Critiques Total: 3.00 Distinguished - Thoroughly and comprehensively critiques one blog, one video, and one pod cast in relation to the topic of the final paper. Assesses the author’s use of bias, validity, and applicability of information. Proficient - Adequately critiques one blog, one video, and one pod cast in relation to the topic of the final paper. Assesses the author’s use of bias, validity, and applicability of information. Some details could be more fully developed. Basic - Briefly critiques one blog, one video, and one pod cast in relation to the topic of the final paper. Critique includes a limited assessment the author’s use of bias, validity, and applicability of information. Many details are lacking development. Below Expectations - Attempts to critique one blog, one video, and one pod cast in relation to the topic of the final paper. Critique includes insufficient detail or relevance and fails to assess the author’s use of bias, validity, and applicability of information. Non-Performance - The critique is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Examination Total: 2.50 Distinguished - Cohesively and clearly examines the influence of web-based information on global citizenship and multicultural understanding. Proficient - Adequately examines the influence of web-based information on global citizenship and multicultural understanding. Some supporting details lack development. Basic - Briefly examines the influence of web-based information on global citizenship and multicultural understanding. Supporting details may lack adequate detail and/or relevance. Below Expectations - Attempts to examine the influence of web-based information on global citizenship and multicultural understanding; however, supporting details are insufficient and lacking in relevance. Non-Performance - The examination is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. List of Factors Total: 2.50 Distinguished - Exceptionally detailed list of three factors for consideration when evaluating internet sources for use in research. Proficient - Sufficiently detailed list of three factors for consideration when evaluating internet sources for use in research. Some details lack development or relevance. Basic - Somewhat detailed list of three factors for consideration when evaluating internet sources for use in research. May lack sufficient detail and/or relevance. Below Expectations - Incomplete list of three factors for consideration when evaluating internet sources for use in research. List includes insufficient detail or relevance. Non-Performance - The list of factors is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Written Communication: Content Development Total: 0.50 Distinguished - Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive content to discover and develop sophisticated ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole. Proficient - Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole. Basic - Uses appropriate and pertinent content, but does not apply it toward discovering or developing ideas. Overall, content assists in shaping the written work. Below Expectations - Uses content, though it may be unrelated or inappropriate to the topic. Content does not contribute toward the development of the written work, and may distract the reader from its purpose. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Critical Thinking: Evidence Total: 0.50 Distinguished - Employs persuasive information from credible source(s) to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly. Proficient - Employs applicable information from credible source(s) to develop an analysis of the topic. Basic - Identifies applicable information from credible source(s), but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. Below Expectations - Displays information from external source(s), but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics Total: 0.25 Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand. Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand. Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader. Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. APA Formatting Total: 0.25 Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title and reference page. Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. Basic - Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Page Requirement Total: 0.25 Distinguished - The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description. Proficient - The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description. Basic - The paper meets over half of the page requirement. Below Expectations - A fraction of the page requirement is completed. Non-Performance - A fraction of the page requirement is completed. Resource Requirement Total: 0.25 Distinguished - Provides ample resources and uses the correct number of sources from the specified search agents. Proficient - Provides the approximate number of sources, while using some of the correct search agents specified in the assignment instructions. Basic - Provides over half of the sources required in the assignment instructions. Below Expectations - Provides inadequate number of resources and does not include sources from specified search agents. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. gen499 week 2 essay.docx

Users want bandwidth and will use as much as offered to them.Compare video, voice, and data formats. Identify at least three bandwidth techniques and how you would manage them with either UDP or TCP protocols.Consider both wired and wireless networks. Do not limit yourself to the TCP/IP protocol.Write a 2- to 3-page paper. Include at least two references.

page 1 book 199.jpgpage 2 book 199.jpgCIS 510 – Extra Credit.Extra credit requires you to use all of the concepts discussed in this course. There are  sections with each section having  point value. You must have all elements required in each section to receive points for that section. All diagrams must be part of your System Review document placed in the appropriate section. The format is included in this document.Extra credit the case study “The State Patrol Ticket Processing System” (Page 199, Chapter 5).  There are five independent systems.1)  Ticket Processing System2)  Accident and Insurance Verification System3)  Driving Record System4)  Driver License System5)  Patrol OperationsThe first four systems are integrated and share a common database; however, each processes only data specifically identified for the system. This project has a $150,000 budget and must be completed within 4 months. You currently have a staff of two programmers, one tester, one network adminstrator, one database adminstrator, and a State Trooper Officer as a liason.Extra Credit Project (150 points):Your team is required to integrate the Patrol Operations system with the other four. Patrol Operations include all information of the State Trooper (Name, address, Badge Number, Rank), vehicle assigned (Type, VIN, State Number), and patrol area.  Sections 1 and 2 are traditional design approach requirements. Sections 3 and 4 are Object- Oriented design requirements. Section 5 will be a full project scope statement.SYSTEM REVIEW DOCUMENTPROJECT: State Trooper Multi-System IntegrationSYSTEMS ANALYST: <Your Name>PROJECT MANAGER: <Your Name>CLASS: CIS510 – SPRING QUARTERSection 1: Entity Relationship Diagram – Visio or Open Source version (30 points)a)  Current System (15 points)b)  Upgraded System (15 points)Section 2: Data Flow Diagram – Visio or Open Source version. (30 points)a)  Current system (15 points)b)  Upgraded system (15 points)Section 3: Class Diagram – Visio or Open Source version. (30 points)a)  Upgraded systemSection 4: Use Case Diagram – Visio or Open Source version. (30 points)a)  Upgraded systemSection 5: Project Scope Statement (30 points) – Use the format below.Project Scope StatementProject Name: State Trooper Multi-system integration Department: State Trooper IT DivisionProject Manager: <Your Name>Date: <Date>Prepared By:Document Owner(s)Project/Organization Role<Your Name>State Trooper Integration/Systems Analyst/Project ManagerProject Closure Report Version ControlVersionDateAuthorChange Description01<Date><Your Name>Created document.Project Justification (6 points)<This must state why the project is necessary, how it will impact operations if not completes, and what impact does it have on operations>  Project Identification (6 Points)Solution: <This must address the final solution in detail>Extraneous Work: Work outside of the scope (basically, what will not be done in this project)Other projects:  Project Deliverables (6 points)<This area must identify each item that you deliver as a final product>  Project Objective (6 points)Costs:  <This must explain how the costs will be used throughout the project>Time:  <This must provide a time-line for each phase>Quality Measures:  <This must identify how you are measuring each phase for quality and completion>  Assumptions/Limitations (6 points)<This must contain any assumptions from reading the case study, as well as any limitiations you feel might impact the project>