FOR THESE 3 QUESTIONS BELOW, please respond briefly in writing, and DRAW one or more drawings to accompany your answers. Don't worry about the quality of your drawings! Your drawings don't have to be great, just expressive. :)Of the common myths about writing that Jensen raises, which one do you most find yourself falling into? Is this the same for all kinds of writing that you do, or is it different depending on what you're writing?- the magnum opus myth- the hostile reader- the impostor myth- the compared-to-X myth- the cleared-deck dream- the perfect first sentence- the need for one more source (You only had to read the beginning of Joli’s reading for today, but sometime when you’re ready for it, I would recommend reading at least the chapter that goes into your particular myth in more detail!)2. Is there another myth that gets in the way of your writing that Jensen hasn't mentioned? What would you call this myth? What other obstacles get you stuck? What obstacles, beliefs, emotions, or ideas do you struggle with when it comes to your writing?3. Invite one demon in for tea. Freewrite for a while: Identify (without hostility or criticism) what you are telling yourself. What belief about writing are you taking for granted? Is that belief really true? If it is, and it is painful, then what can you do to support yourself? If it is not, what is more accurate, and therefore more reasonable, to believe? What is one truth you could speak back to your demon? (Remember, this goes beyond positive thinking or pumping yourself up with supportive slogans. This is about seeing clearly to the reality of your situation, past the myths, which we can gradually dismantle when we allow ourselves to see them for the untruths they are.)

For this discussion, you will explore the relationship between financial analysis and strategic analysis in a review of the case study Case 9: Starbucks Corporation, p.462 (from your textbook)A case study is a puzzle to be solved, so before reading and answering the specific questions, develop your proposed solution by following these five steps:Read the case study to identify the key issues and underlying issues. These issues are the principles and concepts of the course modules which apply to the situation described in the case study.Record the facts from the case study which are relevant to the principles and concepts of the course modules. The case may have extraneous information not relevant to the current module. Your ability to differentiate between relevant and irrelevant information is an important aspect of case analysis, as it will inform the focus of your answers.Describe in detail the actions that would address or correct the situation.Consider how you would support your solution with examples from experience or current real-life examples or cases from textbooks.Complete this initial analysis and then read the discussion questions. Typically, you will already have the answers to the questions, but with a broader consideration. At this point, you can add the details and/or analytical tools required to solve the case.In an original post, present a well-written answer and diagnosis for the following case study questions:Examine the reasons why Starbucks’ strategy has been so successful.Examine the threats to Starbucks’ success in the future. How does Starbucks link organizational goals to measures of value?How does Starbucks link organizational goals to measures of performance?Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories (which require supporting citations) in your initial response along with at least one scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article. Keep in mind that these scholarly references can be found in the Saudi Digital Library by conducting an advanced search specific to scholarly references. Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.Text book :Grant, R. M. (2019). Contemporary strategy analysis (10th ed.) Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 9781119495727Ref:Chapter 2 in Contemporary Strategy Analysis Chapter 2 PowerPoint slides Chapter 2 PowerPoint slides - Alternative Formats in Contemporary Strategy AnalysisLandry, N., & Mclarney, C. (2019). Using Human Resource Management to Drive Business Strategy: The Case of BAE Systems. IUP Journal of Business Strategy, 16(4), 8–22. https://www.iupindia.in/1912/Business%20Strategy/Using_Human_Resource_Management.aspFrigo, M. L., & Krumwiede, K. (2020). Strategic Analysis and the Management Accountant: By working to align strategy, execution, budgets, and financial performance, management accountants can help create superior long-term results for their organization. Strategic Finance, 11, 48.Tzong-Shing Cheng. (2019). The Study of Relationship for Personality Traits, Perception Risk, Motivation, Business Strategies Environment Factors and Business Performance to Entrepreneurs. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 12(2), 360–371.

One of the marks of team excellence is a collaborative climate. In the article When teams work best: 6,000 Team members and leaders tell what it takes to succeed, it stated, “Research demonstrates that effective team leaders ensure a collaborative climate by making communication safe, demanding and rewarding collaborative behavior, guiding the team’s problem-solving efforts, and managing their own control needs (LaFasto, F. & Larson, C., 2001).”In a 2-3 page paper, discuss what constitutes “safe communication” in the workplace: Between co-workers, between subordinates and supervisors, and between subordinates and the organization as a whole. What types of talk needs to be safe-guarded? Why? In an organization, who is responsible for ensuring safe communication? Be sure to reference both the chapter 12 & 14 in your textbook and the LaFasto and Larson Article as you answer these questions.