Baltimore Jail Guards Memorandum

Anonymous
timer Asked: Jan 1st, 2018
account_balance_wallet $5

Question description

Instructions are linked below. This needs to be in the form of a Memorandum. There is no set page amount but we do need to use this link as the reference and in-text page https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/n....

CJ 510 Module Eight Memorandum Guidelines and Rubric Overview: Read the article 2 Baltimore Jail Guards Face Charges of Misconduct. The head of the agency has asked you as a new person in a leadership position to outline a strategy to improve the moral and ethical decision-making of the agency’s employees. In the form of a memorandum, address the issue in the Baltimore jails and outline a strategy for improvement. This assignment will help you analyze a situation from a leadership perspective and develop a strategy to help address this issue. This will help you prepare for the recommendations you need to develop for your selected case study. Prompt: Include the following critical elements in your memorandum:       Issue: Identify the issue occurring in the article. Improvement Need: Explain why this issue needs improvement. Community Impact: Explain how this issue could potentially impact the community. Cultural Impact: Explain how this issue impacts the culture of the organization. Improvement Strategy: Outline a strategy for improving the moral and ethical decision-making of the agency’s employees. Support your work with scholarly evidence from the text or outside sources. Refer to the Criminal Justice Library Tips for support in finding and citing outside resources. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your memorandum does not follow typical APA guidelines and can be single-spaced. Include evidence from the textbook as well as at least one outside scholarly source, which should be cited in APA format at the end of the memorandum. Critical Elements Issue Improvement Need Proficient (100%) Identifies the issue in the article Explains why this issue needs improvement Needs Improvement (80%) Identifies elements of the issue but there are gaps in accuracy or specific details Explains why this issue needs improvement, but explanation lacks detail or contains inaccuracies Not Evident (0%) Does not identify the issue in the article Does not explain why this issue needs improvement Value 10 20 Community Impact Cultural Impact Improvement Strategy Scholarly Evidence Articulation of Response Explains how this issue could potentially impact the community Explains how this issue impacts the culture of the organization Outlines a strategy for improving the moral and ethical decisionmaking of the agency’s employees Utilizes scholarly resources to substantiate claims Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Explains how this issue could potentially impact the community, but explanation lacks detail Explains how this issue impacts the culture of the organization, but explanation lacks detail Outlines a strategy for improving the moral and ethical decisionmaking of the agency’s employees, but outline contains gaps or inaccuracies Utilizes scholarly resources to substantiate claims, but resources do not align or are not relevant Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Does not explain how this issue could potentially impact the community 15 Does not explain how this issue impacts the culture of the organization Does not outline a strategy for improving the moral and ethical decision-making of the agency’s employees 15 Does not utilize scholarly resources to substantiate claims 10 Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 20 100%

Tutor Answer

sethamimo
School: Boston College

Here you go! Let me know if you need any edits or have any questions.

Running head: MEMORANDUM

1

Memorandum
Name of Author
Institutional Affiliation(s)

MEMORANDUM

2
1. Issue

Conspiracy involving drug trafficking gangs corrupting correctional officers in the staterun correction facility is on the rise (Wagner and Wagner, 2018) . The ability of the department to
take punitive action on its officers who have engaged in gross misconduct is a vital element in
the department’s anti-corruption effort. An efficient disciplinary system serves as restraint to
misconducts and communicates to the correctional officers and the public at large that corruption
wont tolerated.
2. Improvement Need
Following the jailing of guards on charges of misconduct and conspiracy of drug traffic a
review was conducted. The review discovered that facility didn’t not have strong anti-corruption
systems and controls in place, thus need to make drastic changes to its policies to ensure issues
like that is a thing of the past. The review found out that
➢ The facility had e...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Totally impressed with results!! :-)

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors