please follow instructions APA formatAn introduction and A conclusion is needed for this paper.I do not have the book but can provide the book title onlyOverviewThe family nurse provides care within many facilities in a community. This is discussed in chapter 17 of your text. They include nurse home visiting programs, community nursing centers, public health departments, and home education, and community education. Discuss these facilities in your community as well as access to these resources. For each resource be sure to include how families in the community benefit. Also discuss three ways in which a family health nurse may be useful in community resources. Use what you've learned about the role of a family health nurse and what he/she may use to help in community settings.ObjectivesExamine family health nurse role in various community health settings.Points: 40ReferencesMinimum of four (4) total references: two (2) references from required course materials and two (2) peer-reviewed references. All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)Peer-reviewed references include references from professional data bases such as PubMed or CINHAL applicable to population and practice area, along with evidence based clinical practice guidelines. Examples of unacceptable references are Wikipedia, UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases.StyleUnless otherwise specified, all the written assignment must follow APA 7th edition formatting, citations and references. Click here to download the Microsoft Word APA template. Make sure you cross-reference the APA 7th edition book as well before submitting the assignment.Number of Pages/WordsUnless otherwise specified all papers should have a minimum of 600 words (approximately 2.5 pages) excluding the title and reference pages.InstructionsTo be successful, complete the following steps in order:STEP 1. Review the instructional materials and finish learning activities in this module.STEP 2. Click here to download the rubric.STEP 3. Create a new Word document, write your paper based on the above overview.STEP 4. Refer to APA book and rubric for correctly formatting the paper.

1). For your first experimental study, you will play the role of researcher, and you will collect data from three different participants (though you will combine your data with other class members, so your final data set will have nearly 140 people!). There are two phases to this study. In the first phase, you will orally ask participants if they are willing to participate in a research study. In the second phase, participants will complete a five-part survey. In Part One, participants look at an Instagram page for Emma Wood along with three photos she is trying to choose between for her new Instagram profile photo. They will also answer some questions about Emma’s Instagram posts. In Part Two, participants will rate their impressions of Emma. In Part Three, participants will rate some of their own characteristics using questions adapted from the Narcissism Personality Inventory (NPI). In Part Four, they will complete demographic questions. Finally, in Part Five, they will note the nature of the photo options they saw in Part I (are they selfies, groupies, or professional?). Note: Items in italics might help you when you start writing Paper II later this semester. To run this study, use the following steps: A). Your first task is to approach three different participants (not all at the same time!). They must be people that you do not know, and cannot be taking a psychology research methods class during the Spring, 2019 semester, or Fall / Summer semesters, 2018. Please DO NOT complete this study yourself, and use only FIU students as participants (no family / friends – You will use them in a later replication study toward the end of the summer semester). There are 48 students in our class, so with each getting data from 3 people, our final sample will be around 140 participants total. B). Phase I: Informed Consent 1). Informed Consent: Ask the potential participant if he or she is willing to participate in a study for your research methods class. You will get their informed consent verbally. Tell them: “Hello, I am conducting a study for my research methods class. I was wondering if you would be willing to participate. The study takes about five to ten minutes. There are no risks to participating, and the main benefit is that I can complete my class assignment. Will you participate?”An oral Yes or No response is fine. If they say no, thank them and find a different participant. If they say yes, move to the next step (Phase II – Questionnaire). C). Phase II: “Questionnaire”1). General InstructionsAfter getting participant’s oral informed consent, randomly give them ONE of the three “Research Study – Florida International University – Spring, 2019” documents. These documents contain our primary independent and dependent variables for the study. One third of our research participants will be in the “Selfie” condition, one third will be in the “Groupie” condition, and one third will be in the “Professional” condition. Ask participants to follow the instructions at the top of the questionnaire. Tell them to read EVERYTHING on the Instagram page, as they will answer questions about it later. They can move through the five “Parts” of this survey at their own pace. Make sure they complete all questionnaire parts (though they can leave some demographic questions blank if they do not want to provide the details). 2). QuestionnaireIn Part I, participants will look at the Instagram page for a woman named Emma Wood. The page contains some general information about Emma wanting to update her profile picture and asking others for advice about which picture to use for the update. Note: EVERYTHING about Emma is identical across all three conditions (but don’t tell participants that!). The only thing that differs is the type of profile picture listed beside her Instagram page: Selfies, Groupies, or Professional.o Conditions:o In the Selfie Condition, there are three different pictures of Emma, and all are selfies. Her facial expressions may differ, but all are self-taken. o In the Groupie Condition, there are also three different pictures, but these are groupies taken by Emma that include at least one other person. o In the Professional (Other-Taken) Condition, there are also three different pictures, but these are clearly taken by some unknown other person. They still feature Emma, but she did not take the picture herself A quick note for you (the researcher): If you look at the second page of the survey in the footer, you will see one of the following: “S”, “G”, or “P”, which relate to the three study conditions – That is, S is for “Selfie”, R is for “Groupie”, and P is for “Professional”. It’s a nice shorthand so you can tell which survey the participant completed if something happens to the first page! However, you don’t need to discuss this internal survey feature in your papers. It’s just FYI o Questions:o There are three general questions in Part I. The first question asks the participant to choose the one picture (out of three) that they think Emma should use in updating her profile. To be honest, we don’t care which one they choose. The goal here is to present pictures as either selfies, groupies, or professional. Question 1 simply ensures that they pay attention to the photos in their own conditionThe second question asks participants to guess when Emma last updated her profile picture. I’ll get to the specific predictions later in this instruction document, but for now, participants who see the “selfie” version of the surveys will probably think Emma updates her profile more frequently than participants who see the “groupie” and “professional” versions of the survey. Note that they use a ratio scale here ranging from 0 (never) to 5 (one hour ago). This is ratio because you can’t get lower than zero (never)! The third question asks the participants to guess how frequently Emma posts her thoughts or pictures on Instagram. Again, participants who see the selfie pictures will probably think she posts more frequently than the other conditions. Here, we have an interval scale. Although it is a 0 to 5 scale once again, “Rarely” doesn’t necessarily imply “never”. Thus a 0 here doesn’t imply she never posts, just that she rarely posts!In Part II, participants will give their general impressions of Emma Wood (the Instagram user). There are ten questions about Emma that participants will complete, all of which use an interval scale of 0 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Note that this is also interval. A 0 does not imply “zero disagreement”, but rather “strong disagreement”. These questions ask about how smart participants thought Emma was, if the participant thinks Emma seems smart, happy, generous, self-absorbed, helpful, shy, selfish, down-to-earth, narcissistic, and egotistical. Although you can look at any (or all) of these questions (ALL are dependent variables), when you write Paper II (which focuses on the methods and results for this study), you will only look at a few of them in detail. Here, I am most interested in the questions about whether participants think Emma is self-absorbed (item #4), selfish (item #7), narcissistic (item #9), and egotistical (item #10). For all four, I think participants will rate Emma as more self-absorbed, selfish, narcissistic, and egotistical in the selfie condition than in the groupie and professional conditions. Of course, we might also expect participants in the selfie condition to see Emma as less generous (item #3) and less down-to-earth (item #8) than participants in the other conditions. If you are working on Paper II, just remember that EACH of these ten questions (ten dependent variables) will have its own hypothesis. The general prediction here is that exposure to the selfie photos will prime participants to see Emma as more narcissistic than participants shown groupie or professional photos.In Part III, participants will rate several statements related to themselves. This includes 10 of 40 items that came directly from the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI). These include statements like, “I have a natural talent for influencing people”, “I am essentially a modest person”, “I try not to be a show off”, etc. To be honest, I doubt we will look at these questions in our analyses for Paper II, but they present a chance to explore some interesting secondary hypotheses, as they relate the possible narcissism of the actual participant. For example, research shows that people who score high on the NPI tend to post more selfies!In Part IV, participants will complete demographic questions. Most of these items are easy to complete without violating the participant’s privacy, but they will know they can leave blank any question(s) they feel uncomfortable answering.Finally, in Part V, we ask participants to choose which description BEST describes the three Emma photos they saw in Part I the photos were selfies, groupies, or professional. Note: this a nominal, or category-based, scale where they are asked to choose one. This is a manipulation check for the study, so we can make sure they paid attention to the nature of the pictures D). Once participants have completed the questionnaire, debrief them regarding the study. That is, tell them about the selfie / narcissism link and your main hypothesis. Read them the following: “Thank you for participating in our study. The purpose of the study is to determine whether selfies impact the impressions that people form about an Instagram user. Prior research shows a link between narcissism and selfies such that narcissists tend to post more selfies than non-narcissists, but does this translate to the impressions that outside observers make about Instagram users? That is, if an Instagram user posts a lot of selfies, do others view the user as narcissistic? To test the impact of selfies on impression formation, all participants saw the same written information about a fictional Instagram user named Emma Wood, who wanted advice about which photo (out of three) she should use to update her profile picture. However, we altered the nature of the pictures that accompanied Emma’s Instagram page so they were “selfie”, “groupie”, or “professional”. Participants in the “Selfie” condition saw three “selfie” photos of Emma (photos she took of herself). Participants in the “Groupie” condition saw three self-taken photos of Emma that included at least one other person in the picture. Participants in the “Professional” condition saw three photos of Emma taken by someone other than Emma. All participants then completed the same survey questions about Emma and themselves. The only difference between the conditions was whether the three photos of Emma were selfies, groupies, or professional. In general, we predict that participants will rate a fictional Instagram user (Emma) as more narcissistic if “selfies” accompany her Instagram account than if “groupies” or “professional” photos accompany her account. More specifically, we predict that if participants are exposed to selfie photos, then they will believe that an Instagram user 1). updates her profile picture more frequently, 2). posts to her social media accounts more often, and 3). seems more self-absorbed, selfish, narcissistic, and egotistical, compared to participants exposed to either groupie or professional photos, though these latter two conditions should not differ from each other in their Instagram user ratings.We will test these hypotheses in our methods course this semester. Thank you for participating!”Methods Students: Note that the underlined portion paragraph above will be helpful when you write Paper I! In fact, you can use that underlined paragraph in your first paper if you like (just copy and paste it into your hypotheses). However, the predictions ARE NOT INCLUDED in your minimum page count. That is, you can copy/paste the predictions, but they do not count in the page minimum!2). Hold onto the completed questionnaires, as you will use them in an upcoming lab. You will enter data into SPSS and analyze it during your lab. Important note: Each student researcher is responsible for collecting data from three participants (one participant for each study condition – S, G and O). However, we will combine survey data from ALL students in your lab section, so your final sample will include at least 140 or so participants. In your papers (especially Paper II), you will use this total set of research participants (at least 140), NOT just the three that you collected yourself. Don’t even discuss “Three participants”, as that is not correct. Discuss ALL participants in your papers3). One last note: Pay close attention to these instructions! You can use them as the basis for Paper II later this semester when you discuss your methods section. That being said, these instructions are too long for a