Description
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
complex
....................................................
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Great content here. Definitely a returning customer.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
ALY 6120 NEU Business Process & Model Question
answer those two questionWhat business process will consume the results of the model(s)?How quickly and frequently should ...
ALY 6120 NEU Business Process & Model Question
answer those two questionWhat business process will consume the results of the model(s)?How quickly and frequently should the model generate results?
18 pages
Learningenvironments R Altawilrevised
Both indoor and outdoor environments are equally important in the provision of a favorable learning environment for young ...
Learningenvironments R Altawilrevised
Both indoor and outdoor environments are equally important in the provision of a favorable learning environment for young children. Currently, most ...
AU Mishandled Interpersonal Conflict in The Film Frozen Discussion
Film options:FrozenErin BrockovichIf you have problems accessing any of this content, contact your instructor immediately. ...
AU Mishandled Interpersonal Conflict in The Film Frozen Discussion
Film options:FrozenErin BrockovichIf you have problems accessing any of this content, contact your instructor immediately.In this assignment, you will write a two- to three-page (500 to 750 word) paper in which you apply some of the communication-based conflict resolution strategies outlined in your textbook to a conflict in a fictional television program or film.In your paper,Define conflict, utilizing Bevan.Describe one interpersonal conflict that was not handled effectively in the television episode or film.Explain how this situation meets the criteria for interpersonal conflict, utilizing Bevan, Section 9.2.oNote: Focus on one exchange that illustrates one conflict and not the entire plot of the episode. If possible, provide some dialogue so the reader can clearly see how the characters handled the situation.Explain why the conflict was not handled effectively, utilizing Bevan (Chapters 8 and 9).Describe two strategies outlined in Bevan that the characters used to address the conflict, utilizing Bevan.Describe two strategies outlined in Bevan that the characters could have used to resolve this conflict more effectively, utilizing Bevan.The Interpersonal Conflict in Television or Film paperMust be two to three double-spaced pages in length, which is 500 to 750 words (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.) resource.Must include a separate title page with the following:oTitle of paperoStudent’s nameoCourse name and numberoInstructor’s nameoDate submittedFor further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).Must utilize an academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance.Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.oFor assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links to an external site.) as well as Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.), refer to the Ashford Writing Center resources.Must use at Bevan multiple times, including to define conflict and explore ways the characters can overcome it.Must document use of Bevan following APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) guide.Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.Late Policy: Faculty will accept late submissions of written assignments up to 3 days after the due date. The maximum late penalty that may be applied to assignments submitted within 3 days of the deadline is 10%.
Work Breakdown Structure
Module 4: Work Breakdown Structure PJM480 - CT 4Using past course texts, current suggested readings, and other scholarly r ...
Work Breakdown Structure
Module 4: Work Breakdown Structure PJM480 - CT 4Using past course texts, current suggested readings, and other scholarly resources, write a review of the WBS.Include the following:Define a WBS.Define work packages.Define metrics used in measuring success and how they are identified in the WBS.Define a roles and responsibility matrix.Lastly, conclude with a summary of the importance of the WBS and project management methodologies, and how they are used in project management.Your paper should meet the following requirements:Be at least 3 pages in length.have title and reference page (not included as part of the page requirements)Be formatted according to PROPER APA FORMATInclude at least two scholarly sources AND CITE SOURCES IN APA FORMAT
5 pages
Reflection On Current Issues In Auditing.edited
Throughout the advanced auditing-current issues class, several current issues in auditing were not only identified but als ...
Reflection On Current Issues In Auditing.edited
Throughout the advanced auditing-current issues class, several current issues in auditing were not only identified but also expounded on. The ...
Speech analysis: Cultural Artifact- the use of baseball in Puerto Rico
DescriptionIn this speech, you will provide an analysis of a
cultural artifact (
the
use of baseball in Puerto Rico) u ...
Speech analysis: Cultural Artifact- the use of baseball in Puerto Rico
DescriptionIn this speech, you will provide an analysis of a
cultural artifact (
the
use of baseball in Puerto Rico) using public identity as a critical lens. Your goal
in this speech is to explain to your audience the basis for your
critical judgment about the artifact.This speech should last at least, but no more
than, 6–8 minutes. You will be given a 15-second grace period on
either end. This time limit is not a suggestion. It is a
requirement, and points will be deducted if you go over or under the
time limit.InstructionsThe object you analyze (
the
use of baseball in Puerto Rico) should be well known or
easily shown to your audience. Your analysis should focus on claims
made by the artifact on the audience in terms of the issue of public
identity (race/gender/orientation, citizenship, or public memory).
Additionally, your speech should inform us about the context of the
artifact by presenting sufficient historical and cultural background
for the audience in class. Ultimately, you should be presenting a
clear and thoughtful argument about the object as something that can
be understood as a material instance of rhetoric. This argument
should not be limited to whether the object was
merely aesthetic, functional, or in conversation with community
standards, but should judge it according to the criteria of how
it—intentionally or not—persuades someone to think, to act, or to
believe in specific ways. Were the purposes of the object (assuming
it had an intended purpose) fulfilled by its persuasive stance or
contradicted? What were the consequences or potential impact of the
artifact? Were the principles behind it valid?This assignment will rely on logos. Logos is one
of the rhetorical proofs that lead to judgment by the audience. Logos
is based on evidence and reasoning, language, and structure. Your
analysis, given in a speech, will demonstrate how you use criticism
as a form of civic engagement. What you believe to be the persuasive
dimensions of the cultural artifact will demonstrate that you know
how to be a critic involved in public life, that you know how to do
criticism that is engaged in civic matters, and that this functions
in ways that are important for the good of the public.Provide support for your speech by drawing on what
others say about the artifact or about artifacts like it: include a
minimum of six published sources cited orally in the speech, cited in
the outline for your speech where you use them, and listed in the
outline bibliography / Works Cited page. Four of the six sources must
be scholarly (edited, peer-reviewed) publications. Journalistic
sources, news-aggregators, and general web pages are not scholarly
sources, but they can be used to provide factual information,
historical background, or pertinent cultural characteristics and
uses. The artifact you analyze is not a source: it is the object of
your analysis. The textbook for this course is not a source: it is
your guide for preparing your speech. Your instructor can be an
invaluable resource in developing your perspective: ask your
instructor for suggested scholarly readings that will help you
conduct your analysis. Remember, your purpose is not merely to
provide facts in an informative speech, but to use these facts to
argue persuasively for the perspective that you are taking.Keep in Mind…
The full
sentence, preparation outline for your speech is worth 40 points.
We have
provided an outline shell
that will help you structure the body, introduction, and conclusion
for your speech.
The outline
should be completed as a Word document and submitted here when you
submit your video.
The speech, as
it is presented in the video you submit, is worth 160 points.
Also review the
evaluation criteria established by CAS for the assessment of all
speeches.
The time frame for completing and
submitting your presentations is indicated on the course schedule.
Cultural
Commonplaces Speech Outline
Cultural
Commonplaces Speech Outline
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
General purpose
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
2.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Specific purpose
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
2.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Introduction: Attention getter
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Introduction: Personal credibility
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Introduction: Thesis
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Introduction: Preview
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Body: Claim A/#1
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Body: Transition from Claim A/#1 to Claim B/#2
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
2.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Body: Claim B/#2
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Body: Transition from Claim B/#2 to C/#3
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
2.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Body: Claim C/#3
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Body: Transition from Claim C/#3 to Conclusion
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
2.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Conclusion: Call to action, summary, closure
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
4.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Grammar, spelling, punctuation, format, & citations 1 point
deducted for each mistake in any of these areas (not to exceed 5
points total)
5.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
5.0 pts
Total Points: 40.0
Similar Content
BSN 436 American Sentinel University Multiple Intelligence Paper
Bsn436 Assignment 1 Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Your final paper should conta...
you will consider threats to internal and external validity in quantitative research
For this Discussion, you will consider threats to internal and external validity in quantitative research and the strategi...
Presentation plan (Template and Sample provided).
Presentation plan (Template and Sample provided).Instruction and the topic are provided, along with template and sample.Ne...
I need help to write my objectives in my C.V
I’m accounting student looking for Coop training this semester and I’m building my CV and I need some help in my objec...
ACCT 350 Accounting Recommendation Letter Task
Handout 7
Ski High, Inc. is a publicly-traded company with annual revenue of $640 million and a fiscal year
ending May 31....
Right To Die, Assisted Suicide. Rough Draft
All requirements are in the attached documents. MLA Format, include work cited. There is an RPQ attached it also must be ...
Cultural Communication Reflection
Studying in a foreign land has been quite challenging, especially when it comes to communication and interpersonal interac...
Keywords Search Assignment
After reading through the Our Temples: Sermon on Mark 12:38-44 passage by Robert Saler, I came through two interesting wor...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
ALY 6120 NEU Business Process & Model Question
answer those two questionWhat business process will consume the results of the model(s)?How quickly and frequently should ...
ALY 6120 NEU Business Process & Model Question
answer those two questionWhat business process will consume the results of the model(s)?How quickly and frequently should the model generate results?
18 pages
Learningenvironments R Altawilrevised
Both indoor and outdoor environments are equally important in the provision of a favorable learning environment for young ...
Learningenvironments R Altawilrevised
Both indoor and outdoor environments are equally important in the provision of a favorable learning environment for young children. Currently, most ...
AU Mishandled Interpersonal Conflict in The Film Frozen Discussion
Film options:FrozenErin BrockovichIf you have problems accessing any of this content, contact your instructor immediately. ...
AU Mishandled Interpersonal Conflict in The Film Frozen Discussion
Film options:FrozenErin BrockovichIf you have problems accessing any of this content, contact your instructor immediately.In this assignment, you will write a two- to three-page (500 to 750 word) paper in which you apply some of the communication-based conflict resolution strategies outlined in your textbook to a conflict in a fictional television program or film.In your paper,Define conflict, utilizing Bevan.Describe one interpersonal conflict that was not handled effectively in the television episode or film.Explain how this situation meets the criteria for interpersonal conflict, utilizing Bevan, Section 9.2.oNote: Focus on one exchange that illustrates one conflict and not the entire plot of the episode. If possible, provide some dialogue so the reader can clearly see how the characters handled the situation.Explain why the conflict was not handled effectively, utilizing Bevan (Chapters 8 and 9).Describe two strategies outlined in Bevan that the characters used to address the conflict, utilizing Bevan.Describe two strategies outlined in Bevan that the characters could have used to resolve this conflict more effectively, utilizing Bevan.The Interpersonal Conflict in Television or Film paperMust be two to three double-spaced pages in length, which is 500 to 750 words (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.) resource.Must include a separate title page with the following:oTitle of paperoStudent’s nameoCourse name and numberoInstructor’s nameoDate submittedFor further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).Must utilize an academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance.Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.oFor assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links to an external site.) as well as Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.), refer to the Ashford Writing Center resources.Must use at Bevan multiple times, including to define conflict and explore ways the characters can overcome it.Must document use of Bevan following APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) guide.Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.Late Policy: Faculty will accept late submissions of written assignments up to 3 days after the due date. The maximum late penalty that may be applied to assignments submitted within 3 days of the deadline is 10%.
Work Breakdown Structure
Module 4: Work Breakdown Structure PJM480 - CT 4Using past course texts, current suggested readings, and other scholarly r ...
Work Breakdown Structure
Module 4: Work Breakdown Structure PJM480 - CT 4Using past course texts, current suggested readings, and other scholarly resources, write a review of the WBS.Include the following:Define a WBS.Define work packages.Define metrics used in measuring success and how they are identified in the WBS.Define a roles and responsibility matrix.Lastly, conclude with a summary of the importance of the WBS and project management methodologies, and how they are used in project management.Your paper should meet the following requirements:Be at least 3 pages in length.have title and reference page (not included as part of the page requirements)Be formatted according to PROPER APA FORMATInclude at least two scholarly sources AND CITE SOURCES IN APA FORMAT
5 pages
Reflection On Current Issues In Auditing.edited
Throughout the advanced auditing-current issues class, several current issues in auditing were not only identified but als ...
Reflection On Current Issues In Auditing.edited
Throughout the advanced auditing-current issues class, several current issues in auditing were not only identified but also expounded on. The ...
Speech analysis: Cultural Artifact- the use of baseball in Puerto Rico
DescriptionIn this speech, you will provide an analysis of a
cultural artifact (
the
use of baseball in Puerto Rico) u ...
Speech analysis: Cultural Artifact- the use of baseball in Puerto Rico
DescriptionIn this speech, you will provide an analysis of a
cultural artifact (
the
use of baseball in Puerto Rico) using public identity as a critical lens. Your goal
in this speech is to explain to your audience the basis for your
critical judgment about the artifact.This speech should last at least, but no more
than, 6–8 minutes. You will be given a 15-second grace period on
either end. This time limit is not a suggestion. It is a
requirement, and points will be deducted if you go over or under the
time limit.InstructionsThe object you analyze (
the
use of baseball in Puerto Rico) should be well known or
easily shown to your audience. Your analysis should focus on claims
made by the artifact on the audience in terms of the issue of public
identity (race/gender/orientation, citizenship, or public memory).
Additionally, your speech should inform us about the context of the
artifact by presenting sufficient historical and cultural background
for the audience in class. Ultimately, you should be presenting a
clear and thoughtful argument about the object as something that can
be understood as a material instance of rhetoric. This argument
should not be limited to whether the object was
merely aesthetic, functional, or in conversation with community
standards, but should judge it according to the criteria of how
it—intentionally or not—persuades someone to think, to act, or to
believe in specific ways. Were the purposes of the object (assuming
it had an intended purpose) fulfilled by its persuasive stance or
contradicted? What were the consequences or potential impact of the
artifact? Were the principles behind it valid?This assignment will rely on logos. Logos is one
of the rhetorical proofs that lead to judgment by the audience. Logos
is based on evidence and reasoning, language, and structure. Your
analysis, given in a speech, will demonstrate how you use criticism
as a form of civic engagement. What you believe to be the persuasive
dimensions of the cultural artifact will demonstrate that you know
how to be a critic involved in public life, that you know how to do
criticism that is engaged in civic matters, and that this functions
in ways that are important for the good of the public.Provide support for your speech by drawing on what
others say about the artifact or about artifacts like it: include a
minimum of six published sources cited orally in the speech, cited in
the outline for your speech where you use them, and listed in the
outline bibliography / Works Cited page. Four of the six sources must
be scholarly (edited, peer-reviewed) publications. Journalistic
sources, news-aggregators, and general web pages are not scholarly
sources, but they can be used to provide factual information,
historical background, or pertinent cultural characteristics and
uses. The artifact you analyze is not a source: it is the object of
your analysis. The textbook for this course is not a source: it is
your guide for preparing your speech. Your instructor can be an
invaluable resource in developing your perspective: ask your
instructor for suggested scholarly readings that will help you
conduct your analysis. Remember, your purpose is not merely to
provide facts in an informative speech, but to use these facts to
argue persuasively for the perspective that you are taking.Keep in Mind…
The full
sentence, preparation outline for your speech is worth 40 points.
We have
provided an outline shell
that will help you structure the body, introduction, and conclusion
for your speech.
The outline
should be completed as a Word document and submitted here when you
submit your video.
The speech, as
it is presented in the video you submit, is worth 160 points.
Also review the
evaluation criteria established by CAS for the assessment of all
speeches.
The time frame for completing and
submitting your presentations is indicated on the course schedule.
Cultural
Commonplaces Speech Outline
Cultural
Commonplaces Speech Outline
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
General purpose
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
2.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Specific purpose
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
2.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Introduction: Attention getter
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Introduction: Personal credibility
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Introduction: Thesis
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Introduction: Preview
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Body: Claim A/#1
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Body: Transition from Claim A/#1 to Claim B/#2
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
2.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Body: Claim B/#2
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Body: Transition from Claim B/#2 to C/#3
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
2.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Body: Claim C/#3
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
3.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Body: Transition from Claim C/#3 to Conclusion
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
2.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Conclusion: Call to action, summary, closure
Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence
outline
4.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Grammar, spelling, punctuation, format, & citations 1 point
deducted for each mistake in any of these areas (not to exceed 5
points total)
5.0 pts
Full Marks
0.0 pts
No Marks
5.0 pts
Total Points: 40.0
Earn money selling
your Study Documents