Wikipedia Analysis

User Generated

fhzzre94

Humanities

Description

In this assignment, we will be examining just how authoritative (and stable) Wikipedia (aka wiki) is. First, you will examine a specific entry from Wikipedia and check for changes that have occurred over a period of six months, and then you will compare the information from the Wikipedia entry with the information from an established reference source such as the Encyclopedia Britannica (EB).

THIS ENTRY IS NICOLAE CEAUSESCU.

Your analysis paper should be no more than two pages. double-spaced, one-inch margins, font size 10 or 12. Your paper should assess the overall stability and authoritative nature of the Wikipedia entry for your research term. Consider such questions:

  • How much has your selected Wikipedia entry changed (or not changed) over a period of at least six months?
  • Do we have any idea of the credentials of the people who created the Wikipedia information, or who made the changes?
  • Were any changes the result of sound, scholarly research?
  • Why did the entry change?
  • How does the Wikipedia information compare with the information in EB? This is the most important part of your analysis, and you should provide a specific explanation about the Wikipedia entry's information in comparison to the information in EB

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: WIKIPEDIA

1

Wikipedia
Name
Institutional Affiliation

2
WIKIPEDIA
Wikipedia and Britannica
The entry of Nicolae Ceausescu has changed much over the last six months, and there is
proof from past editing on Wikipedia which reveals that the article explains regular checks and
editing. Usernames reveal who may have made the changes on Wikipedia, and this may expose a
part of information of the editor, but no detailed information can be found concerning who may
have made these changes to the original document (Terdiman, 2005).There is no concrete
evidence that reveals that these various changes were made due to sound scholarly research.
There are a large number of contributors to Wikipedia, and this diversity of contributors will
often contribute to the accuracy of information. It seems that there is coordination between the
editors of material poste...


Anonymous
I was having a hard time with this subject, and this was a great help.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags