several sientist observe an animal with hair and wings this animal is a
User Generated
ubcrtbbqjva1111
Science
Description
idk i am in 5th grade
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
This question has not been answered.
Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Work, Energy - Dart Problem, physics homework help
A dart of mass m is accelerated horizontally through a tube of length L situated a height h above the ground by a constant ...
Work, Energy - Dart Problem, physics homework help
A dart of mass m is accelerated horizontally through a tube of length L situated a height h above the ground by a constant force F. Upon exiting the tube, the dart travels a horizontal distance Δx before striking the ground, as depicted in the diagram attached.(a) Develop an expression for the velocity of the dart, v, as it leaves the tube in terms of Δx, h, and any fundamental constants. (b) Derive an expression for the kinetic energy of the dart as it leaves the tube in terms of m, Δx, h, and any fundamental constants. (c) Derive an expression for the work done on the dart in the tube in terms of F and L . (d) Derive an expression for the height of the tube above the ground in terms of m, Δx, L, F, and any fundamental constants.
NURS BSN 422 American Sentinel Aurora Critical Evaluation of Research Study
Activity 1Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evide ...
NURS BSN 422 American Sentinel Aurora Critical Evaluation of Research Study
Activity 1Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study 4. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to evidence-based practice. Study 3 - Patients’ and partners’ health-related quality of life before and 4 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgeryStudy 4 - Striving for independence: a qualitative study of women living with vertebral fractureSuggested ReadingSchreiber, M. L. (2016). Evidence-Based Practice. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. MEDSURG Nursing, 25(6), 425-428. Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Wakefield, A. (2014). Searching and critiquing the research literature. Nursing Standard, 28(39), 49-57. doi:10.7748/ns.28.39.49.e8867Chapter 6 (pp. 131-153), Chapter 7 (pp. 157-185), Chapter 8 (pp. 189-226) Chapter 12 (pp.323-350)& Chapter 13 (pp. 351-380) In Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Readings, using & creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett LearningQualitative Specific ResourcesHouser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Readings, using & creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.Chapter 9, p. 229-252Chapter 14, p. 385-416Chapter 15, p. 419-442Additional Instructions:All submissions should have a title page and reference page.Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.Submission Options:Choose One:Instructions:Paper4 to 6-page paper. Include title and reference pages.Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation8 to 10 slides. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation8 to 10 slides with speaker notes. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Video Presentation5 to 8-minute video presentation.Attach reference page or include in video.Professional appearance and background.Video submissions must include a script in Word format, submitted through Turnitin for an Originality Report.TableTable with appropriate columns and headers.Include title and reference pages.Graphs or other illustrationsGraphs or illustrations with appropriate labels. Include title and reference pages.PosterPoster utilizing any applicable poster template. Include visual graphics/images/other formats for visual appeal. Include appropriate title and references on poster.Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements.Evidenced-Based Practice- Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research
Study
Description: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate knowledge of research and its
utilization in practice.
Course Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2)
Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate between
ethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integrate
reliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinical
judgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery
of care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team members
to collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes in complex
health care environments.
QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based Practice
BSN Essential III, IV, VII, IX
Area Gold
Mastery
Silver
Proficient
Bronze
Acceptable
Acceptable
Mastery not
Demonstrated
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
the components
of the
appropriate
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
the components
of the
appropriate
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using most of the
components
(Greater than
3/4) of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using one-half of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research design
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research design
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research design
using most of the
components of
the evaluation
(greater than ¾)
checklists in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research design
using one-half of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation
Evaluates ethical
issues in the
study using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates ethical
issues in the
study using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates ethical
issues in the
study using 3/4
of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates ethical
issues in the
study using 3/4
of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the Evaluates the
purpose
statement using
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement using
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement using
¾ of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement using
one-half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation
Evaluates the
literature review
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature review
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature review
using ¾ of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature review
using one-half of
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation sampling
strategy using
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
3/4 of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
one-half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy and
validity in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using
most of the
checklist
components in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy and
validity in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using
most of the
checklist
components in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using 3/4
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using 3/4
of the
components of
the checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using
one-half of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using
one-half of the
components of
the checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using onefourth or less of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness of
data in qualitative
studies using onefourth or less of
the components of
the checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates how
study results may
(or may not) be
Evaluates how
study results may
(or may not) be
Discusses study
results in general
but not how
Discusses EBP
in general but
does not relate to
Does not discuss
results or how
7 pages
Lab Taxonomy
2. How has DNA sequencing affected the science of classifying organisms? DNA sequencing has enabled gene comparison at mol ...
Lab Taxonomy
2. How has DNA sequencing affected the science of classifying organisms? DNA sequencing has enabled gene comparison at molecular level in contrast to ...
Similar Content
Leeds Metropolitan University Artifacts from AndeM Times and Ancient Art Discussion
For this paper you will select and curate a minimum of 5-10 works of art by 5-10 different ARTIST to include in your own a...
Sound and Wave Frequency Dopplers Effect Question
...
NRS429VN GCU Nurse's Role And Responsibility As Health Educator
the assignment needs to be high college level, and with no higher of 15% plagiarism, also references need to be cited at t...
What is biology?
What is the central dogma of biology? What does it represent? Why is it important to living organisms?
...
La Roche College Evolutionary Differences in The Galapagos Dicussion
https://youtu.be/PeYRaerdUWk
http://highered.mheducation.com/sites/0073525286/student_view0/chapter24/animations_and_vide...
What is the EMF of the cell?
...
Parkinson S Disease
The woman that Pepper assisted would move her hand to pick up the glass from behind. By taking the glass from behind, she ...
Physiology
2. Based on the figure you generated for “1” above, what is the relationship between stimulus amplitude and muscle res...
Case 3
Because the colonial morphology of the sample appeared suspicious, the result indicates that After the lab results, we are...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Work, Energy - Dart Problem, physics homework help
A dart of mass m is accelerated horizontally through a tube of length L situated a height h above the ground by a constant ...
Work, Energy - Dart Problem, physics homework help
A dart of mass m is accelerated horizontally through a tube of length L situated a height h above the ground by a constant force F. Upon exiting the tube, the dart travels a horizontal distance Δx before striking the ground, as depicted in the diagram attached.(a) Develop an expression for the velocity of the dart, v, as it leaves the tube in terms of Δx, h, and any fundamental constants. (b) Derive an expression for the kinetic energy of the dart as it leaves the tube in terms of m, Δx, h, and any fundamental constants. (c) Derive an expression for the work done on the dart in the tube in terms of F and L . (d) Derive an expression for the height of the tube above the ground in terms of m, Δx, L, F, and any fundamental constants.
NURS BSN 422 American Sentinel Aurora Critical Evaluation of Research Study
Activity 1Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evide ...
NURS BSN 422 American Sentinel Aurora Critical Evaluation of Research Study
Activity 1Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study 4. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to evidence-based practice. Study 3 - Patients’ and partners’ health-related quality of life before and 4 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgeryStudy 4 - Striving for independence: a qualitative study of women living with vertebral fractureSuggested ReadingSchreiber, M. L. (2016). Evidence-Based Practice. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. MEDSURG Nursing, 25(6), 425-428. Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Wakefield, A. (2014). Searching and critiquing the research literature. Nursing Standard, 28(39), 49-57. doi:10.7748/ns.28.39.49.e8867Chapter 6 (pp. 131-153), Chapter 7 (pp. 157-185), Chapter 8 (pp. 189-226) Chapter 12 (pp.323-350)& Chapter 13 (pp. 351-380) In Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Readings, using & creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett LearningQualitative Specific ResourcesHouser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Readings, using & creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.Chapter 9, p. 229-252Chapter 14, p. 385-416Chapter 15, p. 419-442Additional Instructions:All submissions should have a title page and reference page.Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.Submission Options:Choose One:Instructions:Paper4 to 6-page paper. Include title and reference pages.Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation8 to 10 slides. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation8 to 10 slides with speaker notes. Add title and reference slides.Follow Rules of 7.Video Presentation5 to 8-minute video presentation.Attach reference page or include in video.Professional appearance and background.Video submissions must include a script in Word format, submitted through Turnitin for an Originality Report.TableTable with appropriate columns and headers.Include title and reference pages.Graphs or other illustrationsGraphs or illustrations with appropriate labels. Include title and reference pages.PosterPoster utilizing any applicable poster template. Include visual graphics/images/other formats for visual appeal. Include appropriate title and references on poster.Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements.Evidenced-Based Practice- Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research
Study
Description: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate knowledge of research and its
utilization in practice.
Course Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2)
Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate between
ethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integrate
reliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinical
judgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery
of care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team members
to collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes in complex
health care environments.
QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based Practice
BSN Essential III, IV, VII, IX
Area Gold
Mastery
Silver
Proficient
Bronze
Acceptable
Acceptable
Mastery not
Demonstrated
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
the components
of the
appropriate
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
the components
of the
appropriate
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using most of the
components
(Greater than
3/4) of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates
credibility of
research article
using one-half of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research design
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research design
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research design
using most of the
components of
the evaluation
(greater than ¾)
checklists in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
problem
statement and
research design
using one-half of
the evaluation
checklists in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation
Evaluates ethical
issues in the
study using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates ethical
issues in the
study using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates ethical
issues in the
study using 3/4
of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates ethical
issues in the
study using 3/4
of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the Evaluates the
purpose
statement using
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement using
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement using
¾ of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
purpose
statement using
one-half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation
Evaluates the
literature review
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature review
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature review
using ¾ of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
literature review
using one-half of
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018)
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation sampling
strategy using
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
the components
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
3/4 of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
sampling
strategy using
one-half of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Does not address
section or
includes less than
one-half of the
evaluation
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy and
validity in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using
most of the
checklist
components in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy and
validity in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using
most of the
checklist
components in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using 3/4
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using 3/4
of the
components of
the checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using
one-half of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using
one-half of the
components of
the checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using onefourth or less of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness of
data in qualitative
studies using onefourth or less of
the components of
the checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates how
study results may
(or may not) be
Evaluates how
study results may
(or may not) be
Discusses study
results in general
but not how
Discusses EBP
in general but
does not relate to
Does not discuss
results or how
7 pages
Lab Taxonomy
2. How has DNA sequencing affected the science of classifying organisms? DNA sequencing has enabled gene comparison at mol ...
Lab Taxonomy
2. How has DNA sequencing affected the science of classifying organisms? DNA sequencing has enabled gene comparison at molecular level in contrast to ...
Earn money selling
your Study Documents
