The production manager wants to use dilution ventilation to control flammable atmospheres (toluene and xylene) in the plant and thinks this is a good idea since he assumes that this will also control worker exposures below the PEL. What is your response and how would you defend your answer with specific details? 200 word minimum response required. APA format, include reference and Plagiarism Free!!!! DUE 27 DEC 13

Must be original, no plagiarism. Must have references and be marked in the body of the work. No WikipediaIn Chapter 2 (file attached) of the text, Managing Conflict through Communication, the five stages in a constructive conflict process are explained. Write a one- to two- page paper in which you identify a conflict that you or someone you know has had and has already been resolved. Apply each of the five stages of a constructive conflict process to your example. Your paper should clearly identify each stage and provide details or examples for each stage. You can review Examples 1 and 2 on page 25 of the text for ideas on how to organize this assignment. Your paper should be APA formatted with a title page and a reference page that references the textbook and any additional resources that you may have used. At least two outside resources must be used for this written assignment.Chapter 2 info PATTERNS AND CYCLES IN CONSTRUCTIVE CONFLICT PROCESSES.docx Grading Rubic COM325.W1.AssignmentRubric.pdf 

The four aspects of learning profile are controversial. Highly respected researchers argue vigorously for the existence of cognitive styles or intelligence preferences. Other noted psychologists argue that the construct of cognitive style or intelligence preference makes little sense in terms of learning. In this discussion, we will briefly debate the validity of both arguments. First, find your assigned “Debate Group” below.Debate Grouping (by first letter of last name): A-L: For cognitive styles or intelligence preferences Debate Process: Using the information in the course text and from additional sources in the Ashford Online Library, develop an argument that supports your assigned side and post it to the discussion. Then respond to at least one peer from the opposite group with a critical evaluation of his or her argument. Propose one or more counter-examples to highlight weakness of the disputed argument, or ask for additional evidence to support the viewpoint. Finally, post your own (personal) opinion based on the arguments, research and your own experience(s). Explain what you believe is the best way to differentiate for cognitive styles or intelligence preferences.