Questions about the Capstone process and DPP template After viewing the information on the capstone process and examining the DHS DPP Form [DOCX], what questions do you have as you prepare to move forward?  The case study company has received the first report from its enterprise content management (ECM) consultant and now has a documented list of major content requirements for the organization. Knowing what content is needed provided some surprises, and there is general agreement that this needs list was lacking. There is also general agreement that it is important to understand how data are currently managed before steps can be taken to improve ECM. Toward this end, the ECM consultant has determined the next step to be an evaluation of the company’s current information infrastructure and content management processes. A more detailed list of required content and the tools used to manage this content will also provide a solid foundation for future ECM planning. What information should be included in this type of detailed evaluation? Assignment One of the first tasks in the development of an enterprise content management manual is to evaluate the enterprise information infrastructure and content management processes. The enterprise information infrastructure and content management processes consist of the data and how they are collected, managed, and stored throughout their life cycle. For this assignment, you will conduct an in-depth evaluation of the enterprise content management infrastructure and content management processes in your selected organization. If the organization already has an enterprise content management system and formal content management procedures in place, you will document the existing system and procedures. If there are currently no formal ECM system or content management procedures in place, you will document the informal parts of the system that exist. The following are the project deliverables: Update the Enterprise Content Management and Data Governance Policies and Procedures Manual title page with a new date and project name. Update the previously completed sections based on instructor feedback. Information Infrastructure Evaluation Content List Provide a categorized list of the content used for the major organizational processes. Content Management Tools Document the tools used to capture, manage, store, preserve, and deliver the content. Content Management Processes Document the processes' flow of content through the infrastructure. Be sure to update your table of contents before submission. Name the document "yourname_IT621_IP2.doc." Worked Example Please refer to the Worked Example below for an example of this assignment based on the Problem-Based Learning Scenario. The worked example is not intended to be a complete example of the assignment but will illustrate the basic concepts required for completion of the assignment and can be used as a general guideline for your own project. Your assignment submission should be more detailed and specific and should reflect your own approach to the assignment rather than just following the same outline provided in the worked example. Note that the worked example includes material from previous worked examples. The new material will be found under the Week 2 sections of the Table of Contents. The worked example is provided here to help with this assignment.  

The Logic of Inference: The Science of UncertaintyDescribing and explaining social phenomena is a complex task. Box’s quote speaks to the point that it is a near impossible undertaking to fully explain such systems—physical or social—using a set of models. Yet even though these models contain some error, the models nevertheless assist with illuminating how the world works and advancing social change.The competent quantitative researcher understands the balance between making statements related to theoretical understanding of relationships and recognizing that our social systems are of such complexity that we will always have some error. The key, for the rigorous researcher, is recognizing and mitigating the error as much as possible.As a graduate student and consumer of research, you must recognize the error that might be present within your research and the research of others.To prepare for this Discussion: Search for and select a quantitative article that interests you and that has social change implications.As you read the article, reflect on George Box’s quote in the introduction for this Discussion.For additional support, review the Skill Builder: Independent and Dependent Variables.Post a very brief description (1–3 sentences) of the article you found and address the following:Describe how you think the research in the article is useful (e.g., what population is it helping? What problem is it solving?).Using Y=f(X) +E notation, identify the independent and dependent variables.How might the research models presented be wrong? What types of error might be present in the reported research?Be sure to support your Main Post and Response Post with reference to the Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

Select and then define a significant issue faced by the justice system, describe the scope and consequences of the issue, and discuss society’s responses to the issue (including public policies and other less formal responses). Papers should also present a clearly reasoned alternative, supported by scholarly research.While the following example can be modified to suit your needs, this outline is likely to result in a high-quality Final Paper: Title Abstract What is the problem? Be sure to narrow your problem enough to allow a focused examination. What are the individual and social implications of this problem? Discussion of implications should be supported by accurate research data. What do the experts say about the problem? What have we, as a society, done about this problem? Consider public policies and other, less formal responses. How are public policies and other, less formal responses working? Describe an alternative solution to the problem. Discuss why the alternative is, or can be, an effective response to the problem. Remember to consider negative consequences of the alternative response. Conclude with your thoughts about your chosen social problem. This is a good place to include personal opinions, assuming you wish to share them in a research paper. References In short, define a problem, discuss the response, and provide alternative responses to the problem. For example, your problem could be drug use/abuse, with a focus on prescription drug abuse among teenagers. Your description of the problems should be fact based, relying on expert opinion. Your alternative response can be an adjustment of current policy or a new direction. For example, you may propose longer prison sentences, or legalization of all drugs. Be creative, although suggestions must be supported by scholarly research.The paper must be eight to ten pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least five scholarly resources, at least three of which can be found in the Ashford Online Library, to support your claims and sub-claims. Cite your resources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar in your online course. Please visit the Academic Research section on your course homepage (accessible through the Student Responsibilities and Policies tab on the left navigation toolbar) to review what types of materials are not acceptable for academic, university-level research.Writing the Final Paper The Final Paper: Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis. Must use at least five scholarly resources, including a minimum of three from the Ashford Online Library. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.