Assignment 2: Research Proposal – Thesis, Major Points, and Plan

User Generated

ZfXabjvgnyy

Humanities

ENG 215 Research and Writing

Description

Hello, I would like to continue on with the following topic: 26) Should colleges and universities expel students who are caught cheating on exams and / or plagiarizing their homework assignments?

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Points: 120 Assignment 2: Research Proposal – Thesis, Major Points, and Plan     Unacceptable Meets Minimum Expectations Fair Proficient Exemplary Below 60% F 60-69% D 70-79% C 80-89% B 90-100% A 1. Identify the topic you selected and explain two (2) reasons for using the genre.  Weight: 5% Did not submit or incompletely identified the topic you selected and did not submit or incompletely explained two (2) reasons for using the genre. Insufficiently identified the topic you selected and insufficiently explained two (2) reasons for using the genre. Partially identified the topic you selected and partially explained two (2) reasons for using the genre. Satisfactorily identified the topic you selected and satisfactorily explained two (2) reasons for using the genre. Thoroughly identified the topic you selected and thoroughly explained two (2) reasons for using the genre. 2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. Did not submit or incompletely included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. Insufficiently included a defensible, relevant thesis statement    Partially included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. Satisfactorily included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. Thoroughly included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. Partially described three (3) major characteristics of your audience. Satisfactorily described three (3) major characteristics of your audience. Thoroughly described three (3) major characteristics of your audience. Insufficiently described the paper’s scope and insufficiently outlined the major sections. Partially described the paper’s scope and insufficiently outlined the major sections. Satisfactorily described the paper’s scope and satisfactorily outlined the major sections. Thoroughly described the paper’s scope and thoroughly outlined the major sections. Insufficiently identified and explained the questions to be answered. Partially identified and explained the questions to be answered. Satisfactorily identified and explained the questions to be answered. Thoroughly identified and explained the questions to be answered. Insufficiently explained your research plan; insufficiently Partially explained your research plan; partially Satisfactorily explained your research plan; satisfactorily Thoroughly explained your research plan; thoroughly Criteria Weight: 10% 3. Describe three (3) major characteristics of your audience (official position, decision-making power, current view on topic, other important characteristic). Did not submit or incompletely described three (3) major characteristics of your audience. in the first paragraph. Insufficiently described three (3) major characteristics of your audience. Weight: 10% 4. Describe the paper’s scope and outline the major sections. Weight: 10% 5. Identify and explain the questions to be answered. Weight: 10% 6. Explain your research plan, including the methods of researching and Did not submit or incompletely described the paper’s scope and did not submit or incompletely outlined the major sections. Did not submit or incompletely identified and explained the questions to be answered. Did not submit or incompletely explained your research plan; organizing research. Weight: 10% 7. Document at least three (3) primary sources and three (3) secondary sources, did not submit or incompletely included the methods of researching and organizing research. No references provided included the methods of researching and organizing research. included the methods of researching and organizing research. included the methods of researching and organizing research. included the methods of researching and organizing research. Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. 7-8 errors present Meets number of required references; most references high quality choices. 3-4 errors present Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. More than 8 errors present Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. 5-6 errors present Weight: 20% 8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 25% 0-2 errors present
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES SHOULD EXPEL EXAM CHEATS

Colleges and Universities should Expel Exam Cheats
Name
Institution

1

COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES SHOULD EXPEL EXAM CHEATS

2

Colleges and Universities should Expel Exam Cheats
Examination malpractice is known to impair the ability of students to obtain degrees and
qualifications that reflect their level of performance on the course of study. Aside from robbing
the culprits of the opportunity to develop their intellect, the practice is unfair to those that abstain
from it because of the need to compete in this market. While experts might argue that the
emphasis on the assessment and god grades is reasonable for the problem, it is one that must be
addressed to restore the reputation of the education system of society. College and university
students are found guilty of cheating during their examin...


Anonymous
I was having a hard time with this subject, and this was a great help.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags