Fed Taxes & Mgmt Decisions

Jan 31st, 2014
SKTFaker
Category:
Business & Finance
Price: $60 USD

Question description

Prepare a three-page memo (at least 900-1,500 words per page) to John and Jane Smith addressing the issues presented: 

1. John Smith tax issues:

a. How is the $300,000 treated for purposes of federal tax income?

b. How is the $25,000 treated for purposes of federal tax income?

c. What is your determination regarding reducing the taxable amount of income for both (a) and (b) above? 

d. Is it more beneficial to continue leasing the business space or to buy the building?

2. Jane Smith tax issues:

a. What are the different tax consequences between paying down the mortgage (debt) and assuming a new mortgage (debt) for federal income tax purposes?

b. Can John and Jane Smith utilize a 1031 tax exchange to buy a more expensive house using additional money from John's case?

c. Does Jane have a business or hobby? Why is this distinction important?

d. Would Jane (and John) realize better tax benefits if she had a separate business for her jewelry-making activities?

e. What tax benefits would John realize if he invested $15,000 in Jane's jewelry making?

f. Can Jane depreciate her vehicle or jewelry-making equipment? How?

3. John and Jane Smith tax issue:

a. Should John and Jane file separate or joint tax returns?

You Decide: It's your turn as a tax professional to decide on the best course of action from a tax perspective on their issues as presented above.

For each issue, begin by restating the issue and numbering as shown above [i.e., 1(a), 1(b), etc.]. Next, explain and discuss the tax rules that apply to the issue, which you gleaned from your tax research. Then, conclude with a definitive answer to the issue, supported by citations to the sources used. So for each issue, you should

state the issue;

explain and discuss the applicable law (IRC sections, regulations, court decision, and so forth); and

present your answer in the form of a concluding paragraph that refers to specific language from the IRC sections, regulations, court decisions, and other sources (if applicable) to support the conclusion.

*A template has been provided in Doc Sharing for your use in preparing this activity. Please use it!

Citations

Citations are required. You must provide citations whenever you refer to the sources of tax law used in this memorandum. You may cite your sources in numbered footnotes, numbered endnotes, or in parentheses immediately after the sentence mentioning the cited source.

Grading Rubric

Category

Points

Description

Superior

100–125

Content and subject: Easily identifiable, clear; meets or exceeds page or word-length requirement; all required citations are provided

Structure: Apparent, understandable, and applicable; excellent flow and well structured

Analysis: Interesting and novel; provides different perspectives; demonstrates critical thinking and critical analysis at a high level 

Mechanics: Virtually devoid of errors in grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling

Achieving

80–99

Content and subject: Concrete overall, but may be slightly unclear; meets or exceeds page- or word-length requirement; some citations missing

Structure: Generally clear and appropriate

Analysis: Evidence relates to the content; evidence may lack some clarity; critical analysis and critical thinking apparent

Mechanics: Good sentence structure (syntax), grammar, punctuation, and spelling, with minor errors

Average

65–79

Content and subject: Fairly easy to read and understand, but paper meanders from topic or lacks cohesion or content; meets page- or word-length requirement; missing most citations

Structure: Overall good, with minor shortfalls 

Analysis: Some critical thinking, but minimal or no analysis or further discussion by the adult learner

Mechanics: Sentence structure has some errors relative to syntax, grammar, punctuation, and spelling

Below Average

< 65

Content and subject: Often unstructured and vague; content not totally applicable to the paper's requirements or introduces substantial material not relevant to the assignment and/or the relevant discussion points; no citations provided for tax law research 

Structure: Mostly unclear and difficult to visualize 

Analysis: Very limited with no analysis or further discussion by the adult learner that demonstrates adult learner critical thinking/analysis

Mechanics: Numerous mistakes in sentences, paragraph formatting, spelling, and grammar that subtract from the content of the paper; writing errors suggest minimal likelihood that paper was proofread for errors prior to submission; writing not at graduate level


Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
(997)
School: UCLA
PREMIUM TUTOR

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

7 Reviews


Summary
Quality
Communication
On Time
Value
kpcutie
Dec 6th, 2016
" Excellent job "
Hemapathy
Nov 23rd, 2016
" all I can say is wow very fast work, great work thanks "
BlueOcean
Nov 9th, 2016
" Awesome! Exactly what I wanted. "
kevin12622
Oct 31st, 2016
" Goes above and beyond expectations ! "
ashleyisgod
Oct 18th, 2016
" Top quality work from this guy! I'll be back! "
likeplum4
Oct 9th, 2016
" Excellent work as usual "
Molly_Moon
Sep 25th, 2016
" AMAZING as always! "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1823 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors