Read the article, "Business Value Dashboard." Then, find an organization that has adopted a real-time dashboard for its internal use within the last three years. Do not repeat examples from the textbook or that have been posted by other students. Please respond to the following: What are the most important parts of this dashboard? How do these parts help the business managers? How do they help the individual contributors? Have real-time dashboards replaced the traditional business report? Justify your answer.

1. Review the case Melinda Speelman v. Bellingham Housing Authority (2012) in your text on page 35. In your response, explain why Speelman believed her due process rights had been violated. What were her main arguments? Did the Court agree with Speelman, or did it agree with the Bellingham? Do you think agree with the ruling if the Court? Why or why not?2. Explain the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process. What is the substantive due process issue presented in Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)?3. Earlier you were asked to contemplate the facts in Melinda Speelman v. Bellingham Housing Authority. Discuss whether you believe Speelman presented a valid argument before the court. As you consider whether access to the courts is a valid due process issue, please design or amend the existing law that would ensure that all people have access to the courts.I have uploaded the case pages of Melinda Speelman v. Bellingham Housing Authority (2012) from my book. Feel free to use the internet for any other sources. Please use APA format and double spacing. Please include references.

Of the 5 purposes of punishment listed in your readings for this week, which do you believe are the most important to the prevention of crime and promoting a civil society? How does this article impact your thinking on this issue? Eduardo Portel, In the U.S., Punishment Comes Before the Crimes, April 29, 2014 https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/30/business/economy/in-the-us-punishment-comes-before-the-crimes.html (last accessed May 10, 2018)Specific and General DeterrenceDeterrence prevents future crime by frightening the defendant or the public. The two types of deterrence are specific and general deterrence. Specific deterrence applies to an individual defendant. When the government punishes an individual defendant, he or she is theoretically less likely to commit another crime because of fear of another similar or worse punishment. General deterrence applies to the public at large. When the public learns of an individual defendant’s punishment, the public is theoretically less likely to commit a crime because of fear of the punishment the defendant experienced. When the public learns, for example, that an individual defendant was severely punished by a sentence of life in prison or the death penalty, this knowledge can inspire a deep fear of criminal prosecution.IncapacitationIncapacitation prevents future crime by removing the defendant from society. Examples of incapacitation are incarceration, house arrest, or execution pursuant to the death penalty.RehabilitationRehabilitation prevents future crime by altering a defendant’s behavior. Examples of rehabilitation include educational and vocational programs, treatment center placement, and counseling. The court can combine rehabilitation with incarceration or with probation or parole. In some states, for example, nonviolent drug offenders must participate in rehabilitation in combination with probation, rather than submitting to incarceration.Ariz. Rev. Stat. §13-901.01, accessed February 15, 2010, http://law.justia.com/arizona/codes/title13/00901-01.html. This lightens the load of jails and prisons while lowering recidivism, which means reoffending.RetributionRetribution prevents future crime by removing the desire for personal avengement (in the form of assault, battery, and criminal homicide, for example) against the defendant. When victims or society discover that the defendant has been adequately punished for a crime, they achieve a certain satisfaction that our criminal procedure is working effectively, which enhances faith in law enforcement and our government.RestitutionRestitution prevents future crime by punishing the defendant financially. Restitution is when the court orders the criminal defendant to pay the victim for any harm and resembles a civil litigation damages award. Restitution can be for physical injuries, loss of property or money, and rarely, emotional distress. It can also be a fine that covers some of the costs of the criminal prosecution and punishment.