Government Question Regents of the University of California v. Bakke

label Law
account_circle Unassigned
schedule 1 Day
account_balance_wallet $5

In the case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the United States Supreme Court outlawed racial quota systems, but upheld affirmative action programs. Do you agree with this decision? Do you believe affirmative action programs are necessary to make up for past discrimination? What are the potential consequences for you if all affirmative action programs were eliminated? Explain your answer.

Apr 22nd, 2015

yes i do agree, the Supreme Court had outlawed segregation in schools, and had even ordered school districts to take steps to assure integration, the question of the legality of voluntary affirmative action programs initiated by universities was unresolved. Proponents deemed such programs necessary to make up for past discrimination, while opponents believed they were illegal,this was against the constitution.

May 4th, 2015

Did you know? You can earn $20 for every friend you invite to Studypool!
Click here to
Refer a Friend
...
Apr 22nd, 2015
...
Apr 22nd, 2015
Oct 22nd, 2017
check_circle
Mark as Final Answer
check_circle
Unmark as Final Answer
check_circle
Final Answer

Secure Information

Content will be erased after question is completed.

check_circle
Final Answer