M1: Discussion Board119119 unread replies.134134 replies.In Module 1, we discussed the eugenics movement in some detail. In this discussion board, I would like you to expand on this coverage. Here are some starting questions for you to ponder:Eugenics has become a somewhat “dirty word” and gets a lot of negative press. Can you think of ways in which eugenics could be practiced ethically?To what extent are prenatal diagnosis programs considered eugenic?What about choosing the sex of your child?Some individuals who know they carry serious genetic diseases practice what may be referred to as “personal eugenics”: they decide not to to have children. Are there any eugenic implications here on society as a whole?A couple uses a surrogate mother because they could not conceive on their own. The surrogate delivers a set of fraternal twins: a healthy girl and a boy with Down syndrome. The boy also had a congenital heart defect. The couple takes the girl home, and abandon their biological son with his gestational mother (True story). What are the eugenic implications here?A couple who are both achondroplastic dwarfs want their child to have short stature like them: would that be positive or negative eugenics? (The edges kinda blur, don't they?) Should they be "allowed" to?Could the advice of a genetic counselor be considered eugenics?Please provide a thoughtful comment on any of these seven questions. Indeed, you can address any other eugenics-related topic. Remember that you also have to reply to another student’s post.You will get a point for each substantive post (Minimum of 150 words), for a maximum of 2 points. All posts must be made before 11:59 PM on Tuesday, Sept 1.

Read the article "Specialized Bird Perch Aids Cross-Pollination" (http://www.readcube.com/articles/10.1038/435041a) about how scientists conducted an experiment to examine the effect of a plant perch on bird pollination. Answer the questions regarding how this article relates to the scientific method. Answers should be in complete sentences utilizing proper grammar and punctuation. What is the hypothesis of the research? (5 pts)What would be a possible null hypothesis? (5 pts)Do you think the scientists use inductive reasoning or deductive reasoning to develop the hypothesis? (3 pts)Describe the experiment the scientists performed. Make sure you talk only about the experiment, not the results or conclusions. (5 pts)What was the independent variable in this experiment? (4 pts)What was the dependent variable in this experiment? (4 pts)What was the treatment of the experiment? (4 pts)Did the scientist use a control group? If so, what was the control group? (5 pts)Briefly describe the results (only) of the experiment. (5 pts)Based on the results, did the scientists reject their null hypothesis? Why or why not? (5 pts)Did the scientists follow the scientific method? Explain why or why not. (5 pts)I tip well for great work! I am looking for someone to support this and other efforts in the subject of Biology for the next seven weeks.

I have a chemistry assignment that I need finished. I just need it done within 4 hours and to hopefully have everything typed out so its easy to read.