Network Protocols ( two pages )

Anonymous
timer Asked: Dec 26th, 2017
account_balance_wallet $10

Question description

Leading Internet Service Provider in OMAN is planning to migrate from IPV4 to

IPV6 for enhancing their internet services. Their vision is to establish a high-speed network

that can be used to improve their network infrastructure for fast, Internet browsing, e-mail,

online gaming, streamed videos and video calling with dramatically increased performance.

 Considering the above said situation, focusing on current communication

technology and also based on future enhancement capabilities, as a network

professional you are assigned to recommend a feasible solution in the form of a

detailed report by analysing “Internet Protocol Versions” so that your report

may help the company to have an understanding of the benefits of IP

technology.

Note: Critically evaluate the concepts related to Internet Protocol Versions.

in the attached file only task 2 part b

Network Protocols (COMP 20001)-Fall-17-CW2 (LAB ASSMNT)-ALL-QP-ML In Semester Coursework Fall 2017 Individual Assignment Module: Network Protocols (COMP 20001) Level: 2 Duration: 4 Weeks Max. Marks: 100 Work Proposal Submission : 16/12/2017 Final Report Submission: 31/12/2017 Instructions to students:  This is an individual assignment.  Present the relevant references /citation at the end of document.  Marks will be awarded for the content written in your own words.  Duplicate documents submitted will be treated as per MEC plagiarism policy.  Report must be uploaded on Moodle on or before the date of submission.  You can make use of the library resources to find information. Internet resources can also be used to search information. Objectives: Students are encouraged to work with Internet Layer Protocols and transport layer protocols. This is research and practical based assignment which allow students work independently and providing evidence and critical evaluation of the topic. Tasks:  Task1: Students need to submit a work proposal for this assignment.  Task2:  Student needs to prepare a report summarizing the key concepts based on published research papers.  Critically evaluate the concepts related to “Internet Layer Protocols”. COMP 20001 (QP) Page 1 of 11 Network Protocols (COMP 20001)-Fall-17-CW2 (LAB ASSMNT)-ALL-QP-ML  Reflect on the functional features of the chosen Internet Layer Protocols and suggest how it could be applied to a real time environment. Note: Referencing should be in CU Harvard style.  Task3: Student needs to perform simulation activity that is intended to provide a foundation for understanding the Transmission Control Protocol and User Datagram Protocol in detail. Simulation mode provides the ability to view the functionality of the different protocols. This activity provides an opportunity to explore the functionality of the TCP and UDP protocols, multiplexing and the function of port numbers in determining which local application requested the data or is sending the data. Task 1. Submit a work proposal for this assignment on or before 14/12/2017 (10 Marks) A report need to be submitted in an MS Word document having the following things: a. Understanding deliverables – a detailed description of deliverables. b. General overview of the proposed plan with initial understanding of solution to task2 and task 3. c. Resources identified. d. Time schedule The work proposal must be submitted in a word file through the link available on Moodle. Task 2. Student is required to write a report for the following tasks: Task 2.a: (Total Marks = 50 Marks) To establish your theoretical framework of this literature writing towards a methodological focus, you need to do a literature review about “Internet layer Protocols” from any scholarly articles based on ISSN referred journals and include the article summary in the form of a report and Reflect on the functional features of the chosen Internet Layer Protocols and suggest how it could be applied to a real time environment. Please Note: Refer the article link as evidence of your review with proper referencing and index citation. The summary should include the main ideas presented in the paper. (25 Marks) COMP 20001 (QP) Page 2 of 11 Network Protocols (COMP 20001)-Fall-17-CW2 (LAB ASSMNT)-ALL-QP-ML Task 2.b: Leading Internet Service Provider in OMAN is planning to migrate from IPV4 to IPV6 for enhancing their internet services. Their vision is to establish a high-speed network that can be used to improve their network infrastructure for fast, Internet browsing, e-mail, online gaming, streamed videos and video calling with dramatically increased performance.  Considering the above said situation, focusing on current communication technology and also based on future enhancement capabilities, as a network professional you are assigned to recommend a feasible solution in the form of a detailed report by analysing “Internet Protocol Versions” so that your report may help the company to have an understanding of the benefits of IP technology. Note: Critically evaluate the concepts related to Internet Protocol Versions. (25 Marks) Task 3. Students are required to do the following tasks for examine the functionality of the TCP and UDP Protocols: (Total Marks = 40 Marks) Task 3.a: Consider the following network topology figure 3.a, students need to Generate Network Traffic in Simulation Mode using packet Tracer. COMP 20001 (QP) (10 Marks) Page 3 of 11 Network Protocols (COMP 20001)-Fall-17-CW2 (LAB ASSMNT)-ALL-QP-ML Task 3.b: For the above simulation, Student needs to examine functionality of the TCP and UDP Protocols by the following steps. Task 3.b.1: Examine multiplexing as all of the traffic crosses the network. (5 Marks) Task 3.b.2: Examine DHCP traffic as the clients communicate with the server. (5 Marks) Task 3.b.3: Examine HTTP traffic as the clients communicate with the server. (5 Marks) Task 3.b.4: Examine FTP traffic as the clients communicate with the server. (5 Marks) Task 3.b.5: Examine SMTP traffic as the clients communicate with the server. (5 Marks) Task 3.b.6: Examine the use of port numbers from the server. (5 Marks) Evaluation Criteria:  Zero marks will be awarded if student is absent for Viva.  Student will be given 10 minutes for Viva.  The contribution of the student will also be evaluated during the Viva. COMP 20001 (QP) Page 4 of 11 Network Protocols (COMP 20001)-Fall-17-CW2 (LAB ASSMNT)-ALL-QP-ML Guidelines:  Answer all the given questions/tasks.  The document should not be more than 15 to 20 pages in (size A4) paper. o Title Page (includes Title of the assessment, Names of the student, Student ID, Department Name, Semester Name, Academic Year) o Table of Contents (Topics covers and page number) o Answer for tasks given in the assignment. o Snapshots of the screen needed where necessary. o References (book, journals, internet resources used in preparing the presentation report/slides or others). References should be properly done by using CU Harvard Style. o The font size is 12, the font type is Calibri and doubled spaced. o Main heading should be of font size 14 and sub heading should be of font size 12.  Student has to submit the report through Moodle.  No marks will be awarded to the absent student. Rules & Regulations  If any topic or diagram of assignment is found copied from the other then marks will be deducted from both assignments.  Assignments with 3 or more identical topics will be awarded 0 Mark.  Zero Mark will be given if student is absent from the viva. The performance will be evaluated through viva and there is no mark for viva.  The purpose of assignment is to do some research work so you can consult books in Library or use internet or computer magazines or any other source. COMP 20001 (QP) Page 5 of 11 Network Protocols (COMP 20001)-Fall-17-CW2 (LAB ASSMNT)-ALL-QP-ML FEEDBACK TO STUDENTS  Work proposal should be submitted through Moodle on or before 14th December 2017. Feedback will be given through Moodle by 23rd December 2017.  Feedback, on assignment will be provided to the students (through Moodle) within two weeks, after the submission date. PLAGIARISM POLICY Plagiarised documents, in parts or whole, submitted by the students will be rejected. 1. For the First offence of plagiarism a) A student will be allowed to re-submit the assignment once, within a maximum period of one week. However, a penalty of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed. b) Mark deduction: When the work is resubmitted, the marking will be undertaken according to the marking criteria. In compliance with this policy, the 25% deduction is then made on the marks obtained. For example, in an assessment that carries a maximum of 50 marks, suppose a student were to obtain 30 marks for the resubmitted work, the final marks for that assessment will be 22.5 (after deducting 25% of the marks actually obtained for the resubmitted work). c) Period of resubmission: The student will have to resubmit the work one week from the date he or she is advised to resubmit. For example, if the formal advice to resubmit was communicated to the student on a Sunday (latest by 5 pm), the student will have to resubmit the work latest by next Sunday 5 pm. d) If the re-submitted work is also detected to be plagiarized, then the work will be awarded a zero. e) Resubmission of the work beyond the maximum period of one week will not be accepted and the work will be awarded a zero. 2. Any further offence of plagiarism a) If any student is again caught in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study (either in the same module, same semester or in any other semester), the student will directly be COMP 20001 (QP) Page 6 of 11 Network Protocols (COMP 20001)-Fall-17-CW2 (LAB ASSMNT)-ALL-QP-ML awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism is detected. In such cases, the student will not be allowed to re-submit the work. 3. Guidelines a) Type 1: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted at different times) of one assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. b) Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all students. c) Type 3: Combination of Type 1 and Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted at different times) of a group assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. All students of the group would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all the students of the group. d) Type 4: Variation of Type 1 and Type 2: In cases where the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the following will be applicable: a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all students of the group. In such cases the group assessment component will be resubmitted as per the policy. b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment component will be resubmitted as per the policy. The policy will then be applied to that student alone. COMP 20001 (QP) Page 7 of 11 Network Protocols (COMP 20001)-Fall-17-CW2 (LAB ASSMNT)-ALL-QP-ML c. In both cases (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment). 4. Amount of similar material a) The total amount of similar material in any form of student work from all sources put together should not exceed 30% (including direct quotations). b) The total amount of quoted material (direct quotations) in any form of student work from all sources put together should not exceed 10%. c) The total amount of similar material in any form of student work from a single source should not exceed 7 percent. However, cases having a similarity of less than 7 percent in such cases may still be investigated by the faculty depending on the seriousness of the case. d) If faculty member find enough merit in the case of a student work with a similarity (with a single source) of more than 7 percent as not a case of plagiarism, the faculty member should provide detailed comments/remarks to justify the case. LATE SUBMISSION POLICY The recommended practice at MEC is to set the cut-off time to 23:59 on the due date for all assessment submissions. As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, for any late submissions, a penalty of deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one week after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of submission. COMP 20001 (QP) Page 8 of 11 Network Protocols (COMP 20001)-Fall-17-CW2 (LAB ASSMNT)-ALL-QP-ML Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if required. COMP 20001 (QP) Page 9 of 11 Network Protocols (COMP 20001)-Fall-17-CW2 (LAB ASSMNT)-ALL-QP-ML Fall 2017 COMP 20001 –Network Protocols (Lab Assignment) ASSESSMENT EVALUATION SHEET Deliverables Task 1 Aspects Work Proposal     Deliverables Aspects 0 Deliverables Task 2.a No attempt/ Summarizing the key Plagiarized Task 2 concepts based on report published research papers. And reflection on the functional features of the chosen Internet Layer Protocols also suggest how it could be applied to a real time environment Task 2.b No attempt/ Research Paper Plagiarized Summarization with report Critically evaluate the concepts related to Internet Layer Protocols Deliverables Task 3 Aspects Marks 0-10 Understanding deliverables General overview of proposed plan Resources identified and Time schedule Credibility of the research sources is established 0 1-10 Average attemptWeak report with partial references (summary covers few parts of the paper) 11-20 Good attemptCould answer with lacks knowledge (summary covers most parts of the paper) 21-25 Complete attemptDetailed analysis done on the question and presented with appropriate conclusion (summary covers all parts of the paper) Average attempt- Good attemptWeak report with Could answer with partial references lacks knowledge (summary covers (summary covers few parts of the most parts of the paper) paper) Complete attemptDetailed analysis done on the question and presented with appropriate conclusion (summary covers all parts of the paper) 1-3 Task 3.a No attempt/ Average attempt Generate Network Plagiarized Traffic report Aspects 0 1-2 Task 3.b.1 No attempt/ Average attempt Examine multiplexing Plagiarized report 4-7 7-10 Good attempt Complete attempt 3-4 Good attempt 5 Complete attempt Task 3.b.2 No attempt/ Average attempt Examine HTTP Traffic Plagiarized report Good attempt Complete attempt Task 3.b.3 No attempt/ Average attempt Examine FTP Traffic Plagiarized report Good attempt Complete attempt Task 3.b.4 No attempt/ Average attempt Examine DHCP Traffic Plagiarized report Good attempt Complete attempt Task 3.b.5 No attempt/ Average attempt Examine SMTP Traffic Plagiarized report Good attempt Complete attempt COMP 20001 (QP) Marks Marks Marks Page 10 of 11 Network Protocols (COMP 20001)-Fall-17-CW2 (LAB ASSMNT)-ALL-QP-ML Task 3.b.6 All Ports Traffic Student ID No attempt/ Average attempt Plagiarized report Good attempt Complete attempt Student Name Assignment Comments for grading Task 1 Task 2 a & b Task 3a & b1-b6 Similarity Index Viva and General Comments Total Marks Penalty Final Marks Signature of Teacher: COMP 20001 (QP) Page 11 of 11

Tutor Answer

phd.writer
School: Boston College

Hello kin...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Thanks, good work

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors