SWK 655 FIU Psychology Paper

User Generated



SWK 655

Florida International University



Unformatted Attachment Preview

Assignment 4 SWK 655: Program Evaluation (revised 2020 08-01) Consider the four types of evaluations described to date: needs assessment, process evaluation, outcome evaluation and efficiency evaluation. For this assignment submission, complete the following: Part 1: 1. Discuss how the four types of evaluations work together to present a comprehensive picture of a program. 2. Consider what would be lost if the information obtained from each of the four types were missing? Part 2: Now consider how to apply, or use, program evaluation in an agency setting. For example, an agency depends on licensed social workers to provide billable services to clients as a funding source to the operational budget. Think about how licensure of providers can be evaluated within the agency. It’s your topic for this assignment. Assume you are part of an evaluation team within an agency in your state or jurisdiction. One of your tasks is to evaluate how many providers in the agency are licensed, and how many providers qualify for licensure but are not licensed. Assume the goal is for 80% of the agency’s providers to be licensed. Hint: You cannot complete this section of the assignment without knowing the licensure requirements for the state or jurisdiction where the agency is located. You MUST use the ASWB website (https://www.aswb.org/regulation/laws-and-regulations-database/) to access the Social Work Regulations Database as a source of knowledge in this assignment. 1. If you were tasked with leading a team to evaluate this program, who are the collaborative team members you would need to create an effective comprehensive evaluation and why? 2. Apply a comprehensive program evaluation to this example. This should not be a general or conceptual discussion of the 4 types of evaluations, it should be an overview of specific application to the example. Create 4 sections where you discuss the needs assessment, the process evaluation, outcomes evaluation, and efficiency evaluation needed in the agency about licensed and unlicensed providers serving clients. Your final product in this section of the assignment fits together to offer a comprehensive “picture” of licensed and unlicensed providers offering services to individuals, families, and groups within the agency. Keep in mind that program evaluations often begin with questions like this. While it may seem vague and unclear, it is now your task to conceptualize and explain how this specific comprehensive evaluation comes together. This assignment assesses the following Advanced Generalist specialized behaviors: A4.1 – C/A, A4.2 – C/A, A9.1 – C/A, A9.2 – C/A, A9.3 – C/A This assignment shall include a minimum of 4 pages (1-inch margins, double spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font) and maximum of 6 pages. Use headings and subheadings to Page 1 of 2 organize your paper. Align your headings with the instructions above, but do not use numbered sections. Write your paper so that it is a standalone document; in other words, write so that any reader can follow your paper without having to read the assignment instructions. Discuss topics within headings rather than answering assignment questions. Use the text and at least two additional references to support your work; be sure to use in text citations to align content from the references within the body of your paper. Be sure to effectively use a title page, reference list, and intext citations. This assignment is worth 30 points. Page 2 of 2
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer:
5 pages
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Please view explanation and answer below.


Assignment 4- SWK 655: Program Evaluation

Assignment 4- SWK 655: Program Evaluation
A comprehensive interpretation of a social program is enabled by understanding what
needs the program seeks to address in the community and the extent to which it identifies the real
needs in the community, the process the program applies in meeting the needs, and how effective
the process is. Also vital for consideration is the outcomes the program intends to realize, how
they address the needs, and the efficiency the program is able to attain. Therefore, the four types
of evaluations play collaborative roles in revealing the nature of the program. Needs assessment,
process evaluation, outcome evaluation, and efficiency evaluation are designed to examine
different stages of the program, which allows an in-depth understanding of the program from its
conception to the end.
Part I
The Four Types of Program Evaluation
Needs Assessment
As the first stage of program evaluation, a needs assessment generates an understanding
of the program's conception. Conception entails an outline of the needs that triggered the
program and the objectives that are purposed to be attained by addressing the needs (Grinnell et
al., 2019). A needs assessment is used to identify what is lacking in a particular population and
how such scarcity inhibits it from attaining satisfactory lives (Grinnell et al., 2019). A need
implies a gap between two measurable circumstances. The two circumstances involve comparing
the current and ideal situations (Grinnell et al., 2019). Needs assessment goes further to collect
and analyze data on how to bridge the gap between the two situations (Grinnell et al., 2019).
Additionally, needs assessment allows program coordinators to systematically capitalize on the
most vital needs while allocating resources where they are needed most (O'Donnell, 2022).

Needs assessment, therefore, provides insights into the nature, scope, and locale of the program
selected to solve the problem based on evidence.
Process Evaluation
Process evaluation illustrates whether the social program was implemented in the manner
it was intended. Program processes encompass the myriad activities and characteristics that
describe how a program is offer...

Really great stuff, couldn't ask for more.


Similar Content

Related Tags