There are different actors in the courtroom, and each has a specific role in how a trial or session will progress. There are also differences between the federal and state courts that are important to understand. In this assignment, you will outline details about the actors in the courtroom and federal and state courts. You will gain an understanding of the courts that will prepare you to participate in the courtroom process.Imagine you are a court administrator for the local superior court. You have been asked to speak to a high school civics class. Specifically, the teacher would like you to provide a general overview of federal and state courts and discuss the primary actors in each court system.Create an 8- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation in which you:Identify actors in the courtroom.Who are the actors in federal courts and state courts? (Include actors the two courts have incommon and any actors who are different.)What are their responsibilities?Why is it important for these responsibilities to be fulfilled adequately? (Consider the effect of overzealousness compared to the effect of underperformance.)Identify what is different between these actors in federal courts from the same actors in the state courts.JudgesDefense attorneysProsecutorsJuriesContrast federal and state (your state or the state you’re from) courts (consider creating a diagram/chart/table).StructureJurisdictionRoles of each courtCase typesInclude detailed speaker notes and at least 1 illustration, such as a chart, diagram, table, etc.Cite a minimum of 2 sources (one source for state courts and one source for federal courts).

For the field of healthcare administration, healthcare leaders and administrators may contribute to the public policy process by advocating for and implementing policy changes to enhance delivery goals for an HSO while also benefitting the HSO’s patient population. Yet, within the public policy process, how do healthcare leaders best engage in the process? There are four steps in the public policy process: 1) identifying a problem, 2) formulating a policy, 3) implementing the policy change, and 4) evaluating the result. While the steps identified here are simplified, they do present a cycle or sequence that healthcare administration leaders may act upon to influence public policy. Consider how healthcare leaders might have contributed to the public policy that brought about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). At what step in the process might have healthcare administration professionals contributed their perspective in designing or implementing this law? Concisely describe how healthcare leaders might influence the public policy process. Consider what healthcare leaders must do to maximize the business and healthcare delivery goals of an HSO. Give a description of how a healthcare administration leader might influence the public policy process to the advantage of a health services organization or other professional association. Be specific and provide examples.

What if you interviewed a focus group? Would you choose conversation or interview guiding? Why or why not? What if you were searching for study subjects? Are there any groups you would be interested in studying that would claim you as an insider?You are required to post 1 thread of at least 500–700 words and 2 replies of at least 200–300 words. For each thread, you must support your assertions with citations from the Scripture, required readings and presentations as well as at least 2 scholarly (i.e. “peer-reviewed) sources. Likewise, each reply must have citations from 2 scholarly (i.e. “peer-reviewed) sources.The thread and replies must follow current APA format. Please note, with any discussion board, there are formatting limitations. For example, Times New Roman and double-spacing are difficult, so that requirement may be waived. However the “spirit” of APA must be present with references, citations, and a readable 12-point font (Blackboard default is acceptable).