IntroductionRead the following case study and respond to the question below.A 1982, a U.S. Supreme Court decision entitled undocumented illegal immigrants to a free education from kindergarten through grade 12. About 65,000 undocumented students graduated from U.S. colleges in 2009 alone. Miguel ("Mike”) and his parents crossed the border illegally from Mexico when he was only two. The family has been living in California for the past 15 years, where his father works as a laborer and his mother as a chambermaid. Mike graduated as valedictorian of his class and also won a prestigious science award. Given his family’s financial situation, he can go to college only because California is one of about twenty states, as of 2018, that allow in-state tuition for children of undocumented immigrants, if they have attended high school in their states. This practice has been challenged in federal court as a violation of federal immigration law. (Boss, 1, p. 363)Several states have already banned undocumented immigrants from their public colleges and universities, arguing that a college education is a scarce resource and tax money should be spent helping citizens get a college education rather than funding the education of undocumented immigrants. Critics also argue that the policy provides an enticement for people to come to the United States illegally. Supporters of in-state tuition argue that it is wrong to punish children for their parents’ actions. In addition, the chance for a college education provides an incentive for bright students to reach their potential as productive members of society.Question: Should in-state tuition be granted to undocumented students?Source1. Judith Boss. 2020. Analyzing Moral Issues (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.InstructionsUse the Case Study Assignment Template [DOCX] to do the following:Describe the relevant facts of the case.Clarify concepts relevant to the case.Apply a moral standard to the case.Articulate a conclusion to the stated question.Include at least two references, such as the textbook and other readings, to support your arguments.Strayer Writing StandardsThis course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.Learning OutcomesThe specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:Practice the application of ethics to everyday life.

The question is: Explain the “all-needs approach” that Donahue presents. Is this approach compatible with the all-hazards perspective? How does this approach differ from the FEMA approach of “whole community? 250 words apa formatresources:::Donahue, D. A., Cunnion, S. O., Balaban, C. D. & Sochats, K. (2012, February). The all needs approach to emergency response (Links to an external site.). The Journal of the NPS Center for Homeland Defense and Security, 8(1). Retrieved from https://www.hsaj.org/articles/204 (Links to an external site.)FEMA, U. S. Department of Homeland Security. (2011, December). A whole community approach to emergency management: Principles, themes, and pathways for action (Links to an external site.) [PDF, File Size 1.4MB]. Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1...