Government Question Regents of the University of California v. Bakke

User Generated

ynjfghqrag123

Business Finance

Description

In the case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the United States Supreme Court outlawed racial quota systems, but upheld affirmative action programs. Do you agree with this decision? Do you believe affirmative action programs are necessary to make up for past discrimination? What are the potential consequences for you if all affirmative action programs were eliminated? Explain your answer.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

yes i do agree, the Supreme Court had outlawed segregation in schools, and had even ordered school districts to take steps to assure integration, the question of the legality of voluntary affirmative action programs initiated by universities was unresolved. Proponents deemed such programs necessary to make up for past discrimination, while opponents believed they were illegal,this was against the constitution.


Anonymous
I use Studypool every time I need help studying, and it never disappoints.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags