Humanities
Case Study

Question Description

It is a short case Study that you read and think about. Answer the questions at the end of the case study.

1. Identifies 3 ethical issues

2. Identifies 3 ethical theories (Methods of ethical reasoning)

3. Description of criterion

4. It should not be longer than 2 pages double-spaced or 1 page single-spaced.

The Prompt and requirements are provided in file. Thank you :)

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Requirements: (MUST FULLFILL) 1. Identifies 3 ethical issues 2. Identifies 3 ethical theories (Methods of ethical reasoning) 3. Description of criterion 4. It should not be longer than 2 pages double-spaced or 1 page single-spaced. Here are some Ethical Theories you can choose from: 1. Utilitarianism 2. Kantian Ethics 3. Ethics of Care 4. Capitalism 5. Global Ethics 6. Discrimination 7. Professional Responsibility 8. Working entitlements 11. Virtue Ethics 12. Theory of Justice – John Rawl It is a short case Study that you read and think about. Answer the questions at the end of the case study. a) Be able to recognize ethical problems/dilemmas, b) Be able to identify at least 3 ethical theories, and c) Be able to provide critical feedback. In other words, how well you answer the questions. Prompt is provided. The Warhead Cable Test Dilemma It was Monday morning at Bryson Corporation’s cable division assembly plant. Stanton Wong, the quality supervisor, had been worrying all weekend about a directive he had received from his boss before leaving work on Friday. Harry Jackson, the plant manager and a vice president of operations, had told Stanton unambiguously to disregard defects in a batch of laminated cable they had produced for a major customer, a military contractor. Now, Stanton was wondering what if anything he should say or do. Bryson Corporation was a large conglomerate headed by an aggressive CEO who had established a track record of buying and turning around low-performing manufacturing firms. Harry Jackson had been sent to the cable plant shortly after it had been acquired, and he was making headway rescuing what had been a marginal operation. The word in the plant was that corporate was pleased with his progress. Harry ran the plant like a dictator, with nearly absolute control, and made sure everyone inside and outside the organization knew it. Harry would intimidate his direct reports, yelling at and insulting them at the least provocation. He harassed many of the young women in the office and was having an affair with one of the sales account managers. Stanton’s two-year anniversary on the job had just passed. He was happy with his progress. He felt respected by the factory workers, by management colleagues, and often even by Harry. His pay was good enough that he and his wife had felt confident to buy a house and start a family. He wanted to keep his reputation as a loyal employee. He had decided early on that he was not about to challenge Harry. At least, that was Stanton’s approach until the warhead cable issue came along. The warhead cable was part of a fuse system used in missiles. In the production process, a round cable was formed into a flat, ribbon-like shape by feeding it through a lamination machine and applying specific heat, speed, and pressure. The flattened cable was then cut into specific lengths and shapes and shipped to the customer, a defense contractor. As part of his quality control duties, Stanton used a standard procedure called an elevated heat seal test to ensure the integrity of the product. The cable was bent at a 90-degree angle and placed in an oven at 105 degrees C for seven hours. If the seal did not delaminate (pop open at the corners), then the product passed the test. This procedure was usually performed on cable from early runs while the lamination machine operator was still producing a batch. That way, if there was a problem, it could be spotted early and corrected. When a batch of cable was ready for shipment, Stanton was responsible for preparing a detailed report of all test results. The customer’s source inspector, Jane Conway, then came to the plant and performed additional sample testing there. On inspection days, Jane tended to arrive around 9:00 a.m. and spend the morning reviewing Stanton’s test data. Typically, she would pull samples from each lot and inspect them. She rarely conducted her own elevated heat seal test, however, relying instead on Bryson’s test data. Stanton and Jane often had lunch together at a nearby restaurant and then finished up the paperwork in the afternoon. The prior week, during a very busy time, a large order for the warhead cable came in with a short turnaround period. Stanton tested a sample taken from an early lot and had good results. But his testing on Friday revealed problems. Of 10 samples, two failed. That afternoon, Stanton went to Harry’s office with the failed samples to show him the delamination. Before Stanton could say a word, Harry called in the production manager and cursed him out. He then turned to Stanton and said, “Let’s wait and see if the source inspector catches this problem.” Stanton reminded him that typically the source inspector didn’t perform this particular test. Harry responded, “Well, most of the samples passed.” Stanton replied, “Yes, but some failed. That shows inconsistency in the lot. The protocol requires that a test failure be reported for such results.” Harry had already made up his mind. “Don’t tell me what I can and cannot do! The decision is mine to make, and what I have decided is that we will see if the source inspector finds the failure!” All weekend, Stanton worried about Harry’s directive. Bryson cables were used to manufacture fuses in missiles. Stanton thought about several people he knew from high school, who were now on active duty in a war zone overseas. He thought about possible harm to innocent civilians or even to U.S. service members if a missile misfired. He wondered if anyone in the parent corporation could help, but did not know anyone there to call. Questions 1. Please identify 3 ethical issues at Bryson Cable, and explain why you think the issues you have identified are ethical ones. 2. Do you think it would be right or wrong for Bryson Cable to sell the faulty cable to the customer? Please use three methods of ethical reasoning to support your view. 3. What do you think Stanton should do or say now? Please identify 3 options and provide an argument for or against each option. ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Final Answer

Hello, please see the following paper: It is quite longer than what is required but it really takes that much to explain everything clearly.Please inform me if there is any concern :)

1. Please identify 3 ethical issues at Bryson Cable, and explain why you think the issues you have
identified are ethical ones.
Fundamentally, ethical issues are situations that require a person or group of persons to choose between
choices that must be assessed or evaluated as right or wrong. In the case given, the most apparent ethical
issue at Bryson Cable is when the plant manager is directing his Quality Assurance supervisor to
disregard defects of a certain batch. The fact that this is known to the plant manager that there are defects
and he chose not to disregard the products and just waited if the inspector will find out is already a
question of integrity and honesty which is clearly an ethical issue. Another ethical issue here is the
existing affair between the plant manager and one of the sales account managers. In ot...

Aljon2017 (2654)
UC Berkeley

Anonymous
Return customer, been using sp for a good two years now.

Anonymous
Thanks as always for the good work!

Anonymous
Excellent job

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors