Reading Responses

User Generated

zb2290

Writing

Womens Voices Thru Time

American University

Description

Responses are expected to follow basic rules of grammar but a formal introduction or conclusion is not needed. Student may begin responding to the readings in the first sentence(e.g."Smith's analysis of x reminded me of y because".Responses should not consist of a summary of the reading(s),but rather be a place to thoughtfully respond to the ideas brought up by the readings.Students may connect the day's readings to previous course readings , current debates/ events , personal experiences, or pose questions about the ideas presented.Students do not need to respond to every reading, but should respond to major themes covered in the day's readings.The purpose of reading responses is to help students get in the habit of thinking analytically and writing succinctly about what the readings and how they may connect to other ideas or current events.

(I attached all the readings which covered in the day's reading)

Unformatted Attachment Preview

13 Introduction to Feminist Concepts and Issues 1.3 Oppression Marilyn Frye It is a fundamental claim of feminism that women are oppressed. The word "oppression” is a strong word. It repels and attracts. It is dangerous and dangerously fashionable and endangered. It is much misused, and sometimes not innocently. The statement that women are oppressed is frequently met with the claim that men are oppressed too. We hear that oppressing is oppressive to those who oppress as well as to those they oppress. Some men cite as evidence of their oppression their much-advertised inability to cry. It is tough, we are told, to be masculine. When the stresses and frustrations of being a man are cited as evidence that oppressors are oppressed by their oppressing, the word “oppression” is being stretched to mean- inglessness: it is treated as though its scope includes any and all human experience of limitation or suffering, no matter the cause, degree or consequence. Once such usage has been put over on us, then if ever we deny that any person or group is op- pressed, we seem to imply that we think they never suffer and have no feelings. We are accused of insensitivity; even of bigotry. For women, such accusation is partic- ularly intimidating, since sensitivity is one of the few virtues that has been assigned to us. If we are found insensitive, we may fear we have no redeeming traits at all and perhaps are not real women. Thus are we silenced before we begin: the name of our situation drained of meaning and our guilt mechanisms tripped. But this is nonsense. Human beings can be miserable without being oppressed, and it is perfectly consistent to deny that a person or group is oppressed without denying that they have feelings or that they suffer. The root of the word “oppression” is the element “press.” The press of the crowd; pressed into military service; to press a pair of pants; printing press; press the button. Presses are used to mold things or flatten them or reduce them in bulk, sometimes to reduce them by squeezing out the gasses or liquids in them. Something pressed is something caught between or among forces and barriers which are so related to each other that jointly they restrain, restrict or prevent the thing's motion or mobility. Mold. Immobilize. Reduce. The mundane experience of the oppressed provides another clue. One of the most characteristic and ubiquitous features of the world as experienced by oppressed peo- ple is the double bind – situations in which options are reduced to a very few and all of them expose one to penalty, censure or deprivation. For example, it is often a requirement upon oppressed people that we smile and be cheerful. If we comply, we signal our docility and our acquiescence in our situation. We need not, then, be taken note of. We acquiesce in being made invisible, in our occupying no space. We participate in our own erasure. On the other hand, anything but the sunniest countenance exposes us to being perceived as mean, bitter, angry or dangerous. This 14 Introduction to Feminist Concepts and Issues catch one be It is the exp booby trapp Cages. C you cannot means, at the least, that we may be found “difficult” or unpleasant to work with, which is enough to cost one one's livelihood; at worst, being seen as mean, bitter, angry or dangerous has been known to result in rape, arrest, beating and murder. One can only choose to risk one's preferred form and rate of annihilation. Another example: it is common in the United States that women, especially youn- ger women, are in a bind where neither sexual activity nor sexual inactivity is all right. If she is heterosexually active, a woman is open to censure and punishment for being loose, unprincipled or a whore. The “punishment” comes in the form of criti- cism, snide and embarrassing remarks, being treated as an easy lay by men, scorn from her more restrained female friends. She may have to lie and hide her behavior from her parents. She must juggle the risks of unwanted pregnancy and dangerous contraceptives. On the other hand, if she refrains from heterosexual activity, she is fairly constantly harassed by men who try to persuade her into it and pressure her to “relax” and “let her hair down”; she is threatened with labels like “frigid,” “uptight,” “man-hater," “bitch” and “cocktease.” The same parents who would be disapproving of her sexual activity may be worried by her inactivity because it suggests she is not or will not be popular, or is not sexually normal. She may be charged with lesbian- ism. If a woman is raped, then if she has been heterosexually active she is subject to the presumption that she liked it (since her activity is presumed to show that she likes sex), and if she has not been heterosexually active, she is subject to the pre- sumption that she liked it (since she is supposedly “repressed and frustrated”). Both heterosexual activity and heterosexual non-activity are likely to be taken as proof that you wanted to be raped, and hence, of course, weren't really raped at all. You can't win. You are caught in a bind, caught between systematically related pressures. Women are caught like this, too, by networks of forces and barriers that expose one to penalty, loss or contempt whether one works outside the home or not, is on welfare or not, bears children or not, raises children or not, marries or not, stays married or not, is heterosexual, lesbian, both or neither. Economic necessity; con- finement to racial and/or sexual job ghettos; sexual harassment; sex discrimination; pressures of competing expectations and judgments about women, wives and mothers (in the society at large, in racial and ethnic subcultures and in one's own mind); dependence (full or partial) on husbands, parents or the state; commitment to political ideas; loyalties to racial or ethnic or other “minority groups; the demands of self-respect and responsibilities to others. Each of these factors exists in complex tension with every other, penalizing or prohibiting all of the apparently available options. And nipping at one's heels, always, is the endless pack of little things. If one dresses one way, one is subject to the assumption that one is advertising one's sexual availability; if one dresses another way, one appears to “not care about oneself” or to be "unfeminine.” If one uses “strong language," one invites categorization as a whore or slut; if one does not, one invites categorization as a “lady” – one too delicately constituted to cope with robust speech or the realities to which it presumably refers. The experience of oppressed people is that the living of one's life is confined and shaped by forces and barriers which are not accidental or occasional and hence avoidable, but are systematically related to each other in such a way as to mined by tl of it, and b wanted to inspected the wires t the closest harmed b looking at whole cag see it in a obvious t1 no one a relations It is no and reco and som seeing o people t are shap The a that abo across C do not The ma while t them. oppres But ea One h The This c sense. wome and jo conve noiso pract world ful a Introduction to Feminist Concepts and Issues 15 s Es ot catch one between and among them and restrict or penalize motion in any direction. It is the experience of being caged in: all avenues, in every direction, are blocked or booby trapped. Cages. Consider a birdcage. If you look very closely at just one wire in the cage, you cannot see the other wires. If your conception of what is before you is deter- mined by this myopic focus, you could look at that one wire, up and down the length of it, and be unable to see why a bird would not just fly around the wire any time it wanted to go somewhere. Furthermore, even if, one day at a time, you myopically inspected each wire, you still could not see why a bird would have trouble going past the wires to get anywhere. There is no physical property of any one wire, nothing that the closest scrutiny could discover, that will reveal how a bird could be inhibited or harmed by it except in the most accidental way. It is only when you step back, stop looking at the wires one by one, microscopically, and take a macroscopic view of the whole cage, that you can see why the bird does not go anywhere; and then you will see it in a moment. It will require no great subtlety of mental powers. It is perfectly obvious that the bird is surrounded by a network of systematically related barriers, no one of which would be the least hindrance to its flight, but which, by their relations to each other, are as confining as the solid walls of a dungeon. It is now possible to grasp one of the reasons why oppression can be hard to see and recognize: one can study the elements of an oppressive structure with great care and some good will without seeing the structure as a whole, and hence without seeing or being able to understand that one is looking at a cage and that there are people there who are caged, whose motion and mobility are restricted, whose lives are shaped and reduced. The arresting of vision at a microscopic level yields such common confusion as that about the male door-opening ritual. This ritual, which is remarkably widespread across classes and races, puzzles many people, some of whom do and some of whom do not find it offensive. Look at the scene of the two people approaching a door. The male steps slightly ahead and opens the door. The male holds the door open while the female glides through. Then the male goes through. The door closes after them. “Now how one innocently asks, “can those crazy womenslibbers say that is oppressive? The guy removed a barrier to the lady's smooth and unruffled progress.” But each repetition of this ritual has a place in a pattern, in fact in several patterns. One has to shift the level of one's perception in order to see the whole picture. The door-opening pretends to be a helpful service, but the helpfulness is false. This can be seen by noting that it will be done whether or not it makes any practical sense. Infirm men and men burdened with packages will open doors for able-bodied women who are free of physical burdens. Men will impose themselves awkwardly and jostle everyone in order to get to the door first. The act is not determined by convenience or grace. Furthermore, these very numerous acts of unneeded or even noisome "help" occur in counterpoint to a pattern of men not being helpful in many practical ways in which women might welcome help. What women experience is a world in which gallant princes charming commonly make a fuss about being help- ful and providing small services when help and services are of little or no use, but "This bod Women long-tern politics of wome 16 Introduction to Feminist Concepts and Issues Courses This maja Women's the inclus with multi and diffe Gender reproduct the future historical the fresh pedagog in which there are rarely ingenious and adroit princes at hand when substantial assistance is really wanted either in mundane affairs or in situations of threat, assault or terror. There is no help with the (his) laundry; no help typing a report at 4 a.m.; no help in mediating disputes among relatives or children. There is nothing but advice that women should stay indoors after dark, be chaperoned by a man, or when it comes down to it, “lie back and enjoy it." The gallant gestures have no practical meaning. Their meaning is symbolic. The door-opening and similar services provided are services which really are needed by people who are for one reason or another incapacitated - unwell, burdened with parcels, etc. So the message is that women are incapable. The detachment of the acts from the concrete realities of what women need and do not need is a vehicle for the message that women's actual needs and interests are unimportant or irrel- evant. Finally, these gestures imitate the behavior of servants toward masters and thus mock women, who are in most respects the servants and caretakers of men. The message of the false helpfulness of male gallantry is female dependence, the invisibility or insignificance of women, and contempt for women. One cannot see the meanings of these rituals if one's focus is riveted upon the individual event in all its particularity, including the particularity of the individual man's present conscious intentions and motives and the individual woman's con- scious perception of the event in the moment. It seems sometimes that people take a deliberately myopic view and fill their eyes with things seen microscopically in order not to see macroscopically. At any rate, whether it is deliberate or not, people can and do fail to see the oppression of women because they fail to see macroscopically and hence fail to see the various elements of the situation as systematically related in larger schemes. As the cageness of the birdcage is a macroscopic phenomenon, the oppressiveness of the situations in which women live our various and different lives is a macro- scopic phenomenon. Neither can be seen from a microscopic perspective. But when you look macroscopically you can see it - a network of forces and barriers which are systematically related and which conspire to the immobilization, reduction and molding of women and the lives we live. Bonnie the autho two-volun editor of Woolf an Susan E of Wash Gauze: V author of Babe: The Healing i Anne DI author of Studies (v Djebar (2 works of 1.4 Irene La She has a and Indig Age, Race, Class, and Sex: Women Redefining Difference Audre Lorde web with 80 www.wiley Much of Western European history conditions us to see human differences in sim- plistic opposition to each other: dominant/subordinate, good/bad, up/down, superior/inferior. In a society where the good is defined in terms of profit rather than in terms of human need, there must always be some group of people who WU 2 Introduction to Feminist Concepts and Issues Intro 1.5 Womanist Alice Walker 1.6 Masculinity as Homophobia: Fear, Shame, and Silence in the Construction of Gender Identity Michael S. Kimmel 1.7 Abandon Your Tedious Search: The Rulebook Has Been Found! Kate Bornstein 1.8 Feminists Theorize Colonial/Postcolonial Rosemary Marangoly George Feminism has many different definitions and facets. A popular definition of feminism is "the radical notion that women are people." The Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary defines it as "1: the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes; 2: organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests."Feminism thus includes both scholarship and activism. African American public intellectual bell hooks takes issue with a narrow definition of feminism that focuses only on seeking equality with men. She importantly asks, to which men do which women seek to be equal, given that not all men are equal? She highlights the extent to which this narrow definition of feminism only focuses on gender issues and therefore applies best to the situation of white, middle-class women. She goes on to redefine feminism more broadly and radically: "Feminism as a movement to end sexist oppression directs our attention to systems of domination and the inter-relatedness of sex, race, and class oppression"("Feminism"31). The most complete definition of feminism is probably that of Black lesbian writer-activist Barbara Smith: "Feminism is the political theory and practice that struggles to free all women: women of color, working-class women, poor women, disabled women, lesbians, old women – as well as white, economically privileged, heterosexual women. Anything less than this vision of total freedom is not feminism, but merely female self-aggrandizement" (25). (Sandoval), "multiple co Intersectionality can be tr Truth and Anna Julia Coc connections between so orientation, race and class sexual orientation as pro contribution to scholarsh the interrelatedness of ra 1972; Mitsuye Yamada in gender, class, and sexua Cherrie Moraga and Glor nialism, race, class, and around the 1990s, schola gender, race, and nationa Yuval-Davis) and among Wendell) and gender, ra Morris) have made impo identity had been added queer, questioning, and i oppression and identity. lesson feminists have le tional approaches is that sense of our life experier location (the time and p access, as well as the s belonging). The readings in this int above. Chicana creative w novel The House on Man character of young Espera ficulties of having multip you to be only one thing, Her first name, Spanish fo meaning reflects her sen cultures - and her hope strong woman in her line meaning of her name - b in your lineage and cultur your place in society. Her awareness of the different States - her "silver"-sound in English In her book The Politi "Oppression" is excerpted a critical definition of op Intersectional Feminism Smith's and hooks's definitions are intersectional, a term that means that they do not only focus on one issue such as gender but broaden the analysis to encompass other vectors of identity and of human domination such as race and racism, social class and classism, sexual orientation, colonialism and imperialism, disability, national origin, reli- gion, and age. This wide-ranging approach, which has created a paradigm shift in Women's Studies, Ethnic Studies, and other fields, has come to be known as intersection- ality (Crenshaw) but is also variously termed “Black feminist thought" (Collins), "multiracial feminism" (Zinn and Dill), "multicultural feminism" (Shohat), "US Third-World feminism" Original publication details: 1.7 Kate Bornstein, “Abandon Your Tedious Search: The Rulebook Has Been Found!” from Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women and the Rest of Us, pp. 45–52. New York: Routledge, 1994. Reproduced with permission of Taylor & Francis Group LLC. 1.8 Rosemary Marangoly George, “Feminists Theorize Colonial/Postcolonial” from Cambridge Companion to Feminist Literary Theory, ed. Ellen Rooney, pp. 211-16; 220-23, 227–31. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Reproduced with permission of Cambridge University Press. 13 Introduction to Feminist Concepts and Issues 1.3 Oppression Marilyn Frye It is a fundamental claim of feminism that women are oppressed. The word "oppression” is a strong word. It repels and attracts. It is dangerous and dangerously fashionable and endangered. It is much misused, and sometimes not innocently. The statement that women are oppressed is frequently met with the claim that men are oppressed too. We hear that oppressing is oppressive to those who oppress as well as to those they oppress. Some men cite as evidence of their oppression their much-advertised inability to cry. It is tough, we are told, to be masculine. When the stresses and frustrations of being a man are cited as evidence that oppressors are oppressed by their oppressing, the word “oppression” is being stretched to mean- inglessness: it is treated as though its scope includes any and all human experience of limitation or suffering, no matter the cause, degree or consequence. Once such usage has been put over on us, then if ever we deny that any person or group is op- pressed, we seem to imply that we think they never suffer and have no feelings. We are accused of insensitivity; even of bigotry. For women, such accusation is partic- ularly intimidating, since sensitivity is one of the few virtues that has been assigned to us. If we are found insensitive, we may fear we have no redeeming traits at all and perhaps are not real women. Thus are we silenced before we begin: the name of our situation drained of meaning and our guilt mechanisms tripped. But this is nonsense. Human beings can be miserable without being oppressed, and it is perfectly consistent to deny that a person or group is oppressed without denying that they have feelings or that they suffer. The root of the word “oppression” is the element “press.” The press of the crowd; pressed into military service; to press a pair of pants; printing press; press the button. Presses are used to mold things or flatten them or reduce them in bulk, sometimes to reduce them by squeezing out the gasses or liquids in them. Something pressed is something caught between or among forces and barriers which are so related to each other that jointly they restrain, restrict or prevent the thing's motion or mobility. Mold. Immobilize. Reduce. The mundane experience of the oppressed provides another clue. One of the most characteristic and ubiquitous features of the world as experienced by oppressed peo- ple is the double bind – situations in which options are reduced to a very few and all of them expose one to penalty, censure or deprivation. For example, it is often a requirement upon oppressed people that we smile and be cheerful. If we comply, we signal our docility and our acquiescence in our situation. We need not, then, be taken note of. We acquiesce in being made invisible, in our occupying no space. We participate in our own erasure. On the other hand, anything but the sunniest countenance exposes us to being perceived as mean, bitter, angry or dangerous. This 14 Introduction to Feminist Concepts and Issues catch one be It is the exp booby trapp Cages. C you cannot means, at the least, that we may be found “difficult” or unpleasant to work with, which is enough to cost one one's livelihood; at worst, being seen as mean, bitter, angry or dangerous has been known to result in rape, arrest, beating and murder. One can only choose to risk one's preferred form and rate of annihilation. Another example: it is common in the United States that women, especially youn- ger women, are in a bind where neither sexual activity nor sexual inactivity is all right. If she is heterosexually active, a woman is open to censure and punishment for being loose, unprincipled or a whore. The “punishment” comes in the form of criti- cism, snide and embarrassing remarks, being treated as an easy lay by men, scorn from her more restrained female friends. She may have to lie and hide her behavior from her parents. She must juggle the risks of unwanted pregnancy and dangerous contraceptives. On the other hand, if she refrains from heterosexual activity, she is fairly constantly harassed by men who try to persuade her into it and pressure her to “relax” and “let her hair down”; she is threatened with labels like “frigid,” “uptight,” “man-hater," “bitch” and “cocktease.” The same parents who would be disapproving of her sexual activity may be worried by her inactivity because it suggests she is not or will not be popular, or is not sexually normal. She may be charged with lesbian- ism. If a woman is raped, then if she has been heterosexually active she is subject to the presumption that she liked it (since her activity is presumed to show that she likes sex), and if she has not been heterosexually active, she is subject to the pre- sumption that she liked it (since she is supposedly “repressed and frustrated”). Both heterosexual activity and heterosexual non-activity are likely to be taken as proof that you wanted to be raped, and hence, of course, weren't really raped at all. You can't win. You are caught in a bind, caught between systematically related pressures. Women are caught like this, too, by networks of forces and barriers that expose one to penalty, loss or contempt whether one works outside the home or not, is on welfare or not, bears children or not, raises children or not, marries or not, stays married or not, is heterosexual, lesbian, both or neither. Economic necessity; con- finement to racial and/or sexual job ghettos; sexual harassment; sex discrimination; pressures of competing expectations and judgments about women, wives and mothers (in the society at large, in racial and ethnic subcultures and in one's own mind); dependence (full or partial) on husbands, parents or the state; commitment to political ideas; loyalties to racial or ethnic or other “minority groups; the demands of self-respect and responsibilities to others. Each of these factors exists in complex tension with every other, penalizing or prohibiting all of the apparently available options. And nipping at one's heels, always, is the endless pack of little things. If one dresses one way, one is subject to the assumption that one is advertising one's sexual availability; if one dresses another way, one appears to “not care about oneself” or to be "unfeminine.” If one uses “strong language," one invites categorization as a whore or slut; if one does not, one invites categorization as a “lady” – one too delicately constituted to cope with robust speech or the realities to which it presumably refers. The experience of oppressed people is that the living of one's life is confined and shaped by forces and barriers which are not accidental or occasional and hence avoidable, but are systematically related to each other in such a way as to mined by tl of it, and b wanted to inspected the wires t the closest harmed b looking at whole cag see it in a obvious t1 no one a relations It is no and reco and som seeing o people t are shap The a that abo across C do not The ma while t them. oppres But ea One h The This c sense. wome and jo conve noiso pract world ful a Introduction to Feminist Concepts and Issues 15 s Es ot catch one between and among them and restrict or penalize motion in any direction. It is the experience of being caged in: all avenues, in every direction, are blocked or booby trapped. Cages. Consider a birdcage. If you look very closely at just one wire in the cage, you cannot see the other wires. If your conception of what is before you is deter- mined by this myopic focus, you could look at that one wire, up and down the length of it, and be unable to see why a bird would not just fly around the wire any time it wanted to go somewhere. Furthermore, even if, one day at a time, you myopically inspected each wire, you still could not see why a bird would have trouble going past the wires to get anywhere. There is no physical property of any one wire, nothing that the closest scrutiny could discover, that will reveal how a bird could be inhibited or harmed by it except in the most accidental way. It is only when you step back, stop looking at the wires one by one, microscopically, and take a macroscopic view of the whole cage, that you can see why the bird does not go anywhere; and then you will see it in a moment. It will require no great subtlety of mental powers. It is perfectly obvious that the bird is surrounded by a network of systematically related barriers, no one of which would be the least hindrance to its flight, but which, by their relations to each other, are as confining as the solid walls of a dungeon. It is now possible to grasp one of the reasons why oppression can be hard to see and recognize: one can study the elements of an oppressive structure with great care and some good will without seeing the structure as a whole, and hence without seeing or being able to understand that one is looking at a cage and that there are people there who are caged, whose motion and mobility are restricted, whose lives are shaped and reduced. The arresting of vision at a microscopic level yields such common confusion as that about the male door-opening ritual. This ritual, which is remarkably widespread across classes and races, puzzles many people, some of whom do and some of whom do not find it offensive. Look at the scene of the two people approaching a door. The male steps slightly ahead and opens the door. The male holds the door open while the female glides through. Then the male goes through. The door closes after them. “Now how one innocently asks, “can those crazy womenslibbers say that is oppressive? The guy removed a barrier to the lady's smooth and unruffled progress.” But each repetition of this ritual has a place in a pattern, in fact in several patterns. One has to shift the level of one's perception in order to see the whole picture. The door-opening pretends to be a helpful service, but the helpfulness is false. This can be seen by noting that it will be done whether or not it makes any practical sense. Infirm men and men burdened with packages will open doors for able-bodied women who are free of physical burdens. Men will impose themselves awkwardly and jostle everyone in order to get to the door first. The act is not determined by convenience or grace. Furthermore, these very numerous acts of unneeded or even noisome "help" occur in counterpoint to a pattern of men not being helpful in many practical ways in which women might welcome help. What women experience is a world in which gallant princes charming commonly make a fuss about being help- ful and providing small services when help and services are of little or no use, but "This bod Women long-tern politics of wome 16 Introduction to Feminist Concepts and Issues Courses This maja Women's the inclus with multi and diffe Gender reproduct the future historical the fresh pedagog in which there are rarely ingenious and adroit princes at hand when substantial assistance is really wanted either in mundane affairs or in situations of threat, assault or terror. There is no help with the (his) laundry; no help typing a report at 4 a.m.; no help in mediating disputes among relatives or children. There is nothing but advice that women should stay indoors after dark, be chaperoned by a man, or when it comes down to it, “lie back and enjoy it." The gallant gestures have no practical meaning. Their meaning is symbolic. The door-opening and similar services provided are services which really are needed by people who are for one reason or another incapacitated - unwell, burdened with parcels, etc. So the message is that women are incapable. The detachment of the acts from the concrete realities of what women need and do not need is a vehicle for the message that women's actual needs and interests are unimportant or irrel- evant. Finally, these gestures imitate the behavior of servants toward masters and thus mock women, who are in most respects the servants and caretakers of men. The message of the false helpfulness of male gallantry is female dependence, the invisibility or insignificance of women, and contempt for women. One cannot see the meanings of these rituals if one's focus is riveted upon the individual event in all its particularity, including the particularity of the individual man's present conscious intentions and motives and the individual woman's con- scious perception of the event in the moment. It seems sometimes that people take a deliberately myopic view and fill their eyes with things seen microscopically in order not to see macroscopically. At any rate, whether it is deliberate or not, people can and do fail to see the oppression of women because they fail to see macroscopically and hence fail to see the various elements of the situation as systematically related in larger schemes. As the cageness of the birdcage is a macroscopic phenomenon, the oppressiveness of the situations in which women live our various and different lives is a macro- scopic phenomenon. Neither can be seen from a microscopic perspective. But when you look macroscopically you can see it - a network of forces and barriers which are systematically related and which conspire to the immobilization, reduction and molding of women and the lives we live. Bonnie the autho two-volun editor of Woolf an Susan E of Wash Gauze: V author of Babe: The Healing i Anne DI author of Studies (v Djebar (2 works of 1.4 Irene La She has a and Indig Age, Race, Class, and Sex: Women Redefining Difference Audre Lorde web with 80 www.wiley Much of Western European history conditions us to see human differences in sim- plistic opposition to each other: dominant/subordinate, good/bad, up/down, superior/inferior. In a society where the good is defined in terms of profit rather than in terms of human need, there must always be some group of people who WU 2 Introduction to Feminist Concepts and Issues Intro 1.5 Womanist Alice Walker 1.6 Masculinity as Homophobia: Fear, Shame, and Silence in the Construction of Gender Identity Michael S. Kimmel 1.7 Abandon Your Tedious Search: The Rulebook Has Been Found! Kate Bornstein 1.8 Feminists Theorize Colonial/Postcolonial Rosemary Marangoly George Feminism has many different definitions and facets. A popular definition of feminism is "the radical notion that women are people." The Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary defines it as "1: the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes; 2: organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests."Feminism thus includes both scholarship and activism. African American public intellectual bell hooks takes issue with a narrow definition of feminism that focuses only on seeking equality with men. She importantly asks, to which men do which women seek to be equal, given that not all men are equal? She highlights the extent to which this narrow definition of feminism only focuses on gender issues and therefore applies best to the situation of white, middle-class women. She goes on to redefine feminism more broadly and radically: "Feminism as a movement to end sexist oppression directs our attention to systems of domination and the inter-relatedness of sex, race, and class oppression"("Feminism"31). The most complete definition of feminism is probably that of Black lesbian writer-activist Barbara Smith: "Feminism is the political theory and practice that struggles to free all women: women of color, working-class women, poor women, disabled women, lesbians, old women – as well as white, economically privileged, heterosexual women. Anything less than this vision of total freedom is not feminism, but merely female self-aggrandizement" (25). (Sandoval), "multiple co Intersectionality can be tr Truth and Anna Julia Coc connections between so orientation, race and class sexual orientation as pro contribution to scholarsh the interrelatedness of ra 1972; Mitsuye Yamada in gender, class, and sexua Cherrie Moraga and Glor nialism, race, class, and around the 1990s, schola gender, race, and nationa Yuval-Davis) and among Wendell) and gender, ra Morris) have made impo identity had been added queer, questioning, and i oppression and identity. lesson feminists have le tional approaches is that sense of our life experier location (the time and p access, as well as the s belonging). The readings in this int above. Chicana creative w novel The House on Man character of young Espera ficulties of having multip you to be only one thing, Her first name, Spanish fo meaning reflects her sen cultures - and her hope strong woman in her line meaning of her name - b in your lineage and cultur your place in society. Her awareness of the different States - her "silver"-sound in English In her book The Politi "Oppression" is excerpted a critical definition of op Intersectional Feminism Smith's and hooks's definitions are intersectional, a term that means that they do not only focus on one issue such as gender but broaden the analysis to encompass other vectors of identity and of human domination such as race and racism, social class and classism, sexual orientation, colonialism and imperialism, disability, national origin, reli- gion, and age. This wide-ranging approach, which has created a paradigm shift in Women's Studies, Ethnic Studies, and other fields, has come to be known as intersection- ality (Crenshaw) but is also variously termed “Black feminist thought" (Collins), "multiracial feminism" (Zinn and Dill), "multicultural feminism" (Shohat), "US Third-World feminism" Original publication details: 1.7 Kate Bornstein, “Abandon Your Tedious Search: The Rulebook Has Been Found!” from Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women and the Rest of Us, pp. 45–52. New York: Routledge, 1994. Reproduced with permission of Taylor & Francis Group LLC. 1.8 Rosemary Marangoly George, “Feminists Theorize Colonial/Postcolonial” from Cambridge Companion to Feminist Literary Theory, ed. Ellen Rooney, pp. 211-16; 220-23, 227–31. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Reproduced with permission of Cambridge University Press.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hello, I have submitted your answer. Kindly take a look and propose any revision. Remember to always invite me alone so that I stand a chance of answering your questions again. Welcome again!😀

Insert Surname here

Name:
Tutor:
Course:
Date:
Operation
Drawing the mental picture of a bird in a cage is a very vital step that is useful in conceptualizing
the idea that the writer is trying to bring home. At the point where the writer states that when one
tries to look at a bird stranded in a cage, they may not be able to fully understand the in...


Anonymous
I use Studypool every time I need help studying, and it never disappoints.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags