Assignment help please
Anonymous

Question Description

Okay! I need help finishing an assignment. I need 1,100 words but only have 699. I will attach everything needed. I will put what needs to be answered. Plus if you must you can add to the already answered answers. Attached is where you will be getting your work from. Plus don't over price it. It shouldnt take that long, plus i piad $30 for the entire assignment and now have to wait for a withdraw. week4.docx NO PLAGIARISM

Theory.to.practice.PNG Please ONly answer question number 2. 

2) What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract?

  • At the end of the scenario, BTT states that it is not interested in distributing Chou's new strategy game, Strat. Assuming BTT and Chou have a contract, and BTT has breached the contract by not distributing the game, discuss what remedies might or might not apply.

  • PLUS you will need to add to the already existing answer. 1,110 words






      Unformatted Attachment Preview

      1) At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The two gatherings, which comprise of the Chou and big time toymaker, entered a verbal contract in the situation. Amid a meeting between the two gatherings, a verbal contract was made to identify with the circulation of a technique amusement made by Chou. This would be viewed as a substantial contract in light of the fact that both sides were of sound personality and meet the essential contract necessity. Moreover, big time automakers sent a subsequent email to Chou after the meeting to layout the points of interest of the oral get that had been made. 2) What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? 3) Does the fact that the parties were communicating by e-mail have any impact on your analysis in Questions 1 and 2 (above)? No, the way that the gatherings were conveying by email did not have an effect on my examination of the above inquiries. The people that authorized the email affected my examination more than the email. 4) What role does the statute of frauds play in this contract? As indicated by Melvin (2011) the statute of fakes is a law representing which contracts must be in writing keeping in mind the end goal to be enforceable and the UCC obliges that the agreement for offers of products esteemed at more than $500 be in composing, however it does oblige that stand out record contains (1) amount, (2) mark of the gathering whom implementation is for and (3) the dialect shows gatherings proposed to frame an agreement (Melvin, 2011). The installment that Chou got ($25,000) was in return for select transaction rights for a 90 day period, however that period finished or terminated before the agreement was drafted. 5) Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the contract to be avoided? BTT couldn't keep away from the agreement under the precept of mix-up because of the way that BTT expected on satisfying its contractual commitments before the adjustment in administration at their organization. A fax was sent to Chou asking for a draft of conveyance understanding after the email was sent about the discussion effectively examined. There was no one-sided misstep in the interest of BTT, yet Chou then again did submit an one-sided error in light of the fact that he didn't give BTT a drafted contract before the 90 day period. 6) Assuming, arguendo, that this e-mail does constitute an agreement, what consideration supports this agreement? Accepting the email constitutes an assention different contemplations that bolster this understanding is the verbal contract between the gatherings. The email was gotten before the90 day period and would constitute an assention. This has nothing to do with the thought which is the inconvenience or compensation in the agreement. Expecting that BTT and Chou have an agreement and was ruptured by BTT a percentage of the cures that might possibly apply are: 1) Breach of agreement. 2) Compensatory harms. 3) Injunctive help. 4) Promissory estoppel 5) Consequential harms. 6) Restitution. 7) Liquidated harms. 8) Reformation. Since BTT sent Chou the email preceding the 90 day lapse BTT is in rupture of agreement and Chou may have the capacity to look for some solution for the break. You recorded most contract cures, however did not choose which apply here. ...
      Purchase answer to see full attachment

      Final Answer

      agneta (44827)
      UIUC

      Anonymous
      I was on a very tight deadline but thanks to Studypool I was able to deliver my assignment on time.

      Anonymous
      The tutor was pretty knowledgeable, efficient and polite. Great service!

      Anonymous
      I did not know how to approach this question, Studypool helped me a lot.

      Studypool
      4.7
      Trustpilot
      4.5
      Sitejabber
      4.4

      Brown University





      1271 Tutors

      California Institute of Technology




      2131 Tutors

      Carnegie Mellon University




      982 Tutors

      Columbia University





      1256 Tutors

      Dartmouth University





      2113 Tutors

      Emory University





      2279 Tutors

      Harvard University





      599 Tutors

      Massachusetts Institute of Technology



      2319 Tutors

      New York University





      1645 Tutors

      Notre Dam University





      1911 Tutors

      Oklahoma University





      2122 Tutors

      Pennsylvania State University





      932 Tutors

      Princeton University





      1211 Tutors

      Stanford University





      983 Tutors

      University of California





      1282 Tutors

      Oxford University





      123 Tutors

      Yale University





      2325 Tutors