Science
i have a maintenance work to do

Question Description

all requirements are uploaded down

word count: 1000 to 1500 words

note : plagiarism must be below 10

i have a maintenance work to do
image.jpeg
i have a maintenance work to do
image.png
i have a maintenance work to do
image.png

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Computer Science 16 (2013) 814 – 823 Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER’13) Eds.: C.J.J. Paredis, C. Bishop, D. Bodner, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, March 19-22, 2013. A Systems Approach towards Reliability-Centred Maintenance (RCM) of Wind Turbines Joel Igbaa,b,*, Kazem Alemzadeha, Ike Anyanwu-Ebob, Paul Gibbonsa, John Friisb a b University of Bristol, BS8 1TR, UK Vestas Wind Systems A/S, Denmark Abstract Wind turbines are a proven source of clean energy with wind power energy harvesting technologies supplying about 3% of global electricity consumption. However there is an increasing demand on maintenance and operational improvements since turbines have been plagued with downtime problems of major components e.g. gearboxes and generators, especially with offshore turbines which are difficult to access. Reliability Centric Maintenance (RCM) is a way of capturing the potential causes of downtime and poor performance by preventing failures and having a proactive approach to operations and maintenance (O&M). However, for a large fleet of turbines, adopting the RCM approach becomes difficult due to the complexities that arise as a result of the interactions between individual elements that make up the system in the product lifecycle. This paper discusses how a systems thinking approach can be used to identify the relevant aspects and possible interactions between the RCM approach and wind turbine gearboxes and also how the gaps that exist within the system can be closed so as to add value to business. The outcome of the paper is a proposal for applying a systems approach to wind turbine gearbox operation and maintenance, optimising the asset value adding contribution at minimal total cost to the operator. © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. OpenB.V. access under CC and/or BY-NC-ND license. © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Selection peer-review under responsibility of Georgia Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Georgia Institute of Technology Institute of Technology Keywords: Systems Thinking; Systems Engineering; Reliability-Centred Maintenance (RCM); Wind Turbine; Failure Mode, Effects and Criticlity Analysis (FMECA); Gearboxes; 1. Introduction The wind industry within three decades has come a long way, with wind turbines now being a proven source of clean energy producing about 3% of the electricity consumed globally [1]. Consequently, the requirements and expectations of wind turbines keep increasing. Fulfilling the increasing demand, wind turbines have become larger generating more power for consumers, but still are expected to perform their required duty without interruption for the most part of their in-service lifecycle. However there is an increasing demand on maintenance and operational * Corresponding author. Tel.: +447411731118. E-mail address: ji0905@bris.ac.uk. 1877-0509 © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Georgia Institute of Technology doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.085 Joel Igba et al. / Procedia Computer Science 16 (2013) 814 – 823 815 improvements since turbines have been plagued with downtime problems of major components e.g. gearboxes and generators, especially with offshore turbines which are difficult to access. With the annual installed capacity growth rate slowing down due to the global economic crisis [2], the service business is now a means at which wind turbine manufacturers can remain profitable. A recent article on Bloomberg [3] indicates that there is now a shift from manufacturing towards the service business, in which the service business of Vestas Wind Systems A/S, the leader in the wind industry, grew at an annual rate of 25% during 2011. This is because about 96% of all turbines sold by Vestas are on some form of service agreement. In the wind turbine industry, it is not uncommon to see many of the wind park projects having some form of operation and service agreement or warranty structure between the wind turbine manufacturer and the customer. These agreements may run for 2-3 years or up to 10 years or more (for a full service agreement). Vestas has what they call the Active Output Maintenance® service programme (AOM)†, which has 5 stages depending on the level of turbine services the customer is willing to pay for during the life time of the turbine. With the risk involved in the business, the majority of wind farm owners/operators sign full agreements with turbine manufacturers. It is then the responsibility of wind turbine manufacturers to ensure that the turbine is monitored continuously and is always available. Once there is a fault, they are also responsible for the maintenance and repair. This is a double-edged sword as turbine manufacturers incur costs for downtime of a failed turbine but also the knowledge derived from continuous monitoring and maintenance of the systems, can and should help turbine manufacturers improve the quality and reduce costs of their products and services. Reliability-Centred Maintenance (RCM) which many industries have used historically to tackle similar challenges in service industry [4, 5] is now finding its way towards wind applications [6, 7, 8]. Compared to the aircraft, nuclear and many other industries, the wind industry is relatively young and has had only about 30 years to work towards getting to the status which took industries like aircraft and automotive about a century to achieve. Hence, the successful application of RCM in the wind sector might be flawed if there is not a full understanding of the impacts and contributions the various elements of the system to delivering an effective RCM programme. In this paper, the authors look at the main RCM tools and techniques and how systems thinking can be applied to effectively use the tools optimally without affecting the performance of the overall system. A focus will be directed more on the interactions between the major elements and not on the specific description of how to apply RCM tools. However, a brief and taxonomic literature review on RCM and its applications in wind and other industries will be presented to give an overview of the methodology. 2. Reliability-Centred Maintenance According to SKF Reliability Systems [9] RCM is: “an approach that employs reactive, preventive, and proactive maintenance practices and strategies in an integrated manner to increase the probability that a machine or component will function in the required manner over its design lifecycle with minimum maintenance”. RCM which started in the aircraft industry, and later within the military, nuclear and oil & gas industries, provides a framework that utilises operating experience in a more systemic way [4]. The goal of RCM is to preserve the most important equipment (system) function with the required reliability and availability at the lowest cost of maintenance [4, 9]. Most authors, including Selvik and Aven [5], agree that as well as reducing maintenance costs, RCM also increases safety and reliability. However, Rausand [4] suggests that RCM cannot improve reliability of a system but only ensure that the inherent reliability is realized. He went further by arguing that reliability can only be improved through redesign or modification. This paper looks to examine the links between the main stages of the RCM technique and other aspects of the product lifecycle including feedback to the design phase, hence building on Rausand’s argument [4]. This paper aims to take the RCM technique further from just the functional failure analysis and optimization of maintenance strategies by looking more holistically through the application of systems thinking tools & techniques. The authors do not wish make an indepth study of the specific analysis of the most relevant functional system failures and Preventive Maintenance (PM) optimisation techniques of wind turbines, but choose instead to look into how the † http://www.vestas.com/en/wind-power-plants/operation-and-service/service.aspx#/vestas-univers 816 Joel Igba et al. / Procedia Computer Science 16 (2013) 814 – 823 interacting elements of RCM can be manipulated towards achieving the desire of maximising the asset value adding contribution (focused on improved reliability) at a minimal total cost reduction through applying systems thinking. The authors also argue that a good implementation of RCM should be fully integrated with other interacting elements in the product lifecycle. This implies that there should be some explicit linkage of RCM to other processes such as design, manufacturing, validation and quality management. The wind industry is now cost driven which implies that RCM should optimally satisfy both cost and reliability objectves. 2.1. RCM Framework Rausand [4] presents a structured approach to RCM using a sequence of twelve activities and steps which Selvik and Aven [5] summarised into a two step procedure: i.Inductive analysis of potential failures, where a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) is used to determine critical components of the system. ii.Application of logical decision diagrams to specify suitable categories of predictive maintainance (PM), replacement, etc. There have also been several improvements to the traditional RCM methodology for different applications, e.g. RCM 2 [10], Reliability and Risk Centred Maintenance (RRCM) [5], Streamlined RCM [11], Reliability Centred Asset Maintenance [12, 8] and the SRCM methodology [9]. Although the detailed procedures of the various forms of RCM listed above are different, the main ideas of RCM presented in each source are more or less the same. Fig 1 shows how interpretations from Rausand [4], Selvik and Aven [5] and Fisher et. al. [7], can be used to summarise the main steps of the RCM methodology. Fig 1 RCM Stages [4, 5, 7] A typical wind turbine consists of a Rotor (which carriers the blades), Nacelle and a Tower. The major components (Drive Train and Generator) are contained in the Nacelle. Literature has shown that gearbox failure and downtime are one of the major causes of poor wind turbine reliability [13, 6]. Also Fischer et. al. [6] suggested the gearbox to be the most critical sub-system of the wind turbine after analysing the failure frequencies and downtime of all major sub-systems of the wind turbine. The authors agree with Fischer et. al. [6] and add that not only because the effect of failure frequencies and subsequent downtime are gearboxes very critical but also because of the relatively high costs attributed to downtime mobilisation, logistics and replacement of gearboxes. This is also emphasised by Musial et. al. [13]. Therefore the direction of this study will focus on the wind turbine gearbox when examining the various relationships between RCM and the overall lifecycle of a wind turbine. Furthermore, from the product lifecycle management (PLM) perspective, a product‡ is described by the stages it passes through in its lifetime from its ‘conception’ as an idea up to its ‘end of life’ or decommissioning. Fig 2 below elaborates on the different stages of a product’s life from its design, through its production, use and disposal. The iterative feedback loops represent the continuous knowledge accumulation feedback process for improving each stage of the lifecycle. RCM is usually implemented during the operational stage of the lifecycle when the product is being used. However, RCM can also be planned for during the design and other early stages of the lifecycle. ‡ In the context of this study product refers to the wind turbine gearbox 817 Joel Igba et al. / Procedia Computer Science 16 (2013) 814 – 823 Fig 2 Product lifecycle diagram as described in [14] The importance of integrating RCM with design through continuous iterative knowledge feedback will be explored further in the following section. 3. Systems perspective towards RCM In systems thinking, the effects or outputs of any system are dependent on the interaction of its parts and studying the parts in isolation will not provide an accurate picture of the system [15]. A systems thinking approach helps to interpret real world problems and situations by looking at the bigger picture and clearly identifying the boundaries and levels of interaction between constituent parts of a system and also between several systems. Literature shows that all systems can be defined by common characteristics [16]. Such characteristics include: 1) system-environment boundary, 2) input, 3) output, 4) process, 5) state, 6) hierarchy, 7) goal-directedness, and 8) information [17]. Fig 3 for example, shows a summary of the inputs, outputs, controls and enablers (IOCE) context diagram for the wind turbine gearbox RCM framework. This diagram begins formulating the problem in a way that will help to find a better understanding of the interacting elements of the RCM framework and other systems. Controls Inputs 1. Data Design information & Requirements Field failure data & statistics Wind site & SCADA data 2. Others Environmental & Logistics Factors Technical competencies Guidelines for RCM Component inspection manuals, procedures & guidelines Internal and external gearbox standards Outputs RCM Framework for Wind Turbine Gearboxes 1. Data FMECA Report & Data In-Service Data 2. Others Optimized Maintenance Strategy Field operations experience Cross-functional team Computerised maintenance management system (CMMS) Tools and Equipment for O&M Enablers Fig 3 RCM framework context diagram 3.1. RCM and the product lifecycle From Fig 3 it can be seen that the constituents of the IOCE for the RCM framework make up the other stages in the product lifecycle. Using the context diagram and the product lifecycle (Fig 3 & Fig 2) as a guide, a SIPOC (suppliers, inputs, process, outputs and customers) diagram [18] (see Fig 4) can be made for the RCM framework to clearly understand the specific links of RCM framework for a wind turbine gearbox to other stages of the gearbox lifecycle. Suppliers and customers define the cross-functional teams and individuals who are stakeholders in providing the inputs and making use of the outputs respectively, from the RCM framework. For the purpose of this 818 Joel Igba et al. / Procedia Computer Science 16 (2013) 814 – 823 example, the majority of suppliers and customers are internal to the organisation, with the only external stakeholder being the gearbox manufacturer. The inputs to the process considered here are mainly the data which are required for RCM. This data varies from design to field data and requires individuals with respective technical competencies to make use of them for RCM. Also, the suppliers and customers of the RCM process are mostly the same groups of individuals, however, they make use of different inputs and outputs of the process. For example, the design engineering team are responsible for providing design information which are needed for RCM, however, they also have to make use of other data like failure and repair information for design reviews. Hence for an ideal RCM framework to be implemented, these stakeholders will have to participate in shaping the requirements for the process directly or indirectly. For example, design & manufacturing data are needed to be correlated with field operations data in order to identify the functional failures and select critical components. Therefore, the RCM group working on these aspects should be made up of representatives with the knowhow of the design and manufacturing details of the gearbox as well as those with field O&M experience. Fig 4 SIPOC for the RCM framework for wind turbine gearbox 3.2. The Lifecycle System of Systems (SoS) So far, there has been a gradual build-up in describing and linking RCM to the overall product lifecycle. In the context of a wind turbine project, the systems representation of the lifecycle is shown in Fig 5 below. The two clouds represent the production (in blue) and services/operations (in green) stages of the lifecycle showing the important interactions between major constituents of both systems. In a quick run through, a gearbox after being designed will go through a series of tests and then once manufactured will have to be integrated with other subsystems of the wind turbine (product integration). After integration with other components, the turbine is then installed in the field (construction) after which the service and operations lifetime begin in the field. The field 819 Joel Igba et al. / Procedia Computer Science 16 (2013) 814 – 823 operation is characterized by plant operations and platform management. Plant operations are responsible for running individual wind farms while the platform management consists of those responsible for managing specific wind turbine type across different regions. Both the plant operations and platform management are responsible for overseeing service and maintenance of the turbines. The diagram also shows the connecting links from design to the field O&M stages and also the links between the quality team and other upstream stages of the lifecycle. Finally, the top management oversees all the different stages emphasizing the importance of aligning all stages of the lifecycle to the overall business strategy. Top Management, Finance, Business Strategy etc. Design & Product Development Validation & Testing Manufacturing Product Integration Quality Construction Plant operations Platform management Service & maintenance Spare parts & Repair Fig 5 Systems diagram representing the key stages of the lifecycle of a wind turbine gearbox 4. Discussion The previous two sections have presented the RCM framework for wind turbine gearbox maintenance and applied systems thinking to understand how the various stages of such a framework interact with other stages of the product lifecycle. This section will discuss further these interactions by looking at three key stages where the RCM framework can be anchored to the overall lifecycle. 4.1. Data collection and analysis as a vital input for RCM During operation the gearbox is subjected to varying loads depending on the site conditions the wind turbine is exposed to. Typically, data is needed for the functional failure analysis, some of which have been identified in the previous section (see Fig 3). However, Fig 6 below shows the component lifecycle of a gearbox and its sub components, indicating the various types of data within the entire lifecycle. Data required for RCM analysis spans across the lifecycle but the data collected during RCM is limited in scope. Hence there is a need to clearly map out and identify the potential sources of data and align them to RCM so that the right analysis can be carried out. On the other hand FMECA should identify possible gaps in some upstream processes (e.g. problem with manufacturing process due to error in a batch production). This can be realised through a good correlation of field failures with 820 Joel Igba et al. / Procedia Computer Science 16 (2013) 814 – 823 Re-use of components Component Lifecycle for wind turbine gearboxes operation data to make accurate judgements about the functional failures through a root cause analysis (RCA) that reveals this. BOM, Drawings & Assembly Details Design Lifecycle Design Specifications New Component Manufactured Measurement report Material certificate Testing Vibration, Temp & Noise Data Gear teeth contact patterns Test, Validation and integration to Wind Turbine Running gearbox on nominal loads Field tests Field inspections & online monitoring during operation Inspection Reports & maintenance Data Repair & Disassembly Inspections Failure Categories New-life or end of component life Peak loads, temps, oil pressure etc. from online S ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Final Answer

Attached.

Surname1
Student
Instructor
Course
Date
Wind Turbines
The wind turbine is a clean energy source utilizing wind power as a harvesting
technology. The latter supplies about 4% of the energy used globally, for electricity
consumption (Igba et al. 814). However, there is an increased demand for maintenance of the
same as it experiences problems with its major components such as generators. RCM is a
significant method of determining downtime effects experienced; downtime leads to poor
performance of the turbine. According to Igba et al. (814), RCM as an approach entails
reactive, proactive and preventive maintenance strategies to increase the feasibility of a
machine over its life cycle with minimal or no maintenance. Also, the RCM is used to
prevent failures and provide a superb approach to operations and support. Adoption of the
method is complicated, and this results from the complexities of element interactions.
However, this paper seeks to discuss scope, value, and feasibility of the plan, methodology,
maintenance approach, statistical implementations and finally a conclusion and
recommendations of the journal, ‘System Approach towards RCM of Wind Turbines.'
Scope, Value, and Feasibility
Wind power technology has moved milestones through decades, both concerning
global power installation and turbine size. However, as one of the most significant energy
source, ambitious goals are set for its continuity. For instance, according to Igba et al. (814),
most EU directives suggest a percentage increase of up to 2 1% of renewable energy come

Surname2
2020. Also, the European Wind Energy Association targets approximately, 240 GW energy
by the end o...

Cornell University

Anonymous
Return customer, been using sp for a good two years now.

Anonymous
Thanks as always for the good work!

Anonymous
Excellent job

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors