Determinate vs. Indeterminate Sentencing

Anonymous

Question Description

Until the 1970s, most states provided inmates with a mechanism for early release at the discretion of a parole board under an indeterminate sentencing model. Since that time, determinate sentencing increasingly gained dominance until only very recently, when some states have started to question whether they should revert back to an indeterminate model. This week you compare each sentencing model and provide examples of both.

Write a 700–1,050 word essay incorporating the following:

  • Describe indeterminate sentencing.
  • Outline the pros and cons of indeterminate sentencing.
  • Provide a minimum of two examples of indeterminate sentencing.
  • Describe determinate sentencing.
  • Outline the pros and cons of determinate sentencing.
  • Provide a minimum of two examples of determinate sentencing.

Format your work consistent with APA guidelines.

Include a title and reference page.

Cite a minimum of three reliable sources within the body of your paper using in-text citations where appropriate.

Tutor Answer

Kishnewt2017
School: Boston College

Attached.

Running head: DETERMINATE AND INDETERMINATE SENTENCING

Determinate and Indeterminate sentencing
Name
Institution

1

DETERMINATE AND INDETERMINATE SENTENCING

2

Indeterminate sentencing is a jail sentence with no clear date of release. There are
scheduled hearings held by the state parole board to decide the time the convict is eligible for
parole. This can happen within the time range of the sentence one is serving. From this kind of
penalty, it is expected that an individual has undergone restoration while in jail and has shown
progress. With satisfactory progress, the convict is released but if the parole team sees no
progress in the person, parole is denied, and thus one serves the remaining time (Tony, 2000).
A parole board ascertains the exact release date of the guilty party. A parole board is a set
of individuals who audit the guilty party's record while he or she is detained with a specific end
goal to decide if the wrongdoer is qualified for release. The parole board takes a look at such
factors as the detainee's conduct, restoration endeavors, work efforts and several other factors. If
the parole board discovers that the wrongdoer is eligible, the guilty party might be discharged.
With indeterminate sentencing, convicts demonstrating higher progress are released.
Such choices consider the crimes a person commits along with their rap sheet, behaviors and
their commitment towards restoration. In some situations, the victims forgive the offenders and
submit articulations which in most cases result in one being granted parole. (Tony, 2000).
There are several critics concerning indeterminate sentencing with most arguing that
there is excessive control placed under the supervision of the parole board, which tend to prompt
self-assertive and unfair outcomes. Such, in most cases, result in individuals with little
associations and considered minorities are getting overly unforgiving choices. On the other hand,
the less meriting wrongdoers but with great relationships are discharged early.
A good case study of intermediate sentencing is the situation of Homaida Al-Turki, a
Saudi-Arabia national. He was arraigned in court on counts of raping his housekeeper. He was

DETERMINATE AND INDETERMINATE SENTENCING

3

charged with a total of twelve counts of sexual assault. Mr. Homaida was found guilty of keeping
his house help in his home without her consent and thus became a slave. Mr. Al-Turki found
reprieve when his sentence was reduced because of the time he had served at Limon, Colorado.
Furthermore, due to suggestions from a current...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Top quality work from this tutor! I’ll be back!

Anonymous
It’s my second time using SP and the work has been great back to back :) The one and only resource on the Interwebs for the work that needs to be done!

Anonymous
Thanks, good work

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors