UNT Wk 5 What Is the Primary Tool for Communicating Across Cultures Questions

User Generated

iraxng08

Other

University of North Texas

Description

 

Unformatted Attachment Preview

F O U R T H E D I T I O N THE CULTURAL DIMENSION OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS Gary P. Ferraro The University of North Carolina at Charlotte Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ferraro, Gary P. The cultural dimension of international business 1 Gary P. Ferraro.4th ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-13-090327-2 1. International business enterprise-Social aspects. 2. Intercultural communication. 3. Technical assistance-Anthropologicalaspects. I. Title HD2755.5 .F48 2001 320.3'5--dc21 00-067759 For Avery and Mitchell, with the hope that their generation will become the best intercultural communicators yet. VP, Editoral Director: Laura Pearson AVP, Publisher: Nancy Roberts Editorial Assistant: Lee Peterson Project Manager: Merrill Peterson Cover Director: Jayne Conte Cover Design: Bruce Kenselaar Cover Photo: Steve Mason/PhotoDisc, Inc. Photo Researcher: Sheila Norman Interior Image Specialist: Beth Boyd Manager, Rights and Permissions: Kay Dellosa Director, Image Resource Center: Melinda Reo Marketing Manager: Chris Barker Prepress and Manufacturing Buyer: Ben Smith This book was set in 10112Times New Roman by DM Cradle Associates Inc. and was printed and bound by Courier Companies, Inc. The cover was printed by Phoenix Color Corp. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-13-0'70327-2 PRENTICE-HALL INTERNATIONAL (UK) LIMITED, London PRENTICE-HALL OF AUSTRALIA PTY. LIMITED, Sydney PRENTICE-HALL CANADA INC.,Toronto PRENTICE-HALL HISPANOAMERICANA, S.A., Mexico PRENTICE-HALL OF INDIA PRNATE LIMITED, New Delhi PRENTICE-HALL OF JAPAN, INC., To& PEARSON EDUCATION ASIA PTE.LTD.,Singapore EDITORA PRENTICE-HALL DO BRASIL, LTDA., Rio de Janeiro Contents Preface vii 1. Cultural Anthropology and International Business, I The Anthropological Perspective, 2 Cultural Anthropology and Business, 6 Culture and International Business, 7 The Need for Greater Awareness of the Cultural Environment, 9 International Competency-A National Problem, 15 2. Culture and lnternational Business: A Conceptual Approach, 18 Culture Defined, 18 Culture Is Learned, 20 Culture Influences Biological Processes, 22 Cultural Universals, 24 Economic Systems 26 Marriage and Family Systems 27 Educational Systems 28 Social Control Systems 28 Supernatural Belief Systems 29 Cultural Change, 29 Ethnocentrism, 35 Cultures Are Integrated Wholes, 37 Conclusion, 41 Cross-Cultural Scendrios, 43 iv Contents 3. Communicating across Cultures: Language, 46 The Need for Linguistic Proficiency in International Business, 46 Linguistic Diversity, 50 Language and Culture, 53 The Influence of Culture on Language 53 The Influence of Language on Culture 54 Language Mirrors Values 56 Explicit versus Implicit Communication, 57 Language and Social Context, 62 Some Additional Complicating Factors 65 Slang 65 Euphemisms 65 Proverbs 66 Humor 68 Conversational Taboos 69 ErbalDueling Conclusion, 70 Cross-Cultural Scenarios, 70 4. Communicating across Cultures: The Nonverbal Dimension, 73 The Nature of Nonverbal Communication, 73 Body Posture, 76 Hand Gestures, 79 Facial Expressions, 82 Gaze, 84 Proxemics, 86 Bodily Contact (Touching), 89 Conclusion, 93 Cross-Cultural Scenarios, 94 5. Contrasting Cultural Values, 97 The Individual-Collective Dimension, 100 How This Value Plays Out in the Two Types of Society I01 Implications for Business 103 The Equality-Hierarchy Dimension, 105 How This Value Plays Out in the Two Types of Society 106 Implications for Business 107 The Tough-Tender Dimension, 108 How This Value Plays Out in the Two Types of Society 110 Implications for Business 111 The Uncertainty-AvoidanceDimension, 112 How This Value Plays Out in the Two Types of Society 114 Implications for Business 115 67 I I Contents The Time Dimension, 115 Precise versus Loose Reckoning of Time 115 Sequential versus Synchronized Timing 117 Past, Present, and Future Orientations 118 How This Value Plays Out in Dzfferent Types of Societies I20 Implications for Business 121 Conclusion, 121 Cross-Cultural Scenarios, 122 6. Negotiating across Cultures, 125 The Nature of Cross-Cultural Negotiation, 126 Where to Negotiate, 127 Effective Strategies fdr International Negotiators, 129 Concentrate on I Long-Term Relationships, Not Short-Term Contracts 129 Focus on the Interests behind the Positions I30 Avoid Overreliance on Cultural Generalizations 132 Be Sensitive to Timing I33 Remain Flexible 134 Prepare Carefully 134 Learn to Listen; Not Just Speak 136 The Use of Interpretors, 138 The Global Negotiator, 139 Cross-Cultural Scenarios, 140 7. Coping with Culture Shock, 142 The Nature of Culture Shock, 142 Minimizing Culture Shock, 148 Cross-Cultural Scenzirios, 154 8. Developing Global Mdinagers, 157 Selection, 159 I ~ommunicatiohSkill 160 Personality Traits 160 Motivation 161 Family Circumstances 161 Cross-Cultural Training, 163 Repatriation, 168 1 Global Managers for the Twenty-First Century, 171 Cross-Cultural Scenarios, 178 Appendix A Cross-Cultural Scenario Discussions, 180 Appendix B Locating R'elevant Cultural Information, 188 The Traditional Anthropological Approach, I88 HRAF: An Underutilized Cultural Database, 189 v vi Contents Documentary Sources Useful in Developing a Cultural Profile, 190 Culture-SpecificAssociations 190 Some Country-Specific Series 190 US. Government Sources 191 Sources of Country-Speczjk News and Current Events 191 Sources on Business Customs and Protocols 192 The Electronic Library 193 Human Resources for Culture-Specific Information, 194 One b Own Company 194 Academia 194 Foreign Trade Ofices 195 Private-Sector Consultants and Trainers 195 The Search for Cultural Information upon Arrival, 196 In-Country Documentary Resources 196 Resources 197 Conclusion, 198 References, 199 Photo Credits, Index, 208 207 In-Country Human Preface This book is aimed at demonstrating how the theory and insights of cultural anthropology can positively influence the conduct of international business. To date, anthropologists have given embarrassingly little attention to this subject, and writers in the field of international management and marketing, although acknowledging the importance of the cultural dimension, have dealt with it in a cursory and anecdotal fashion. This bookwhich explores the contributions that cultural anthropology can make to the more effective and humane conduct of international business--can serve the interests of both the international business community and the discipline of anthropology, which is continually searching for new, nonacademic environments in which to make practical contributions. Specifically, the book takes a fourfold approach to understanding the cultural dimension of international business. I. Culture-General Approach: Making the Connections between AnthropologicalTheory (Generalizations) and International Business Chapter 2 provides an in-depth look at the concept of culture, what generalizations hold true for all cultures of the world, and the implications of those generalizations for international business. This chapter is predicated on the notion that it is impossible for anyone to master all of the specific cultural facts about the thousands of cultures found in the world today. Thus, a more conceptual approach is needed. The chapter begins with various definitions of the culture concept, followed by some important generalizations that can be usefully applied to any cross-cultural situation. The importance of these cultural generalizations for the conduct of international business is then discussed. viii Preface II. Understanding Communication Patterns--Verbal And Nonverbal In Chapters 3 and 4 we examine some of the critical dimensions of communication, both verbal and nonverbal, in a cross-cultural business setting. Effective communication between people from the same cultural and linguistic group is often difficult enough, but when one is attempting to communicate with people who speak little or no Englishand have different ideas, attitudes, assumptions, perceptions, and ways of doing thingsthe chances for miscommunication increase enormously. In Chapter 3, we examine the critical importance of language competence in an international business situation, the interrelatedness between language and culture, the situational use of language, and some additional factors (such as slang and euphemisms) that can further complicate verbal communication in an international business context. In Chapter 4 we discuss the importance of knowing the nonverbal communication patterns prevalent in the international business arena. As important as language is to sending and receiving messages, nonverbal communication is perhaps even more important. Not only do nonverbal cues help us interpret verbal messages, but they are also responsible in their own right for the majority of the messages that make up human communication. Six major modes of communicating nonverbally-posture, hand gestures, facial expressions, eye contact, proxemics, and touching-are discussed in a cross-cultural perspective. The aim of this chapter is to demonstrate how many ways there are to miscommunicate in a cross-cultural business setting unless one is familiar with the nonverbal patterns of communication in addition to the linguistic patterns. Ill. Cultural Self-Awareness: Their Values and Ours Chapter 5, dealing with values, is designed with two purposes in mind. First, it aims to show that people from different cultures view the world from the viewpoint of different cultural assumptions. And second, it encourages Western businesspeople to increase their cultural self-awareness-that is, their ability to recognize the influences of their culture on their thinking and behavior. An increase in cultural self-awareness should make it easier to diagnose difficulties when communicating in a foreign business setting. It should enable the overseas businessperson to discover how a cross-cultural misunderstanding may have arisen from his or her own cultural assumptions rather than from some shortcoming of the culturally different person. This chapter has undergone extensive revision in this edition. Whereas previous editions had focused on American cultural values, this edition takes a more conceptual approach. Following the lead of such theorists as Florence Kluckhohn, John Condon, and Geert Hofstede, among others, Chapter 5 now presents a framework of values that can be used to analyze cultural differences throughout the world. The model examines such dimensions of values as individualism versus collectivism, equality versus hierarchy, tough versus tender societies, varying levels of uncertainty avoidance, and certain aspects of time, including precise versus loose reckoning of time, past, present, and future time orientations, and sequential versus synchronical aspects of time. Chapter 5 describes Preface ix each of these dimensions, shows how they play out in different types of societies, and then examines the implications for conducting business. IV. Culture-Specific Approach: Finding Relevant Cultural Information The final segment of this four-pronged approach involves a discussion of how and where to find the specific cultural information needed for any particular international business assignment. For example, how does one procure current and pertinent data describing the cultural patterns that exist in Djakarta, Madras, or La Paz? Appendix B explores a number of anthropological and nonanthropological data sources (both documentary and human) that can be useful in developing a profile of any particular culture. This appendix is based on the assumption that if U.S. businesses are to meet the current challenges of a highly competitive world economy, they will need an everincreasing flow of information about the cultures of those with whom they are conducting business. Chapter 6 deals with negotiating across cultures. Although it is recognized that no two international negotiating situations are ever identical, some negotiating strategies are generally valid in most situations. Based on the experiences of successful and culturally sensitive international negotiators, this chapter provides such general guidelines as (1) concentrating on long-term relationships, (2) focusing on the interests behind the positions, (3) being attuned to timing, and (4) needing flexibility, careful preparation, and willingness to listen. Chapter 7 of this book examines culture shock, a phenomenon that can sour an otherwise promising international business assignment. Although there are no ways of totally eliminating this psychologically disorienting experience, there are steps to take before, during, and after an international assignment that can reduce some of the more debilitating symptoms. The chapter concludes with suggestions for minimizing culture shock. Chapter 8 examines developing global leaders, expatiate excellence, and a number of other important global human resource issues. This chapter argues that expatriate assignments must be managed in a more systematic, holistic, and long-term way than they are currently being managed. This requires international firms to be attentive to all phases of transferring personnel abroad, including selection, cross-cultural preparation, incountry support, repatriation, and the utilization of those skills gained abroad for future assignments. As a final note, attention should be given to the scenarios appearing at the end of Chapters 2 through 8. The reader is encouraged to analyze these minicase studies in an attempt to determine why a cultural conflict has arisen and how the conflict or misunderstanding portrayed could have been avoided. Although it is impossible to include examples of every possible cross-cultural conflict in a business setting, these end-ofchapter scenarios are designed to help the reader gain a greater sensitivity to the wide range of potential conflicts that could arise. Explanations of these scenarios appear in Appendix A. x Preface As with the previous editions of this book, a number of reviewers have made insightful suggestions for improvement. I trust that all reviewers will notice that many of their helpful suggestions have in fact been incorporated into the new edition. In particular, I would like to thank the following reviewers for their helpful suggestions: John .'F Staeck, College of DuPage; Thomas E. Durbin, California State University-Stanislaus; R. Boyd Johnson, Indiana Wesleyan University; and John Rhoades, St. John Fisher College. Gary P. Ferraro Cultural Anthropology and International Business How often do we hear people say "The whole argument is academic"? By this statement they mean that, despite the elegance of the logic, the whole line of reasoning makes little or no difference. In other words, the term academic has become synonymous with irrelevant. In all of academia, it is hard to think of other disciplines generally perceived by the public to be any more irrelevant to the everyday world than cultural anthropology, the comparative study of cultures. The student of biology, for example, can apply his or her skills to the solution of vital medical problems; the student of creative arts can produce lasting works of art; and the political science student, owing to a basic understanding of political dynamics, can become a local, state, or national leader. But according to popular perception, the study of cultural anthropology, with its apparent emphasis on the nonWestern cultures of the world, has little to offer other than a chance to dabble in the exotic. To counter the long-held popular view that cultural anthropology is of little use in helping to understand the world around us, in recent years an increasing number of cultural anthropologists have applied the theories, findings, and methods of their craft to a wide range of professional areas. Professionals in such areas as education, urban administration, and the various health services have been coming to grips, albeit reluctantly, with the cultural environments within which they work; however, those in the area of international business, although having perhaps the greatest need, remain among the most skeptical concerning the relevance of cultural anthropology. There has in fact been little contact between cultural anthropology and the international business sector. According to Erve Chambers, cultural anthropologists have avoided working with the international business community because of "a highly prejudiced ethical stance which associates commercial success and profit taking with a lack of concern for human welfare" (1985, 128). Also, Western multinational corporationshave not actively sought the services of cultural anthropologists, whom they generally view as serving little useful pur- 2 Cultural Anthropology and International Business pose other than providing more interesting cocktail-party conversation about the esoteric peoples of the world. In short, both cultural anthropologists and international businesspeople view the concerns of the other as irrelevant, morally questionable, or trivial. This book rests on the fundamental assumption that to operate effectively in the international business arena one must master the cultural environment by means of purposeful preparation as well as sustained learning throughout one's overseas assignment. Now, as in the past, international businesspeople acquire their international expertise while on the job, and they consider such hands-on factors as business travel and overseas assignments to be the most important experiences. While not minimizing the value of experiential learning, this book argues that, in addition to on-the-job learning (and in most cases, before entering the international marketplace), successful international businesspeople must prepare themselves in a very deliberate manner in order to operate within a new, and frequently very different, cultural environment. THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE When the average American hears the word anthropologist, two images usually come to mind. The first image is that represented by Harrison Ford in his portrayal of anthropologist Indiana Jones in the film Raiders of the LostArk. In his search for clues to the secrets of lost civilizations, Indiana Jones spends most of his time being chased by irate cannibals, engaging in hand-to-hand combat with sinister Nazis, and being thrown into pits with thousands of snakes. Although this image is exciting theater, it gives us little insight into what anthropology is all about. The second image of an anthropologist is that of the irrelevant academic who spends every moment out of the classroom interviewing exotic peoples whose cultures are about to become extinct. Anthropology, however, is neither hazardous to the health nor irrelevant. Both these views of anthropology are misleading stereotypes, which obscure both the nature of the discipline and its relevance to the world. The scientific discipline of anthropology is far less life-endangering than Hollywood would have us believe and far more relevant than most of us imagine. To be certain, anthropologists do travel to the far corners of the world studying little-known cultures (cultural anthropologists) and languages (anthropological linguists). Moreover, some anthropologists unearth fossil remains (physical anthropologists) and artifacts (archaeologists) of people who lived thousands or, in some cases, millions of years ago. Despite the fact that these four subareas of anthropology frequently deal with different types of data, they are all directed toward a single purpose: the scientific study of human cultures in whatever form, time period, or region of the world in which they might be found. According to Carol and Melvin Ember, Anthropology is concerned explicitly and directly with all varieties of people throughout the world, not just those close at hand or within a limited area. It is also interested in people of all periods. Beginning with the immediate ancestors of humans who lived a few million years ago, anthropology traces the development of humans until the present. Every part of the world that has ever contained a human population is of interest to anthropologists. (1999,2) Cultural Anthropology and International Business Cultural anthropologist no longer work only in exotic parts of the world, such as southwest Africa. 3 4 Cultural Anthropology and International Business Anthropology differs from other disciplines that study humans in that it is much broader in scope both geographically and historically. Four distinct yet closely related subfields comprise anthropology: (1) archaeology, the study of ancient and prehistoric societies; (2) physical anthropology, the study of humans as biological entities; (3) anthropological linguistics, the comparative study of languages; and (4) cultural anthropology, the search for similarities and differences among contemporary peoples of the world. Even though the discipline encourages all anthropologists to constantly integrate these four fields, in recent decades increasing disciplinary specialization has made it virtually impossible for any anthropologist to cover all four fields in a comprehensive way. When we look at the contributions anthropology can make to the more effective conduct of international business, we are looking primarily at cultural anthropology. Cultural anthropology seeks to understand how and why contemporary peoples of the world differ in their customary ways of behaving and how and why they share certain similarities. It is, in short, the comparative study of cultural differences and similarities found throughout the world. Cultural anthropologists may often appear to be documenting inconsequential cultural facts about little-known peoples of the world, but our learning more about the wide range of cultural variations will serve as a check on those who might generalize about "human nature" solely on observations from their own society. It is not at all unusual for people to assume that their own ways of thinking and acting are unquestionably rational, "natural," or "human." Consider, for example, the nonverbal gesture of negation (found in the United States and in other parts of the world), shaking the head from side to side. In some parts of India, however, people use this very same gesture to communicate not negation but affirmation. In fact, there are any number of different ways of nonverbally communicating the idea of negation, all of which are no more or no less rational than shaking the head from side to side. The study of cultural anthropology provides a look at the enormous variations in thinking and acting found in the world today and how many different solutions have been generated for solving the same problem. Anthropologydoes more than simply document the enormous variations in human cultures. If anthropology deserves to be called a science, it must go beyond the mere cataloging of cultural differences. It must also identify and describe the commonalities of humans amid the great diversity-that is, the regularities found in all cultural contexts regardless of how different those contexts might appear at first glance. For example, for any society to continue to exist over the long run, it must solve the basic problem of how to pass on its total cultural heritage--all the ideas, values, attitudes, behavior patterns, and so on-to succeeding generations. Should that complexity of cultural traditions not be passed on to future generations, that society will very likely not survive. Saudis have solved this problem by developing Koranic schools, which pass on the cultural traditions to the younger generations; in parts of West Africa, "bush schools" train young adolescents to become adults; in our own society, we rely on a formal system of compulsory education, complete with books, desks, and teachers. Although the details of these educational systems vary enormously, all societies in the world-today or in the past-have worked out a system for ensuring that new generations will learn their culture. Thus, the science of anthropology attempts to document the great variations in cultural forms while Cultural Anthropology and International Business 5 looking for both the common strands that are found in and the general principles that apply to all cultures. The strong comparative perspective that anthropologists bring to the study of the human condition helps reduce the probability that their theories will be culture bound. Sociologists and psychologists, for example, concentrating as they have on studies of peoples from Western societies, are more likely to construct theories that are based on Western assumptions of reality. The cross-cultural perspective of anthropological studies has frequently served as a corrective to those disciplinesthat rely more heavily for their theory construction on data from Western societies. According to Clifford Geertz, cultural anthropologists were the first to recognize that the world does not divide into the pious and the superstitious; that there are sculptures in jungles and paintings in deserts; that political order is possible without centralized power and principled justice without codified rules; that the norms of reason were not fixed in Greece, the evolution of morality not consummated in England. . . . We have, with no little success, sought to keep the world off balance; pulling out rugs, upsetting tea tables, setting off fire crackers. It has been the office of others to reassure; ours to unsettle. (1 984,275) In addition to being comparative, the anthropological perspective has another distinctive feature. Unlike other social or behavioral sciences, anthropologists analyze cultural differences and similarities firsthand. For example, psychologists usually study human behavior by using post facto data rather than actually observing the behavior as it is occurring; sociologists generally rely on secondary information gleaned from questionnaires, interviews, and census reports; historians are removed in time from the people and events that constitute their subject matter. Cultural anthropologists, however, use participant observation as a major method for collecting culturally comparative information. When anthropologists use participant observation, they share in the everyday activities of the local people while making detailed descriptive observationsof people eating, working, playing, conversing, dancing, fighting, or any other activity that might distinguish their cultural patterns. Given the nature of the anthropological enterprise, it is not surprising that the founders of modern anthropology developed the tradition of firsthand field observations of cultural behavior. If indeed anthropology had set as its task the comparative study of human cultures, it would have to study all human cultures, many of which had not been studied before. In the absence of descriptive studies of exotic cultures, early anthropologists had no other choice but to learn the language and spend at least a year immersed in the culture of the people under study. Today, even though libraries are well stocked with descriptive studies of a wide variety of world cultures, participant observation remains a preferred investigative strategy among contemporary anthropologists. Thus, cultural anthropologists are trained to analyze the social organizations of various types of societies. In the early twentieth century, cultural anthropologists tended to devote their energies exclusively to the analysis of small-scale, technologically sirnple, and usually non-Western peoples. Within the last several decades, however, cultural anthropologists have become increasingly involved in the study of more complex societies.Yet whether dealing with simple or complex societies, the focus of cultural an- 6 Cultural Anthropology and International Business thropologists has been the comparative study of sociocultural organizations wherever, or in whatever form, they may be found. CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND BUSINESS Since the 1930s, cultural anthropologists have conducted a modest amount of research in industrial and corporate settings, focusing largely on corporate cultures in the United States. For example, the human relations school of organizational research of the 1930s and 1940s produced a number of ethnographies showing how informal cultural patterns could influence managerial goals (Mayo 1933, Roethlisberger and Dickson 1939, Gardner 1945, Warner and Low 1947, Richardson and Walker 1948). More recent studies of corporate cultures have attempted to show how specific configurations of values contribute to the relative success or failure of meeting corporate goals (Denison 1990, Kotter 1992, Frost et al. 1991, Rhinesmith 1996). This body of research is predicated on the understanding that, business organizations are like those societies studied by traditional anthropologists. For example, like people found in small-scale, preliterate societies, corporate members engage in rituals; perpetuate corporate myths and stories; adhere to a set of norms, symbols, and behavioral expectations; and use specialized vocabularies. Since business organizations tend to be both differentiated and socially stratified, specific roles and statuses can be identified. Also, business organizations, through dealings with such groups as unions, governments, environmental groups, and consumers, have external relations with other social systems. Given these similarities, cultural anthropologists have made modest contributions to the understanding of domestic business organizations, and they have the potential for making many others. The anthropological perspective can be useful in the study of purely domestic business organizations, which frequently are composed of many social components that come from different backgrounds, hold contrasting values and attitudes, and have conflicting loyalties. For instance, the company vice president will not likely have much in common with the assembly-line worker, the union representative, the president of the local Sierra Club, the OSHA inspector, the janitor, or many members of that diverse group called the buying public. And yet, if the organization is to function effectively, that high management official needs to know about the values, attitudes, expectations, concerns, and behavioral patterns of all these people, and others as well. This is particularly true today as more and more minorities are brought into domestic workforces under equal opportunity employment laws. In short, domestic business organizations can be viewed as minicultures (composed of different people with different roles, statuses, and value systems) that operate within the wider national cultural context. In the mid-1990s, approximately 500 doctoral anthropologists were working in the private sector for consulting firms or large corporations (Baba 1994, 178). That number has no doubt increased as we enter the new millenium. Anthropologist John Sherry, who years ago studied communications technology among the Navajo, is now a member of a team of design ethnographers with Intel Corporation. Their purpose is to learn as much Cultural Anthropology and International Business 7 as possible (by using anthropological methods) about how people work and use hightech tools so that Intel can design more efficient tools in the future. Anthropologists are trained to patiently observe human behavior for hours on end while recording those behaviors in minute detail. Intel (along with other high-tech firms like IBM, Hewlett Packard, Motorola, AT&T, and Xerox) is betting that useful insights will emerge from those minute details. To illustrate this application of anthropology, Sherry and lus fellow design ethnographers spent large amounts of time in the late 1990s hanging out in teenagers' bedrooms. They talked to over 100 teenagers, analyzed still photos, and studied hours of videos that cataloged how their bedrooms were used. The team concluded that teenagers would like to send photos to each other by transmitting images over telephone lines that would enter a friend's computer and then be displayed in a bedside electronic picture frame. It is not surprising then, that in 2000 the world's first Internet-connected picture frame was on the market (Takahashi 1998). Failure to consider the cultural context in the domestic organization can, and has, led to misunderstandings, miscommunication, costly marketing blunders, lawsuits, and generally an undermining of organizational goals. When moving into the area of international business, the need to be aware of cultural environments becomes even more critical. Here the magnitude of the cultural differences is vastly greater; consequently, breakdown of communication usually increases geometrically. Although the anthropological perspective is valuable in understanding any business organization, be it domestic or international, this book focuses on the contributions that cultural anthropology can make to the improvement of international business operations, with particular emphasis on the functional areas of international marketing and management. CULTURAL AND INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS Whether dealing with issues of marketing, managing, or negotiating, the success or failure of a company abroad depends on how effectively its employees can exercise their skills in a new location. That ability will depend on both their job-related expertise and the individual's sensitivity and responsiveness to the new cultural environment. One of the most common factors contributing to failure in international business assignments is the erroneous assumption that if a person is successful in the home environment, he or she will be equally successful in applying technical expertise in a different culture. Research has shown that failures in the overseas business setting most frequently result from an inability to understand and adapt to foreign ways of thinking and acting rather than from technical or professional incompetence (Tung 1988; Black, Gregersen, and Mendenhall 1992). At home, U.S. businesspeople equip themselves with vast amounts of knowledge of their employees, customers, and business partners. Market research provides detailed information on values, attitudes, and buying preferences of U.S. consumers; middle- and upper-level managers are well versed in the intricacies of their organization's culture; and labor negotiators must be highly sensitive to what motivates those on the other side of the table. Yet when Americans turn to the international arena, 8 Cultural Anthropology and International Business they frequently deal with customers, employees, and fellow workers with a dearth of information that at home would be unimaginable. The literature on international business is filled with examples of business miscues when U.S. corporations attempted to operate in an international context. Some are mildly amusing; others are downright embarrassing. All of them, to one degree or another, have been costly in terms of money, reputation, or both. For example, when American firms try to market their products in other countries, they often assume that if a marketing strategy or slogan is effective in, say, Cleveland, it will be equally effective in other parts of the world. But problems can arise when changing cultural contexts. The following examples illustrate some miscues. An airline offering service to Brazil advertised that it had comfortable "rendezvous lounges" in its business-class section. Unfortunately, it failed to realize that the word rendezvous in Portuguese refers to a room for illicit sexual encounters. Chicken entrepreneur Frank Purdue decided to translate one of his very successful advertising slogans into Spanish, but the new slogan didn't produce the desired results. The slogan "It takes a tough man to make a tender chicken" was translated into Spanish as "It takes a virile man to make a chicken affectionate." And the Dairy Association's wildly successful ad campaign "Got Milk?' had the unfortunate translation "Are you lactating?" when used in Mexico. Although all these cross-cultural advertising blunders cause us to chuckle, they can result in a loss of revenue and even product credibility. Insensitivity to the cultural realities of foreign workforces can lead to less than desirable results. David Anderson (1985) tells of a U.S. businessperson who rewarded the most outstanding member of a Japanese marketing team by promoting him to head up the group. Rather than being proud and grateful, however, the top performer seemed ashamed, and the others in the group were uncomfortable and demoralized. Contrary to what the American manager had anticipated, performance in the group quickly deteriorated. What the American had not realized was that Japanese feel most comfortable working in teams, with all sharing equally in decisions, workloads, and responsibility for outcomes. As Anderson puts it, "The attempt at motivation, American-style,destroyed a sense of harmonious cooperation the Japanese workers had cherished" (1985,54-55). Just as inattention to the cultural context can result in some costly blunders in marketing and management, it also can affect seriously the success of international business negotiations. Time, effort, reputation, and even contracts can be lost because of cultural ignorance. Alison Lanier tells of one American executive who paid a very high price for failing to do his cultural homework: A top level, high priced vice president had been in and out of Bahrain many times, where liquor is permitted. He finally was sent to neighboring Qatar (on the Arabian Gulf) to conclude a monumental negotiation that had taken endless months to work out. Confident of success, he slipped two miniatures of brandy into his briefcase, planning to celebrate quietly with his colleague after the ceremony. Result: not only was he deported immediately on arrival by a zealous customs man in that strictly Moslem country, but the firm was also "disinvited" and ordered never to return. The Qatari attitude was that this man had tried to flout a deeply-held religious conviction; neither he nor his firm, therefore, was considered "suitable" for a major contract. (1979, 160-61) Cultural Anthropology and International Business 9 These are only a few of the examples of the price paid for miscalculating--orsimply ignoring-the cultural dimension of international business. The most cursory review of the international business literature will reveal many other similarly costly mistakes. In 1974, Ricks, Fu, and Arpan published a compendium of international business miscues appropriately entitled International Business Blunders. Less than a decade later, an entirely new collection was published (Ricks 1983), describing only those international business blunders that have occurred since 1974. More recently, Ricks (1993, 1999) has published his latest volumes of new and "improved" international business blunders. The purpose here is not to demonstrate the folly and insensitivity of the American businessperson when operating overseas but to show that the world is changing faster than most of us can calculate. IfAmerican businesspeople are to meet the challenges of an increasingly interdependent world, they will need to develop a better understanding of how cultural variables influence international business enterprises. A healthy dialogue between cultural anthropologists and members of the international business communitywhich this book seeks to initiate-is an important step in achieving that needed understanding. THE NEED FOR GREATER AWARENESS OFTHE CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT In recent decades, a growing tendency of business and industry has been to become increasingly more globally interdependent.To remain competitive, most businesses, both here and abroad, needed to enter into international/cross-culturalalliances. The overall consequences of this trend have been that more and more companies have engaged in such activities as joint ventures, licensing agreements, turnkey projects, and foreign capital investments. Since the end of the cold war in the late 1980s, however, world economies have experienced dramatic changes, which collectively have been subsumed under the term globalization. The term has become one of the most overused and poorly understood words in the English language. To be certain, there have been interconnections between countries and cultures for centuries, but when the Berlin Wall came down in 1989, the world began to change in some dramatic ways. Forces were unleashed that have had and will continue to have profound effects on all cultures of the world. According to Thomas Friedman (1999), globalization is not just a passing trend but a worldwide phenomenon that has replaced the cold war system. From 1945 until the late 1980s, the nations and cultures of the world were compartmentalized into two major camps, the "communist bloc" and the "free world." However, with the demise of world communism, so powerfully symbolized by the physical dismantling of the Berlin Wall, the world is experiencing (at a very rapid pace) a new type of integration of markets, technology, and information that is oblivious to both national and cultural borders. This post-cold war globalization is driven by free-market capitalism and the idea that the more a country opens up its markets to free trade, the healthier its economy will become. The economics of globalization involves lowering tariff barriers while privatizing and deregulating national economies. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) 10 Cultural Anthropology and InternationalBusiness What follows is just a few illustrations of how extensively the lives of all the world's peoples are interconnected: The United States remains highly reliant on other countries for a number of important minerals. For example, the United States imports 100 percent of its graphite, manganese, mica, columbium, and strontium and more than 90 percent of its bauxite and diamonds. The hundred largest multinational corporations in the world own nearly $2 trillion of assets outside their home countries. The United States has the fourth largest Spanish-speaking population in the world. More than 60 percent of the people of Miami, for example, speak Spanish as their first language. In the past quarter of a century, the percentage of the U.S. population that is foreign born has grown from 4.8 percent in 1970,to 6.2percent in 1980,to 7.9 percent in 1990,and to over 9 percent at the turn of the century. A significant number of corporations make more than half their total sales in foreign markets. To illustrate, Coca-Cola sells more of its product in Japan than it does in the United States. Direct foreign investments in the United States have increased from $13.2billion in 1970 to $81 l .7billion in 1998,more than a sixtyfold increase in the last quarter of a century (World Almanac and Book of Facts 1999). U.S. direct investments abroad have increased from $335 billion in 1988 to more than $980 billion in 1998 (World Almanac and Book of Facts 1999). The near meltdown of many Asian economies in the late 1990s had profound if temporary effects on the economies of the United States and Western Europe. Foreign-owned firms operating in the United States employ over 5 million workers, approximately one in ten manufacturing jobs. and the European Economic Union are two examples of the recent globalization of markets. The result of the globalization of markets is that goods and services from all over the world are making their way into other cultures. At the same time that world trade barriers are falling, a concomitant revolution is going on in the world of information technology. In the mid-1980s only a handful of people in the world could operate a computer. Today, computers are nearly as common in the home as the radio was in the 1940s. Moreover, the development of digitization, fiber optics, satellite communication, and the Internet now enables people to communicate with one another instantaneously. During the cold war days, grandparents in Pennsylvania had to wait several weeks to see a photograph of a new grandchild born in Istanbul. Today, however, a photo of the new baby can be taken in Istanbul with a digital camera, loaded into your laptop computer, and sent via e-mail to the grandparents in a matter of minutes. With the advent of e-commerce, anyone with a good product, a computer, a telephone, access to the Internet, a website, and a UPS account can become a potential entrepreneur. Globalization has encouraged the participation of large numbers of new players in the world markets. It is now possible to enter the global economy vir- Cultural Anthropology and International Business 11 tually overnight, with very little capital outlay, and become a global competitor by the next afternoon. New York Times correspondent Thomas Freidman discusses the various dimensions of globalization in The Lexus and the Olive Tree (1999). He provides an insightll glimpse into our very rapidly changing world, a world dominated by global business and the rapid exchange of information. Friedman makes a number of interesting contrasts between the cold war and post-cold war eras. The defining symbol of the cold war era was the Berlin Wall, an immovable presence that functioned to separate people and ideas; the hallmark of globalization, on the other hand, is the Internet that functions to integrate people by facilitating communication. The concept of weight has been replaced by speed. During the cold war, the operative question was "How big is your missile?'The mantra for the new millenium is "How fast is your modem?" The mentality during the cold war was "us" versus "them," but the emerging globalized world sees all people as competitors. To make a sports analogy, the cold war era was like two sumo wrestlers trying to knock each other out of the ring; the era of globalization is like sprinters racing one another continually to be the first to get their share of global markets. Clearly, the end of the cold war helped facilitate this new era of globalization, but it did not, in and of itself, cause it to happen. Several other monumental changes since the late 1980s also have defined globalization. First, the world has experienced a revolution in computer technology, which has made communication faster and cheaper for a rapidly growing segment of the world's population. To illustrate, the speed of computers 12 Cultural Anthropology and International Business during the 1990s has doubled every eighteen months, and the space on disks has increased 60 percent every year. Moreover, voice, music, videos, and photos can be digitized and sent cheaply and quickly over fiber-optic cable. Second, fundamental changes have occurred in the way we invest our money. During the cold war era, investing was done by the large banks, insurance companies, and investment firms; today it is, to a much larger degree, in the hands of individuals.At least in the industrialized world, individuals, not multibillion-dollar firms, are managing their own investments through mutual funds and 401K pension accounts. The ability to move one's personal investment funds around has been made even easier by e-trading on the Internet, which eliminates the need for a broker. Third, there has been a fundamental change in the flow of information all over the world. The walls and barriers so prominent during the cold war era allowed governments to control their populations through systematic control of information. As recently as the mid-1980s, copy machines in Russia and China were unavailable to anyone other than government officials because they posed a threat to government monopolies on the flow of information. Today, however, the availability of "b b @ and ~ wants to bif he can check &l,Mil: Cultural Anthropology and International Business 13 the Internet permits the spread of ideas (and ideologies) across national boundaries with little government interference. It has become a clichC to say that the world is becoming a global village. Rapid technological developments in transportation and communications in recent decades have brought the peoples of the world closer together in ways that we could barely imagine just a decade ago. The globalization of many companies has made it difficult to determine the home country of certain brands. Nike running shoes are made in Taiwan, BMWs are made in South Carolina, and some computer parts are manufactured in as many as a half-dozen different countries. Swissair has moved its entire accounting department to Bombay, India, to take advantage of lower labor costs of a highly educated workforce. Even the Carolina Panthers football team plays in a stadium named after a Swedish cell phone company. Moreover, businesses in a number of countries are gaining prominence in certain markets. To illustrate, India has become the world's leading producer of tractors, just as the French have dominated world markets in glass and the Europeans have taken ownership of most of the publishing industry in the United States. Unfortunately, despite the growing world interdependency,a concomitant revolution in cross-cultural understanding among all the peoples of the world has not occurred. And, of course, no one could argue that we have witnessed any degree of cultural homogenization of world populations. Instead, this rapid globalization of world economies is making the need for understanding the cultural dimension of our business enterprises increasingly more imperative, not less. Working, as many of us do today, with ultra highspeed technology in the world of e-commerce does not absolve us from having to understand the cultures (values and behaviors) of our customers, suppliers, or business partners. The cultural differences found in today's world are every bit as important in our cyber-businesses as they were a mere ten years ago when few people had even heard of the Internet. During the nineteenth and much of the twentieth centuries, companies lived or died by the availability of physical resources, such as steel or plastics, which were used to manufacture their products. Commerce, as we have known it up until a few decades ago, was largely the exchange of material goods from producer to consumer. With the rapid globalization the world has experienced since the 1980s,however, a major shift has taken place away from physical commodities toward knowledge. In this new information age that is developing, it is people and the knowledge they possess that constitute the real competitive advantage. The organizations that will thrive in the twentieth century are those willing and able to mobilize, develop, and reward their key resources: people. They will need to develop what Robert Rosen refers to as "globally literate leaders,. . . who manage their own culture and the cultures of others" (2000,24). How well the United States will fare in this increasingly interdependent world in the decades to come is not altogether predictable. During the quarter of a century immediately following World War 11, the United States enjoyed unprecedented and unparalleled economic success. Our postwar technologies gave rise to products that the world wanted, and we were very willing and able to supply everything from atomic energy and microelectronics to Levis and Big Macs. The United States, owing to its technology, managerial techniques, and investment capital, was in the enviable position of 14 Cultural Anthropology and International Business being the "only game in town." During this period our world market shares were large, and we enjoyed a healthy balance of payments. Then, in the early 1970s, the trade surpluses that we had enjoyed for so long disappeared, and we began to have trade deficits. Ironically, it was in 1 9 7 h u r bicentennial year-that our trade accounts moved into a negative imbalance. The substantial trade deficit of over $9 billion in 1976 has risen dramatically since then. Some have argued that this serious, negative trade imbalance is largely the result of unfair trade practices by some of our trading partners. However we might choose to explain it, the inescapable conclusion is that we are not selling our goods and services to the rest of the world as successfully as we did during the past. American businesses must realize that-despite what may have occurred in the past-the product will no longer sell itself. Since there are so many good products on the market today, the crucial factor in determining who makes the sale is not so much the intrinsic superiority of the product but rather the skill of the seller in understanding the dynamics of the transaction between oneself and the customer. A large part of that dynamic involves understanding the cultural differences and similarities operating in the global marketplace. Unfortunately, because of our relative success in the past, we are not particularly well equipped to meet the challenges of the international economic arena during the twenty-first century. Part of the problem lies in the fact that many U.S. companies, particularly middlesized ones, have not attempted to sustain sales and production by venturing into the international marketplace. Although there has been an increase during the 1980s in the number of U.S. firms that export, it remains that fewer than 1 percent of all U.S. companies are responsible for 80 percent of all U.S. exporting activities. Even though most U.S. corporations have competed successfully in domestic markets, with a unified language and business practices, they have not been very adept at coping with the wide range of different languages, customs, and cultural assumptions found in the international business arena. For many of the firms that do enter foreign markets, success has One of the most eloquent statements of the need for international businesspeople to become better attuned to other languages and cultures was made by William Rugh, former U.S. ambassador to Yemen and the United Arab Emirates: As the U.S. Ambassador to a wealthy country in the Persian Gulf for the past three years, I saw a constant stream of U.S. company representatives passing through our embassy on their way to try to sell their goods and services to local importers and local government officials. In an embarrassing number of cases, the businessman was woefully ignorant of even the basic rules of successful marketing in the Middle East. Seeing a number of lucrative opportunities snatched from us by sawy British or French or Japanese businessmen, who had taken the time to learn about the local culture and even some of the local language, I realized that some of my compatriates were very naive, and assumed that the sales pitch that worked in the United States would work anywhere abroad. Not necessarily. Some U.S. firms, which have been doing business in the region for a while, have learned the ropes, but many have not. (1995) Cultural Anthropology and International Business 15 I been inconsistent at best. Nowhere is this better illustrated than in the area ofAmericans !living and working abroad. Statistics on Americans returning from overseas working assignments before the end of their contracts vary widely throughout the international business literature. Estimates of attrition rates in the late 1970s ran as high as 65 to 85 percent for certain industries (Harris 1979,49; Edwards 1978,42). More recent figures, while not as high, still serve to illustrate how difficult it is for Americans to live and work successfully abroad. For example, Shari Caudron (1991, 27) cites premature returns of Americans living in Saudi Arabia to be as high as 68 percent; 36 percent in Japan; 27 percent in Brussels; and 18 percent in London, a city that one would expect most Americans to adjust to easily. Regardless of whether we are dealing with attrition rates of 68 percent or 18 percent, the costs are enormous. Considering that it costs a firm between three and five times an employee's base salary to keep that employee and his or her family in a foreign assignment (Greengard 1999,106), the financial considerations alone can be staggering. These costs refer only to premature returns; there is no way of measuring the additional losses incurred by those firms whose personnel don't become such statistics.Those personnel who stay in their overseas assignments are frequently operating with decreased efficiency and, owing to their less than perfect adjustment to the foreign cultural environment, often cost their firms enormous losses in time, reputation, and successful contracts. INTERNATIONAL COMPETENCY-A NATIONAL PROBLEM The situation that has emerged in the 1990s is that as the world grows more interdependent, we Americans can no longer expect to solve all the world's problems by ourselves, nor is it possible to declare ourselves immune from them. If our nation is to continue to be a world leader, we must build deep into our national psyche the need for international competency-that is, a specialized knowledge of foreign cultures, including professional proficiency in languages, and an understanding of the major political, economic, and social variables affecting the conduct of international and intercultural affairs. At the same time that we are faced with an ever-increasing need for international competency, the resources our nation is devoting to its development are declining. This problem is not limited to the area of business. It is, rather, a national problem that affects many aspects ofAmerican life, including our national security, diplomacy, scientific advancement, and international political relations, in addition to economics. Future generations of American businesspeople, however, must be drawn from the society at large, and it is this society, through its educational institutions, that has not in the past placed central importance on educating the general populace for international competence. When compared with other countries, the United States does not stack up very well in terms of international or intercultural competence. A Gallup poll conducted for the National Geographic Society in the late 1980s revealed that Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty four scored lower on geographic and cultural knowledge than did similarly aged young adults in the eight other industrialized nations in the study (Gallup, 1988). A Department of Education report in 1990 showed that one in six high 16 Cultural Anthropology and International Business school seniors in the United States thought that the Panama Canal shortened travel time between New York and London. The bad news continues. In a more recent study of 313 students at a major public university in the southwestern part of the United States, Raymond Eve, Bob Price, and Monika Counts (1994) found that only 43 percent were able to correctly identify Australia as the continent with coastlines on both the Pacific and Indian Oceans; only 42 percent correctly placed Libya in North Africa; and fewer than 50 percent knew that Portuguese was the primary language of Brazil. Moreover, the United States continues to be the only country in the world where it is possible to earn a college degree without taking any courses in a foreign language. Most American university students in fact graduate without any functional knowledge of a language other than English. Given the relatively low priority that international competency has had in our educational institutions in recent years, it is not surprising that those Americans who are expected to function successfully in a multicultural environment are so poorly prepared for the task. If the international dimension is weak in our general education programs today, it is even weaker in our business school curricula. To illustrate, in the majority of M.B.A. programs in the United States, it is still possible to earn a degree without ever taking a single course in international business. Although graduate schools in business have increased their international offerings over the past decade, courses on the cultural environment of international business have received relatively little attention. This basic neglect of cross-cultural issues in business education is generally reflected in the attitudes of the international business community. To illustrate, in a study of 127 U.S. firms with international operations, respondents showed very little concern for the cultural dimension of international business. When asked what should be included in the education of an international businessperson, respondents mentioned-almost without exception--onlytechnical courses. In other words, very little interest was shown in language, culture, or history of one's foreign business partners (Reynolds and Rice, 1988, 56). As we enter the new milleniurn, however, evidence suggests that some companies are beginning to take these cultural considerations more seriously. However we choose to measure it, Americans are poorly equipped to deal with the numerous challenges of our changing world. Whether we are talking about language competence, funding for international education, opportunities for foreign exchange, or simply the awareness of global knowledge, the inadequacies are real and potentially threatening to many areas of our national welfare, international business in particular. The Whenever Westerners believe that other cultures have nothing worthwhile to offer, they are engaging in a type of cultural arrogance that can be self-defeating, as Professor Howard Perlmutter of the Wharton School of Business reminds us: "If you have a joint venture with a Japanese company, they'll send 24 people here to learn everything you know, and you'll send one person there to tell them everything you know. . . ."(Kupfer 1988, 58) Cultural Anthropology and International Business 17 problem referred to in the literature as a national crisis has no easy solution. What is required initially is broad public awareness of the problem, followed by concerted actions on a number of fronts. One way of helping to meet the challenge is by creating a dialogue between (1) people whose professions are directly and negatively affected by the problem and (2) cultural anthropologists, whose major objective is the comparative study of cultural systems. As a long-overdue corrective, this text focuses on how cultural variations can affect the conduct of international business. C H A P T E R Culture and International Business A Conceptual Approach As mentioned in Chapter 1, anthropologists do more than simply accumulate and catalog information on the world's exotic and not so exotic cultures. Like other scientists, they attempt to generate theories about culture that apply to all human populations. Since it is impossible for any individual to master every cultural fact about every culture in the world, a more theoretical approach can be instructive; that is, a number of general concepts about culture can be applied to a wide variety of cross-cultural situations, regardless of whether one is dealing with Nigerians, Peruvians, or Appalachian coal miners. In this chapter we explore what is meant-and what is not meant-by the term culture. In addition to defining this central anthropologicalconcept, we also examine six important generalizationsconcerning the concept of culture and their significance for the U.S. businessperson operating in the world marketplace. Being equipped with such general concepts can facilitate the adjustment to an unfamiliar cultural environment. CULTURE DEFINED In everyday usage, the term culture refers to the finer things in life, such as the fine arts, literature, and philosophy. Under this very narrow definition of the term, the cultured person is one who prefers Handel to hard rock; can distinguish between the artistic styles of Monet and Manet; prefers pheasant under glass to grits and red-eye gravy and twelveyear-old scotch to beer; and spends his or her leisure time reading Kierkegaard rather than watching wrestling on television. For the anthropologist, however, the term culture has a much broader meaning that goes far beyond mere personal refinements. The only requirement for being cultured is to be human. Thus, all people have culture. The scantily clad Dani of New Guinea is as much a cultural animal as is Isaac Stern. For the anthro- Culture and International Business 19 pologist, cooking pots, spears, and mud huts are as legitimate items of culture as syrnphonies, oil paintings, and great works of literature. The term culture has been defined in a variety of ways. Even anthropologists,who claim culture as their guiding conceptual principle, do not agree on a single definition of the term. In fact, A. L. Kroeber and C. Kluckhohn (1952) identified over 160 different definitions of culture. One of the earliest widely cited definitions, offered by Edward Tylor over a 125 years ago, defined culture as "that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society" ( 1 871, 1). More recently, Clyde Kluckholn and W. H. Kelly have referred to culture as "all the historically created designs for living, explicit and implicit, rational, irrational, and nonrational, which exist at any given time as potential guides for the behavior of men" (1945, 97). M. J. Herskovits spoke of culture as being "the man made part of the environment" (1955,305),and James Downs defined culture as being "a mental map which guides us in our relations to our surroundings and to other people" (1971,35). Running the risk of adding to the confusion, here is still another definition: Culture is everything that people have, think, and do as members of their society. The three verbs in this definition (have, think, and do) can help us identify the three major structural components of the concept of culture; that is, for a person to have something, some material object must be present. When people think,ideas, values, attitudes, and beliefs are present. When people do,they behave in certain socially prescribed ways. Thus, culture is made up of ( 1 ) material objects; (2) ideas, values, and attitudes; and (3) normative, or expected, patterns of behavior. The final phrase of our working definition, "as members of their society," should serve as a reminder that culture is shared by at least two or more people. Real, live societies are of course always larger than that. In other words, there is no such thing as the Anthropologist Hendrick Serrie has provided an excellent example of how an anthropological understanding of local cultural patterns in southern Mexico prevented the costly mistake of mass producing a solar cooker developed for this area (1986, xvi-xvii). Designed to reduce the use of firewood for cooking by encouraging the use of solar energy, these solar stoves, with the assistance of a four-foot parabolic reflector, produced levels of heat comparable to a wood fire. Although initial demonstrations of the cooker caught the interest of the local people, a number of cultural features militated against the widespread acceptance of this technological device.To illustrate, (1) the major part of the cooking in this part of Mexico is done early in the morning and in the early evenings, at those times when solar radiation is at its lowest level, and (2) although the solar stove was very effective for boiling beans and soup, it was inadequate for cooking tortillas, a basic staple in the local diet.Thus, for these and other cultural reasons, it was decided not to mass produce and market the solar cookers because, even though the cooker worked well technically, it made little sense culturally. 20 Culture and International Business culture of a hermit. If a solitary individual thinks and behaves in a certain way, that thought or action is idiosyncratic, not cultural. For an idea, a thing, or a behavior to be considered cultural, it must be shared by some type of social group or society. In addition to this working definition, a number of features of the concept of culture should be made explicit. In the remainder of this chapter, we briefly examine these features that hold true for all cultures, and discuss why they are valuable insights into the cultural environment of international business. CULTURE IS LEARNED Culture is transmitted through the process of learning and interacting with one 5 environment, rather than through the geneticprocess. Culture can be thought of as a storehouse of all the knowledge of a society. The child who is born into any society finds that the problems that confront all people have already been solved by those who have lived before. For example, material objects, methods for acquiring food, language, rules of government, forms of marriage, and systems of religion have already been discovered and are knctioning within the culture when a child is born. If a male child is born into a small country village in Spain, for example, during his lifetime he will likely acquire his food by farming, pay allegiance to the Spanish government, enjoy bullfighting, and be a Catholic. If a male child is born into an East African herding society, in contrast, he will probably acquire his food from his cattle, obey the laws of his elders, spend his leisure time telling tribal folktales, and worship his ancestors as gods. Although these children will grow up to behave quite differently, one basic principle concerning culture is clear: Both children were born into an already existing culture. Each child has only to learn the various solutions to these basic human problems that his culture has set down for him. Once these solutions are learned, behavior becomes almost automatic. In other words, culture is passed on from one generation to another within a society. It is not inborn or instinctive. If the power of cultural learning needs documentation, one only has to cite the cases of extremely isolated children. Today, there are a number of tragic yet well-documented instances of infants who have been shut away in closets or attics with only the barest minimum of human contact during their formative years. One such case was that of Anna, who at nearly six years of age was found tied to a chair in the attic of her grandfather's house in a condition that was barely human. According to Kingsley Davis, "She had no glimmering of speech, absolutely no ability to walk, no sense of gesture, not the least capacity to feed herself. . . and no comprehension of cleanliness" (1947,434). At age eight and a half, after spending three years in a home for retarded children, Anna had made dramatic progress in developing human characteristics. She could bounce and catch a ball, she had become toilet trained, she could feed and dress herself, and she had developed a speech proficiency of about a normal two-year-old. Since Anna had received virtually no socialization or meaningful human interaction during the first six years of her life, her early motor and mental retardation was clearly the direct result of this human deprivation. She had few, if any, opportunities to learn her culture. In the absence of such learning, infants cannot hope to develop into Culture and InternationalBusiness 21 The learned nature of culture is dramatically illustrated by Amram Scheinfeld, who writes of an American-Chinese man: Fung Kwok Keung, born Joseph Rhinehart (of German-Americanstock), who, at the age of two, was adopted by a Chinese man on Long Island and three years later taken to China, where he was reared in a small town (Nam Hoy, near Canton) with the family of his foster father until he was 20. Returning then to New York (in 1928), he was so completely Chinese in all but appearance that he had to be given "Americanization" as well as English lessons to adapt him to his new life. A few years later, after the outbreak of World War II, he was drafted into the American army and sent to Italy. In many ways he was alien to the other American soldiers and tried continuously to be transferred to service in China, but army red tape held him fast in Italy until the war's end. Back again in New York, Rhinehart-Fung at this writing works as a compositor on a Chinese newspaper (an intricate job which few but Chinese could handle), and stills speaks English very imperfectly, with a Chinese accent. (1950, 505) functioning humans. The significance of this tragic case demonstrates how little one's biological resources, when taken alone, can contribute to one's humanness. Despite the enormous variations in the details of cultures throughout the world, all people acquire their culture through the same process: learning. It is sometimes easy to fall into the trap of thinking that since the Australian Bushman and the Central African Pygmy do not know what we know, they must be childlike, ignorant, and generally incapable of learning. These primitives, the argument goes, have not learned about calculus, Shakespeare, or the Los Angeles Dodgers because they are not as intelligent as we are. Yet no evidence whatsoever suggests even remotely that people in some cultures are less efficient learners than people in other cultures. What the comparative study of culture does tell us is that people in different cultures learn different cultural content-that is, different ideas, values, behavior patterns, and so on-and they learn that content every bit as efficiently as anyone else. For example, despite the inability of the average Kikuyu of East Africa to solve a problem by using differential equations, they would be able to recite exactly how they are related (step by step) to a network of hundreds of kinspeople. Kikuyu farmers have mastered what to us is a bewildering amount of kinship information because their culture places great emphasis on such knowledge if the rather complex Kikuyu marriage and kinship system is to work. The Bushman hunters in Namibia are at ease in determining which direction the wounded impala traveled when the herd they have been tracking split and went in two different directions. Such a problem for them is certainly no harder to solve than a typical verbal problem found on the S.A.T. exam: "A is to B as B is to?' And it is more relevant to their everyday survival. Hence, people from different cultures learn those things that contribute to adjusting to their particular environments. This notion that culture is acquired through the process of learning has several important implications for the conduct of international business. First, such an understanding can lead to greater tolerance for cultural differences, a prerequisite for effective intercultural communication within a business setting. Second, the learned nature of culture 22 Culture and International Business Even though these children have very different life styles from children in the United States, they acquire their culture through the same process-learning. serves as a reminder that since we have mastered our own culture through the process of learning, it is possible (albeit more difficult) to learn to function in other cultures as well. Thus, cross-cultural expertise for Western businesspeople can be accomplished through effective training programs. Finally, the learned nature of culture leads us to the inescapable conclusion that foreign workforces, although perhaps lacking certain job-related skills at the present time, are perfectly capable of learning those skills in the future, provided they are exposed to culturally relevant training programs. CULTURE INFLUENCES BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES If we stop to consider it, the great majority of our conscious behavior is acquired through learning and interacting with other members of our culture. Even those responses to our purely biological needs (eating, coughing, defecating) are frequently influenced by our cultures. For example, all people share a biological need for food. Unless a minimum number of calories is consumed, starvation will occur; therefore, all people eat. But what we eat, how often and, how much we eat, with whom we eat, and according to what set of rules are all regulated, at least in part, by our culture. Clyde Kluckhohn, an anthropologist who spent many years in Arizona and New Mexico studying the Navajo, provides us with a telling example of how culture affects biological processes: Culture and International Business 23 I once knew a trader's wife in Arizona who took a somewhat devilish interest in producing a cultural reaction. Guests who came her way were often served delicious sandwiches filled with a meat that seemed to be neither chicken nor tuna fish yet was reminiscent of both. To queries she gave no reply until each had eaten his fill. She then explained that what they had eaten was not chicken, not tuna fish, but the rich, white flesh of freshly killed rattlesnakes. The response was instantaneous-vomiting, often violent vomiting. A biological process is caught into a cultural web. (1968,25-26) This is a dramatic illustration of how culture can influence biological processes. In fact, in this instance, the natural biological process of digestion was not only influenced but also was reversed. A learned part of our culture (the idea that rattlesnake meat is a repulsive thing to eat) actually triggered the sudden interruption of the normal digestive process. Clearly, there is nothing in rattlesnake meat that causes people to vomit, for those who have internalized the opposite idea-that rattlesnake meat should be eaten- have no such digestive tract reversals. The effects of culturally produced ideas on our bodies and their natural processes take many different forms. For example, instances of the voluntary control of pain reflexes are found in a number of cultures throughout the world. Among the nineteenth-century Cheyenne nation, as part of the religious ceremony known as the Sun Dance, young men were taught that self-inflicted pain was a way to achieve supernatural visions. One popular method of self-torture was to remain suspended from the top of a high pole, supported only by leather thongs attached to wooden skewers inserted under the skin of the chest or back. The Cheyenne believed that by remaining in what must have been an excruciatingly painful position for long periods of time without showing signs of pain, the young men were able to communicate more directly with the deity. The ritual firewalkers from Fiji are similarly motivated to control pain reflexes voluntarily, for they believe that the capacity to not show pain brings people closer to those supernatural forces that control their lives. The ethnographic examples are too numerous to cite, but whether we are looking at Cheyenne men engaged in the Sun Dance ceremony, Fiji firewalkers, or U.S. women practicing the Lamaze Cpsychoprophylactic) method of childbirth, the principle is the same: People learn ideas from their cultures that when internalized can actually alter the experience of pain. In other words, a component of culture (that is, ideas) can channel or influence biologically based pain reflexes. Those nontangible parts of culture, composed of ideas, values, beliefs, and so on, can have powerful effects on the human body. For anyone familiar with the pages of National Geographic, the variety of forms of bodily mutilation found throughout human populations is vast. People alter their bodies because their cultures teach them that to do so will make them more attractive, healthier, or more socially acceptable. For instance, women in the Padaung tribe in Burma elongate their necks by wearing large numbers of steel neck rings; Masai men and women in East Africa put increasingly larger pieces of wood through their earlobes, thereby creating loops in their ears; men in New Guinea put bones through their noses; traditional Chinese women had their feet tightly bound as young girls to retard the growth of their feet; Nubians in the Sudan scar their faces and bodies in intricate geometric designs; Pacific Islanders practice elaborate body tattooing; and the Kikuyu of Kenya circumcise both men and women as part of the rite of passage 24 Culture and International Business into adulthood. It has even been reported that a group of people living between Canada and Mexico engage in the somewhat barbaric practice of putting holes in their earlobes for the purpose of hanging pieces of jewelry from them. And they practice this type of bodily mutilation for the very same reason that people tattoo their bodies, scar their faces, or put bones through their noses-because their cultures teach them that it is the acceptable thing to do. The effects that cultural ideas have on our bodies and our bodily processes are not always as benign as the piercing of ears. For example, many of the forms of bodily mutilation-such as circumcision, tattooing, and scarification-can have deleterious effects on one's health, such as the spread of infection. As reported by W. Cannon (1942), individuals whose cultures include witchcraft can be so thoroughly convinced that they are being bewitched that the resulting severe disturbances of bodily functioning end in death. In the United States it has been suggested that a possible explanation for the greater incidence of urinary tract infections among women is that, for purely social purposes, they avoid urinating more than do men, thereby causing greater stress on the bladder and the greater likelihood of infection. Moreover, the cultural idea of associating slimness with feminine attractiveness in the United States, when taken to excess, can lead to the lifethreatening condition of anorexia. The basic anthropological notion that culture channels biological processes can provide some important insights for the international businessperson when confronted with cross-cultural managerial or marketing problems. For example, in Bombay such a concept should be a reminder not to serve beef noodle soup in the company cafeteria, for to do so might cause a mass exodus to the infirmary. Or if we know that strongly held cultural beliefs in, for example, witchcraft can produce physiological maladies that can render the normally efficient worker dysfunctional, it would be reasonable for the company to have in its employ a local ritual specialist capable of counteracting the witchcraft. It is interesting to speculate if there would have been an infant formula controversy had Western manufacturers of this product understood the connection between low-level technology in third-world cultures (lack of unpolluted water, fuel supplies, and refrigeration) and the high mortality rates among those infants using the formula. CULTURAL UNIVERSALS All cultures of the world--despite many dzfferences-face a number of common problems and share a number of common features, which we call cultural universals. Even the most casual perusal of an introductory textbook in cultural anthropology leads us to the inescapable conclusion that there are many societies with their own unique cultures. The determination of how many different cultures exist today depends largely on how one defines the problem, a definitional question on which there is hardly consensus among the world's anthropologists. We can get a rough approximation of world cultural variation by realizing that approximately 850 separate and distinct cultures (speaking mutually unintelligible languages) are on the continent of Africa alone. Rather than being Cultural Anthropology and International Business 25 Here are two examples of how cultural ideas concerning beauty affect how women adorn themselves. 26 Culture and International Business preoccupied with the precise number of cultures in the world at any one time, we should emphasize the significance of the variability; that is, the great number of differences between cultures illustrates how flexible and adaptable humans are in relation to other animals, for each culture has arrived at different solutions to the universal human problems facing all societies. As we encounter the many different cultural patterns found throughout the world, there is a natural tendency to become overwhelmed by the magnitude of the differences and overlook the commonalities. Even anthropologists, when describing "their people," tend to emphasize the uniqueness of the culture and only infrequently look at the similarities between cultures. But all societies, if they are to survive, are confronted with fundamental universal needs that must be satisfied. When cultures develop ways of meeting these needs, general cultural patterns emerge. At a very concrete level, differences in the details of cultural patterns exist because different societies have developed different ways of meeting these universal societal needs. Yet at a higher level of abstraction, a number of commonalities exist because all cultures have worked out solutions to certain problems facing all human populations. Let's briefly examine the needs that all cultures must satisfy and the universal cultural patterns that emerge to satisfy these needs. Economic Systems One of the most obvious and immediate needs of a society is to meet the basic physiological requirements of its people. To stay alive, all humans need a certain minimal caloric intake, potable water, and, to varying degrees, protection from the elements in terms of clothing and shelter. No societies in the world have access to an infinite supply of such basic resources as food, water, clothing, and housing materials. Since these commodities are always in finite supply, each society must develop systematic ways of producing, distributing, and consuming these essential resources. Thus, each society must develop an economic system. To illustrate this principle of cultural universals, we can look at one component of economic systems-namely, forms of distribution. Besides working out patterned ways of producing basic material goods (or procuring them from the immediate environment), all societies must ensure that these goods are distributed to all those members of the society whose very survival depends on receiving them. In the United States, most goods and services are distributed according to the capitalistic mode, based on the principle of "each according to his or her capacity to pay." In such socialist countries as the People's Republic of China, Albania, and Cuba, goods and services are distributed according to another quite different principle-that is, "each according to his or her need." These two well-known systems of distribution hardly exhaust the range of possibilities found in the world. The Pygmies of Central Africa distribute goods by a system known as "silent barter," in which the trading partners, in an attempt to attain true reciprocity, avoid face-to-face contact during the exchange. The Bushmen of present-day Culture and International Business 27 Namibia distribute the meat of an animal killed in the hunt according to the principle of kinship- each share of meat is determined by how one is related to the hunter. But whatever particular form the system of distribution might take, there are no societies-at least not for long-that have failed to work out and adhere to a well-understood and systematic pattern of distribution. Marriage and Family Systems For a society to continue over time, it is imperative that it work out systematic procedures for mating, child rearing, and education. If it fails to do this, it will die in a very short time. No society permits random mating, for all societies have worked out rules for determining who can marry whom, under what conditions, and according to what procedures. All societies, in other words, have patterned systems of marriage. And since human infants (as compared with the young of other species) have a particularly long period of dependency on adults, every society needs to work out systematic ways of meeting the needs of dependent children. If the basic needs of dependent children are not satisfied, they simply will not survive to adulthood; consequently, the very survival of the society is in jeopardy. Thus, we can say that all societies have patterns of child rearing and family institutions. Educational Systems Along with ensuring that the basic physical needs of the child are met, a society must see to it that the children learn the way of life of the society. Rather than expecting each new child to rediscover for himself or herself all the accumulated knowledge of the past, a society must have an organized way of passing on its cultural heritage from one generation to another. This universal societal need for cultural transmission gives rise to some form of educational system in every society. Social Control Systems If groups of people are to survive, they must develop some established ways of preserving social order; that is, all societies must develop mechanisms that will ensure that most of the people obey most of the laws most of the time. If this need is not met, people will violate each other's rights to such an extent that anarchy will prevail. Certainly, different societies meet this need for social order in different ways. In the United States, behavior control rests on a number of formal mechanisms, such as a written constitution; local, state, and federal laws; and an elaborate system of police, courts, and penal institutions, among other things. Many small-scale, technologically simple societies have less formal means of controlling the behavior of their members. Regardless of the specific methods used, one thing is certain: Every society has a system for coercing people to obey the social rules, and these are called social control systems. 28 Culture and International Business Supernatural Belief Systems All societies have a certain degree of control over their social and physical environments. All people in a society can understand and predict a number of things. For example, a heavy object when dropped into a lake will sink to the bottom; if I have $5 and give you $2, I will have only $3 left; the sun always rises in the east and sets in the west. However, we cannot explain or predict with any degree of certainty many other things: Why does a child develop a fatal disease, but the child's playmate next door does not? Why do tornadoes destroy some houses and leave others unharmed? Why do safe drivers die in auto accidents and careless drivers do not? Such questions have no apparent answers, for they cannot be explained by our conventional systems of justice or rationality. Therefore, societies must develop supernatural belief systems for explaining these unexplainable occurrences. The way people explain the unexplainable is to rely on various types of supernatural explanations such as magic, religion, witchcraft, sorcery, and astrology. Thus, despite the great variety in the details of cultural features found throughout the world, all cultures, because they must satisfy certain universal needs, have a number of traits in common. This basic anthropological principle, known as cultural universals, can be an important tool for helping international businesspeople more fully understand and appreciate culturally different business environments. Greater empathy for cultural differences-a necessary if not sufficient condition for increased knowledge--can be Culture and International Business 29 attained if we can avoid concentrating solely on the apparent differences between cultures but appreciate their underlying commonalities as well. According to Richard Robinson, The successful international manager is one who sees and feels the similarity of structure of all societies. The same set of variables are seen to operate, although their relative weights may be very different. This capacity is far more important than possession of specific area expertise, which may be gained quite rapidly if one already has an ability to see similarities and ask the right questions--thosethat will provide the appropriate values or weights for the relevant variables. Such an individual can very quickly orient himself on the socioculturalmap. (1983,127) In other words, we will be less likely to prejudge or be critical of different practices, ideas, or behavior patterns if we can appreciate the notion that they represent different solutions to the same basic human problems facing all cultures of the world, including our own. CULTURAL CHANGE All cultures experience continual change. Any anthropological account of the culture of any society is a type of snapshot view of one particular time. Should the ethnographer return several years after completing a cultural study, he or she would not find exactly 30 Culture and International Business the same situation, for no culture remains completely static year after year. Early twentieth-century anthropologists-particularly those of the structural/functiona1 orientation-tended to de-emphasize cultural dynamics by suggesting that some societies were in a state of equilibrium in which the forces of change were negated by those of cultural conservatism. Although small-scale, technologically simple, preliterate societies tend to be more conservative (and thus change less rapidly) than modern, industrialized, highly complex societies, it is now generally accepted that, to some degree, change is a constant feature of all cultures. Students of culture change recognize that cultural innovation (the introduction of new thoughts, norms, or material items) occurs as a result of both internal and external forces. Mechanisms of change that operate within a given culture are called discovery and invention. Despite the importance of discovery and invention, most innovations introduced into a culture are the result of borrowing from other cultures. This process is known as cultural dzfusion, the spreading of cultural items from one culture to another. The importance of cultural borrowing can be better understood if viewed in terms of economy of effort: Borrowing someone else's invention or discovery is much easier than discovering or inventing it all over again. Anthropologists generally agree that as much as 90 percent of all things, ideas, and behavioral patterns found in any culture had their origins elsewhere. Individuals in every culture, limited by background and time, can get new ideas with far less effort if they borrow them. This statement holds true for our own culture as well as other cultures, a fact that Americans frequently tend to overlook. Since so much cultural change is the result of diffusion, it deserves a closer examination. Keeping in mind that cultural diffusion varies considerably from situation to situation, we can identify certain regularities that will help us make some general statements that hold true for all cultures. First, cultural diffusion is a selectiveprocess. Whenever two cultures come into contact, each does not accept everything indiscriminately from the other. If they did, the vast cultural differences that exist today would have long since disappeared. Rather, items will be borrowed from another culture only if they prove to be useful andlor compatible. For example, we would not expect to see the diffusion of swine husbandry from the United States to Saudi Arabia, the predominant Muslim population of which holds a strong dietary prohibition on pork. Similarly, polyandry (the practice of a woman having two or more legal husbands at a time) is not likely to be borrowed by the United States because of its obvious lack of fit with other features of mainstream American culture. Successful idternationalmarketing requires an intimate knowledge of the cultures found in foreign markets to determine if, how, and to what extent specific products are likely to become accepted by these foreign cultures. According to a study by Everett Rogers (197 1,22-23), the rapidity with which an innovation is adopted--or, indeed, whether it will be adopted at all-is affected by the following five variables: 1 . Relative advantage: the extent to which an innovation is thought to be superior to whatever it replaces 2. Compatibility: the extent to which an innovation is perceived to be congruous with the existing cultural values, attitudes, behavior patterns, and material objects Culture and International Business Culture historian Ralph Linton reminds us of the enormous amount of cultural borrowing that has taken place in order to produce the complex culture found in the United States: Our solid American citizen awakens in a bed built on a pattern which originated in the Near East but which was modified in Northern Europe before it was transmitted to America. He throws back covers made from cotton, domesticated in India, or linen, domesticated in the Near East, or wool from sheep, also domesticated in the Near East, or silk, the use of which was discovered in China. All of these materials have been spun and woven by processes invented in the Near East. He slips into his moccasins, invented by the lndians of the Eastern woodlands, and goes to the bathroom, whose fixtures are a mixture of European and American inventions, both of recent date. He takes off his pajamas, a garment invented in India, and washes with soap ihented by the ancient Gauls. He then shaves, a masochistic rite which seems to have been derived from either Sumer or ancient Egypt. Returning to the bedroom, he removes his clothes from a chair of southern European type and proceeds to dress. He puts on garments whose form originally derived from the skin clothing of the nomads of the Asiatic steppes, puts on shoes made from skins tanned by a process invented in ancient Egypt and cut to a pattern derived from the classical civilizations of the Mediterranean, and ties around his neck a strip of bright-colored cloth which is a vestigial survival of the shoulder shawls worn by the seventeenthcentury Croatians. Before going out for breakfast he glances through the window, made of glass invented in Egypt, and if it is raining puts on overshoes made of rubber discovered by the Central American lndians and takes an umbrella, invented in southeastern Asia. Upon his head he puts a hat made of felt, a material invented in the Asiatic steppes. On his way to breakfast he stops to buy a paper, paying for it with coins, an ancient Lydian invention. At the restaurant a whole new series of borrowed elements confronts him. His plate is made of a form of pottery invented in China. His knife is of steel, an alloy first made in southern India, his fork a medieval Italian invention, and his spoon a derivative of a Roman original. He begins breakfast with an orange, from the eastern Mediterranean, a canteloupe from Persia, or perhaps a piece of African watermelon. With this he has coffee, an Abyssinian plant, with cream and sugar. Both the domestication of cows and the idea of milking them originated in the Near East, while sugar was first made in India. After his fruit and first coffee he goes on to waffles, cakes made by a Scandinavian technique from wheat domesticated in Asia Minor. Over these he pours maple syrup, invented by the lndians of the Eastern woodlands. As a side dish he may have the egg of a species of bird domesticated in Indo-China, or thin strips of the flesh of an animal domesticated in Easte...
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer:
400 words
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.

Instructions word count 350 minimum
In a new Microsoft Word document, please answer the following
questions and submit them to this Dropbox.
(1) What is the primary tool for communicating across cultures?
The primary tool for communicating across cultures is effective
cross-cultural communication, which involves understanding and
respecting cultural differences in order to achieve mutual
understanding and effective collaboration. Language is the main
means of cross-cultural communication. Understanding cultural
subtleties and communication practices of other cultures depends
on the language. That is not the only instrument required, though.
Also, businesses need to be aware of the political, historical, and
cultural background of the nations in which they conduct business
(F...


Anonymous
Just what I was looking for! Super helpful.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags