Justice Department Sets Sights on Wall Street Executives

Oct 4th, 2017
Anonymous
Category:
Business Finance
Price: $40 USD

Question description

Class Discussion 2

Please read and discuss the Pizzo, Fricker, Muolo, Inside Job: The Looting of America’s Savings and Loans, pp. 41-82, Justice Department Sets Sights on Wall Street Executives, and Justice Department Memo on Corporate Wrongdoing (articles located in "Files" section of Canvas).

Compare and contrast the articles (similarities and differences) and please give your opinions and reactions. What are some points that struck you?

If you quote from an article, please use page numbers so that your classmates can refer to your points.

Please post an initial post (250 word minimum) by midnight Wednesday, and a response post (150 word minimum) by midnight, Saturday.

JNSTDB JOn The Looting of America's Savings and Loans STEPHIN PIZZO, MARI FRICKIR, and PAUI MUOTO Copyright 1989, 1991 by Stephen Pi. z zo, l4axy Fricker, and Paul }tuolo, 4 I HarpcrPcrcnoir.l ,l Dilirir dH.'?.r(.UiuPatnhn .tO I N SIDE JOB CHAPTER 1 Centennial Gears Up for Deregulation Bclorc dcrcgulation most thrilts wc.c smdl. Orlc did not go into thc uvings rnd lorn busincrs to gct !ich. In fact, shrting a small commu- nity.bscd savingr rnd lon bordcrcd on pc.rorming .ommunity vicc-locd pcoplc poolint thcir rcaourcc! to aarurc thcrc would $r tr r ralc placc lor thcir rzvingr rnd a rcurct for hornc hcns. Thcsc rmall. to$,II thrift wcrc iust barcly cling out : living whcn dcrcgulrtion prscd Congrcas and thcy bccemc thc prima taagcts for th. wolvcs thzt dcragrr htion unlcashcd. Thcy wcrc cary h.gcb for thc fut-trlling hith rollirs vho showd up to woo thc mostly unrophistic.tcd mrn:gcn :nd boards oJ dircctors with promisint p.oicitt or to ofict top iollzr !o loc.l shrrcholdcrs for thcir stocl. Hundrcds of rrnall thriftr rcross thc nztion fcll into thc wrong h:nds in thc wccb aod montlx lollowing dercguL- tion,.nd onc of thosc was Ccntcnnial Seving end taan, e ltrtcthnft in Northcm Califomir. From itr plein veniih bcginnin$, Ccntcnni2l roclct.d to uniEugirEblc hcightr within iust r icu cha.tcrcd months eftar d.rcgulation. But fc1l, ploplc noticcd thc mcbmorphosis until Ccntcnni.l! officcrs thrcy cnd of l98l . spcct cul2r Clostm:s party it thc It wes thc mort hvish Chrirtm:r pzrty rnyon. cujld reczll. ,.Elcgant " &n:is.ancc Fzirc" w.r thc thcmc. Couple grspcd :s iGtcrs pro clzrmcd th.ir entry rnto thc hall, now tn$forncd into an Eliz:ht-hrn 4l 42 INsIDE CENTENNI?rL CE,lIS UP fOR Df,AECULATtoN ,(} JOA But thc vision w:s slow in materhlizing end thc litdc thrift ipcnt iti 6lst three ye3r! going through r succctsion o[ hcHustcr presidcnts, none of whorn left a memorablc marl on thc town or thc institution's bottom line. Howcver, a5 1980 drcw to a clorc tall of impcnding d.rcgulation circuLted through thc industry. Ccntennial's dir€ctors \rantcd someone at thc helm who could sail their little thift ort of bccrlmcd seas and irto the unch.rtcd potentirl promiscd by thc chrmpions of deregulation. One of Centennial's dircctors rccalled his ecquaintancc with I mrn who had plenty of cxpcricncc in the thrift industry. Er*in "Erv' Hanscn, age 48, hrd bccn bouncing around thc industry r long timc. Hc hrd worted as a senior cxecutivc for lmperial Savings end Loan in Southcrn California, :s a deputy commissioner aIId th. numbcr h*o p.rioo in the Califomi. s.vings rod lorn commisioncr's ofrcc, er CEO for Far West Fioancbl in Ncwport Beach, California, and a: chicf ac.ountrnt for the Fcdcral Homc [,oan Ban[ Board in Washington, tinv white lights Canforcst o[ J00 living trecs sparlling with 75,000 lf.ii'f irfrirn."'.-a ,f,..gh plp.d-i" fog that dmulatcd thc moorr and rugs covcrcd ihc foor' invited glcstt wcre entertaincd the300 ,f,e ttes, teat a 6ddlels, iuSglcrs, jet€Is' rnd Prnt oJr.a .ri"c-noUin Hoods, *aihctses, onc for cv€ry tx'o gucsts' worc Elia' W.;t." "ta *"'--.*".ecr-plumcd hats, rufcd lace bodice' vrrds of rollcd the-10
Justice Department Sets Sights on Wall Street Executives - The New York Times 9/14/15, 4:20 AM http://nyti.ms/1NiRp4i U.S. Justice Department Sets Sights on Wall Street Executives By MATT APUZZO and BEN PROTESS SEPT. 9, 2015 WASHINGTON — Stung by years of criticism that it has coddled Wall Street criminals, the Justice Department issued new policies on Wednesday that prioritize the prosecution of individual employees — not just their companies — and put pressure on corporations to turn over evidence against their executives. The new rules, issued in a memo to federal prosecutors nationwide, are the first major policy announcement by Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch since she took office in April. The memo is a tacit acknowledgment of criticism that despite securing record fines from major corporations, the Justice Department under President Obama has punished few executives involved in the housing crisis, the financial meltdown and corporate scandals. “Corporations can only commit crimes through flesh-and-blood people,” Sally Q. Yates, the deputy attorney general and the author of the memo, said in an interview on Wednesday. “It’s only fair that the people who are responsible for committing those crimes be held accountable. The public needs to have confidence that there is one system of justice and it applies equally regardless of whether that crime occurs on a street corner or in a boardroom.” Though limited in reach, the memo could erase some barriers to prosecuting corporate employees and inject new life into these high-profile investigations. The Justice Department often targets companies themselves and turns its eyes toward http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/10/us/politics/new-justice-dept-rules-aime…Homepage&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1 Page 1 of 5 Justice Department Sets Sights on Wall Street Executives - The New York Times 9/14/15, 4:20 AM individuals only after negotiating a corporate settlement. In many cases, that means the offending employees go unpunished. The memo, a copy of which was provided to The New York Times, tells civil and criminal investigators to focus on individual employees from the beginning. In settlement negotiations, companies will not be able to obtain credit for cooperating with the government unless they identify employees and turn over evidence against them, “regardless of their position, status or seniority.” Credit for cooperation can save companies billions of dollars in fines and mean the difference between a civil settlement and a criminal charge. “We mean it when we say, ‘You have got to cough up the individuals,’ ” Ms. Yates said, a day before she was to address the policy in a speech at New York University School of Law. But in many ways, the new rules are an exercise in public messaging, substantive in some respects but symbolic in others. Because the memo lays out guidelines, not laws, its effect will be determined largely by how Justice Department officials interpret it. And several of the points in the memo merely codify policy that is already in place. “It’s a good memo, but it states what should have been the policy for years,” said Brandon L. Garrett, a University of Virginia law professor and the author of the book “Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise With Corporations.” “And without more resources, how are prosecutors going to know whether companies are still burying information about their employees?” It is also unknown whether the rules will encourage companies to turn in their executives, but Ms. Yates said the Justice Department would not allow companies to foist the blame onto low-level officials. “We’re not going to be accepting a company’s cooperation when they just offer up the vice president in charge of going to jail,” she said. Under Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., the Justice Department faced http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/10/us/politics/new-justice-dept-rules-aime…Homepage&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1 Page 2 of 5 Justice Department Sets Sights on Wall Street Executives - The New York Times 9/14/15, 4:20 AM repeated criticism from Congress and consumer advocates that it treated corporate executives leniently. After the 2008 financial crisis, no top Wall Street executives went to prison, highlighting a disparity in how prosecutors treat corporate leaders and typical criminals. Although prosecutors did collect billions of dollars in fines from big banks like JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup, critics dismissed those cases as hollow victories. Justice Department officials have defended their record fighting corporate crime, saying that it can be nearly impossible to charge top executives who insulate themselves from direct involvement in wrongdoing. Ms. Yates’s memo acknowledges “substantial challenges unique to pursuing individuals for corporate misdeeds,” but it says that the difficulty in targeting high-level officials is precisely why the Justice Department needs a stronger plan for investigating them. The new rules take effect immediately, but they are not likely to apply to investigations that are far along, such as one into General Motors over defects. Prosecutors in New York are struggling to charge company employees over problems linked to the deaths of more than 100 people, partly because the laws governing car companies require that prosecutors show that the employees intended to break the law, a higher standard than in other industries like pharmaceuticals and food. Ms. Yates, a career prosecutor, has established herself in the first months of her tenure as the department’s most vocal advocate for tackling white-collar crime. She foreshadowed plans for the new policy in a February speech to state attorneys general, in which she declared that “even imposing unprecedented financial penalties on the institutions whose conduct led to the financial crisis is not a substitute for holding individuals within those institutions personally accountable.” A criminal case last year against BNP Paribas, France’s biggest bank, demonstrated the gap between charging a bank and its employees. Even as officials extracted a record $8.9 billion penalty and made the company one of the first giant banks to plead guilty to a crime, no BNP employees faced charges. The Justice http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/10/us/politics/new-justice-dept-rules-aime…Homepage&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1 Page 3 of 5 Justice Department Sets Sights on Wall Street Executives - The New York Times 9/14/15, 4:20 AM Department said the bank insulated its employees by withholding records until after a deadline had passed to file individual charges. While the idea of white-collar investigations may conjure images of raids of corporate offices by federal agents, the reality is much different. When suspected of wrongdoing, large companies typically hire lawyers to conduct internal investigations and turn their findings over to the Justice Department. Those conclusions form the basis for settlement discussions, and they are likely to take on greater significance now that companies will be expected to name names. Whatever its practical implications, the memo is likely to resonate on the presidential campaign trail. In a speech this summer, Hillary Rodham Clinton seized on the sentiment that too many executives were escaping accountability, declaring that, if she were elected, her administration would “prosecute individuals as well as firms when they commit fraud.” For the Justice Department, corporate prosecutions have a long history of political implications and judicial second-guessing. Ms. Yates’s memo is the latest in a series of guidelines drafted and tweaked over the years, often in the period leading to presidential elections. The effort started in 1999 with Mr. Holder, the deputy attorney general at the time. But two cases that followed chipped away at the guidelines and had a chilling effect on corporate prosecutions: the Supreme Court’s reversal of a conviction against the accounting firm Arthur Andersen in the Enron scandal, and a federal court’s rejection of a case against KPMG employees linked to tax shelters. Prosecutors began to shift from indictments and guilty pleas to deferredprosecution agreements — essentially a form of corporate probation. The memo from Ms. Yates, which took shape in recent months through a Justice Department working group that started during Mr. Holder’s tenure, tries to place a new emphasis on individual prosecutions without running afoul of those court rulings. Still, even if the Justice Department’s effort succeeds, it will not automatically http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/10/us/politics/new-justice-dept-rules-aime…Homepage&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1 Page 4 of 5 Justice Department Sets Sights on Wall Street Executives - The New York Times 9/14/15, 4:20 AM put more executives behind bars. Mr. Garrett, the University of Virginia law professor, analyzed the cases in which corporate employees had been charged. More than half, he said, were spared jail time. A version of this article appears in print on September 10, 2015, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Justice Dept. Sets Its Sights on Executives. © 2015 The New York Times Company http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/10/us/politics/new-justice-dept-rules-aime…Homepage&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1 Page 5 of 5

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Jkennish
School: Boston College
PREMIUM TUTOR

Hey buddy? Find the attached file. Thanks and Goodbye. Always feel free to invite me exclusively in future

Articles Reading Comparison
Well according to our readings Inside Job, The Looting of America’s Savings and Loans, pp. 4182, Justice Department Sets Sights on Wall Street Executives, and Justice Department Memo on
Corporate Wrongdoing, seem to agree that i...

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

Review from student
Anonymous
" Excellent job "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1824 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors