Textbook: Public Speaking Strategies For Success, Seventh EditionDavid ZarefskyISBN-13: 978-0-205-85726-5DescriptionIn this Lesson, you will analyze the structure of a short speech, Lou Gehrig’s “Farewell to Baseball,”.InstructionsPlease be sure to complete in a single Word document. You will assess a short speech in terms of its organization and structure. Part I: Analyze the “Farewell to Baseball” SpeechOn July 4, 1939, Yankee First Baseman Lou Gehrig gave a short speech of farewell during retirement ceremonies at Yankee Stadium in New York City. In terms of the rhetorical situation, the speaker produced a fitting response that eliminated the exigence in that situation. In any ceremony, of course, it is customary for the guest of honor to make a few remarks and the speaker eliminates that exigence just by saying something. Lou Gehrig, however, perceived an additional exigence: sadness among baseball fans. He reduced that exigence in giving his speech.A rhetorical analysis of the speech begins with the historical context: Lou Gehrig had set a record for the number of consecutive games played in U.S. major-league baseball, but he suddenly quit playing for health reasons. The occasion was “Lou Gehrig Day,” a ceremony held at the stadium prior to a game to commemorate the career of the retiring ballplayer. The audience included spectators, other players, team and league officials, workers, and radio listeners. The speaker was a professional athlete who, not as comfortable with sportswriters as his teammate Babe Ruth had been, had not planned to speak until his wife convinced him that he should. The speech was short, extemporaneous, and reflected gratitude. But this only recounts the facts about the speech without accounting for the constraints and opportunities from each element that the speaker was able to use to make the speech a fitting response that reduced the exigence.In this rhetorical situation, the occasion provided the speaker with constraints and resources. He was obliged to speak, given the conventions of such occasions, and was in uniform at a public gathering in a place where people were used to seeing him. As such, the occasion requires a somewhat formal ceremonial speech that reflects on the shared values of the community in a public, rather than private, gathering. In a familiar setting, the occasion gave a somewhat shy man a comfortable space in which to speak. The audience would expect a speech that was short, graceful, and respectful of shared values that would address their feelings appropriately but not overshadow the baseball game. The audience provided respectful attention and a heightened emotional register for the speaker, which gave his speech a purpose: he spoke to eliminate the emotional exigence of sadness. The speaker, who had attended Columbia University in the engineering program (on a baseball scholarship), was an uncomfortable public speaker, but he had a strong sense of responsibility. His intelligence and determination sustained him in a time that was difficult personally, professionally, and publicly. The speech had to be short, emotional without being weepy, prepared but heartfelt, and appropriate to the occasion in its ideas, structure, and language. The speech drew on the resources and accommodated the constraints of each element in the rhetorical situation to be a fitting response that achieved its purpose.Lou Gehrig’s “Farewell to Baseball” provides us with an opportunity to consider the critical roles of speakers, citizen-critics, and rhetorical critics. As speakers, we can learn from the speech, as it is an example of several of the principles of public speaking that we have developed in this course; we can consider these whenever we speak on ceremonial occasions. As citizen-critics, we can listen for the shared values of the community reflected in the speech, consider their merits, and think about how we would respond as the next speaker to attempt a fitting response, either reinforcing and extending the values or modifying and revising them depending on the new exigence. As rhetorical critics, we can analyze the speech itself; for this lesson, we will focus on the structure of the speech.After you view and read the speech (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., identify the ideas and values that make up the propositional content of the speech. Then, consider the structure. The speech does not follow all of the advice given by the Zarefsky textbook, of course; ceremonial speeches often privilege resonance of ideas over clarity of expression, and Gehrig’s speech does not contain all of the functions of an introduction, conclusion, or transition that you will be expected to use in your speech—just most of them. In your rhetorical situation, the constraints and opportunities for your speech assignment include using the strategies and tactics for structure in the textbook. Using those strategies, analyze the structure of Lou Gehrig’s “Farewell to Baseball” in an essay of 300–400 words or one to two double-spaced pages, in Times New Roman with 12-point font and indented paragraphs. Include a word count in your submission. All papers should be Word-processed, with sources cited in the style you are most familiar with (such as APA, MLA, or Chicago), if you use scholarly research to support your claims. All papers must be free from typographical and spelling mistakes. Errors of grammar, syntax, and composition affect the assignment grade.Criteria:Values expressed in “Farewell to Baseball” 5 pointsArrangement of “Farewell to Baseball” 5 pointsFunctions of Introduction and Conclusion in “Farewell to Baseball” 5 pointsHow does “Farewell to Baseball” structure manage constraints and resources? 5 points

Read the first half of Beowulf. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/16328/16328-h/1632... Write a post about how the laws of “civilization” create a conflict with the natural world in this story (especially in the form of Grendel and his mother).  Rewrite the story in your head to figure out whether Beowulf is acting in a just way to Grendel.  Was Grendel behaving in a way according to his nature when he ate the warriors?  Was he aware of the Danish king’s laws against this kind of dining, or did he view the Danish court as a buffet?  And once again we have a mother bent on revenge…seems like a theme, doesn’t it? Is Grendel’s mother’s behavior just? Is the Danish king’s behavior just when he sends Beowulf to kill Grendel Reply “ After the death of Danish King Scyld, his grandson Hrothgar becomes the new king and creates a new hall called Herot to house his army. When the hall was completed, the Danish soldiers gathered together and celebrated by singing loudly. This singing provoked the monster Grendel who lives in the bottom of a mere nearby, and one night he showed up at the hall and killed thirty of the soldiers while they slept. For years to come the Danish people became afraid of the monster, and advisors don't know how to calm him down. You can say that Grendel acted justly because he is a monster, and felt disturbed by the noise of the men in the hall. While it is not just for the danes, to Grendel it was justified since he is a monster and that's what they do. The Danish King was just in sending Beowulf to kill Grendel because the monster killed 30 of his soldiers, it is only right to go and get revenge. When Beowulf arrived with his Geat's, he is met by Grendel and they both go to fight. Beowulf manages to rip off his arm, which sent Grendel to flee but ultimately died later on. The soldiers returned to the hall with Beowulf and celebrated the victory knowing they can sleep peacefully in their hall. Little did they know, Grendel's mother is plotting revenge for her son's death which is justified because to Grendels mother, she lost her son and almost every mother would do the same if their son was killed. “ .