Description
Explanation & Answer:
1 Page
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Please view explanation and answer below.
1
Fire Death Rates by State.
Your Name
Instructor’s Name
Course
Date of submission
2
My expected thoughts are that there will be an increase in fire risks as time goes by due to
the increase in the number of residential and the growth of the urban centers. There should be high
risks of fires in the urban areas than in the rural areas due to hi...
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Awesome! Made my life easier.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
BUS 4474 Business and society: Al and The Honda auction cases discussion
At the end of Ch. 8 of your textbook (starting on p. 270 in the loose-leaf version) you will find Short Incidents for Ethi ...
BUS 4474 Business and society: Al and The Honda auction cases discussion
At the end of Ch. 8 of your textbook (starting on p. 270 in the loose-leaf version) you will find Short Incidents for Ethical Reasoning. Read "AL" and "THE HONDA AUCTION." For each incident, you must identify the pertinent facts, the ethical issue(s), all relevant stakeholders and determine how they could be impacted by the decision that will be made, identify and apply at least one principle for ethical reasoning, and then consider alternative courses of action and choose the best course of action based on stakeholder impacts and the outcome of the application of the ethical principle. You can use A Framework for Ethical Decision Making or the Eight Steps to Ethical Decision Making (found in the CSR & Ethics Module) as a guide.Your textbook defines stakeholders as an entity that is benefitted or burdened by the actions of a corporation or whose actions may benefit or burden the corporation. Some common examples of stakeholders would include customers, employees, suppliers, stockholders, and the community.Businesses will almost always have multiple stakeholders, and many times their interests will conflict. This means that a business decision-maker will frequently have to make a decision in the face of competing claims from different stakeholders. The question of whose interests should be prioritized requires the exercise of judgment. This skill—examining competing claims and deciding which one is the strongest—is called evaluation. You will want to consider the power, urgency, and legitimacy that each stakeholder presents. You should put yourselves in each stakeholder’s position—Why do they care about the outcome of the decision? How will they be affected? What outcome would they prefer? What are their arguments in support of their preferred outcome? You will want to consider the power, urgency, and legitimacy that each stakeholder presents. Two of the videos below will give you a brief review of stakeholder theory and give you an idea of what skills you will be expected to demonstrate when you complete this assignment. Additionally, writing mechanics and grammar are graded as part of this assignment. A video on improving mechanics in business writing is provided below to help refresh your memory. Viewing statistics will be collected and counted as part of the assignment’s grade.Before submitting the assignment, review the rubric attached to the assignment to ensure you have included everything in your paper that needs to be included. Your submission must be in a Word document or PDF, typed in size 12 Times New Roman font and double-spaced. Your submission must not exceed 10 pages.
PHIL 347N CCN Wk 3 Facts and Opinions in Information Sharing Discussion
Week 3 Discussion: Evaluating SourcesRequired ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:Textbook: Cha ...
PHIL 347N CCN Wk 3 Facts and Opinions in Information Sharing Discussion
Week 3 Discussion: Evaluating SourcesRequired ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:Textbook: Chapter 6, 7LessonMinimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)Introduction"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions – but not their own facts." (Daniel Patrick Moynihan, cited in Vanity Fair, 2010, para. 2)We form opinions – and make our judgments – based on facts we observe and values we hold. Our judgments are also influenced by the opinions of others. In the section "An Expert on Hate in America" in Chapter 6, one of the authors, Dr. Peter Facione, renders an opinion on a non-profit civil rights organization: Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Dr. Facione is a leading advocate and one of the most influential voices in the field of critical thinking.His endorsement of the civil rights organization is unqualified. It is also transparent: Dr. Facione reveals that he is a financial supporter of the organization and has arranged speaking engagements for its founder. This is Dr. Facione's invitation to you, the reader:Knowing where you can learn more about the SPLC for yourself, and knowing about Dr. Facione's endorsement and support of the Center's work, evaluate this claim made by Dr. Facione: "The SPLC is an expert on hate in America" (p. 124).The endorsement of the SPLC is contained in the most current edition of the text, whose copyright date is 2016. Since that time Morris Dees, co-founder and former chief trial counsel, has been fired (Hassan, Zraick & Blinder, 2019). Previously, there has been controversy about groups and individuals that are listed by the SPLC as "hate groups" (Graham, 2016; Price, 2018). The organization, which has nearly a half-billion dollars in assets, has also been criticized for how it spends these funds (Robinson, 2019).Self-Assessment QuestionBefore you submit your initial post, make sure to read the assigned chapter. Then, ask yourself the following: Did the article in Chapter 6 of the text seem credible and reliable? Why? Be very specific:Was it because it is in a textbook?Because it was written by a learned and respected person?Because of content in the article?Because of your previous knowledge of the SPLC?Initial Post InstructionsFor the initial post, address the following:Conduct additional research on the SPLC. Did your opinion alter in any way? Why?Only after you have done some responsible research should you begin to respond to the discussion prompt. The discussion is not about the SPLC; it is not about Dr. Facione. It is about what you have learned about forming opinions.Your post must answer this question:How do you define the term "expert"?Your post must also discuss at least two (2) of the following questions:How important are facts in the process of forming an opinion? Explain what you believe to be the purpose or function of facts in making a judgment.How did you respond to the self-assessment question? Since doing further research, have you re-thought the way in which you assess credibility and reliability? What is the importance of factoring the recency of a reference or opinion (i.e., how old is it?) into an assessment of credibility and reliability?How would you evaluate Dr. Facione's claim "The SPLC is an expert on hate in America" (p. 124). Does the SPLC fit your definition of "expert"? Be specific in your answer.Follow-Up Post InstructionsRespond to at least one peer. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.Writing RequirementsMinimum of 2 posts (1 initial & 1 follow-up)Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source)APA format for in-text citations and list of references
Liberty University Early Education and Development Article Discussion
1.Choose 2 articles from professional journals of education (scholarly and/or peer-reviewed articles only). You must choos ...
Liberty University Early Education and Development Article Discussion
1.Choose 2 articles from professional journals of education (scholarly and/or peer-reviewed articles only). You must choose articles to related one of the language arts (reading, writing, listening, speaking, viewing or visual representation) in the course textbook. Both articles should be on the same topic. This topic must be clearly included in your title on the title page. Articles must be published within the last 5 years and must be more than 5 pages.
2.Your review must be written in your words and include 1–2 scholarly citations per paragraph in current APA format, except in the reflective section where none are included. Do not over quote from the article. Instead, summarize and paraphrase.
3.Write a separate critique for each journal article. However, the assignment will be submitted as 1 Microsoft Word document. The content of the paper, including 2 critiques, must be 4–5 pages. In addition to the content, make sure to include a title and reference page.
4.Organize and format each critique with the headings and subheadings outlined below. Do not write the questions. You must write your critiques with well-formed paragraphs that flow logically from one topic to the next.
5 pages
GEN103 Ashford Week 5 Factual Statements Vs Analytical Information Quiz
An example of an opinion would be which of the following? Bob’s Burgers is the best show on television.
GEN103 Ashford Week 5 Factual Statements Vs Analytical Information Quiz
An example of an opinion would be which of the following? Bob’s Burgers is the best show on television.
Florida Department of Corrections
Overview: Understanding the structure of a criminal justice organization is the foundation of organizational assessment. T ...
Florida Department of Corrections
Overview: Understanding the structure of a criminal justice organization is the foundation of organizational assessment. This will allow you to accurately assess whether or not an organization is fulfilling its mission statement. Once assessment is determined, interdepartmental dissemination will be streamlined due to familiarity with the structure of the organization. Prompt: Submit a draft of the structure (Section II) of your final project. Start with an outline of the organization as a whole entity. Once the structure has been determined, begin to analyze how departments interact to maximize efficiency in meeting the standards of the organization. Be sure to address all of the critical elements as outlined below. Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed: II. Structure: In this section, you will analyze the overall structure of the organization to set the stage for your performance assessment. For the purposes of this project, you will select a subdivision of the agency on which to focus your performance assessment. A. What are the departments or subdivisions into which your selected organization is divided, and how do these subdivisions work together as a whole in relation to the mission of the organization? In other words, each department or subdivision has its own goals, but how do all the departments or subdivisions work together to achieve the organization’s mission? B. Describe your selected subdivision, and outline the specific goals and responsibilities of the subdivision, describing how they align with the overall mission of the agency. Consider how the goals of the selected subdivision align with the mission of the agency. C. Describe the key policies in place that run your selected subdivision of the organization, explaining how these policies align with the mission of the subdivision. For example, the subdivision might have specific rules and regulations within its operating procedures and laws that ensure the subdivision meets its established goals. Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format. Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (80%) Not Evident (0%) Value Structure: Departments or Subdivisions Outlines the departments or subdivisions of the organization and explains how the subdivisions work together as a whole in relation to the mission of the organization Outlines the departments or subdivisions of the organization and explains how the subdivisions work together as a whole in relation to the mission of the organization, but with gaps in detail or accuracy Does not outline the departments or subdivisions of the organization and does not explain how the subdivisions work together as a whole in relation to the mission of the organization 30 Structure: Subdivision Describes the selected subdivision, outlining the specific goals and responsibilities, describing how they align with the overall mission of the agency Describes the selected subdivision, outlining the specific goals and responsibilities, describing how they align with the overall mission of the agency, but with gaps in detail or accuracy Does not describe the selected subdivision 30 Structure: Policies Describes the key policies in place that run the selected subdivision of the organization, explaining how these policies align with the mission of the subdivision Describes the key policies in place that run the selected subdivision of the organization, explaining how these policies align with the mission of the subdivision, but with gaps in detail, accuracy, or logic Does not describe the key policies in place that run the selected subdivision of the organization, explaining how these policies align with the mission of the subdivision 30 Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%
Similar Content
Human Resource Management overview, writing homework help
You have been hired by a company as a Human Resource Generalist to create a Human Resources Department for a real-wor...
Research various decision-making process options and the advantages and disadvantages of each, assignment help
g decision process," or similar words.
Research various decision-making process options and the advantages and disadvant...
Perspectives from the Qur'an by Abdel Haleem Reading
ı have an assignment due tomorrow .Same format but different topic.you have the documents that i send you last time. (you...
Korea: The Impossible Country, Literature homework help
Korea: The Impossible Country (Daniel Tudor) Book report assignment
Question #1 -
What are the key ideas e...
Describe your current or past organization's organizational structure, assignment help
Question 1:Post an original thread in this forum answering the questions below - Put your name in the subject line (e.g. "...
Responses4
I agree with the first student’s response as physical protection is essential and generally defines the security standar...
Financial Management Worksheet
Instructions: Enter all answers directly in this worksheet. When finished select Save As, and save this document using you...
Research Question Project
Role games as a means of developing psychological competence in adolescence In this psychological based research, the focu...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Dune
by Frank Herbert
The 48 Laws of Power
by Robert Greene
Team of Vipers
by Cliff Sims
Where'd You Go Bernadette
by Maria Semple
The Point of it All - A Lifetime of Great Loves and Endeavors
by Charles Krauthammer
Anthem
by Ayn Rand
The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
by Stieg Larsson
The Good Earth
by Pearl S. Buck
Catching Fire
by Suzanne Collins
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
BUS 4474 Business and society: Al and The Honda auction cases discussion
At the end of Ch. 8 of your textbook (starting on p. 270 in the loose-leaf version) you will find Short Incidents for Ethi ...
BUS 4474 Business and society: Al and The Honda auction cases discussion
At the end of Ch. 8 of your textbook (starting on p. 270 in the loose-leaf version) you will find Short Incidents for Ethical Reasoning. Read "AL" and "THE HONDA AUCTION." For each incident, you must identify the pertinent facts, the ethical issue(s), all relevant stakeholders and determine how they could be impacted by the decision that will be made, identify and apply at least one principle for ethical reasoning, and then consider alternative courses of action and choose the best course of action based on stakeholder impacts and the outcome of the application of the ethical principle. You can use A Framework for Ethical Decision Making or the Eight Steps to Ethical Decision Making (found in the CSR & Ethics Module) as a guide.Your textbook defines stakeholders as an entity that is benefitted or burdened by the actions of a corporation or whose actions may benefit or burden the corporation. Some common examples of stakeholders would include customers, employees, suppliers, stockholders, and the community.Businesses will almost always have multiple stakeholders, and many times their interests will conflict. This means that a business decision-maker will frequently have to make a decision in the face of competing claims from different stakeholders. The question of whose interests should be prioritized requires the exercise of judgment. This skill—examining competing claims and deciding which one is the strongest—is called evaluation. You will want to consider the power, urgency, and legitimacy that each stakeholder presents. You should put yourselves in each stakeholder’s position—Why do they care about the outcome of the decision? How will they be affected? What outcome would they prefer? What are their arguments in support of their preferred outcome? You will want to consider the power, urgency, and legitimacy that each stakeholder presents. Two of the videos below will give you a brief review of stakeholder theory and give you an idea of what skills you will be expected to demonstrate when you complete this assignment. Additionally, writing mechanics and grammar are graded as part of this assignment. A video on improving mechanics in business writing is provided below to help refresh your memory. Viewing statistics will be collected and counted as part of the assignment’s grade.Before submitting the assignment, review the rubric attached to the assignment to ensure you have included everything in your paper that needs to be included. Your submission must be in a Word document or PDF, typed in size 12 Times New Roman font and double-spaced. Your submission must not exceed 10 pages.
PHIL 347N CCN Wk 3 Facts and Opinions in Information Sharing Discussion
Week 3 Discussion: Evaluating SourcesRequired ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:Textbook: Cha ...
PHIL 347N CCN Wk 3 Facts and Opinions in Information Sharing Discussion
Week 3 Discussion: Evaluating SourcesRequired ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:Textbook: Chapter 6, 7LessonMinimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)Introduction"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions – but not their own facts." (Daniel Patrick Moynihan, cited in Vanity Fair, 2010, para. 2)We form opinions – and make our judgments – based on facts we observe and values we hold. Our judgments are also influenced by the opinions of others. In the section "An Expert on Hate in America" in Chapter 6, one of the authors, Dr. Peter Facione, renders an opinion on a non-profit civil rights organization: Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Dr. Facione is a leading advocate and one of the most influential voices in the field of critical thinking.His endorsement of the civil rights organization is unqualified. It is also transparent: Dr. Facione reveals that he is a financial supporter of the organization and has arranged speaking engagements for its founder. This is Dr. Facione's invitation to you, the reader:Knowing where you can learn more about the SPLC for yourself, and knowing about Dr. Facione's endorsement and support of the Center's work, evaluate this claim made by Dr. Facione: "The SPLC is an expert on hate in America" (p. 124).The endorsement of the SPLC is contained in the most current edition of the text, whose copyright date is 2016. Since that time Morris Dees, co-founder and former chief trial counsel, has been fired (Hassan, Zraick & Blinder, 2019). Previously, there has been controversy about groups and individuals that are listed by the SPLC as "hate groups" (Graham, 2016; Price, 2018). The organization, which has nearly a half-billion dollars in assets, has also been criticized for how it spends these funds (Robinson, 2019).Self-Assessment QuestionBefore you submit your initial post, make sure to read the assigned chapter. Then, ask yourself the following: Did the article in Chapter 6 of the text seem credible and reliable? Why? Be very specific:Was it because it is in a textbook?Because it was written by a learned and respected person?Because of content in the article?Because of your previous knowledge of the SPLC?Initial Post InstructionsFor the initial post, address the following:Conduct additional research on the SPLC. Did your opinion alter in any way? Why?Only after you have done some responsible research should you begin to respond to the discussion prompt. The discussion is not about the SPLC; it is not about Dr. Facione. It is about what you have learned about forming opinions.Your post must answer this question:How do you define the term "expert"?Your post must also discuss at least two (2) of the following questions:How important are facts in the process of forming an opinion? Explain what you believe to be the purpose or function of facts in making a judgment.How did you respond to the self-assessment question? Since doing further research, have you re-thought the way in which you assess credibility and reliability? What is the importance of factoring the recency of a reference or opinion (i.e., how old is it?) into an assessment of credibility and reliability?How would you evaluate Dr. Facione's claim "The SPLC is an expert on hate in America" (p. 124). Does the SPLC fit your definition of "expert"? Be specific in your answer.Follow-Up Post InstructionsRespond to at least one peer. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.Writing RequirementsMinimum of 2 posts (1 initial & 1 follow-up)Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source)APA format for in-text citations and list of references
Liberty University Early Education and Development Article Discussion
1.Choose 2 articles from professional journals of education (scholarly and/or peer-reviewed articles only). You must choos ...
Liberty University Early Education and Development Article Discussion
1.Choose 2 articles from professional journals of education (scholarly and/or peer-reviewed articles only). You must choose articles to related one of the language arts (reading, writing, listening, speaking, viewing or visual representation) in the course textbook. Both articles should be on the same topic. This topic must be clearly included in your title on the title page. Articles must be published within the last 5 years and must be more than 5 pages.
2.Your review must be written in your words and include 1–2 scholarly citations per paragraph in current APA format, except in the reflective section where none are included. Do not over quote from the article. Instead, summarize and paraphrase.
3.Write a separate critique for each journal article. However, the assignment will be submitted as 1 Microsoft Word document. The content of the paper, including 2 critiques, must be 4–5 pages. In addition to the content, make sure to include a title and reference page.
4.Organize and format each critique with the headings and subheadings outlined below. Do not write the questions. You must write your critiques with well-formed paragraphs that flow logically from one topic to the next.
5 pages
GEN103 Ashford Week 5 Factual Statements Vs Analytical Information Quiz
An example of an opinion would be which of the following? Bob’s Burgers is the best show on television.
GEN103 Ashford Week 5 Factual Statements Vs Analytical Information Quiz
An example of an opinion would be which of the following? Bob’s Burgers is the best show on television.
Florida Department of Corrections
Overview: Understanding the structure of a criminal justice organization is the foundation of organizational assessment. T ...
Florida Department of Corrections
Overview: Understanding the structure of a criminal justice organization is the foundation of organizational assessment. This will allow you to accurately assess whether or not an organization is fulfilling its mission statement. Once assessment is determined, interdepartmental dissemination will be streamlined due to familiarity with the structure of the organization. Prompt: Submit a draft of the structure (Section II) of your final project. Start with an outline of the organization as a whole entity. Once the structure has been determined, begin to analyze how departments interact to maximize efficiency in meeting the standards of the organization. Be sure to address all of the critical elements as outlined below. Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed: II. Structure: In this section, you will analyze the overall structure of the organization to set the stage for your performance assessment. For the purposes of this project, you will select a subdivision of the agency on which to focus your performance assessment. A. What are the departments or subdivisions into which your selected organization is divided, and how do these subdivisions work together as a whole in relation to the mission of the organization? In other words, each department or subdivision has its own goals, but how do all the departments or subdivisions work together to achieve the organization’s mission? B. Describe your selected subdivision, and outline the specific goals and responsibilities of the subdivision, describing how they align with the overall mission of the agency. Consider how the goals of the selected subdivision align with the mission of the agency. C. Describe the key policies in place that run your selected subdivision of the organization, explaining how these policies align with the mission of the subdivision. For example, the subdivision might have specific rules and regulations within its operating procedures and laws that ensure the subdivision meets its established goals. Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format. Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (80%) Not Evident (0%) Value Structure: Departments or Subdivisions Outlines the departments or subdivisions of the organization and explains how the subdivisions work together as a whole in relation to the mission of the organization Outlines the departments or subdivisions of the organization and explains how the subdivisions work together as a whole in relation to the mission of the organization, but with gaps in detail or accuracy Does not outline the departments or subdivisions of the organization and does not explain how the subdivisions work together as a whole in relation to the mission of the organization 30 Structure: Subdivision Describes the selected subdivision, outlining the specific goals and responsibilities, describing how they align with the overall mission of the agency Describes the selected subdivision, outlining the specific goals and responsibilities, describing how they align with the overall mission of the agency, but with gaps in detail or accuracy Does not describe the selected subdivision 30 Structure: Policies Describes the key policies in place that run the selected subdivision of the organization, explaining how these policies align with the mission of the subdivision Describes the key policies in place that run the selected subdivision of the organization, explaining how these policies align with the mission of the subdivision, but with gaps in detail, accuracy, or logic Does not describe the key policies in place that run the selected subdivision of the organization, explaining how these policies align with the mission of the subdivision 30 Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%
Earn money selling
your Study Documents