obsession for secrecy and the reasons for not sharing intelligence at a national level

Anonymous
timer Asked: Dec 23rd, 2017
account_balance_wallet $15

Question description

The obsession for secrecy and the reasons for not sharing intelligence at a national level was exposed after the attacks of September 11, 2001. Answer the following questions in your initial response.

1. Do you believe law enforcement has since overcome the obstacles of not sharing intelligence information between the federal, state and local levels?


2. Find one real life example since September 11, 2001 where intelligence sharing between agencies occurred. You may use current events as sources.

3. Using the knowledge you have gained from this course. Describe your position with three (3) specific recommendations of how to effectively share intelligence information to prevent or reduce crime.

Instructions: APA 6th edition format is not required in your response unless students introduce information from outside sources. All forum responses need to be 500 words and sources




Zero Points Substance (Possible 40 points) Collaboration (Possible 30 points) Beginning Zero points: Student failed to respond to the essay question Developing 25 points: Presentation is unclear; a basic understanding of the topic and issues is not evident; explanation is lacking; segments of the required answer are lacking; sources and supporting facts are not utilized; length requirements may not have been met. Accomplished 30 points: Student’s initial posting did not meet the length requirement; and/or presentation evidences some confusion concerning topics under discussion; analysis may be lacking and/or elements of the question are not answered; support and references may be lacking. Exemplary 35 points: Student answered/addressed most aspects of the question/topic posed in the Forum; initial posting met length requirement; a basic understanding of relevant concepts/theories is demonstrated; relevant sources were located; minimal or no facts/examples were used in support of presentation. Zero points: Student filed none of the required replies. 15 points: Student filed only one of the required replies OR filed the required replies but failed to meet length requirements. 25 points: Student filed the minimum number of replies, meeting the length requirements and evidencing an understanding of the issues under discussion and the views of colleagues. Student failed to respond to specific queries posed to him by colleagues or by the Instructor. Student did not take initiative in advancing the discussion throughout the week. 40 points: Student answered/addressed all aspects of the topic/question posed in the Forum; initial posting met length requirement; analysis of concepts and theories clearly demonstrates superior knowledge and a clear understanding of the topic; relevant and scholarly resources were located and used appropriately; facts and examples are used in support of presentation. 30 points: Student filed all required replies and they met the length requirement; the replies were substantive, thoughtful responses and contributed to the discussion; student exceeded minimum requirements by answering all queries posed to him by others and remained present and actively engaged in the discussion throughout the week; student reached out to draw others into the conversation and drew connections between and among subjects/issues relevant to the discipline. Timeliness (Possible 10 points) Writing (Possible 10 points) Zero points: Student failed to respond to the essay question Citations (Possible 10 points; zero points if citations are missing) Zero points: Student failed to include APA citation and/or references Zero points: Student filed more than two required postings in an untimely manner. 4 points: Writing contains several grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors. Language lacks clarity or includes some use of jargon and /or conversational tone; sentence structure is awkward. 4 points: Citations of reference sources exist; citations apparently correspond to the correct source but do not enable the reader to locate the source. APA 6th edition format not evident. 2 points: Student filed two required postings in an untimely manner. 7 points: Student filed one required posting in an untimely manner. 10 points: Student filed all required postings in a timely manner. 6 points: Student demonstrates consistent and correct use of the rules of grammar usage, punctuation and spelling, with a few errors; there is room for improvement in writing style and organization. 8 points: Student demonstrates consistent and correct use of the rules of grammar usage, punctuation, and spelling. Language is clear and precise throughout all submissions. Sentences display consistently strong, varied structure and organization is excellent. 10 points: Student demonstrates a quality of writing consistent with scholarly works in the relevant discipline; student is facile in the use of subject-matter vocabulary and application of concepts; writing is pleasing to the reader and absolutely error free. 6 points: Attempts to cite reference sources are made, but the reader has difficulty finding the sources; attempts to use APA 6th edition format are evident but poorly executed 8 points: Reference sources are cited as necessary, but some components of the citations are missing and/or APA 6th edition format is faulty in some respects. 10 points: Reference sources relied on by the student are cited appropriately and accurately. No writing of others is left without quotation and/or attribution, as appropriate. APA 6th edition format is used correctly and consistently.

Tutor Answer

mariam90
School: UCLA

Hoping you are doing great...Below is the response to the prompt above. Let me know if you need anything edited. Thanks!!

Running Head: INTELLIGENCE POLICING AND INFORMATION SHARING

Obstacles for information exchange between the intelligence and the law enforcers
Student’s Name
Professor
Course
Date

1

OBSTACLES OF INFORMATION SHARING BETWEEN THE INTELLIGENCE AND LAW ENFORCERS

2

Obstacles for information exchange between the intelligence and the law enforcers
The US congress has tried to eliminate any buriers that obstruct information interchange
between the intelligence and the law enforcers (Jenkins, & Butterworth, 2014 pp. 10). Before the
September 2001 attacks, there were prominent buriers to information sharing from the
intelligence unit to law enforcers, at f...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Wow this is really good.... didn't expect it. Sweet!!!!

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors