Business Finance
Grantham Week 4 CHAP8 Johnson vs Transportation Agency Case Study

Grantham University

Question Description

Week 4 Case Questions Select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list below, and respond in writing to the case questions. . 1.Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County (Ch 8, p 269). 2.Lomack v. City of Newark (Ch 8, p 275). 3.Cleveland Firefighters for Fair Hiring Practices v. City of Cleveland I & II (Ch 8, p 278). 4.Gerald v. University of Puerto Rico (Ch 9, p 304). 5.EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine (Ch 9, p 314). 6.Hardage v. CBS (Ch 9, p 319). The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded: •Write between 750 – 1,250 words (approximately 3 – 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see example below.. •Use font size 12 and 1” margins.. •Include cover page and reference page.. •At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.. •No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.. •Use at least three references from outside the course material, one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.. •Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style.. References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing.

Final Answer

Attached.

Running head: EMPLOYMENT LAW

1

Employment Law
Institution Affiliation
Date

EMPLOYMENT LAW

2

Case: Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County (Ch 8, p 269)
1. What was the legal issue? What did the court decide?
The petitioner of the case was Johnson while the respondent was the Transportation
Agency, Santa Clara Cty. The company advertised for the position of road dispatcher, and
Diane Joyce was promoted to that position instead Paul Johnson. Both candidates were
qualified; the company took into consideration the gender as they made the promotion
decision. Joyce had gotten a lower score than Johnson had. She was brought in so she could
change the environment of having men dominate the skilled craft worker positions. The
Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the company, that is was not unreasonable for the
company to consider gender while making the promotion.
2. What does this case reveal about the conditions under which affirmative action is
legal?
This case proved that there are several factors that need to be considered. It was crucial to
overlook the fact that Johnson had gotten a better score in order to bring improvements to a position
that is male-domi...

agneta (48554)
Duke University

Anonymous
Solid work, thanks.

Anonymous
The tutor was great. I’m satisfied with the service.

Anonymous
Goes above and beyond expectations !

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors