Scenario case A Valley in northeast King County regularly floods

User Generated

xryylcnex

Humanities

Description

Scenario: A Valley in northeast King County regularly floods. Every year, usually in late fall or early spring, the River overflows its banks enough to close a few roads that run across the valley floor. Normally, the flooding isn’t severe, but roughly every 10 years there is usually one serious flood where most of the valley is several feet under water. Despite the relatively predictable nature of these floods, people still build houses there and those houses routinely get flooded. (Some of them near Fall City are built on “stilts,” but this doesn’t seem as good of a solution as just moving to higher ground.)

Exercise: This exercise has two parts.

(1) Using the concept of moral hazard, propose TWO explanation for why people haven’t moved out of the valley. Are there other explanations for why someone might not move out of the valley that are not related to moral hazard? How plausible are those explanations? If you were an elected public official, what might you do to prevent this moral hazard problem and how effective do you think you would be in implementing your policy. Think about the trade-offs you, as a politician, face.

(2) Provide two other examples of moral hazard and/or offsetting behavior. What other types of rules or regulations would you implement to prevent people from falling into the moral hazard trap? In other words, how would you prevent offsetting behavior in the situations you present? Or can moral hazard be prevented at all?

(*Note that There is a very subtle difference between moral hazard and offsetting behavior. Moral hazard does include offsetting behavior, but not all offsetting behavior involves a moral hazard. )

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: MORAL HAZARD

1

Moral hazard
Students name:
Institution affiliation

MORAL HAZARD

2

Reasons why people have not moved out of the valley
According to economist KRUGMAN (2008), moral hazard is any situation in which
one person makes the decision about how much risk to take while someone else bears the cost
if things go badly. In King County, flooding insurance is done by the National Flood
Insurance Program. Now in the perspective of moral hazard, the homeowners have not
moved out despite the frequent and almost certain future floods because they know they will
be taken care of in time of flooding by the program. Why they ignore other solutions is
because t...


Anonymous
Excellent! Definitely coming back for more study materials.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags