New York University Fans of Vampire Films Essay

User Generated

enavn6811

Writing

New York University

Description

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Major Assignment 1: Evaluation Argument (Write a Review) Evaluation Argument objective: Find a review of a work (movie, game, book, tv show, or podcast) that you disagree with. Then, write your own review of that work, showing in what way you both agree and disagree with the original review. As you plan your essay, draw on this reading about evaluation arguments, as well as this reading about responding to counterarguments. Name your audience: Include at the top of the page the name of the magazine or website where you imagine your review to be published, which should be the same place where the original review was published. NOTE: Your imagined audience should inform the style of your argument. Introducing your argument: Introduce readers to the genre of the work and the work itself. Introduce, as well, the perspective you’ll be arguing against. Then, your thesis should establish how well the work does or does not fulfill your criteria for greatness/rhetorical effectiveness within its genre. Refuting counterarguments: These are a few ways you might disagree with the original review (this list is not exhaustive): • Disagree with how they define what makes a work great in this genre. • Disagree with how they define the genre as a whole. • Find fault in the methods of their argument, such as lack of logical support for their points, lack of key knowledge about the work or the genre, unfounded assumptions, or biased descriptions. Thesis and Essay Structure: Your introductory paragraph should set readers’ expectations for the purpose of your argument. Examples: • • • Do you want to write this essay because you disagreed so much with the review it made your blood boil? Your introduction should give a clear account of the review and the work it was reviewing, and at least a hint at why you disagree with that review. Structure the paragraphs of your essay around addressing what you think that review gets right and wrong. Do you want to write this essay to persuade readers of the work’s importance and the underappreciated genre it belongs to? Your introduction should define that genre, helping us understand what it offers to audiences, and clarifying how the work succeeds within that genre. The body of your essay should support your own opinions, addressing counterarguments only when relevant. Following the points raised in “An Essay on Essays,” feel free to play around with the structure of your essay. Make sure your essay, however, still has structure: a movement from the beginning to the end, a logic that the reader can follow, or a pattern like the rhyming of a poem. Don’t be afraid to be experimental. Try to observe some, if not all, of the strategies or guidelines outlined by LibreTexts on Evaluation Argument. Chapter 7 in the textbook may help in describing what makes a work great in this particular genre. Feel free to make up a genre as long as you can define it convincingly. Examples: Great TV Shows to Half-watch While Cooking or Romance Novels Which Also Work as Psychotherapy. Visual Design: If you are writing about a visual medium, embed at least two images to support your argument. If you are writing about a verbal medium (a book or a podcast), use pull quotes in at least two places in your essay. Label, caption, and cite your images/pull quotes. Format: 750-1250 words double-spaced. Remember to include both in-text citations and a Works Cited page for all sources paraphrased or quoted. Chapter 1 is your guide to how to informally reference specific types of works, including films, in your paragraphs. The Purdue Owl website is your source for creating full citations for your sources in MLA and APA formats. A successful essay will: • Appeal to your audience. What style, tone, or content would most appeal to readers of the magazine where you imagine this published? As you embed images/quotes and structure your headings and paragraphs, think of how your visual presentation works to absorb and guide your readers. • Define the context: Briefly summarize what your work is about, and define what particular genre it belongs to and the audience is it trying to appeal to. (Examples: Japanese Horror Manga; Biopics about Musicians; True Crime Podcasts; Tower Defense Games; etc.) What are the genre’s distinguishing features? What are the criteria that make this kind of work rhetorically effective? Chapter 7 contains strategies that will be useful here. • Be thesis-driven: Make a claim (thesis) for the work’s rhetorical effectiveness based on the specific criteria you’ve defined. A strong claim is both contestable—reasonable people might disagree—and predictive—it will set up expectations for your essay’s argument. • Develop main points around 3 or 4 specific criteria: Analysis and evaluation rely on your objective judgments of how well the work uses the persuasive tools available to it. The tools unique to a graphic novel include panel layout and the thickness of the ink line. Tools unique to a podcast might include music, pacing, and tone of voice. Consider what the work does to make you trust its information, to absorb you into its logic, and to appeal to your emotions, desires and values. • Support your points with concrete examples: Use elements of the work to develop and support your points. In addition to text, consider sound elements for podcasts or games, or color, design, and images for visual works. Chapter 2 will be helpful for this. Grading Rubric GRADING CRITERIA: Evaluation Argument Points Possible Student Score Appeals to audience using specific style, tone, and content 15 Defines the context of the subject including summary, 10 genre, distinguishing features, opposing arguments from another review, etc. Has a clear thesis driving your argument, and develops this 30 thesis using 3 to 4 specific criteria Supports main points of the thesis with concrete examples 25 and careful consideration of counter arguments. Displays correct grammar and mechanics 10 Demonstrates concision, clarity, and fluency 10 TOTAL 100 GRADE SCALE: [100 to 97 A+] [96 to 93=A] [92 to 90=A-] [89 to 87=B+] [86 to 83=B] [82 to 80=B-] [79 to 77=C+] [76 to 73=C] [72 to 70=C-] [69 to 67=D+] [66 to 63=D] [62 to 60=D-] [59 to 0=F] Tips for Composing Essay 1: Evaluation Argument / Review of a Work Tips for Success in Composing Essay 1: Evaluation Argument Advice for emulating the style of a particular magazine or website: • Here is some sage advice from the writer Kurt Vonnegut. The only point I would add to Vonnegut's is to find writers whose style you admire and imitate them. For this essay, go back to our Week 2 discussion, reread the review you found that you liked best, and look closely at its style--its sentence patterns, word choices, its ways of creating emphasis, and even its visual design features such as images and headings and color. Pick one or two of these stylistic features to imitate in your own essay. Advice for persuasive & absorbing description of the work you're reviewing: • Learn how to effectively describe a scene or image in detail, so that you can absorb your readers in the work: https://pdx.pressbooks.pub/empoword/chapter/describing-scene/ • Collect some adjectives for describing tone. If you're trying to describe the tone of a scene or character, or just the feeling that a particular moment in a story gives you, and you can't find the right words for it: Here's a list of tone words you might pick from. • Employ some expert terminology for describing film/tv/scenes from games: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/writing_in_literature/writin g_about_film/terminology_and_starting_prompts.html Integrating images or pull quotes in your essay: This is a requirement for Essay 1. The links below will help you with the technical aspects. • • • Images--how to properly embed, label, and cite them. Design advice for adding attractive pull quotes Technical advice for adding pull quotes in Word Citing sources: • If you're using an automatic citation generator--words of advice to do so successfully. How to cite in MLA format: • In-text citations • Works Cited Page entries for books • Works Cited Page entries for films, podcasts, & tv shows. • In-text citations and Works Cited Page entries for video games. Tips for Composing Essay 1: Evaluation Argument / Review of a Work How to cite in APA format: • In-text citations • References Page entries for books • References Page entries for films, podcasts, & tv shows. • In-text citations and References Page entries for video games.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer:
1250 Words
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.

1

Evaluation Argument
Name
Institution
Professor
Course
Date

2
Evaluation Argument
My Audience: Fans of Vampire Films
"What We Do in the Shadow" is a film by Taika Waititi and Jemaine Clement. The film
was established in 2005 and is based on a short film written and directed by its founders. Hughes
(2022) says that "What We Do in the Shadow" has become famous for its high-profile guest stars
popping up as unexpected guests of additional comic relief. The film follows the everyday lives
of the seemingly main characters (four vampires) living together on New York's Staten Island.
Lazlo, Nandor, and Nadja are the traditional vampires, while Colin Robinson is an energy
vampire who eliminates the boredom he induces through lengthy explanations and stories.
Guillermo, Nandor's familiar, waits on Nandor with hopes of becoming a vampire himself. The
series successfully makes these mythical characters relatable, like in other famous films.
However, I disagree with the various elements of the film's plot, characterization, and themes.
This essay discusses how I agree and disagree with specific aspects of "What We Do in the
Shadow."
I agree that "What We Do in the Shadow" has become famous due to increased highprofile guests that improve the comedy. The film is entertaining because these high-profile stars
undertake vampire roles related to their personalities. For example, Donal Logue, famous for his
roles in "Grounded for Life and Gotham," appears in season three of the film as a vampire
version of himself. Logue has significant experience in vampire films, and he is a member of the
Worldwide Vampiric Council (Miller, 2022). Thus, he has significantly contributed to the film's
popularity and entertainment. Benedict Wong is another high-profile star that contributed to the
film's popularity. Wong is famous for "the Marvel Cinematic Universe" and joined in season two

3
of "What We Do in the Shadow." He acts as Wallace, demonstrating his skills as a flesh-eating
Zombie.
However, I disagree with the film's strategy to use high-profile stars to enhance their
popularity because they might negatively affect the viewer's curiosity. Kubrak (2020) says that
interesting films often build curiosity among viewers, encouraging them to watch the next
seasons. "What We Do in the Shadow" might be inefficient in maintaining the viewers' curiosity
because they already know the actors. For example, Wong might not seem scary when eating
human flesh because viewers know his character. Kubrak (2020) reveals that high-profile stars
might not perform better in new films than in previous films because their fans can predict their
actions. Thus, the high-profile stars might become bored if the film targets the stars' fans. The
film could be more interesting if it used upcoming actors because they would build the viewers'
curiosity better than high-profile stars....


Anonymous
Awesome! Perfect study aid.

Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags