Trademark Case Study

Apr 21st, 2015
Price: $15 USD

Question description

Length – minimum of three pages 

Topic/Case Study Response:

You were approached by a friend in the fashion industry who has experience designing shoes, 

and based on an idea you and your friend had, you developed a computer-implemented modeling 

and design algorithm which scans any person’s foot to create a computer generated model.  

Based upon that model, the design algorithm creates a unique and fashionable shoe that is 

customized to the user’s foot.  In fact, the shoes are so customized and fit so well that people 

who have worn the prototype shoes made for them are amazed and say that the shoes create a 

“seal” around their feet.  In addition, the shoes are particularly fashionable, and are similar to, if 

not more appealing than the style and fit of many hand-made Italian shoes.  As a result, you and 

your friend used your personal savings to begin to market your shoes under the name “Seal 

Couture”, and so far, things couldn’t be going any better.

You hired a marketing consultant, who pitched the idea to a group in California who focuses on 

trying to help small businesses succeed.  The California group also has ties to the film and music 

industry, and liked your business model and idea so well they decided to have you design shoes 

for all of the artists who were nominated for Grammys.   Before you knew it, you were being 

flown out to Los Angeles to create custom shoes for musicians including Kanye West and Taylor 

Swift, both of which said your shoes were the most comfortable and fashionable shoes they ever 

had worn and ordered several pairs.  In fact, your shoes were so popular that you were getting 

requests from the Hollywood rich and famous, including George Clooney, Jennifer Lopez, Sarah 

Jessica Parker, Kate Winslett, Johnny Depp, and Julia Roberts.  Vanity Fair and GQ magazines 

have featured your spring line of shoes in their latest issues, publishing photographs of models 

wearing your shoes.  With all of the success your idea has gained, you are about to launch your 

custom shoe line, “Seal Couture”.  Your shoes are marketed as ultra-high end, custom footwear 

which are sold to the rich, and often famous, at prices beginning at $1,400 a pair, and will only 

be available at your high-end “Seal Couture” boutiques on Rodeo Drive and Manhattan.    

After you received your Computer Science degree, you went to law school, and with your 

knowledge of intellectual property law, you knew that you needed to secure protection for your 

mark, “Seal Couture”.  As a result, you applied to the United States Patent and Trademark Office 

for a federally registered trademark on your “Seal Couture” mark, used in connection with your 

goods identified as “footwear, including shoes and boots”.  

Today you received a letter from the United States Patent and Trademark Office refusing your 

registration for a trademark for “Seal Couture” based on a likelihood of confusion with an 

existing federally registered trademark for the mark “Seal” used in connection with “clothing, 

namely, tee-shirts, shorts, swim suits, dresses, hats, and socks”.  The United States Patent and 

Trademark Office considered that the similarity of the marks, similarity of the goods, and 

similarity of trade channels of the goods were the most relevant factors supporting the likelihood 

of confusion determination.  In particular, the United States Patent and Trademark Office stated 

that your mark is similar in appearance and sound to the existing “Seal” mark because both 

“Seal” and “Seal Couture” share the common term “Seal”.  Furthermore, the United States Patent 

and Trademark Office stated that because your goods are identified as “footwear, including shoes 

and boots” and the existing “Seal” mark is applied to “clothing, namely, tee-shirts, shorts, swim 

suits, dresses, hats, and socks”, the goods are related.  Specifically, the United States Patent and 

Trademark Office stated that the goods are related enough to cause consumers to be confused 

into thinking that your “footwear, including shoes and boots” marketed under the name “Seal 

Couture”, may actually be associated with the mark “Seal”, because “clothing, namely, tee-

shirts, shorts, swim suits, dresses, hats, and socks” are often sold in the same stores as “footwear, 

including shoes and boots”, and under the same trademark.  As a result, the United States Patent 

and Trademark Office concluded that because the two trademarks are similar and the goods are 

related, confusion as to source is likely, and thus refused registration for your trademark.  

Since your trademark for “Seal Couture” is being rejected as being too similar to the mark “Seal” 

for similar products, you did some research.  It turns out that the owners of the “Seal” mark make 

and sell, and apply their “Seal” mark to beachwear-themed tee shirts, shorts, swim suits, dresses, 

hats, and socks which are light, pastel colored and include prints, patterns, and cartoons of ocean 

wildlife, including seals, whales, and dolphins.  The ocean-themed tee-shirts, shorts, swim suits, 

dresses, hats, and socks which bear the “Seal” trademark are sold at a price range between $5 

and $45, at stores such as Kohl’s, JC Penney, Marshall’s, and TJ Maxx.  

For this case study, write a response to the United States Patent and Trademark Office arguing 

why the your mark and goods are different enough from the existing “Seal” mark that no 

consumer confusion is likely.  In preparing your argument, use the rules from the PerfumeBay v. 

eBay case.

NOTE: It's important to use the rules from PerfumeBay v. eBay case.

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
School: New York University

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

Review from our student for this Answer

Apr 26th, 2015
"Very Satisfied."
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1831 tutors are online

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors