1. Reflecting on the 'You Know how I know your gay" scene from 40 Year Old Virgin, can it be said that the characters Seth Rogan and Paul Rudd are playing are homophobic. What does their discussion say on the construction of masculinity? Draw on evidence from the book and videos.2. Define what Granovetter (1974) meant by the strength of weak ties. Give one example of how this might work in the real world of social networks.3. What is social control? Distinguish between formal social sanctions and informal social sanctions. For what types of deviance are each sanction most effective, and why?4. Immigration law makes it clear that entering the United States without the proper paperwork and permissions is a crime. In a few sentences, explain what the responses in the survey in Figure 2 suggest about how most people feel regarding both the criminal and deviant properties of illegal immigration.5. What is the difference between income and wealth? Why might certain sociologists prefer to measure inequality based on wealth instead of income?

The Final Project for this course requires that you apply the material that you have studied during the term to a case study of your choice. For this Assignment, you must choose a well-known current or historical person for an in-depth analysis of personality development. Some examples of the type of person you can choose are famous politicians, philanthropists, entertainers, businesspersons, historical figures or individuals who made significant contributions to your field of study or career. Do NOT select an individual who has significant, known psychological issues. You should choose a figure whose biographical information (including their childhood) can be easily researched.During this course, you have studied several models of personality development. For your Final Project, you will write a 5–7 page paper that describes the way in which two models that you studied in the course applies to the personality development of the case study that you chose. Your paper must include the following components: Part 1. THE CLIENTPresent a short summary of the person's early life experiences. This section must include all relevant background, including family history, significant life experiences, and important contributions that may have influenced or resulted from the individual's personality development. This section should be a maximum of 1–2 pages in length.Part 2. THEORIESSelect TWO personality theories we have discussed in our class:Explain the major elements of each selected theoryExplain the advantages of each selected theoryExplain the objections/concerns of each selected theory.Explain how each theory might explain your selected client’s personalityThis section should be 3-4 pages in length.Part 3. ASSESSMENTSTo measure this individual's personality, explain TWO specific assessment tools you would use. Explain what specific information a helping professional might gain from each of the assessment tools. This section should be at least 1 page in length.Include references from the text and course learning activities. Your project should be double-spaced, include a reference page, include a minimum of THREE scholarly resources, and adhere to APA guidelines. You can find additional help on APA in the Writing Center.Submitting your AssignmentPut your project in a Word document. Save it in a location and with a name that you will remember.Note: This is a Course Level Assessment Assignment.

Visit the Strayer Library to read one (1) article of your choosing from Harvard Law Review. Need help? Start with this search of all articles available and add keywords. Next, go to Cornell University Law School's online legal dictionary and encyclopedia Wex, located at http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex, and explore the contents available on the Website.Provide at least one (1) example to illustrate the manner in which a paralegal could use the information that you explored as primary or secondary sources of law. Justify your response.Compare two different research methods. Explain the benefits and drawbacks of each.