounty to builders and lenders could have
required compliance with a nondiscrimination policy,” Charles Abrams,
the urban-studies expert who helped create the New York City Housing
Authority, wrote in 1955. “Instead, the FHA adopted a racial policy that
could well have been culled from the Nuremberg laws.”
The devastating effects are cogently outlined by Melvin L. Oliver and
Thomas M. Shapiro in their 1995 book, Black Wealth/White Wealth:
Locked out of the greatest mass-based opportunity for wealth
accumulation in American history, African Americans who
desired and were able to afford home ownership found
themselves consigned to central-city communities where their
investments were affected by the “self-fulfilling prophecies” of
the FHA appraisers: cut off from sources of new investment[,]
their homes and communities deteriorated and lost value in
comparison to those homes and communities that FHA
appraisers deemed desirable.
In Chicago and across the country, whites looking to achieve the American
dream could rely on a legitimate credit system backed by the government.
Blacks were herded into the sights of unscrupulous lenders who took them
for money and for sport. “It was like people who like to go out and shoot
lions in Africa. It was the same thrill,” a housing attorney told the historian
Beryl Satter in her 2009 book, Family Properties. “The thrill of the chase
11 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
and the kill.”
The kill was profitable. At the time of
REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK
The American Case Against a Black
Middle Class
“When a black family in Chicago saves
up enough to move out of the crowded
slums into Cicero, the neighborhood
riots.”
Read more
his death, Lou Fushanis owned more
than 600 properties, many of them in
North Lawndale, and his estate was
estimated to be worth $3 million.
He’d made much of this money by
exploiting the frustrated hopes of
black migrants like Clyde Ross.
During this period, according to one estimate, 85 percent of all black
home buyers who bought in Chicago bought on contract. “If anybody who
is well established in this business in Chicago doesn’t earn $100,000 a
year,” a contract seller told The Saturday Evening Post in 1962, “he is
loafing.”
Contract sellers became rich. North Lawndale became a ghetto.
Clyde Ross still lives there. He still owns his home. He is 91, and the
emblems of survival are all around him—awards for service in his
community, pictures of his children in cap and gown. But when I asked
him about his home in North Lawndale, I heard only anarchy.
“We were ashamed. We did not want anyone to know that we were that
ignorant,” Ross told me. He was sitting at his dining-room table. His
glasses were as thick as his Clarksdale drawl. “I’d come out of Mississippi
where there was one mess, and come up here and got in another mess. So
how dumb am I? I didn’t want anyone to know how dumb I was.
“When I found myself caught up in it, I said, ‘How? I just left this mess. I
just left no laws. And no regard. And then I come here and get cheated
12 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
wide open.’ I would probably want to do some harm to some people, you
know, if I had been violent like some of us. I thought, ‘Man, I got caught up
in this stuff. I can’t even take care of my kids.’ I didn’t have enough for my
kids. You could fall through the cracks easy fighting these white people.
And no law.”
Blacks were herded into the sights
of unscrupulous lenders who took
them for money and for sport.
But fight Clyde Ross did. In 1968 he joined the newly formed Contract
Buyers League—a collection of black homeowners on Chicago’s South and
West Sides, all of whom had been locked into the same system of
predation. There was Howell Collins, whose contract called for him to pay
$25,500 for a house that a speculator had bought for $14,500. There was
Ruth Wells, who’d managed to pay out half her contract, expecting a
mortgage, only to suddenly see an insurance bill materialize out of thin
air—a requirement the seller had added without Wells’s knowledge.
Contract sellers used every tool at their disposal to pilfer from their clients.
They scared white residents into selling low. They lied about properties’
compliance with building codes, then left the buyer responsible when city
inspectors arrived. They presented themselves as real-estate brokers,
when in fact they were the owners. They guided their clients to lawyers
who were in on the scheme.
The Contract Buyers League fought back. Members—who would
13 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
eventually number more than 500—went out to the posh suburbs where
the speculators lived and embarrassed them by knocking on their
neighbors’ doors and informing them of the details of the contract-lending
trade. They refused to pay their installments, instead holding monthly
payments in an escrow account. Then they brought a suit against the
contract sellers, accusing them of buying properties and reselling in such a
manner “to reap from members of the Negro race large and unjust
profits.”
The story of Clyde Ross and the Contract Buyers League
In return for the “deprivations of their rights and privileges under the
Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments,” the league demanded “prayers
for relief”—payback of all moneys paid on contracts and all moneys paid
for structural improvement of properties, at 6 percent interest minus a
“fair, non-discriminatory” rental price for time of occupation. Moreover,
the league asked the court to adjudge that the defendants had “acted
14 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
willfully and maliciously and that malice is the gist of this action.”
Ross and the Contract Buyers League were no longer appealing to the
government simply for equality. They were no longer fleeing in hopes of a
better deal elsewhere. They were charging society with a crime against
their community. They wanted the crime publicly ruled as such. They
wanted the crime’s executors declared to be offensive to society. And they
wanted restitution for the great injury brought upon them by said
offenders. In 1968, Clyde Ross and the Contract Buyers League were no
longer simply seeking the protection of the law. They were seeking
reparations.
II. “A Difference of Kind, Not Degree”
A
CCORDING TO THE MOST-RECENT STATISTICS, North Lawndale is
now on the wrong end of virtually every socioeconomic indicator.
In 1930 its population was 112,000. Today it is 36,000. The
halcyon talk of “interracial living” is dead. The neighborhood is 92
percent black. Its homicide rate is 45 per 100,000—triple the rate of the
city as a whole. The infant-mortality rate is 14 per 1,000—more than
twice the national average. Forty-three percent of the people in North
Lawndale live below the poverty line—double Chicago’s overall rate.
Forty-five percent of all households are on food stamps—nearly three
times the rate of the city at large. Sears, Roebuck left the neighborhood in
1987, taking 1,800 jobs with it. Kids in North Lawndale need not be
confused about their prospects: Cook County’s Juvenile Temporary
Detention Center sits directly adjacent to the neighborhood.
North Lawndale is an extreme portrait of the trends that ail black Chicago.
Such is the magnitude of these ailments that it can be said that blacks and
15 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
whites do not inhabit the same city. The average per capita income of
Chicago’s white neighborhoods is almost three times that of its black
neighborhoods. When the Harvard sociologist Robert J. Sampson
examined incarceration rates in Chicago in his 2012 book, Great American
City, he found that a black neighborhood with one of the highest
incarceration rates (West Garfield Park) had a rate more than 40 times as
high as the white neighborhood with the highest rate (Clearing). “This is a
staggering differential, even for community-level comparisons,” Sampson
writes. “A difference of kind, not degree.”
Interactive Census Map
Explore race, unemployment, and vacancy rates over seven decades in Chicago. (Map design and
development by Frankie Dintino)
16 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
In other words, Chicago’s impoverished black neighborhoods
—characterized by high unemployment and households headed by single
parents—are not simply poor; they are “ecologically distinct.” This “is not
simply the same thing as low economic status,” writes Sampson. “In this
pattern Chicago is not alone.”
The lives of black Americans are better than they were half a century ago.
The humiliation of WHITES ONLY signs are gone. Rates of black poverty
have decreased. Black teen-pregnancy rates are at record lows—and the
gap between black and white teen-pregnancy rates has shrunk
significantly. But such progress rests on a shaky foundation, and fault lines
are everywhere. The income gap between black and white households is
roughly the same today as it was in 1970. Patrick Sharkey, a sociologist at
New York University, studied children born from 1955 through 1970 and
found that 4 percent of whites and 62 percent of blacks across America
had been raised in poor neighborhoods. A generation later, the same study
showed, virtually nothing had changed. And whereas whites born into
affluent neighborhoods tended to remain in affluent neighborhoods,
blacks tended to fall out of them.
This is not surprising. Black families, regardless of income, are
significantly less wealthy than white families. The Pew Research Center
estimates that white households are worth roughly 20 times as much as
black households, and that whereas only 15 percent of whites have zero or
negative wealth, more than a third of blacks do. Effectively, the black
family in America is working without a safety net. When financial calamity
strikes—a medical emergency, divorce, job loss—the fall is precipitous.
And just as black families of all incomes remain handicapped by a lack of
wealth, so too do they remain handicapped by their restricted choice of
17 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
neighborhood. Black people with upper-middle-class incomes do not
generally live in upper-middle-class neighborhoods. Sharkey’s research
shows that black families making $100,000 typically live in the kinds of
neighborhoods inhabited by white families making $30,000. “Blacks and
whites inhabit such different neighborhoods,” Sharkey writes, “that it is
not possible to compare the economic outcomes of black and white
children.”
A national real-estate association
advised not to sell to “a colored
man of means who was giving his
children a college education.”
The implications are chilling. As a rule, poor black people do not work
their way out of the ghetto—and those who do often face the horror of
watching their children and grandchildren tumble back.
Even seeming evidence of progress withers under harsh light. In 2012, the
Manhattan Institute cheerily noted that segregation had declined since the
1960s. And yet African Americans still remained—by far—the most
segregated ethnic group in the country.
With segregation, with the isolation of the injured and the robbed, comes
the concentration of disadvantage. An unsegregated America might see
poverty, and all its effects, spread across the country with no particular
bias toward skin color. Instead, the concentration of poverty has been
18 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
paired with a concentration of melanin. The resulting conflagration has
been devastating.
One thread of thinking in the African American community holds that
these depressing numbers partially stem from cultural pathologies that can
be altered through individual grit and exceptionally good behavior. (In
2011, Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, responding to violence among
young black males, put the blame on the family: “Too many men making
too many babies they don’t want to take care of, and then we end up
dealing with your children.” Nutter turned to those presumably fatherless
babies: “Pull your pants up and buy a belt, because no one wants to see
your underwear or the crack of your butt.”) The thread is as old as black
politics itself. It is also wrong. The kind of trenchant racism to which black
people have persistently been subjected can never be defeated by making
its victims more respectable. The essence of American racism is
disrespect. And in the wake of the grim numbers, we see the grim
inheritance.
The Contract Buyers League’s suit brought by Clyde Ross and his allies
took direct aim at this inheritance. The suit was rooted in Chicago’s long
history of segregation, which had created two housing markets—one
legitimate and backed by the government, the other lawless and patrolled
by predators. The suit dragged on until 1976, when the league lost a jury
trial. Securing the equal protection of the law proved hard; securing
reparations proved impossible. If there were any doubts about the mood of
the jury, the foreman removed them by saying, when asked about the
verdict, that he hoped it would help end “the mess Earl Warren made with
Brown v. Board of Education and all that nonsense.”
19 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
An unsegregated America might
see poverty spread across the
country, with no particular bias
toward skin color.
The Supreme Court seems to share that sentiment. The past two decades
have witnessed a rollback of the progressive legislation of the 1960s.
Liberals have found themselves on the defensive. In 2008, when Barack
Obama was a candidate for president, he was asked whether his daughters
—Malia and Sasha—should benefit from affirmative action. He answered
in the negative.
The exchange rested upon an erroneous comparison of the average
American white family and the exceptional first family. In the contest of
upward mobility, Barack and Michelle Obama have won. But they’ve won
by being twice as good—and enduring twice as much. Malia and Sasha
Obama enjoy privileges beyond the average white child’s dreams. But that
comparison is incomplete. The more telling question is how they compare
with Jenna and Barbara Bush—the products of many generations of
privilege, not just one. Whatever the Obama children achieve, it will be
evidence of their family’s singular perseverance, not of broad equality.
20 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
III. “We Inherit Our Ample Patrimony”
I
N 1783, the freedwoman Belinda Royall petitioned the
commonwealth of Massachusetts for reparations. Belinda had been
born in modern-day Ghana. She was kidnapped as a child and sold
into slavery. She endured the Middle Passage and 50 years of enslavement
at the hands of Isaac Royall and his son. But the junior Royall, a British
loyalist, fled the country during the Revolution. Belinda, now free after
half a century of labor, beseeched the nascent Massachusetts legislature:
The face of your Petitioner, is now marked with the furrows of
time, and her frame bending under the oppression of years,
while she, by the Laws of the Land, is denied the employment of
21 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
one morsel of that immense wealth, apart whereof hath been
accumilated by her own industry, and the whole augmented by
her servitude.
WHEREFORE, casting herself at your feet if your honours, as to
a body of men, formed for the extirpation of vassalage, for the
reward of Virtue, and the just return of honest industry—she
prays, that such allowance may be made her out of the Estate of
Colonel Royall, as will prevent her, and her more infirm
daughter, from misery in the greatest extreme, and scatter
comfort over the short and downward path of their lives.
Belinda Royall was granted a pension of 15 pounds and 12 shillings, to be
paid out of the estate of Isaac Royall—one of the earliest successful
attempts to petition for reparations. At the time, black people in America
had endured more than 150 years of enslavement, and the idea that they
might be owed something in return was, if not the national consensus, at
least not outrageous.
22 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
Click the image above to view the full document.
“A heavy account lies against us as a civil society for oppressions
committed against people who did not injure us,” wrote the Quaker John
Woolman in 1769, “and that if the particular case of many individuals
were fairly stated, it would appear that there was considerable due to
them.”
As the historian Roy E. Finkenbine has documented, at the dawn of this
country, black reparations were actively considered and often effected.
Quakers in New York, New England, and Baltimore went so far as to make
“membership contingent upon compensating one’s former slaves.” In
1782, the Quaker Robert Pleasants emancipated his 78 slaves, granted
them 350 acres, and later built a school on their property and provided for
their education. “The doing of this justice to the injured Africans,” wrote
Pleasants, “would be an acceptable offering to him who ‘Rules in the
kingdom of men.’ ”
23 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
Click the image above to view the full document.
Edward Coles, a protégé of Thomas Jefferson who became a slaveholder
through inheritance, took many of his slaves north and granted them a plot
of land in Illinois. John Randolph, a cousin of Jefferson’s, willed that all his
slaves be emancipated upon his death, and that all those older than 40 be
given 10 acres of land. “I give and bequeath to all my slaves their
freedom,” Randolph wrote, “heartily regretting that I have been the owner
of one.”
In his book Forever Free, Eric Foner recounts the story of a disgruntled
planter reprimanding a freedman loafing on the job:
Planter: “You lazy nigger, I am losing a whole day’s labor by
you.”
Freedman: “Massa, how many days’ labor have I lost by you?”
24 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
In the 20th century, the cause of reparations was taken up by a diverse cast
that included the Confederate veteran Walter R. Vaughan, who believed
that reparations would be a stimulus for the South; the black activist Callie
House; black-nationalist leaders like “Queen Mother” Audley Moore; and
the civil-rights activist James Forman. The movement coalesced in 1987
under an umbrella organization called the National Coalition of Blacks for
Reparations in America (N’COBRA). The NAACP endorsed reparations in
1993. Charles J. Ogletree Jr., a professor at Harvard Law School, has
pursued reparations claims in court.
But while the people advocating reparations have changed over time, the
response from the country has remained virtually the same. “They have
been taught to labor,” the Chicago Tribune editorialized in 1891. “They
have been taught Christian civilization, and to speak the noble English
language instead of some African gibberish. The account is square with
the ex-slaves.”
Not exactly. Having been enslaved for 250 years, black people were not
left to their own devices. They were terrorized. In the Deep South, a
second slavery ruled. In the North, legislatures, mayors, civic associations,
banks, and citizens all colluded to pin black people into ghettos, where
they were overcrowded, overcharged, and undereducated. Businesses
discriminated against them, awarding them the worst jobs and the worst
wages. Police brutalized them in the streets. And the notion that black
lives, black bodies, and black wealth were rightful targets remained deeply
rooted in the broader society. Now we have half-stepped away from our
long centuries of despoilment, promising, “Never again.” But still we are
haunted. It is as though we have run up a credit-card bill and, having
pledged to charge no more, remain befuddled that the balance does not
disappear. The effects of that balance, interest accruing daily, are all
25 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
around us.
Broach the topic of reparations today and a barrage of questions inevitably
follows: Who will be paid? How much will they be paid? Who will pay? But
if the practicalities, not the justice, of reparations are the true sticking
point, there has for some time been the beginnings of a solution. For the
past 25 years, Congressman John Conyers Jr., who represents the Detroit
area, has marked every session of Congress by introducing a bill calling for
a congressional study of slavery and its lingering effects as well as
recommendations for “appropriate remedies.”
A country curious about how reparations might actually work has an easy
solution in Conyers’s bill, now called HR 40, the Commission to Study
Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act. We would support this
bill, submit the question to study, and then assess the possible solutions.
But we are not interested.
“It’s because it’s black folks making
REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK
What We Should Be Asking About
Reparations
“Any contemplation of compensated
emancipation must grapple with how
several counties, and some states in
the South, would react to finding
themselves suddenly outnumbered by
free black people.”
Read more
the claim,” Nkechi Taifa, who helped
found N’COBRA, says. “People who
talk about reparations are considered
left lunatics. But all we are talking
about is studying [reparations]. As
John Conyers has said, we study
everything. We study the water, the
air. We can’t even study the issue?
This bill does not authorize one red cent to anyone.”
That HR 40 has never—under either Democrats or Republicans—made it
to the House floor suggests our concerns are rooted not in the
impracticality of reparations but in something more existential. If we
26 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
conclude that the conditions in North Lawndale and black America are not
inexplicable but are instead precisely what you’d expect of a community
that for centuries has lived in America’s crosshairs, then what are we to
make of the world’s oldest democracy?
One cannot escape the question by hand-waving at the past, disavowing
the acts of one’s ancestors, nor by citing a recent date of ancestral
immigration. The last slaveholder has been dead for a very long time. The
last soldier to endure Valley Forge has been dead much longer. To proudly
claim the veteran and disown the slaveholder is patriotism à la carte. A
nation outlives its generations. We were not there when Washington
crossed the Delaware, but Emanuel Gottlieb Leutze’s rendering has
meaning to us. We were not there when Woodrow Wilson took us into
World War I, but we are still paying out the pensions. If Thomas Jefferson’s
genius matters, then so does his taking of Sally Hemings’s body. If George
Washington crossing the Delaware matters, so must his ruthless pursuit of
the runagate Oney Judge.
Black families making $100,000
typically live in the kinds of
neighborhoods inhabited by white
families making $30,000.
In 1909, President William Howard Taft told the country that
“intelligent” white southerners were ready to see blacks as “useful
members of the community.” A week later Joseph Gordon, a black man,
27 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
was lynched outside Greenwood, Mississippi. The high point of the
lynching era has passed. But the memories of those robbed of their lives
still live on in the lingering effects. Indeed, in America there is a strange
and powerful belief that if you stab a black person 10 times, the bleeding
stops and the healing begins the moment the assailant drops the knife. We
believe white dominance to be a fact of the inert past, a delinquent debt
that can be made to disappear if only we don’t look.
There has always been another way. “It is in vain to alledge, that our
ancestors brought them hither, and not we,” Yale President Timothy
Dwight said in 1810.
We inherit our ample patrimony with all its incumbrances; and
are bound to pay the debts of our ancestors. This debt,
particularly, we are bound to discharge: and, when the
righteous Judge of the Universe comes to reckon with his
servants, he will rigidly exact the payment at our hands. To give
them liberty, and stop here, is to entail upon them a curse.
IV. “The Ills That Slavery Frees Us From”
A
MERICA BEGINS IN BLACK PLUNDER AND WHITE DEMOCRACY, two
features that are not contradictory but complementary. “The men
who came together to found the independent United States,
dedicated to freedom and equality, either held slaves or were willing to
join hands with those who did,” the historian Edmund S. Morgan wrote.
“None of them felt entirely comfortable about the fact, but neither did
28 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
they feel responsible for it. Most of them had inherited both their slaves
and their attachment to freedom from an earlier generation, and they
knew the two were not unconnected.”
When enslaved Africans,
plundered of their bodies,
plundered of their
families, and plundered of
their labor, were brought
to the colony of Virginia in
1619, they did not initially
endure the naked racism
Slaves in South Carolina prepare cotton for the gin in
1862. (Timothy H. O’sullivan/Library of Congress)
that would engulf their
progeny. Some of them
were freed. Some of them
intermarried. Still others
escaped with the white indentured servants who had suffered as they had.
Some even rebelled together, allying under Nathaniel Bacon to torch
Jamestown in 1676.
One hundred years later, the idea of slaves and poor whites joining forces
would shock the senses, but in the early days of the English colonies, the
two groups had much in common. English visitors to Virginia found that its
masters “abuse their servantes with intollerable oppression and hard
usage.” White servants were flogged, tricked into serving beyond their
contracts, and traded in much the same manner as slaves.
This “hard usage” originated in a simple fact of the New World—land was
boundless but cheap labor was limited. As life spans increased in the
colony, the Virginia planters found in the enslaved Africans an even more
29 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
efficient source of cheap labor. Whereas indentured servants were still
legal subjects of the English crown and thus entitled to certain protections,
African slaves entered the colonies as aliens. Exempted from the
protections of the crown, they became early America’s indispensable
working class—fit for maximum exploitation, capable of only minimal
resistance.
For the next 250 years, American law worked to reduce black people to a
class of untouchables and raise all white men to the level of citizens. In
1650, Virginia mandated that “all persons except Negroes” were to carry
arms. In 1664, Maryland mandated that any Englishwoman who married
a slave must live as a slave of her husband’s master. In 1705, the Virginia
assembly passed a law allowing for the dismemberment of unruly
slaves—but forbidding masters from whipping “a Christian white servant
naked, without an order from a justice of the peace.” In that same law, the
colony mandated that “all horses, cattle, and hogs, now belonging, or that
hereafter shall belong to any slave” be seized and sold off by the local
church, the profits used to support “the poor of the said parish.” At that
time, there would have still been people alive who could remember blacks
and whites joining to burn down Jamestown only 29 years before. But at
the beginning of the 18th century, two primary classes were enshrined in
America.
“The two great divisions of society are not the rich and poor, but white and
black,” John C. Calhoun, South Carolina’s senior senator, declared on the
Senate floor in 1848. “And all the former, the poor as well as the rich,
belong to the upper class, and are respected and treated as equals.”
In 1860, the majority of people living in South Carolina and Mississippi,
almost half of those living in Georgia, and about one-third of all
30 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
Southerners were on the wrong side of Calhoun’s line. The state with the
largest number of enslaved Americans was Virginia, where in certain
counties some 70 percent of all people labored in chains. Nearly
one-fourth of all white Southerners owned slaves, and upon their backs the
economic basis of America—and much of the Atlantic world—was erected.
In the seven cotton states, one-third of all white income was derived from
slavery. By 1840, cotton produced by slave labor constituted 59 percent of
the country’s exports. The web of this slave society extended north to the
looms of New England, and across the Atlantic to Great Britain, where it
powered a great economic transformation and altered the trajectory of
world history. “Whoever says Industrial Revolution,” wrote the historian
Eric J. Hobsbawm, “says cotton.”
The wealth accorded America by slavery was not just in what the slaves
pulled from the land but in the slaves themselves. “In 1860, slaves as an
asset were worth more than all of America’s manufacturing, all of the
railroads, all of the productive capacity of the United States put together,”
the Yale historian David W. Blight has noted. “Slaves were the single
largest, by far, financial asset of property in the entire American
economy.” The sale of these slaves—“in whose bodies that money
congealed,” writes Walter Johnson, a Harvard historian—generated even
more ancillary wealth. Loans were taken out for purchase, to be repaid
with interest. Insurance policies were drafted against the untimely death
of a slave and the loss of potential profits. Slave sales were taxed and
notarized. The vending of the black body and the sundering of the black
family became an economy unto themselves, estimated to have brought in
tens of millions of dollars to antebellum America. In 1860 there were
more millionaires per capita in the Mississippi Valley than anywhere else
in the country.
31 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
Beneath the cold numbers
lay lives divided. “I had a
constant dread that Mrs.
Moore, her mistress,
would be in want of
money and sell my dear
wife,” a freedman wrote,
reflecting on his time in
slavery. “We constantly
dreaded a final separation.
Our affection for each was
very strong, and this made
us always apprehensive of
a cruel parting.”
Forced partings were
common in the
antebellum South. A slave
In this artistic rendering by Henry Louis Stephens, a
well-known illustrator of the era, a family is in the process
of being separated at a slave auction. (Library of
Congress)
in some parts of the region
stood a 30 percent chance
of being sold in his or her
lifetime. Twenty-five
percent of interstate trades
destroyed a first marriage
and half of them destroyed a nuclear family.
When the wife and children of Henry Brown, a slave in Richmond,
Virginia, were to be sold away, Brown searched for a white master who
might buy his wife and children to keep the family together. He failed:
32 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
The next day, I stationed myself by the side of the road, along
which the slaves, amounting to three hundred and fifty, were to
pass. The purchaser of my wife was a Methodist minister, who
was about starting for North Carolina. Pretty soon five
waggon-loads of little children passed, and looking at the
foremost one, what should I see but a little child, pointing its
tiny hand towards me, exclaiming, “There’s my father; I knew
he would come and bid me good-bye.” It was my eldest child!
Soon the gang approached in which my wife was chained. I
looked, and beheld her familiar face; but O, reader, that glance
of agony! may God spare me ever again enduring the
excruciating horror of that moment! She passed, and came near
to where I stood. I seized hold of her hand, intending to bid her
farewell; but words failed me; the gift of utterance had fled, and
I remained speechless. I followed her for some distance, with
her hand grasped in mine, as if to save her from her fate, but I
could not speak, and I was obliged to turn away in silence.
In a time when telecommunications were primitive and blacks lacked
freedom of movement, the parting of black families was a kind of murder.
Here we find the roots of American wealth and democracy—in the
for-profit destruction of the most important asset available to any people,
the family. The destruction was not incidental to America’s rise; it
facilitated that rise. By erecting a slave society, America created the
economic foundation for its great experiment in democracy. The labor
strife that seeded Bacon’s rebellion was suppressed. America’s
indispensable working class existed as property beyond the realm of
33 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
politics, leaving white Americans free to trumpet their love of freedom and
democratic values. Assessing antebellum democracy in Virginia, a visitor
from England observed that the state’s natives “can profess an unbounded
love of liberty and of democracy in consequence of the mass of the people,
who in other countries might become mobs, being there nearly altogether
composed of their own Negro slaves.”
V. The Quiet Plunder
T
HE CONSEQUENCES of 250 years of enslavement, of war upon black
families and black people, were profound. Like homeownership
today, slave ownership was aspirational, attracting not just those
who owned slaves but those who wished to. Much as homeowners today
might discuss the addition of a patio or the painting of a living room,
slaveholders traded tips on the best methods for breeding workers,
exacting labor, and doling out punishment. Just as a homeowner today
might subscribe to a magazine like This Old House, slaveholders had
journals such as De Bow’s Review, which recommended the best practices
for wringing profits from slaves. By the dawn of the Civil War, the
enslavement of black America was thought to be so foundational to the
country that those who sought to end it were branded heretics worthy of
death. Imagine what would happen if a president today came out in favor
of taking all American homes from their owners: the reaction might well
be violent.
“This country was formed for the white, not for the black man,” John
Wilkes Booth wrote, before killing Abraham Lincoln. “And looking upon
African slavery from the same standpoint held by those noble framers of
our Constitution, I for one have ever considered it one of the greatest
34 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
blessings (both for
themselves and us) that
God ever bestowed upon a
favored nation.”
In the aftermath of the
Civil War, Radical
Republicans attempted to
reconstruct the country
upon something
resembling universal
equality—but they were
beaten back by a campaign
of “Redemption,” led by
White Liners, Red Shirts,
and Klansmen bent on
upholding a society
“formed for the white, not
Click the image above to view the full document.
for the black man.” A
wave of terrorism roiled
the South. In his massive
history Reconstruction,
Eric Foner recounts incidents of black people being attacked for not
removing their hats; for refusing to hand over a whiskey flask; for
disobeying church procedures; for “using insolent language”; for disputing
labor contracts; for refusing to be “tied like a slave.” Sometimes the
attacks were intended simply to “thin out the niggers a little.”
Terrorism carried the day. Federal troops withdrew from the South in
1877. The dream of Reconstruction died. For the next century, political
35 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
violence was visited upon blacks wantonly, with special treatment meted
out toward black people of ambition. Black schools and churches were
burned to the ground. Black voters and the political candidates who
attempted to rally them were intimidated, and some were murdered. At
the end of World War I, black veterans returning to their homes were
assaulted for daring to wear the American uniform. The demobilization of
soldiers after the war, which put white and black veterans into competition
for scarce jobs, produced the Red Summer of 1919: a succession of racist
pogroms against dozens of cities ranging from Longview, Texas, to
Chicago to Washington, D.C. Organized white violence against blacks
continued into the 1920s—in 1921 a white mob leveled Tulsa’s “Black
Wall Street,” and in 1923 another one razed the black town of Rosewood,
Florida—and virtually no one was punished.
A postcard dated August 3, 1920, depicts the aftermath of a lynching in Center, Texas, near the
Louisiana border. According to the text on the other side, the victim was a 16-year-old boy.
36 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
The work of mobs was a rabid and violent rendition of prejudices that
extended even into the upper reaches of American government. The New
Deal is today remembered as a model for what progressive government
should do—cast a broad social safety net that protects the poor and the
afflicted while building the middle class. When progressives wish to
express their disappointment with Barack Obama, they point to the
accomplishments of Franklin Roosevelt. But these progressives rarely note
that Roosevelt’s New Deal, much like the democracy that produced it,
rested on the foundation of Jim Crow.
“The Jim Crow South,” writes Ira Katznelson, a history and politicalscience professor at Columbia, “was the one collaborator America’s
democracy could not do without.” The marks of that collaboration are all
over the New Deal. The omnibus programs passed under the Social
Security Act in 1935 were crafted in such a way as to protect the southern
way of life. Old-age insurance (Social Security proper) and unemployment
insurance excluded farmworkers and domestics—jobs heavily occupied by
blacks. When President Roosevelt signed Social Security into law in 1935,
65 percent of African Americans nationally and between 70 and 80
percent in the South were ineligible. The NAACP protested, calling the
new American safety net “a sieve with holes just big enough for the
majority of Negroes to fall through.”
The oft-celebrated G.I. Bill similarly failed black Americans, by mirroring
the broader country’s insistence on a racist housing policy. Though
ostensibly color-blind, Title III of the bill, which aimed to give veterans
access to low-interest home loans, left black veterans to tangle with white
officials at their local Veterans Administration as well as with the same
banks that had, for years, refused to grant mortgages to blacks. The
historian Kathleen J. Frydl observes in her 2009 book, The GI Bill, that so
37 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
many blacks were disqualified from receiving Title III benefits “that it is
more accurate simply to say that blacks could not use this particular title.”
In Cold War America, homeownership was seen as a means of instilling
patriotism, and as a civilizing and anti-radical force. “No man who owns
his own house and lot can be a Communist,” claimed William Levitt, who
pioneered the modern suburb with the development of the various
Levittowns, his famous planned communities. “He has too much to do.”
But the Levittowns were, with Levitt’s willing acquiescence, segregated
throughout their early years. Daisy and Bill Myers, the first black family to
move into Levittown, Pennsylvania, were greeted with protests and a
burning cross. A neighbor who opposed the family said that Bill Myers was
“probably a nice guy, but every time I look at him I see $2,000 drop off the
value of my house.”
The neighbor had good reason to be afraid. Bill and Daisy Myers were
from the other side of John C. Calhoun’s dual society. If they moved next
door, housing policy almost guaranteed that their neighbors’ property
values would decline.
38 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
In August 1957, state police pull teenagers out of a car during a demonstration against Bill and
Daisy Myers, the first African Americans to move into Levittown, Pennsyvlania. (AP Photo/Bill
Ingraham)
Whereas shortly before the New Deal, a typical mortgage required a large
down payment and full repayment within about 10 years, the creation of
the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation in 1933 and then the Federal
Housing Administration the following year allowed banks to offer loans
requiring no more than 10 percent down, amortized over 20 to 30 years.
“Without federal intervention in the housing market, massive
suburbanization would have been impossible,” writes Thomas J. Sugrue, a
historian at the University of Pennsylvania. “In 1930, only 30 percent of
Americans owned their own homes; by 1960, more than 60 percent were
home owners. Home ownership became an emblem of American
citizenship.”
That emblem was not to be awarded to blacks. The American real-estate
industry believed segregation to be a moral principle. As late as 1950, the
National Association of Real Estate Boards’ code of ethics warned that “a
39 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
Realtor should never be instrumental in introducing into a neighborhood
… any race or nationality, or any individuals whose presence will clearly be
detrimental to property values.” A 1943 brochure specified that such
potential undesirables might include madams, bootleggers,
gangsters—and “a colored man of means who was giving his children a
college education and thought they were entitled to live among whites.”
The federal government concurred. It was the Home Owners’ Loan
Corporation, not a private trade association, that pioneered the practice of
redlining, selectively granting loans and insisting that any property it
insured be covered by a restrictive covenant—a clause in the deed
forbidding the sale of the property to anyone other than whites. Millions of
dollars flowed from tax coffers into segregated white neighborhoods.
One man said his black neighbor
was “probably a nice guy, but every
time I look at him I see $2,000
drop off the value of my house.”
“For perhaps the first time, the federal government embraced the
discriminatory attitudes of the marketplace,” the historian Kenneth T.
Jackson wrote in his 1985 book, Crabgrass Frontier, a history of
suburbanization. “Previously, prejudices were personalized and
individualized; FHA exhorted segregation and enshrined it as public
policy. Whole areas of cities were declared ineligible for loan guarantees.”
Redlining was not officially outlawed until 1968, by the Fair Housing Act.
40 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
By then the damage was done—and reports of redlining by banks have
continued.
The federal government is premised on equal fealty from all its citizens,
who in return are to receive equal treatment. But as late as the mid-20th
century, this bargain was not granted to black people, who repeatedly paid
a higher price for citizenship and received less in return. Plunder had been
the essential feature of slavery, of the society described by Calhoun. But
practically a full century after the end of the Civil War and the abolition of
slavery, the plunder—quiet, systemic, submerged—continued even amidst
the aims and achievements of New Deal liberals.
VI. Making The Second Ghetto
T
ODAY CHICAGO is one of the most segregated cities in the country, a
fact that reflects assiduous planning. In the effort to uphold white
supremacy at every level down to the neighborhood, Chicago—a
city founded by the black fur trader Jean Baptiste Point du Sable—has long
been a pioneer. The efforts began in earnest in 1917, when the Chicago
Real Estate Board, horrified by the influx of southern blacks, lobbied to
zone the entire city by race. But after the Supreme Court ruled against
explicit racial zoning that year, the city was forced to pursue its agenda by
more-discreet means.
Like the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation, the Federal Housing
Administration initially insisted on restrictive covenants, which helped bar
blacks and other ethnic undesirables from receiving federally backed
home loans. By the 1940s, Chicago led the nation in the use of these
restrictive covenants, and about half of all residential neighborhoods in
the city were effectively off-limits to blacks.
41 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
It is common today to become misty-eyed about the old black ghetto,
where doctors and lawyers lived next door to meatpackers and
steelworkers, who themselves lived next door to prostitutes and the
unemployed. This segregationist nostalgia ignores the actual conditions
endured by the people living there—vermin and arson, for instance—and
ignores the fact that the old ghetto was premised on denying black people
privileges enjoyed by white Americans.
In 1948, when the Supreme Court ruled that restrictive covenants, while
permissible, were not enforceable by judicial action, Chicago had other
weapons at the ready. The Illinois state legislature had already given
Chicago’s city council the right to approve—and thus to veto—any public
housing in the city’s wards. This came in handy in 1949, when a new
federal housing act sent millions of tax dollars into Chicago and other
cities around the country. Beginning in 1950, site selection for public
housing proceeded entirely on the grounds of segregation. By the 1960s,
the city had created with its vast housing projects what the historian
Arnold R. Hirsch calls a “second ghetto,” one larger than the old Black Belt
but just as impermeable. More than 98 percent of all the family publichousing units built in Chicago between 1950 and the mid-1960s were
built in all-black neighborhoods.
Governmental embrace of segregation was driven by the virulent racism of
Chicago’s white citizens. White neighborhoods vulnerable to black
encroachment formed block associations for the sole purpose of enforcing
segregation. They lobbied fellow whites not to sell. They lobbied those
blacks who did manage to buy to sell back. In 1949, a group of Englewood
Catholics formed block associations intended to “keep up the
neighborhood.” Translation: keep black people out. And when civic
engagement was not enough, when government failed, when private
42 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
banks could no longer hold the line, Chicago turned to an old tool in the
American repertoire—racial violence. “The pattern of terrorism is easily
discernible,” concluded a Chicago civic group in the 1940s. “It is at the
seams of the black ghetto in all directions.” On July 1 and 2 of 1946, a
mob of thousands assembled in Chicago’s Park Manor neighborhood,
hoping to eject a black doctor who’d recently moved in. The mob pelted
the house with rocks and set the garage on fire. The doctor moved away.
In 1947, after a few black veterans moved into the Fernwood section of
Chicago, three nights of rioting broke out; gangs of whites yanked blacks
off streetcars and beat them. Two years later, when a union meeting
attended by blacks in Englewood triggered rumors that a home was being
“sold to niggers,” blacks (and whites thought to be sympathetic to them)
were beaten in the streets. In 1951, thousands of whites in Cicero, 20
minutes or so west of downtown Chicago, attacked an apartment building
that housed a single black family, throwing bricks and firebombs through
the windows and setting the apartment on fire. A Cook County grand jury
declined to charge the rioters—and instead indicted the family’s NAACP
attorney, the apartment’s white owner, and the owner’s attorney and
rental agent, charging them with conspiring to lower property values. Two
years after that, whites picketed and planted explosives in South Deering,
about 30 minutes from downtown Chicago, to force blacks out.
43 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
The September 1966 Cicero protest against housing discrimination was one of the first nonviolent civilrights campaigns launched near a major city. (Associated Press)
When terrorism ultimately failed, white homeowners simply fled the
neighborhood. The traditional terminology, white flight, implies a kind of
natural expression of preference. In fact, white flight was a triumph of
social engineering, orchestrated by the shared racist presumptions of
America’s public and private sectors. For should any nonracist white
families decide that integration might not be so bad as a matter of
principle or practicality, they still had to contend with the hard facts of
American housing policy: When the mid-20th-century white homeowner
claimed that the presence of a Bill and Daisy Myers decreased his property
value, he was not merely engaging in racist dogma—he was accurately
observing the impact of federal policy on market prices. Redlining
destroyed the possibility of investment wherever black people lived.
44 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
VII. “A Lot Of People Fell By The Way”
S
PECULATORS IN NORTH LAWNDALE, and at the edge of the black
ghettos, knew there was money to be made off white panic. They
resorted to “block-busting”—spooking whites into selling cheap
before the neighborhood became black. They would hire a black woman to
walk up and down the street with a stroller. Or they’d hire someone to call
a number in the neighborhood looking for “Johnny Mae.” Then they’d
cajole whites into selling at low prices, informing them that the more
blacks who moved in, the more the value of their homes would decline, so
better to sell now. With these white-fled homes in hand, speculators then
turned to the masses of black people who had streamed northward as part
of the Great Migration, or who were desperate to escape the ghettos: the
speculators would take the houses they’d just bought cheap through blockbusting and sell them to blacks on contract.
To keep up with his payments and keep his heat on, Clyde Ross took a
second job at the post office and then a third job delivering pizza. His wife
took a job working at Marshall Field. He had to take some of his children
out of private school. He was not able to be at home to supervise his
children or help them with their homework. Money and time that Ross
wanted to give his children went instead to enrich white speculators.
“The problem was the money,” Ross told me. “Without the money, you
can’t move. You can’t educate your kids. You can’t give them the right kind
of food. Can’t make the house look good. They think this neighborhood is
where they supposed to be. It changes their outlook. My kids were going to
the best schools in this neighborhood, and I couldn’t keep them in there.”
Mattie Lewis came to Chicago from her native Alabama in the mid-’40s,
45 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
when she was 21, persuaded by a friend who told her she could get a job as
a hairdresser. Instead she was hired by Western Electric, where she
worked for 41 years. I met Lewis in the home of her neighbor Ethel
Weatherspoon. Both had owned homes in North Lawndale for more than
50 years. Both had bought their houses on contract. Both had been active
with Clyde Ross in the Contract Buyers League’s effort to garner
restitution from contract sellers who’d operated in North Lawndale, banks
who’d backed the scheme, and even the Federal Housing Administration.
We were joined by Jack Macnamara, who’d been an organizing force in the
Contract Buyers League when it was founded, in 1968. Our gathering had
the feel of a reunion, because the writer James Alan McPherson had
profiled the Contract Buyers League for The Atlantic back in 1972.
Click the image above to download a PDF version of The Atlantic’s April 1972 profile of the Contract
Buyers League.
46 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
Weatherspoon bought her home in 1957. “Most of the whites started
moving out,” she told me. “‘The blacks are coming. The blacks are
coming.’ They actually said that. They had signs up: DON’T SELL TO
BLACKS.”
Before moving to North Lawndale, Lewis and her husband tried moving to
Cicero after seeing a house advertised for sale there. “Sorry, I just sold it
today,” the Realtor told Lewis’s husband. “I told him, ‘You know they
don’t want you in Cicero,’ ” Lewis recalls. “ ‘They ain’t going to let nobody
black in Cicero.’ ”
In 1958, the couple bought a home in North Lawndale on contract. They
were not blind to the unfairness. But Lewis, born in the teeth of Jim Crow,
considered American piracy—black people keep on making it, white
people keep on taking it—a fact of nature. “All I wanted was a house. And
that was the only way I could get it. They weren’t giving black people loans
at that time,” she said. “We thought, ‘This is the way it is. We going to do it
till we die, and they ain’t never going to accept us. That’s just the way it is.’
“The only way you were going to buy a home was to do it the way they
wanted,” she continued. “And I was determined to get me a house. If
everybody else can have one, I want one too. I had worked for white
people in the South. And I saw how these white people were living in the
North and I thought, ‘One day I’m going to live just like them.’ I wanted
cabinets and all these things these other people have.”
White flight was not an
47 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
accident—it was a triumph of
racist social engineering.
Whenever she visited white co-workers at their homes, she saw the
difference. “I could see we were just getting ripped off,” she said. “I would
see things and I would say, ‘I’d like to do this at my house.’ And they would
say, ‘Do it,’ but I would think, ‘I can’t, because it costs us so much more.’ ”
I asked Lewis and Weatherspoon how they kept up on payments.
“You paid it and kept working,” Lewis said of the contract. “When that
payment came up, you knew you had to pay it.”
“You cut down on the light bill. Cut down on your food bill,”
Weatherspoon interjected.
48 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
Ethel Weatherspoon at her home in North Lawndale. After she bought it in 1957, she says,
“most of the whites started moving out.” (Carlos Javier Ortiz)
“You cut down on things for your child, that was the main thing,” said
Lewis. “My oldest wanted to be an artist and my other wanted to be a
dancer and my other wanted to take music.”
Lewis and Weatherspoon, like Ross, were able to keep their homes. The
suit did not win them any remuneration. But it forced contract sellers to
the table, where they allowed some members of the Contract Buyers
League to move into regular mortgages or simply take over their houses
outright. By then they’d been bilked for thousands. In talking with Lewis
and Weatherspoon, I was seeing only part of the picture—the tiny minority
who’d managed to hold on to their homes. But for all our exceptional ones,
for every Barack and Michelle Obama, for every Ethel Weatherspoon or
Clyde Ross, for every black survivor, there are so many thousands gone.
49 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
Deputy sheriffs patrol a Chicago street in 1970 after a dozen Contract Buyers League families
were evicted. (Courtesy of Sun-Times Media)
“A lot of people fell by the way,” Lewis told me. “One woman asked me if I
would keep all her china. She said, ‘They ain’t going to set you out.’ ”
VIII. “Negro Poverty is not White Poverty”
O
N A RECENT SPRING AFTERNOON in North Lawndale, I visited Billy
Lamar Brooks Sr. Brooks has been an activist since his youth in the
Black Panther Party, when he aided the Contract Buyers League. I
met him in his office at the Better Boys Foundation, a staple of North
Lawndale whose mission is to direct local kids off the streets and into jobs
and college. Brooks’s work is personal. On June 14, 1991, his 19-year-old
son, Billy Jr., was shot and killed. “These guys tried to stick him up,”
Brooks told me. “I suspect he could have been involved in some things …
He’s always on my mind. Every day.”
Brooks was not raised in the streets, though in such a neighborhood it is
50 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
impossible to avoid the influence. “I was in church three or four times a
week. That’s where the girls were,” he said, laughing. “The stark reality is
still there. There’s no shield from life. You got to go to school. I lived here. I
went to Marshall High School. Over here were the Egyptian Cobras. Over
there were the Vice Lords.”
Brooks has since moved away from Chicago’s West Side. But he is still
working in North Lawndale. If “you got a nice house, you live in a nice
neighborhood, then you are less prone to violence, because your space is
not deprived,” Brooks said. “You got a security point. You don’t need no
protection.” But if “you grow up in a place like this, housing sucks. When
they tore down the projects here, they left the high-rises and came to the
neighborhood with that gang mentality. You don’t have nothing, so you
going to take something, even if it’s not real. You don’t have no street, but
in your mind it’s yours.”
Visit North Lawndale today with Billy Brooks
51 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
We walked over to a window behind his desk. A group of young black men
were hanging out in front of a giant mural memorializing two black men:
IN LOVIN MEMORY QUENTIN AKA “Q,” JULY 18, 1974 ❤ MARCH 2, 2012.
The name and face of the other man had been spray-painted over by a rival
group. The men drank beer. Occasionally a car would cruise past, slow to a
crawl, then stop. One of the men would approach the car and make an
exchange, then the car would drive off. Brooks had known all of these
young men as boys.
“That’s their corner,” he said.
We watched another car roll through, pause briefly, then drive off. “No
respect, no shame,” Brooks said. “That’s what they do. From that alley to
that corner. They don’t go no farther than that. See the big brother there?
He almost died a couple of years ago. The one drinking the beer back there
… I know all of them. And the reason they feel safe here is cause of this
building, and because they too chickenshit to go anywhere. But that’s their
mentality. That’s their block.”
Brooks showed me a picture of a Little League team he had coached. He
went down the row of kids, pointing out which ones were in jail, which
ones were dead, and which ones were doing all right. And then he pointed
out his son—“That’s my boy, Billy,” Brooks said. Then he wondered aloud
if keeping his son with him while working in North Lawndale had hastened
his death. “It’s a definite connection, because he was part of what I did
here. And I think maybe I shouldn’t have exposed him. But then, I had to,”
he said, “because I wanted him with me.”
From the White House on down, the myth holds that fatherhood is the
great antidote to all that ails black people. But Billy Brooks Jr. had a father.
Trayvon Martin had a father. Jordan Davis had a father. Adhering to
52 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
middle-class norms has never shielded black people from plunder.
Adhering to middle-class norms is what made Ethel Weatherspoon a
lucrative target for rapacious speculators. Contract sellers did not target
the very poor. They targeted black people who had worked hard enough to
save a down payment and dreamed of the emblem of American citizenship
—homeownership. It was not a tangle of pathology that put a target on
Clyde Ross’s back. It was not a culture of poverty that singled out Mattie
Lewis for “the thrill of the chase and the kill.” Some black people always
will be twice as good. But they generally find white predation to be thrice
as fast.
Is affirmative action meant to
increase “diversity”? If so, it only
tangentially relates to the specific
problems of black people.
Liberals today mostly view racism not as an active, distinct evil but as a
relative of white poverty and inequality. They ignore the long tradition of
this country actively punishing black success—and the elevation of that
punishment, in the mid-20th century, to federal policy. President Lyndon
Johnson may have noted in his historic civil-rights speech at Howard
University in 1965 that “Negro poverty is not white poverty.” But his
advisers and their successors were, and still are, loath to craft any policy
that recognizes the difference.
After his speech, Johnson convened a group of civil-rights leaders,
53 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
including the esteemed A. Philip Randolph and Bayard Rustin, to address
the “ancient brutality.” In a strategy paper, they agreed with the president
that “Negro poverty is a special, and particularly destructive, form of
American poverty.” But when it came to specifically addressing the
“particularly destructive,” Rustin’s group demurred, preferring to advance
programs that addressed “all the poor, black and white.”
The urge to use the moral force of the
REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK
White Racism vs. White Resentment
“The idea that Affirmative Action
justifies white resentment may be the
greatest argument made for
reparations—like ever.”
Read more
black struggle to address broader
inequalities originates in both
compassion and pragmatism. But it
makes for ambiguous policy.
Affirmative action’s precise aims, for
instance, have always proved elusive.
Is it meant to make amends for the
crimes heaped upon black people? Not according to the Supreme Court. In
its 1978 ruling in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the Court
rejected “societal discrimination” as “an amorphous concept of injury that
may be ageless in its reach into the past.” Is affirmative action meant to
increase “diversity”? If so, it only tangentially relates to the specific
problems of black people—the problem of what America has taken from
them over several centuries.
This confusion about affirmative action’s aims, along with our inability to
face up to the particular history of white-imposed black disadvantage,
dates back to the policy’s origins. “There is no fixed and firm definition of
affirmative action,” an appointee in Johnson’s Department of Labor
declared. “Affirmative action is anything that you have to do to get results.
But this does not necessarily include preferential treatment.”
54 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
Yet America was built on the preferential treatment of white people—395
years of it. Vaguely endorsing a cuddly, feel-good diversity does very little
to redress this.
Today, progressives are loath to invoke white supremacy as an explanation
for anything. On a practical level, the hesitation comes from the dim view
the Supreme Court has taken of the reforms of the 1960s. The Voting
Rights Act has been gutted. The Fair Housing Act might well be next.
Affirmative action is on its last legs. In substituting a broad class struggle
for an anti-racist struggle, progressives hope to assemble a coalition by
changing the subject.
The politics of racial evasion are seductive. But the record is mixed. Aid to
Families With Dependent Children was originally written largely to
exclude blacks—yet by the 1990s it was perceived as a giveaway to blacks.
The Affordable Care Act makes no mention of race, but this did not keep
Rush Limbaugh from denouncing it as reparations. Moreover, the act’s
expansion of Medicaid was effectively made optional, meaning that many
poor blacks in the former Confederate states do not benefit from it. The
Affordable Care Act, like Social Security, will eventually expand its reach
to those left out; in the meantime, black people will be injured.
“All that it would take to sink a new WPA program would be some skillfully
packaged footage of black men leaning on shovels smoking cigarettes,”
the sociologist Douglas S. Massey writes. “Papering over the issue of race
makes for bad social theory, bad research, and bad public policy.” To
ignore the fact that one of the oldest republics in the world was erected on
a foundation of white supremacy, to pretend that the problems of a dual
society are the same as the problems of unregulated capitalism, is to cover
the sin of national plunder with the sin of national lying. The lie ignores
55 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
the fact that reducing
American poverty and
ending white supremacy
are not the same. The lie
ignores the fact that
closing the “achievement
gap” will do nothing to
close the “injury gap,” in
which black college
graduates still suffer
higher unemployment
rates than white college
graduates, and black job
applicants without
criminal records enjoy
roughly the same chance
Billy Brooks, who assisted the Contract Buyers League,
still works in the neighborhood, helping kids escape
poverty and violence. (Carlos Javier Ortiz)
of getting hired as white
applicants with criminal
records.
Chicago, like the country at large, embraced policies that placed black
America’s most energetic, ambitious, and thrifty countrymen beyond the
pale of society and marked them as rightful targets for legal theft. The
effects reverberate beyond the families who were robbed to the
community that beholds the spectacle. Don’t just picture Clyde Ross
working three jobs so he could hold on to his home. Think of his North
Lawndale neighbors—their children, their nephews and nieces—and
consider how watching this affects them. Imagine yourself as a young
black child watching your elders play by all the rules only to have their
56 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
possessions tossed out in the street and to have their most sacred
possession—their home—taken from them.
The message the young black boy receives from his country, Billy Brooks
says, is “ ‘You ain’t shit. You not no good. The only thing you are worth is
working for us. You will never own anything. You not going to get an
education. We are sending your ass to the penitentiary.’ They’re telling
you no matter how hard you struggle, no matter what you put down, you
ain’t shit. ‘We’re going to take what you got. You will never own anything,
nigger.’ ”
IX. Toward A New Country
W
HEN CLYDE ROSS WAS A CHILD, his older brother Winter had a
seizure. He was picked up by the authorities and delivered to
Parchman Farm, a 20,000-acre state prison in the Mississippi
Delta region.
“He was a gentle person,” Clyde Ross says of his brother. “You know, he
was good to everybody. And he started having spells, and he couldn’t
control himself. And they had him picked up, because they thought he was
dangerous.”
Built at the turn of the century, Parchman was supposed to be a
progressive and reformist response to the problem of “Negro crime.” In
fact it was the gulag of Mississippi, an object of terror to African Americans
in the Delta. In the early years of the 20th century, Mississippi Governor
James K. Vardaman used to amuse himself by releasing black convicts into
the surrounding wilderness and hunting them down with bloodhounds.
“Throughout the American South,” writes David M. Oshinsky in his book
57 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
Worse Than Slavery, “Parchman Farm is synonymous with punishment and
brutality, as well it should be … Parchman is the quintessential penal farm,
the closest thing to slavery that survived the Civil War.”
When the Ross family went to retrieve Winter, the authorities told them
that Winter had died. When the Ross family asked for his body, the
authorities at Parchman said they had buried him. The family never saw
Winter’s body.
And this was just one of their losses.
Scholars have long discussed methods by which America might make
reparations to those on whose labor and exclusion the country was built. In
the 1970s, the Yale Law professor Boris Bittker argued in The Case for
Black Reparations that a rough price tag for reparations could be
determined by multiplying the number of African Americans in the
population by the difference in white and black per capita income. That
number—$34 billion in 1973, when Bittker wrote his book—could be
added to a reparations program each year for a decade or two. Today
Charles Ogletree, the Harvard Law School professor, argues for something
broader: a program of job training and public works that takes racial justice
as its mission but includes the poor of all races.
To celebrate freedom and democracy while forgetting America’s origins in
a slavery economy is patriotism à la carte.
Perhaps no statistic better illustrates the enduring legacy of our country’s
shameful history of treating black people as sub-citizens, sub-Americans,
and sub-humans than the wealth gap. Reparations would seek to close this
chasm. But as surely as the creation of the wealth gap required the
cooperation of every aspect of the society, bridging it will require the
58 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
same.
When we think of white
supremacy, we picture Colored
Only signs, but we should picture
pirate flags.
Perhaps after a serious discussion and debate—the kind that HR 40
proposes—we may find that the country can never fully repay African
Americans. But we stand to discover much about ourselves in such a
discussion—and that is perhaps what scares us. The idea of reparations is
frightening not simply because we might lack the ability to pay. The idea of
reparations threatens something much deeper—America’s heritage,
history, and standing in the world.
T
HE EARLY AMERICAN ECONOMY was built on slave labor. The Capitol
and the White House were built by slaves. President James K. Polk
traded slaves from the Oval Office. The laments about “black
pathology,” the criticism of black family structures by pundits and
intellectuals, ring hollow in a country whose existence was predicated on
the torture of black fathers, on the rape of black mothers, on the sale of
black children. An honest assessment of America’s relationship to the
black family reveals the country to be not its nurturer but its destroyer.
And this destruction did not end with slavery. Discriminatory laws joined
the equal burden of citizenship to unequal distribution of its bounty. These
59 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
laws reached their apex in the mid-20th century, when the federal
government—through housing policies—engineered the wealth gap, which
remains with us to this day. When we think of white supremacy, we picture
COLORED ONLY signs, but we should picture pirate flags.
On some level, we have always grasped this.
“Negro poverty is not white poverty,” President Johnson said in his
historic civil-rights speech.
Many of its causes and many of its cures are the same. But there
are differences—deep, corrosive, obstinate differences
—radiating painful roots into the community and into the
family, and the nature of the individual. These differences are
not racial differences. They are solely and simply the
consequence of ancient brutality, past injustice, and present
prejudice.
We invoke the words of Jefferson and Lincoln because they say something
about our legacy and our traditions. We do this because we recognize our
links to the past—at least when they flatter us. But black history does not
flatter American democracy; it chastens it. The popular mocking of
reparations as a harebrained scheme authored by wild-eyed lefties and
intellectually unserious black nationalists is fear masquerading as
laughter. Black nationalists have always perceived something
unmentionable about America that integrationists dare not
acknowledge—that white supremacy is not merely the work of hotheaded
demagogues, or a matter of false consciousness, but a force so
60 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
fundamental to America that it is difficult to imagine the country without
it.
And so we must imagine a new country. Reparations—by which I mean the
full acceptance of our collective biography and its consequences—is the
price we must pay to see ourselves squarely. The recovering alcoholic may
well have to live with his illness for the rest of his life. But at least he is not
living a drunken lie. Reparations beckons us to reject the intoxication of
hubris and see America as it is—the work of fallible humans.
Won’t reparations divide us? Not any more than we are already divided.
The wealth gap merely puts a number on something we feel but cannot
say—that American prosperity was ill-gotten and selective in its
distribution. What is needed is an airing of family secrets, a settling with
old ghosts. What is needed is a healing of the American psyche and the
banishment of white guilt.
What I’m talking about is more than recompense for past injustices—more
than a handout, a payoff, hush money, or a reluctant bribe. What I’m
talking about is a national reckoning that would lead to spiritual renewal.
Reparations would mean the end of scarfing hot dogs on the Fourth of July
while denying the facts of our heritage. Reparations would mean the end
of yelling “patriotism” while waving a Confederate flag. Reparations
would mean a revolution of the American consciousness, a reconciling of
our self-image as the great democratizer with the facts of our history.
X. “There Will Be No ‘Reparations’ From
Germany”
E ARE NOT the first to be summoned to such a challenge.
61 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
W
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
In 1952, when West Germany began the process of making
amends for the Holocaust, it did so under conditions that
should be instructive to us. Resistance was violent. Very few
Germans believed that Jews were entitled to anything. Only 5 percent of
West Germans surveyed reported feeling guilty about the Holocaust, and
only 29 percent believed that Jews were owed restitution from the German
people.
“The rest,” the historian Tony Judt
REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK
The Auschwitz All Around Us
“It’s very hard to accept white
supremacy as a structure erected by
actual people, as a choice, as an
interest, as opposed to a momentary
bout of insanity.”
Read more
wrote in his 2005 book, Postwar,
“were divided between those (some
two-fifths of respondents) who
thought that only people ‘who really
committed something’ were
responsible and should pay, and those
(21 percent) who thought ‘that the
Jews themselves were partly responsible for what happened to them
during the Third Reich.’ ”
Germany’s unwillingness to squarely face its history went beyond polls.
Movies that suggested a societal responsibility for the Holocaust beyond
Hitler were banned. “The German soldier fought bravely and honorably
for his homeland,” claimed President Eisenhower, endorsing the Teutonic
national myth. Judt wrote, “Throughout the fifties West German
officialdom encouraged a comfortable view of the German past in which
the Wehrmacht was heroic, while Nazis were in a minority and properly
punished.”
Konrad Adenauer, the postwar German chancellor, was in favor of
reparations, but his own party was divided, and he was able to get an
62 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
agreement passed only with the votes of the Social Democratic opposition.
“If I could take German property
without sitting down with them
for even a minute but go in with
jeeps and machine guns,” said
David Ben-Gurion, “I would do
that.”
Among the Jews of Israel, reparations provoked violent and venomous
reactions ranging from denunciation to assassination plots. On January 7,
1952, as the Knesset—the Israeli parliament—convened to discuss the
prospect of a reparations agreement with West Germany, Menachem
Begin, the future prime minister of Israel, stood in front of a large crowd,
inveighing against the country that had plundered the lives, labor, and
property of his people. Begin claimed that all Germans were Nazis and
guilty of murder. His condemnations then spread to his own young state.
He urged the crowd to stop paying taxes and claimed that the nascent
Israeli nation characterized the fight over whether or not to accept
reparations as a “war to the death.” When alerted that the police watching
the gathering were carrying tear gas, allegedly of German manufacture,
Begin yelled, “The same gases that asphyxiated our parents!”
Begin then led the crowd in an oath to never forget the victims of the
Shoah, lest “my right hand lose its cunning” and “my tongue cleave to the
63 of 70
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
roof of my mouth.” He took the crowd through the streets toward the
Knesset. From the rooftops, police repelled the crowd with tear gas and
smoke bombs. But the wind shifted, and the gas blew back toward the
Knesset, billowing through windows shattered by rocks. In the chaos,
Begin and Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion exchanged insults. Two
hundred civilians and 140 police officers were wounded. Nearly 400
people were arrested. Knesset business was halted.
Begin then addressed the chamber with a fiery speech condemning the
actions the legislature was about to take. “Today you arrested hundreds,”
he said. “Tomorrow you may arrest thousands. No matter, they will go,
they will sit in prison. We will sit there with them. If necessary, we will be
killed with them. But there will be no ‘reparations’ from Germany.”
Survivors of the Holocaust
feared laundering the
reputation of Germany
with money, and
mortgaging the memory
of their dead. Beyond that,
there was a taste for
revenge. “My soul would
be at rest if I knew there
would be 6 million
Nahum Goldman, the president of the Jewish Claims
Commission (center), signs 1952 reparations agreements
between Germany and Israel. The two delegations
entered the room by different doors, and the ceremony
was carried out in silence. (Associated Press)
64 of 70
German dead to match the
6 million Jews,” said Meir
Dworzecki, who’d
survived the concentration
camps of Estonia.
11/27/15 9:52 PM
The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-...
Ben-Gurion countered this sentiment, not by repudiating vengeance but
with cold calculation: “If I could take German prope...
Purchase answer to see full
attachment