[Poster Title] Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit maecenas porttitor congue massa fusce [Replace the following names and titles with those of the actual contributors: Dorena Paschke, PhD1; David Alexander, PhD2; Jeff Hay, RN, BSN, MHA3, and Pilar Pinilla, MD4 1[Add affiliation for first contributor], 2[Add affiliation for second contributor], 3[Add affiliation for third contributor], 4[Add affiliation for fourth contributor] INTRO METHODS Type the abstract here. To remove bullet points, just click the Bullets button on the Home tab. FINDINGS Chart Title • List methods and descriptions here 6 • Method 1 • Method 2 5 Series 3, 5 • Method 3 Series 1, 4.5 Axis Title 4 3 Series 2, 2.8 2 1 0 Category 1 Category 2 METHODS Category 3 Category 4 Chart Title 6 Add title if necessary. Click the B button on the home tab to add bold formatting. • • • Background item 5 Series 3, 5 Background item Series 1, 4.5 Background item • Type a caption for the data content or pictures here. Axis Title 4 3 Series 2, 2.8 2 FINDINGS 1 0 Category 1 Item Heading Heading Heading 122 233 345 Item 759 856 290 Item 228 134 238 Item 954 875 976 • Result 1 • Result 2 • Result 3 CONCLUSION • Conclusion 1 Item 324 325 301 • Conclusion 2 Item 199 137 186 • Conclusion 3 • Type a caption for the data content or pictures here. Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Research Poster 60 Points, 30% of Final Grade You are charged with conducting a content analysis and reporting your findings in the format of a research poster. First, you will devise a research question. Second, you will systematically collect a sample of text from 6 newspaper articles utilizing a purposive sampling design. Third, you will code the data in three steps: 1) open coding, 2) devise a coding guide, 3) re-code utilizing your coding guide. Third, you will produce a paper and associated research poster that summarizes your project. It should be written in academic tone and include the following: Title Student Name Introduction (.5 pages) Hook the reader with warrant(s) for your project. Present your topic, research question, and hypotheses. Summarize the findings and argument explaining why you found what you did. Methods (1 page) Explain nature of your population and data, your sampling strategy, how you analyzed the data, examples of the codes that emerged from initial and focused coding, the strengths and limitations of your analysis to answer your research question, and any ethical issues you encountered. Findings (1-2 pages) Present a summary of your key findings that relate to your research question. Integrate examples from your coded data from your analysis to support your findings (i.e. statistics, quotes) Discussion & Conclusion (.5-1 page) Synthesize and tie up loose ends. Review the key findings as they relate to the initial framing of the paper and the argument presented in the introduction. Develop a conclusion that reiterates the importance of your research, while leaving the reader with something to ponder. Spend one paragraph presenting at least two ideas for future research. Spend at least one paragraph discussing broader societal implications and/or ideas for reform or ways to address the issue addressed in your project. References (½ page) Present any citations in ASA format. It is optional to include references. **You will submit your paper and poster electronically to profdingeman@gmail.com by the deadline **You will also submit hard copies of your newspaper articles & coding notes. If these are not included you will receive a full grade deduction (i.e. an A goes down to B) Research Paper & Poster Rubric *60 points possible* Introduction – 10 points ______ Compelling “Hook” – 3 points ______ Warrant for the project – 1 point ______ Research Question / Purpose of Paper – 2 point ______ Key finding(s) and argument(s) – 4 points Methods – 15 points ______ Introduction to methods section (usually a reminder of research question) – 1 point ______ Population – 2 points ______ Sampling strategy – 2 points ______ How analyzed the data – 2 points ______ Examples of initial codes – 2 points ______ Examples of focused codes – 2 points ______ Reflection on strengths and limitations of method used to answer question(s) – 4 points Findings – 15 points ______ Findings of content analysis are presented – 5 points ______ Strength of the organization of findings as they relate to research question – 5 points ______ Strength of integration of supporting data into the argument – 5 points Discussion & Conclusion – 10 points ______ Summary of key findings – 4 points ______ Ties findings back to research question & hypothesis – 2 points ______ Ideas for future research – 2 points ______ Compelling conclusion (i.e. discussion of future research, political implications, etc.) – 2 point Miscellaneous – 10 points ______ Visual Presentation – 5 points ______ Grammar – 2 points ______ Tone – 3 points Qualitative Assessment The score of the paper can be increased or decreased based on the instructor’s qualitative, holistic, and subjective evaluation of the poster and any extenuating circumstances. It may be reduced for being late, too short/long, unrelated to the prompt, missing data and coding notes, etc. It may be increased if the student went beyond expectations, performed particularly well in certain areas, etc. COMMENTS:
Purchase answer to see full attachment