Description
Discussion Assignment. SUPER EASY.
Suppose you are a sociologist studying alleged police brutality. Construct two arguments: one proposing that you ought to be as objective as possible in your work, and the other suggesting that, while striving for accuracy, you should take a stand against any injustices which your research may uncover. Which position do you find more convincing? Why?
Rubric for Grading:
Understanding: displayed an excellent understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts, 2) Research: integrated relevant research to support responses, 3) Deadline: met the deadline, 4) Word count: a minimum of 150 words, 5) Writing skills: well-organized and contained grammatically correct sentences without any spelling errors.
In addition to these questions, I would like you to simply respond to 2 other students' responses agreeing with them on something they wrote with consideration of other student's point of view. This is simply agreeing with a total of 2 other students responses with a minimum of 100 words for each response.
Explanation & Answer
Hello, I have done the work perfectly as you requested. The work is free from grammatical errors and plagiarism.
Surname 1
Name:
Professor:
Course:
Date:
Discussion questions
Argument: Proposing that ought to be as objective as possible in my work
I think that being a social worker, I should always be objective at my work for my study
to be successful. Being objective will keep more motivated when carrying out my research
because I will not be emotional or agitated by anything when carrying it out. Being objective at
work will always inspire me to go on with the study because I know that I’m supposed to be an
agent of social science where I should contact an agent of reducing social injustices. Being
objective will make me focused because I will be able to view individual points from my
position and interpret them and complete a...