Name: Antonio Kemp
Institution name: Saint Leo University
Professor’s name: Jodi Pushkin
Should the college implement a mandatory attendance policy?
Before we embark on any discussions, it is important to note the significance of the topic
under discussion. The topic above explains the tug of war that has always been there between the
students and the professors, this is because they all share a different view as to how matters
should be handled when it comes to class attendance. This in return has pushed me as a lecturer
to create a claim study to the whole issue.
I am a very experienced lecturer and the topic is a question is a very great one. It has been
a major concern between the students and the administration. The things are that the professors
want the students to attend all the classes in a claim that they want to teach the students directly
instead of only teaching a handful of students. This is contrary to the experience of the students
because they want the freedom that they will have the authority to select which classes they want
to attend. This becomes even more difficult because the school has given the lecturers the
authority to select whether the students should all come or they have a choice. Thus a
controversial situation as some professors is strict while others are freestyle. On speaking to
some of the professors, they wish that all the students should attend the lectures but on
approaching the students with this same topic, they think they should have the choice of
thinking. This, as I came to find out, is because they believe that as long as a class work can be
performed out of the room then they do not have to attend. They only have to attend the lab
classes because the results have to be looked for and analyzed individually.
It is very important to study and understand which of the two is correct or better put, it is
important to understand who made a stronger argument? The main argument of the professors is
that the students need to see this teaching first hand. That is if many students attend a class, they
are able to ask questions as to what they did not understand and they are helped. However, if
they do not attend these classes, they do not grasp the concept and so the whole teaching process
becomes difficult for any of them to comprehend. They end up having to learn from their friends.
This is a very great disadvantage according to the professors. However, the students share a
different view. This is to say that they believe that they should have a choice as to which classes
they should attend. This, as I came to find out, is because they believe that as long as a class
work can be performed out of the room then they do not have to attend. They only have to attend
the lab classes because the results have to be looked for and analyzed individually.
Some professors, however, do not implement this, but instead; give bonus points to those who
These arguments led to the development of some policies that would help reduce this
pressure. Professors came up with bonus points. Bonus points are marks that are given to
students who fully attend the classes or at least three-quarters of it. Some of the professors saw a
better opportunity to capture the students and created the participation policy. This is where
students are able to receive points that will be included in the exams and so many will attend and
also try and participate so as to earn points. There is also the part where the professors came up
with weekly CATs and RATs which will be used as bonus points and this prompts students to
attend classes in order to grasp the concept. These non-mandatory policies are very useful to us
lecturers as we do not have to worry about attendance. However, they do not capture everyone.
This is because some students just attend these classes just to receive the bonus points.
In summary, I strongly believe that students must attend classes. In case one does not
understand the concept, they are given an option of asking questions, thus learning becomes
Verbeeten, M. J., & Van Hoof, H. B. (2007). Mandatory attendance policy and motivation
among hospitality management students. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 19(1), 2837.
Clair, K. L. S. (1999). A case against compulsory class attendance policies in higher education.
Innovative Higher Education, 23(3), 171-180.
Purchase answer to see full